CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03458702Updated Nov 25, 2019Results posted

The Effects of Emotional Exposure on State Anxiety

An interventional study of YogaFit and Quiet Rest in Generalized Anxiety Disorder, sponsored by Texas Tech University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-25.

Sponsored by Texas Tech University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A randomized repeated-measures crossover clinical trial was performed. Forty healthy, female college students completed a 30 min session of YogaFit and a time-matched seated rest condition on separate days. After each condition, participants viewed 30 min of emotional picture stimuli. State anxiety, heart rate and time-domain and frequency-domain measures of HRV were assessed baseline, post- condition, and post-exposure to emotional stimuli. Data were analysed using a condition x time (2 × 3) repeated-measures ANOVA.

Read the detailed description

The design was a repeated-measures randomized crossover trial. Each study participant completed 4 different sessions on 4 different days: (day 1) participant screening; (day 2 or 3) study condition A (seated, quiet rest); (alternate day 2 or 3) study condition B (moderate-intensity YogaFit); and (day 4) a session to rate IAPS pictures (14) and undergo a single DEXA scan [Prodigy/301776R. G.E. Medical Systems-Lunar DEXA Scanner, Fairfield, CT, USA]. Utilizing a simple randomization process, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to participate in either the YogaFit condition or the quiet rest condition. The study conditions were counterbalanced and alternated using odd and even numbers to begin the sequence. Participants were not informed if the first condition was A or B. Self-reported anxiety levels and 10 min of continuous physiological data were collected: (a) baseline; (b) post-condition; and (c) post-exposure for both condition A and B. All participants completed both the psychological and physiological assessments. Both experimental conditions A and B were completed in 90 min. To ensure compliance, participants were observed through a glass window every 10 min during study conditions. Testing time and procedures were identical with the exception of the experimental condition on days two and three.

All participants were familiarized with the videotaped YogaFit session before participating in the study. Participants were instructed to arrive for all visits dressed in loose fitting athletic wear and were asked to refrain from all food, alcohol, caffeine, gum chewing or the use of tobacco products 3 h before their scheduled meeting in the laboratory.

During pre-screening, participants completed: (a) a standard health history questionnaire; (b) the STAI-Y2; (c) the BDI and (d) a custom DEXA safety questionnaire. Qualified participants were then asked to track their menstrual cycle using a menstrual log and e-mail the primary investigator on day 1 of the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle, thus using the first day of the women's menstrual cycle to generate an unpredictable random sequence and to eliminate any sequence bias. The participant was then scheduled for condition A first or condition B first. The conditions were counterbalanced to control for order effects, with odd numbers beginning condition A first and even numbers beginning condition B first. To control for the effects of the menstrual cycle on anxiety, participants completed condition A and condition B within a 7-day period during the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle (specifically days 1-10). Participants were also asked to maintain pre-study physical activity levels during the 7-day period. All testing was completed by day 10 of their menstrual cycle. State anxiety was psychologically quantified using a reliable and validated assessment of anxiety, Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-YI).

Instruments for testing all physiological variables were calibrated and used by the same investigator in order to control possible inter-tester variation. During both condition A and B, a ProComp Infiniti System with Biograph software version 6.0 was used to measure HR and indices of HRV at a sampling rate of 2048 cycles per sec at the 3 different time points. Three electrodes were placed on the participants to monitor HR as specified by the ProComp Infiniti System. The negative electrode was placed in the right shoulder fossa below the clavicle, the positive electrode was placed medially on the thorax below the sternum, and the ground electrode was placed in the left shoulder fossa below the clavicle. Indices of HRV included the time-domain variable, root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) and two frequency-domains: the low frequency power bands and the high frequency power bands in normalized units (LFNU and HFNU, respectively).

Measures of HR and HRV were analysed using CardioPro Infinity-HRV Analysis Software Module-SA7J90 [ProComp Infiniti System, Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Cimetra LLC]. An accelerometer using the ActiLife 6 Software and a Polar Heart Rate Sensor were strapped to the participant and used to monitor the intensity level of both study conditions A and B. The accelerometer was used only to record HR data and no other accelerometer data were analysed. Participants were then informed of the experimental condition. For study condition A (quiet, seated rest), participants sat on a yoga mat in a cross-legged position for 30 min in a quiet laboratory setting. For study condition B [YogaFit Vinyasa Flow (referred to as YogaFit in this manuscript)], participants followed, via digital versatile disc, a standardized YogaFit format choreographed by a certified American Council of Exercise Instructor and Registered Yoga Alliance Teacher. Yoga- Fit was performed in the same laboratory setting and lasted 30 min. There are 7 principles of alignment that are applied in every YogaFit session: (1) establish a base and dynamic tension; (2) create core stability; (3) align the spine; (4) soften and align the knees; (5) relax shoulders back and down; (6) hinge at the hips; and (7) shorten the lever. The YogaFit essence is based on: Breathing, Feeling, Listening to the Body, Letting Go of Competition, Judgement, Expectations, and Staying in the Present Moment. The movements included in each specific phase were chosen from Beth Shaw's YogaFit Vinyasa Flow Series. To measure intensity of theYogaFit routine, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) [24] were recorded following both condition A and B. The accelerometer and heart rate sensor were removed after the study condition. After both study conditions, participants again completed STAI-Y1 and 10 min of post-condition data were collected. Participants then viewed 90 emotionally arousing pictures from the IAPS after both study conditions A and B. Pictures were viewed on a 70" × 70"portable projection screen. The 90 pictures were arranged in 3 blocks of 30; each block contained 10 pictures from each valence category. Among the 90 pictures used, 30 were pleasant (15 erotica and 15 babies, families, and cute animals); 30 were neutral (15 neutral people and 15 neutral objects and scenes); and 30 were unpleasant (15 threat and 15 mutilation) based on normative ratings of valence [5]. No more than two pictures from the same category appeared consecutively. Two different picture orders were constructed and counterbalanced across testing day and experimental condition. Each picture was shown for 4-s, followed by a 12-, 14-, or 16-s inter-picture interval, which consisted of a centrally located fixation cross. The total picture-viewing time, including brief breaks between each picture block, was approximately 30 min. Participants were instructed to look at each picture the entire time it was on the monitor and to subjectively categorize each picture as pleasant, neutral, or unpleasant using a response pad [E-Prime 2.0, Psychology Software Tools, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA] resting on their lap. These ratings were not used to compare to the normative ratings, but rather, the purpose of categorizing the pictures was to ensure that participants concentrated on the pictures. Immediately after viewing the pictures, participants again completed STAI-Y1 and 10 min post-exposure data were collected. In accordance with the Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, participants were also asked to rate the IAPS images in order to further image standardization. Participants rated each of the 90 pictures (hard copy, one picture per page in a standard, self-paced order) using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) during visit 4 to the laboratory. Additionally, participants underwent a single DEXA scan for body composition assessment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • autonomic function
  • emotion
  • heart rate variability
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria included women who:

  • were between 18 and 25 years of age;
  • were not suffering from any medical conditions that would influence the results or compromise safety during training-such as disorders effecting balance, or pregnancy;
  • who were not taking antidepressant or anti-anxiety medication;
  • were not clinically diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder in the previous six months;
  • were within the normal range (± 1 SD from the M) for female college students for trait anxiety according to Spielberger's Trait Anxiety Inventory [(STAI-Y2); range: 40.40 ± 10.15] (Spielberger 1983);
  • were within normal (minimal to mild) levels of depression according to the Beck Depression Inventory [(BDI); range: 0-18] (Oliver and Simmons 1984);
  • had a normal menstrual cycle (cycles occurring less than every 26 to 35 days and lasting less than 2 or more than 7 days);
  • were not considered high-risk for dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) based on a standardized questionnaire approved by the University Radiation Safety Committee; and
  • were familiar with yoga or had not participated in at least 3 yoga practice sessions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria included women who:

    • were less than 18 or more than 25 years of age;
    • were suffering from any medical conditions that would influence the results or compromise safety during training-such as disorders effecting balance, or pregnancy;
    • who were taking antidepressant or anti-anxiety medication;
    • were clinically diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder in the previous six months;
    • were not within the normal range (± 1 SD from the M) for female college students for trait anxiety according to Spielberger's Trait Anxiety Inventory [(STAI-Y2); range: 40.40 ± 10.15];
    • were not within normal (minimal to mild) levels of depression according to the Beck Depression Inventory [(BDI); range: 0-18];
    • had an abnormal menstrual cycle (cycles occurring less than every 26 to 35 days and lasting less than 2 or more than 7 days);
    • were considered high-risk for dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) based on a standardized questionnaire approved by the University Radiation Safety Committee; and
    • were not familiar with yoga or had not participated in at least 3 yoga practice sessions.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    YogaFit then Quiet Rest

    Participants participated in a 30 min YogaFit and then a session of 30 min of Quiet Rest on a separate day.

    Behavioral: YogaFit · Behavioral: Quiet Rest

  • Experimental
    Quiet Rest then YogaFit

    Participants participated in a 30 min Quiet Rest session and then a session of 30 min of YogaFit on a separate day.

    Behavioral: YogaFit · Behavioral: Quiet Rest

Interventions

  • BehavioralYogaFit

    For YogaFit Vinyasa Flow (referred to as YogaFit in this manuscript)\], participants followed, via digital versatile disc, a standardized YogaFit format choreographed by an American Council of Exercise Certified and Registered Yoga Teacher (RYT). YogaFit was performed in the same laboratory setting and lasted 30 min. YogaFit is a westernized version of yoga that does not use Sanskrit terms (Shaw 2009). Breath was an integral part of every movement with specific breath rates for each phase of the session. The objective was to move the body with intention and purpose and be present in the body.

  • BehavioralQuiet Rest

    Participants completed 30 min of quiet rest

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. STAI-Y1 Score Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

    State anxiety (STAI-Y1 score) at baseline ( 10 min prior to condition), post-condition (10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after completion of 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)) was measured by Spielberger's 20 question State Anxiety Questionnaire (STAI-YI). Scores range from 20-80, with higher scores indicative of increased state anxiety.

    Time frame: 10 min prior to condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli

  2. Heart Rate Assessed at Baseline, During Condition, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

    HR in beats per min assessed utilizing three electrodes and ProComp Infiniti Software at baseline (10 min prior to condition), during the condition (30 min of YogaFit and Quiet Rest), post-condition (10 min after YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)).

    Time frame: 10 min prior to condition, 30 min during condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli

  3. Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

    A measure of HRV, RMSSD, was assessed using three electrodes and CardioPro Infiniti-HRV Analysis Software at baseline (10 min prior to condition), post-condition (10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)). HRV is associated with good health: increased RMSSD is thought to be beneficial.

    Time frame: 10 min prior to condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli

  4. Low-frequency Band (LFNU) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

    A measure of HRV, LFNU, assessed using three electrodes and CardioPro software at baseline (10 min prior to condition), post-condition (10 min after YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)). Low frequency (LF) is defined as 0.04-0.15 Hz (cycles per s) or a band ranging from 0.04 Hz to 0.15 Hz. High frequency (HF) is defined as a band ranging from 0.15-0.4 Hz (cycles per s). The most common frequency domain parameters include the powers in absolute and relative terms and the normalized power of the HF and LF bands or expressed as normalized units. The formula for n.u. for LF = LF in ms2/LF in ms2 + LF in ms2 HRV is associated with good health: increased LFNU is thought to be beneficial.

    Time frame: 10 min prior to condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli

  5. High-frequency Band (HFNU) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

    A measure of HRV, HFNU, assessed using three electrodes and CardioPro software at baseline (10 min prior to condition), post-condition (10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)). High frequency (HF) is defined as a band ranging from 0.15-0.4 Hz (cycles per s). Low frequency (LF) is defined as 0.04-0.15 Hz (cycles per s) or a band ranging from 0.04 Hz to 0.15 Hz. The most common frequency domain parameters include the powers in absolute and relative terms and the normalized power of the HF and LF bands or expressed as normalized units. The formula for n.u. for HF = HF in ms2/LF in ms2 + LF in ms2. HRV is associated with good health: HFNU and LFNU are negatively correlated.

    Time frame: 10 min prior to condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli

Secondary outcomes

  1. RPE Assessed Post-Condition

    Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) assessed using Borg's scale of perceived exertion and pain. Scores range from 6-20, with 6 indicating no exertion at all.

    Time frame: Post-Condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest

06

Results

Posted Nov 25, 2019

Participant flow

We recruited women from yoga classes at the university.

Study Condition A (Yoga or Rest)
Participant flow — Study Condition A (Yoga or Rest)
MilestoneYogaFit Then Quit RestQuiet Rest Then Yoga Fit
Started2828
Completed2422
Not completed46
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up46
Study Condition B (Yoga or Rest)
Participant flow — Study Condition B (Yoga or Rest)
MilestoneYogaFit Then Quit RestQuiet Rest Then Yoga Fit
Started2422
Completed2020
Not completed42
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up42
Picture Rating/Body Composition
Participant flow — Picture Rating/Body Composition
MilestoneYogaFit Then Quit RestQuiet Rest Then Yoga Fit
Started2020
Completed2020
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimarySTAI-Y1 Score Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

State anxiety (STAI-Y1 score) at baseline ( 10 min prior to condition), post-condition (10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after completion of 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)) was measured by Spielberger's 20 question State Anxiety Questionnaire (STAI-YI). Scores range from 20-80, with higher scores indicative of increased state anxiety.

Time frame:
10 min prior to condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
STAI-Y1 Score Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure
score on a scaleYogaFitQuiet Rest
Baseline33.48 ± 9.4133.53 ± 10.63
Post-Condition27.43 ± 7.0529.78 ± 7.82
Post-Exposure33.18 ± 10.7534.48 ± 10.34
Statistical analysis
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · t-test, 2 sided · p = >.05
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = <0.001
PrimaryHeart Rate Assessed at Baseline, During Condition, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

HR in beats per min assessed utilizing three electrodes and ProComp Infiniti Software at baseline (10 min prior to condition), during the condition (30 min of YogaFit and Quiet Rest), post-condition (10 min after YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)).

Time frame:
10 min prior to condition, 30 min during condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Heart Rate Assessed at Baseline, During Condition, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure
beats per minuteYogaFitQuiet Rest
Baseline72.48 ± 10.6173.59 ± 11.25
During Condition101.01 ± 22.6569.35 ± 10.61
Post-Condition74.51 ± 10.3970.43 ± 9.77
Post-Exposure71.69 ± 9.7370.17 ± 9.65
Statistical analysis
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = >.05
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = 0.005
PrimaryRoot Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

A measure of HRV, RMSSD, was assessed using three electrodes and CardioPro Infiniti-HRV Analysis Software at baseline (10 min prior to condition), post-condition (10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)). HRV is associated with good health: increased RMSSD is thought to be beneficial.

Time frame:
10 min prior to condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure
millisecondsYogaFitQuiet Rest
Baseline61.32 ± 30.8061.87 ± 33.98
Post-Condition62.41 ± 36.3375.66 ± 40.67
Post-Exposure72.75 ± 43.1179.41 ± 42.49
Statistical analysis
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = > .05
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = 0.042
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · Chi-squared, Corrected · p = <0.001
PrimaryLow-frequency Band (LFNU) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

A measure of HRV, LFNU, assessed using three electrodes and CardioPro software at baseline (10 min prior to condition), post-condition (10 min after YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)). Low frequency (LF) is defined as 0.04-0.15 Hz (cycles per s) or a band ranging from 0.04 Hz to 0.15 Hz. High frequency (HF) is defined as a band ranging from 0.15-0.4 Hz (cycles per s). The most common frequency domain parameters include the powers in absolute and relative terms and the normalized power of the HF and LF bands or expressed as normalized units. The formula for n.u. for LF = LF in ms2/LF in ms2 + LF in ms2 HRV is associated with good health: increased LFNU is thought to be beneficial.

Time frame:
10 min prior to condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Low-frequency Band (LFNU) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure
ratioYogaFitQuiet Rest
Baseline53.50 ± 17.1353.75 ± 17.93
Post-Condition52.56 ± 16.0754.50 ± 17.77
Post-Exposure58.42 ± 13.8656.52 ± 15.18
Statistical analysis
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = >.05
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = 0.016
PrimaryHigh-frequency Band (HFNU) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure

A measure of HRV, HFNU, assessed using three electrodes and CardioPro software at baseline (10 min prior to condition), post-condition (10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest) and post-exposure (10 min after 30 min of viewing emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)). High frequency (HF) is defined as a band ranging from 0.15-0.4 Hz (cycles per s). Low frequency (LF) is defined as 0.04-0.15 Hz (cycles per s) or a band ranging from 0.04 Hz to 0.15 Hz. The most common frequency domain parameters include the powers in absolute and relative terms and the normalized power of the HF and LF bands or expressed as normalized units. The formula for n.u. for HF = HF in ms2/LF in ms2 + LF in ms2. HRV is associated with good health: HFNU and LFNU are negatively correlated.

Time frame:
10 min prior to condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest,10 min after exposure to emotional stimuli
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
High-frequency Band (HFNU) Assessed at Baseline, Post-Condition and Post-Exposure
ratioYogaFitQuiet Rest
Baseline46.49 ± 17.1346.25 ± 17.93
Post-Condition47.19 ± 16.2244.55 ± 17.89
Post-Exposure41.58 ± 13.8643.55 ± 15.15
Statistical analysis
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = >.05
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · ANOVA · p = 0.026
SecondaryRPE Assessed Post-Condition

Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) assessed using Borg's scale of perceived exertion and pain. Scores range from 6-20, with 6 indicating no exertion at all.

Time frame:
Post-Condition, 10 min after completion of YogaFit and Quiet Rest
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
RPE Assessed Post-Condition
score on a scaleYogaFitQuiet Rest
RPE Assessed Post-Condition10.83 ± 1.666.05 ± 0.22
Statistical analysis
  • YogaFit vs Quiet Rest · t-test, 1 sided · p = <.05

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
YogaFit—0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)
Quiet Rest—0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)YogaFit and Quit Rest
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years40
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)YogaFit and Quit Rest
Female40
Male0
STAI-Y2 score
STAI-Y2 score(units on a scale)YogaFit and Quit Rest
Mean39.05 ± 5.91
Beck Depression Inventory
Beck Depression Inventory(units on a scale)YogaFit and Quit Rest
Mean7.68 ± 4.21
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)YogaFit and Quit Rest
Mean23.21 ± 3.12
Body Fat Percentage
Body Fat Percentage(percentage)YogaFit and Quit Rest
Mean34.94 ± 7.58
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Texas Tech University
    Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Albracht-Schulte K, Robert-McComb J. The effects of yoga and quiet rest on subjective levels of anxiety and physiological correlates: a 2-way crossover randomized trial. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Oct 17;18(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2343-1. PubMed 30333014 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03458702
Lead sponsor
Texas Tech University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 8, 2018
Start date
Sep 12, 2013
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2014
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Nov 25, 2019
Last update
Nov 25, 2019

Study contacts

Jacalyn Robert-McComb, PhD
principal investigator · Texas Tech University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion