ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03422159ORANGESUpdated Sep 21, 2021Results posted

Metabolic Resuscitation Using Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine, and Glucocorticoids in Sepsis.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ascorbic Acid and Thiamine in Sepsis, Severe and Septic Shock, sponsored by Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-21.

Primary conditionShock, SepticRegistry: SepsisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sepsis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Shock, Septic
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Shock, Septic, a narrower term within Sepsis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study has been created to compare the addition of intravenous (IV) vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone to the usual standard of care of sepsis and septic shock. Sepsis is a possibly life-threatening condition in which a patient may have organ dysfunction due to an infection. Septic shock is defined as low blood pressure and organ dysfunction that do not improve after administering IV fluids. Standard of care for sepsis and septic shock include early administration of IV antibiotics, IV fluids, and vasopressors if need be to provide oxygen to vital organs.

A large amount of experimental data has shown that vitamin C and corticosteroids decrease the release of inflammatory substances which may lead to organ failure seen in sepsis. Vitamin C and corticosteroids also improve blood flow to vital organs and increase the body's ability to respond well to vasopressor medications used in septic shock. Low blood levels of both thiamine and vitamin C are common in sepsis. The study will be placebo controlled, meaning one group will receive vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone, and the other will receive an inactive substance ("placebo"). The goal of the study is to compare the effects of receiving vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone (along with the standard sepsis care) versus placebo and standard sepsis care.

Read the detailed description

The global burden of sepsis is substantial with an estimated 15 to 19 million cases per year; the vast majority of these cases occur in low income countries. With more timely diagnosis and improvement in supportive care the 28-day mortality from sepsis in high income countries has declined to about 25%, however, the mortality from septic shock remains as high as 45%. Moreover, the mortality from sepsis and septic shock in low income countries is reported to be as high as 60%. In addition to short term mortality, septic patients suffer from a numerous short- and long-term complications and are at an increased risk of death for up to five years following the acute event. Over the last 3 decades over 100 phase II and phase III clinical trial have been performed testing various novel pharmacologic agents and therapeutic intervention in an attempt to improve the outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock; all of these studies have failed to show an improvement in patient outcomes. New therapeutic approaches to sepsis are desperately required; considering the global burden of sepsis these interventions should be effective, cheap, safe and readily available.

A large body of experimental data has demonstrated that both corticosteroids and intravenous vitamin C reduce activation of nuclear factor ƘB (NFƘB) attenuating the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, reduce the endothelial injury characteristic of sepsis thereby reducing endothelial permeability and improving macrocirculatory flow, augment the release of endogenous catecholamines and enhance vasopressor responsiveness. In animal models these effects have resulted in reduced organ injury and increased survival. Corticosteroids have been evaluated in several clinical trials, with meta-analysis of these trials demonstrating somewhat conflicting outcomes. Low-dose stress corticosteroids have proven to be safe with no increased risk of clinically important complications. While corticosteroids decrease vasopressor dependency the effect on survival is less clear.

Several studies have investigated the use of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill patients. Nathens et al randomized 595 surgical ICU patients (91% trauma patients) to receive intravenous vitamin C and vitamin E for up to 28 days.The vitamin combination was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of multiple system organ failure (p=0.04) with a trend to reduced mortality and length of ICU stay. No adverse effects were noted with the vitamin combination. Fowler et al performed a pilot study in 24 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. In this study patients were randomized to placebo (n=8), low dose intravenous vitamin C (50 mg/kg) (n=8) or high dose vitamin C (200mg/kg). Vitamin C attenuated the inflammatory response with both doses of the vitamin being devoid of any side effects. Although the Sequential Sepsis Related Organ Failure Score (SOFA) fell significantly in both treatment arms the study was underpowered to determine any outcome benefit. Zabet and colleagues performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which they evaluated the role of intravenous vitamin C in a dose of 100 mg/kg/day (about 7g/day) in 28 surgical ICU patients with septic shock. In this study the mean dose of norepinephrine and duration of norepinephrine administration were significantly lower in the ascorbic acid than the placebo group. The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the ascorbic acid than the placebo group (14% vs. 64%, p = 0.009). No side effects related to the vitamin C infusion were reported. Tanaka et al randomized 37 patients with severe burn to very high dose vitamin C (about 110g/day) or placebo. Patients who received vitamin C required less fluid resuscitation with a trend towards reduced length of stay and mortality. No adverse effects were noted with the very high dosages of vitamin C. Several studies have administered vitamin C in doses exceeding 100g/day as adjuvant therapy in patients with cancer with no discernable side effects. Vitamin C appears to be toxic to normal human cells (not cancer cells) at a concentration on greater than 25 millimole (mM). A dose of 6g/day will achieve a steady state serum concentration of about 240 micromole (uM) which is about 100 times less than the dose required to cause cellular toxicity. The package insert for vitamin C lists no contraindications or adverse effects of the drug and states that as much as "6 grams has been administered without evidence of toxicity". The only reported restriction to the use of high dose intravenous vitamin C is in patients with known glucose-6-phosphate deficiency (G6PD) in whom hemolysis has been reported. It is important to recognize that patents with sepsis predictably have very low serum vitamin C levels, which can only be corrected with intravenous vitamin C in a dose of more than 3gm per day. The low or undetectable levels of vitamin C likely result from the metabolic consumption of the molecule as well as increased renal losses. Furthermore, unlike all other mammals, primates and guinea pigs are unable synthesize vitamin C is due to mutations in the L-gulono-_-lactone oxidase (GLO) gene which codes for the enzyme responsible for catalyzing the last step of vitamin C biosynthesis. In almost all species, except humans and guinea pigs, vitamin C production increases during stress and is secreted by the adrenal gland; in these species vitamin C is best considered a stress "hormone". Vitamin C is an essential cofactor for the production of corticosteroids and catecholamines by the adrenal gland. Vitamin C has been shown to reverse adrenal suppression caused by induction doses of etomidate during anesthesia.

Ascorbate donates a single electron in all its redox reactions, generating the ascorbate radical. This radical is not very reactive with anything but itself. Dismutation of two ascorbate radicals forms a molecule each of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate. Hydrolysis of the lactone ring of dehydroascorbate irreversibly converts it to 2,3-diketo-1-gulonic acid which is then converted to oxalate. Oxalate is normally excreted by the kidney and serum levels will increase with renal impairment. In patients with renal impairment receiving mega-dose vitamin C, supersaturation of serum with oxalate may result in tissue deposition as well as crystallization in the kidney. Glyoxylate, a byproduct of intermediary metabolism, is either reduced to oxalate or oxidized to carbon dioxide (CO2) by the enzyme glyoxylate aminotransferase; thiamine pyrophosphate is a co-enzyme required for this reaction. Thiamine deficiency increases the conversion of glyoxylate to oxalate resulting in hyper- oxalosis. Donnino and colleagues have demonstrated that thiamine deficiency is common (32%) in patients with sepsis and that treatment with thiamine in these patients reduces mortality. In a post-hoc analysis of this study these authors demonstrated that thiamine decreased the risk of acute kidney injury and the required for renal replacement therapy in all treated patients.

It has previously been suggested that "...the best hope for therapeutic advances [in sepsis] will depend on broad-base targeting, in which multiple components are targeted at the same time." Such combination "chemo-therapy" targeting multiple biological pathways is the standard approach in the treatment of malignant disease. While the benefits of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine alone are likely limited, the investigators believe that these medications act synergistically to reduce the risk of organ failure and death in patients with sepsis. This hypothesis is supported previous research and more recently a set of elegant experiments performed by Barabutis et al. Using a validated pulmonary endothelial monolayer model, these authors demonstrated that hydrocortisone together with vitamin C protected the vascular endothelium from damage by endotoxin while neither agent alone had this effect. Previous research has demonstrated that vitamin C reverses oxidation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) a likely manifestation of sepsis. Oxidation of the GR limits binding of the GR to both ligand and DNA responsive units decreasing the activity of glucocorticoids. Furthermore, glucocorticoids increase the expression of the sodium vitamin C transporter-2 (SVCT-2) which is an essential transport protein necessary for vitamin C to be transported intracellularly.

The investigators therefore propose that a "metabolic resuscitation protocol" including vitamin C, corticosteroids and thiamine will limit the development of organ failure and reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. This postulate is supported by the preliminary findings by Marik et al. In a retrospective before-after clinical study, these authors compared the outcome and clinical course of consecutive septic patients treated with intravenous vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine during a 7-month period (treatment group) compared to a control group treated in during the preceding 7 months. The primary outcome was hospital survival. A propensity score was generated to adjust the primary outcome. There were 47 patients in both treatment and control groups with no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The hospital mortality was 8.5% (4 of 47) in the treatment group compared to 40.4% (19 of 47) in the control group (p \< 0.001). The propensity adjusted odds of mortality in the patients treated with the vitamin C protocol was 0.13 (95% CI 0.04-0.48, p=0.002). The SOFA score decreased in all patients in the treatment group with none developing progressive organ failure. Vasopressors were weaned off all patients in the treatment group, a mean of 18.3 ± 9.8 hours after starting treatment with vitamin C protocol. The mean duration of vasopressor use was 54.9 ± 28.4 hours in the control group (p\<0.001). The results of this study provide sufficient information for the design of an adequately powered, pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis, Severe
  • Septic Shock

Browse trials for

03

In context

Shock, Septic Reclassified

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 140 is above the median of 79 across 636 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Compared within Shock, Septic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

i. Diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock within 12 hours of admission to the ICU ii. as dictated by IRB and local practice. iii. Compliance with the 3 hour sepsis bundle

  • 30ml/kg of intravenous crystalloid fluid (e.g.: sodium chloride 0.9%) for lactic acid >4 and/or systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg / mean arterial pressure \<65mmHg
  • Lactic acid level drawn
  • Broad spectrum antibiotics given after obtaining blood cultures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

i. Age \< 18 years ii. Pregnant iii. DNR/DNI with limitations of care on admission iv. Patients with terminal end stage disease (i.e. stage IV cancer, end stage heart failure) that are unlikely to survive to hospital discharge v. Patients with a primary admitting diagnosis of an acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary syndrome, active gastrointestinal bleeding, burn or trauma [64-66] vi. Requirement for immediate surgery [64-66] vii. Patients with and a CD4 \< 50 mm2 [64-66] viii. Patients with known glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6PD) deficiency.[39] ix. Patients with sepsis/septic shock transferred from another hospital x. Patients with features of sepsis/septic shock > 24 hours after admission

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Arm

    Based on published clinical data, vitamin C pharmacokinetic modeling, the package insert as well as the preliminary study by Marik et al, Vitamin C will be administered as an intravenous dose of 6gm per day divided in 4 equal doses. This dosage is reported to be devoid of any complications or side effects. Hydrocortisone will be dosed according to the consensus guidelines of the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Thiamine will be administered according to current recommendations in a dose of 200mg q 12 hourly. This will be continued for 4 days, or less if discharged from the ICU prior.

    Drug: Ascorbic Acid · Drug: Thiamine · Drug: Hydrocortisone

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Arm

    Vitamin C placebo will consist of an identical bag of 100mL normal saline (but with no vitamin C) and will be labeled "Vitamin C or Placebo". Placebo will be infused over 30 minutes as per the infusion instructions of the active vitamin and protected from light with a brown bag. Hydrocortisone placebo will be provided as an identical 3mL syringe as 1mL of normal saline.The thiamine placebo will be placed in a 50mL bag of Normal Saline labeled "Thiamine 200mg or Placebo" and run over 30 minutes (100mL/hr) Placebo patients will receive a matching 50mL bag of Normal Saline. All of these will be given for up to 4 days, or less if discharged from the ICU prior.

    Drug: Sodium Chloride 0.9%

Interventions

  • Ascorbic Acid 1.5g IV piggyback every 6 hours for 4 days (or discharge from ICU if prior to 4 days).

    Also known as: Vitamin C

  • Thiamine 200mg IV piggyback every 12 hours for 4 days (or discharge from ICU if prior to 4 days).

  • Hydrocortisone 50mg IV push every 6 hours for 4 days (or discharge from ICU if prior to 4 days).

    Also known as: Solucortef

  • DrugSodium Chloride 0.9%

    Placebo "Ascorbic Acid" 100mL IV piggyback every 6 hours, Placebo "Thiamine" 50mL IV piggyback every 12 hours, and Placebo "Hydrocortisone" IV push every 6 hours for 4 days (or discharge from ICU if prior to 4 days).

    Also known as: Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Vasopressor Independence (Hours)

    Defined as the time from starting the active treatment/placebo to discontinuation of all pressors.

    Time frame: From start of vasopressor medication to final discontinuation of vasopressor medication, up to 7 days.

  2. Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

    Defined as the day 4 post-randomization SOFA score minus the initial SOFA score. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems. The score is calculated on admission and every 24 hours until discharge using the worst parameters measured during the prior 24 hours SOFA score ranges from 0 (no organ dysfunction) to 24 (highest possible score / organ dysfunction).

    Time frame: 4 days post-randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procalcitonin (PCT) Clearance

    PCT at 96 hours minus initial PCT, divided by the initial PCT multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: 4 days post-randomization

  2. ICU Mortality

    ICU mortality rate

    Time frame: From admission to hospital until final discharge from the ICU, up to 28 days.

  3. ICU Length of Stay

    Time from admitting to ICU to discharge.

    Time frame: From admission to the ICU until final discharge from the ICU, up to an average of 7 days.

  4. Ventilator Free Days

    Number of days alive and off of the ventilator at day 28.

    Time frame: 28 Days post-randomization

  5. Hospital Length of Stay

    Time from admitting to discharge of hospital stay.

    Time frame: From admission to the hospital until final discharge, up to 28 days.

  6. Hospital Mortality

    In-hospital mortality rate.

    Time frame: Survival until hospital discharge, up to 28 days.

07

Results

Posted Sep 21, 2021
Limitations and caveats
The relative weakness was its small, homogenous (primarily caucasian) cohort size, limiting the ability to detect differences in hospital mortality and length of stay.

Participant flow

Between February 14th, 2018 and April 29th, 2019, 256 patients were evaluated within two community hospital intensive care units.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment ArmPlacebo Arm
Started7070
Completed6869
Not completed21
Withdrew: Exclusion due to terminal disease21

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Vasopressor Independence (Hours)

Defined as the time from starting the active treatment/placebo to discontinuation of all pressors.

Time frame:
From start of vasopressor medication to final discontinuation of vasopressor medication, up to 7 days.
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Time to Vasopressor Independence (Hours)
hoursHAT TreatmentComparator
Time to Vasopressor Independence (Hours)27 ± 2253 ± 38
Statistical analysis
  • HAT Treatment vs Comparator · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001
PrimaryChange in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

Defined as the day 4 post-randomization SOFA score minus the initial SOFA score. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems. The score is calculated on admission and every 24 hours until discharge using the worst parameters measured during the prior 24 hours SOFA score ranges from 0 (no organ dysfunction) to 24 (highest possible score / organ dysfunction).

Time frame:
4 days post-randomization
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
score on a scaleTreatment ArmPlacebo Arm
Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score2.9 ± 3.31.93 ± 3.5
SecondaryProcalcitonin (PCT) Clearance

PCT at 96 hours minus initial PCT, divided by the initial PCT multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
4 days post-randomization
Reported as:
Mean · Percent
Procalcitonin (PCT) Clearance
PercentTreatment ArmPlacebo Arm
Procalcitonin (PCT) Clearance63 ± 17058 ± 66
SecondaryICU Mortality

ICU mortality rate

Time frame:
From admission to hospital until final discharge from the ICU, up to 28 days.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
ICU Mortality
ParticipantsTreatment ArmPlacebo Arm
ICU Mortality610
SecondaryICU Length of Stay

Time from admitting to ICU to discharge.

Time frame:
From admission to the ICU until final discharge from the ICU, up to an average of 7 days.
Reported as:
Mean · days
ICU Length of Stay
daysTreatment ArmPlacebo Arm
ICU Length of Stay4.76 ± 4.34.66 ± 3.45
SecondaryVentilator Free Days

Number of days alive and off of the ventilator at day 28.

Time frame:
28 Days post-randomization
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Ventilator Free Days
DaysTreatment ArmPlacebo Arm
Ventilator Free Days22 ± 6.222.4 ± 4.3
SecondaryHospital Length of Stay

Time from admitting to discharge of hospital stay.

Time frame:
From admission to the hospital until final discharge, up to 28 days.
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Hospital Length of Stay
DaysTreatment ArmPlacebo Arm
Hospital Length of Stay11.5 ± 6.811 ± 6.2
SecondaryHospital Mortality

In-hospital mortality rate.

Time frame:
Survival until hospital discharge, up to 28 days.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Hospital Mortality
ParticipantsTreatment ArmPlacebo Arm
Hospital Mortality1113

Adverse events

Collected over Each participant was assessed for adverse events up to hospital discharge, or up to 28 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Arm11/68 (16.2%)0/68 (0%)0/68 (0%)
Placebo Arm13/69 (18.8%)0/69 (0%)0/69 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TreatmentComparatorTotal
Mean70 ± 1267 ± 1468 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TreatmentComparatorTotal
Female364278
Male322759
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)TreatmentComparatorTotal
Caucasian6665131
Non-Caucasian246
Comorbidities
Comorbidities(Participants)TreatmentComparatorTotal
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)252146
Diabetes243357
Dementia7411
Heart failure181331
Malignancy151126
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)231740
Cirrhosis033
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)303
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)10414
Morbid Obesity (BMI >40)161329
Immunocompromised6511
Primary diagnosis
Primary diagnosis(Participants)TreatmentComparatorTotal
Pneumonia293059
Urinary tract infection182543
Primary bacteremia91120
Gastrointestinal/biliary9817
Other13922
Other Baseline Characteristics
Other Baseline Characteristics(Participants)TreatmentComparatorTotal
Need for mechanical ventilation343569
Vasopressor usage during hospital admission5647103
Acute Kidney Injury (Stage 1 or higher based on KDIGO definitions)5452106
Positive blood cultures222345
Baseline Labs
Baseline Labs(mg/dL)TreatmentComparatorTotal
Creatinine (mg/dL)2.1 ± 1.52 ± 1.512 ± 0
Ascorbic acid level (mg/dL)0.52 ± 10.48 ± 0.40.5 ± 0
Thiamine (mg/dL)193 ± 144148 ± 53170 ± 0
Baseline White Blood Cell Count (WBC) x10^9/L
Baseline White Blood Cell Count (WBC) x10^9/L(x10^9 cells/L)TreatmentComparatorTotal
Mean16 ± 1019 ± 9.717.5 ± 0

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Monmouth Medical Center, Southern Campus
    Lakewood, New Jersey 08701, United States
  • Community Medical Center
    Toms River, New Jersey 08755, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010 Oct 16;376(9749):1339-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60446-1. Epub 2010 Oct 11. PubMed 20934212 ↗
  • Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637. PubMed 24638143 ↗
  • Silva E, Pedro Mde A, Sogayar AC, Mohovic T, Silva CL, Janiszewski M, Cal RG, de Sousa EF, Abe TP, de Andrade J, de Matos JD, Rezende E, Assuncao M, Avezum A, Rocha PC, de Matos GF, Bento AM, Correa AD, Vieira PC, Knobel E; Brazilian Sepsis Epidemiological Study. Brazilian Sepsis Epidemiological Study (BASES study). Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R251-60. doi: 10.1186/cc2892. Epub 2004 Jun 15. PubMed 15312226 ↗
  • Sales Junior JA, David CM, Hatum R, Souza PC, Japiassu A, Pinheiro CT, Friedman G, Silva OB, Dias MD, Koterba E, Dias FS, Piras C, Luiz RR; Grupo de Estudo de Sepse do Fundo AMIB. [An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units: Sepsis Brazil study]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006 Mar;18(1):9-17. Portuguese. PubMed 25310321 ↗
  • The 10 leading causes of death by country income group 2012. WHO factsheets. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index1.html . 2015. World Health Organization. 5-24-2016.
  • Wang HE, Szychowski JM, Griffin R, Safford MM, Shapiro NI, Howard G. Long-term mortality after community-acquired sepsis: a longitudinal population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 17;4(1):e004283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004283. PubMed 24441058 ↗
  • Artenstein AW, Higgins TL, Opal SM. Sepsis and scientific revolutions. Crit Care Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2770-2. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829eb98f. PubMed 23989175 ↗
  • Fisher BJ, Seropian IM, Kraskauskas D, Thakkar JN, Voelkel NF, Fowler AA 3rd, Natarajan R. Ascorbic acid attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1454-60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182120cb8. Erratum In: Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):2022. PubMed 21358394 ↗
  • Fisher BJ, Kraskauskas D, Martin EJ, Farkas D, Puri P, Massey HD, Idowu MO, Brophy DF, Voelkel NF, Fowler AA 3rd, Natarajan R. Attenuation of sepsis-induced organ injury in mice by vitamin C. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 Sep;38(7):825-39. doi: 10.1177/0148607113497760. Epub 2013 Aug 5. PubMed 23917525 ↗
  • Han M, Pendem S, Teh SL, Sukumaran DK, Wu F, Wilson JX. Ascorbate protects endothelial barrier function during septic insult: Role of protein phosphatase type 2A. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010 Jan 1;48(1):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.10.034. Epub 2009 Oct 17. PubMed 19840845 ↗
  • Kim SR, Ha YM, Kim YM, Park EJ, Kim JW, Park SW, Kim HJ, Chung HT, Chang KC. Ascorbic acid reduces HMGB1 secretion in lipopolysaccharide-activated RAW 264.7 cells and improves survival rate in septic mice by activation of Nrf2/HO-1 signals. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015 Jun 15;95(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 17. PubMed 25896849 ↗
  • Bornstein SR, Yoshida-Hiroi M, Sotiriou S, Levine M, Hartwig HG, Nussbaum RL, Eisenhofer G. Impaired adrenal catecholamine system function in mice with deficiency of the ascorbic acid transporter (SVCT2). FASEB J. 2003 Oct;17(13):1928-30. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-1167fje. Epub 2003 Aug 1. PubMed 12897061 ↗
  • Wilson JX. Mechanism of action of vitamin C in sepsis: ascorbate modulates redox signaling in endothelium. Biofactors. 2009 Jan-Feb;35(1):5-13. doi: 10.1002/biof.7. PubMed 19319840 ↗
  • Wilson JX. Evaluation of vitamin C for adjuvant sepsis therapy. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013 Dec 10;19(17):2129-40. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5401. Epub 2013 Jun 25. PubMed 23682970 ↗
  • Marik PE. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. Chest. 2009 Jan;135(1):181-193. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1149. PubMed 19136406 ↗
  • Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, Briegel J, Keh D, Kupfer Y. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 3;2015(12):CD002243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002243.pub3. PubMed 26633262 ↗
  • Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Eichacker PQ, Natanson C. The effects of steroids during sepsis depend on dose and severity of illness: an updated meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Apr;15(4):308-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02752.x. PubMed 19416302 ↗
  • Kalil AC, Sun J. Low-dose steroids for septic shock and severe sepsis: the use of Bayesian statistics to resolve clinical trial controversies. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Mar;37(3):420-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2121-0. Epub 2011 Jan 18. PubMed 21243334 ↗
  • Sprung CL, Annane D, Keh D, Moreno R, Singer M, Freivogel K, Weiss YG, Benbenishty J, Kalenka A, Forst H, Laterre PF, Reinhart K, Cuthbertson BH, Payen D, Briegel J; CORTICUS Study Group. Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):111-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071366. PubMed 18184957 ↗
  • Nathens AB, Neff MJ, Jurkovich GJ, Klotz P, Farver K, Ruzinski JT, Radella F, Garcia I, Maier RV. Randomized, prospective trial of antioxidant supplementation in critically ill surgical patients. Ann Surg. 2002 Dec;236(6):814-22. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200212000-00014. PubMed 12454520 ↗
  • Fowler AA 3rd, Syed AA, Knowlson S, Sculthorpe R, Farthing D, DeWilde C, Farthing CA, Larus TL, Martin E, Brophy DF, Gupta S; Medical Respiratory Intensive Care Unit Nursing; Fisher BJ, Natarajan R. Phase I safety trial of intravenous ascorbic acid in patients with severe sepsis. J Transl Med. 2014 Jan 31;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-32. PubMed 24484547 ↗
  • Zabet MH, Mohammadi M, Ramezani M, Khalili H. Effect of high-dose Ascorbic acid on vasopressor's requirement in septic shock. J Res Pharm Pract. 2016 Apr-Jun;5(2):94-100. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.179569. PubMed 27162802 ↗
  • Tanaka H, Matsuda T, Miyagantani Y, Yukioka T, Matsuda H, Shimazaki S. Reduction of resuscitation fluid volumes in severely burned patients using ascorbic acid administration: a randomized, prospective study. Arch Surg. 2000 Mar;135(3):326-31. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.3.326. PubMed 10722036 ↗
  • Ma Y, Chapman J, Levine M, Polireddy K, Drisko J, Chen Q. High-dose parenteral ascorbate enhanced chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer and reduced toxicity of chemotherapy. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 5;6(222):222ra18. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007154. PubMed 24500406 ↗
  • Hoffer LJ, Robitaille L, Zakarian R, Melnychuk D, Kavan P, Agulnik J, Cohen V, Small D, Miller WH Jr. High-dose intravenous vitamin C combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer: a phase I-II clinical trial. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0120228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120228. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25848948 ↗
  • Hoffer LJ, Levine M, Assouline S, Melnychuk D, Padayatty SJ, Rosadiuk K, Rousseau C, Robitaille L, Miller WH Jr. Phase I clinical trial of i.v. ascorbic acid in advanced malignancy. Ann Oncol. 2008 Nov;19(11):1969-74. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn377. Epub 2008 Jun 9. Erratum In: Ann Oncol. 2008 Dec;19(12):2095. PubMed 18544557 ↗
  • Stephenson CM, Levin RD, Spector T, Lis CG. Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of high-dose intravenous ascorbic acid in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;72(1):139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2179-9. Epub 2013 May 14. PubMed 23670640 ↗
  • Monti DA, Mitchell E, Bazzan AJ, Littman S, Zabrecky G, Yeo CJ, Pillai MV, Newberg AB, Deshmukh S, Levine M. Phase I evaluation of intravenous ascorbic acid in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029794. Epub 2012 Jan 17. PubMed 22272248 ↗
  • Welsh JL, Wagner BA, van't Erve TJ, Zehr PS, Berg DJ, Halfdanarson TR, Yee NS, Bodeker KL, Du J, Roberts LJ 2nd, Drisko J, Levine M, Buettner GR, Cullen JJ. Pharmacological ascorbate with gemcitabine for the control of metastatic and node-positive pancreatic cancer (PACMAN): results from a phase I clinical trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;71(3):765-75. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2070-8. Epub 2013 Feb 5. PubMed 23381814 ↗
  • Ohno S, Ohno Y, Suzuki N, Soma G, Inoue M. High-dose vitamin C (ascorbic acid) therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009 Mar;29(3):809-15. PubMed 19414313 ↗
  • de Grooth HJ, Choo WP, Spoelstra-de Man AM et al. Pharmacokinetics of four high- dose regimens of intravenous Vitamin C in critically ill patients [Abstract]. Intensive Care Med 2016.
  • Padayatty SJ, Sun H, Wang Y, Riordan HD, Hewitt SM, Katz A, Wesley RA, Levine M. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics: implications for oral and intravenous use. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Apr 6;140(7):533-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-7-200404060-00010. PubMed 15068981 ↗
  • Long CL, Maull KI, Krishnan RS, Laws HL, Geiger JW, Borghesi L, Franks W, Lawson TC, Sauberlich HE. Ascorbic acid dynamics in the seriously ill and injured. J Surg Res. 2003 Feb;109(2):144-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(02)00083-5. PubMed 12643856 ↗
  • Ascorbic Acid Injection. http://www.drugs.com/pro/ascorbic-acid-injection.html . 2015. The Torrance Company. 6-12-2016.
  • Campbell GD Jr, Steinberg MH, Bower JD. Letter: Ascorbic acid-induced hemolysis in G-6-PD deficiency. Ann Intern Med. 1975 Jun;82(6):810. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-82-6-810_1. No abstract available. PubMed 1138591 ↗
  • Rees DC, Kelsey H, Richards JD. Acute haemolysis induced by high dose ascorbic acid in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. BMJ. 1993 Mar 27;306(6881):841-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6881.841. No abstract available. PubMed 8490379 ↗
  • Drouin G, Godin JR, Page B. The genetics of vitamin C loss in vertebrates. Curr Genomics. 2011 Aug;12(5):371-8. doi: 10.2174/138920211796429736. PubMed 22294879 ↗
  • Patak P, Willenberg HS, Bornstein SR. Vitamin C is an important cofactor for both adrenal cortex and adrenal medulla. Endocr Res. 2004 Nov;30(4):871-5. doi: 10.1081/erc-200044126. PubMed 15666839 ↗
  • Das D, Sen C, Goswami A. Effect of Vitamin C on adrenal suppression by etomidate induction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):410-7. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.185522. PubMed 27397444 ↗
  • Nooraei N, Fathi M, Edalat L et al. Effect of Vitamin C on serum cortisol after etomidate induction of anesthesia. J Cell Mol Anesth 2016; 1:28-33.
  • Massey LK, Liebman M, Kynast-Gales SA. Ascorbate increases human oxaluria and kidney stone risk. J Nutr. 2005 Jul;135(7):1673-7. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.7.1673. PubMed 15987848 ↗
  • Wandzilak TR, D'Andre SD, Davis PA, Williams HE. Effect of high dose vitamin C on urinary oxalate levels. J Urol. 1994 Apr;151(4):834-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35100-5. PubMed 8126804 ↗
  • Hoppe B, Beck BB, Milliner DS. The primary hyperoxalurias. Kidney Int. 2009 Jun;75(12):1264-1271. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.32. Epub 2009 Feb 18. PubMed 19225556 ↗
  • Sidhu H, Gupta R, Thind SK, Nath R. Oxalate metabolism in thiamine-deficient rats. Ann Nutr Metab. 1987;31(6):354-61. doi: 10.1159/000177294. PubMed 3426152 ↗
  • Ortiz-Alvarado O, Miyaoka R, Kriedberg C, Moeding A, Stessman M, Monga M. Pyridoxine and dietary counseling for the management of idiopathic hyperoxaluria in stone-forming patients. Urology. 2011 May;77(5):1054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.002. Epub 2011 Feb 19. PubMed 21334732 ↗
  • Donnino MW, Andersen LW, Chase M, Berg KM, Tidswell M, Giberson T, Wolfe R, Moskowitz A, Smithline H, Ngo L, Cocchi MN; Center for Resuscitation Science Research Group. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thiamine as a Metabolic Resuscitator in Septic Shock: A Pilot Study. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):360-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001572. PubMed 26771781 ↗
  • Moskowitz A, Andersen LW, Cocchi MN, Karlsson M, Patel PV, Donnino MW. Thiamine as a Renal Protective Agent in Septic Shock. A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 May;14(5):737-741. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-656BC. PubMed 28207287 ↗
  • Aird WC. The role of the endothelium in severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Blood. 2003 May 15;101(10):3765-77. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1887. Epub 2003 Jan 23. PubMed 12543869 ↗
  • Marik PE, Pastores SM, Annane D, Meduri GU, Sprung CL, Arlt W, Keh D, Briegel J, Beishuizen A, Dimopoulou I, Tsagarakis S, Singer M, Chrousos GP, Zaloga G, Bokhari F, Vogeser M; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1937-49. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817603ba. PubMed 18496365 ↗
  • Okamoto K, Tanaka H, Makino Y, Makino I. Restoration of the glucocorticoid receptor function by the phosphodiester compound of vitamins C and E, EPC-K1 (L-ascorbic acid 2-[3,4-dihydro-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-2-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)-2H-1-benzopyran-6-yl hydrogen phosphate] potassium salt), via a redox-dependent mechanism. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998 Jul 1;56(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(98)00121-x. PubMed 9698091 ↗
  • Fujita I, Hirano J, Itoh N, Nakanishi T, Tanaka K. Dexamethasone induces sodium-dependant vitamin C transporter in a mouse osteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1. Br J Nutr. 2001 Aug;86(2):145-9. doi: 10.1079/bjn2001406. PubMed 11502226 ↗
  • Barabutis N, Khangoora V, Marik PE, Catravas JD. Hydrocortisone and Ascorbic Acid Synergistically Prevent and Repair Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Pulmonary Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction. Chest. 2017 Nov;152(5):954-962. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 21. PubMed 28739448 ↗
  • Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R, Hooper MH, Catravas J. Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Before-After Study. Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1229-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036. Epub 2016 Dec 6. PubMed 27940189 ↗
  • Marik PE. The physiology of volume resuscitation. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2014; 4:353-59.
  • Marik PE. Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure. Ann Intensive Care. 2014 Jun 21;4:21. doi: 10.1186/s13613-014-0021-0. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25110606 ↗
  • Marik P, Bellomo R. A rational approach to fluid therapy in sepsis. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Mar;116(3):339-49. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev349. Epub 2015 Oct 27. PubMed 26507493 ↗
  • Marik PE. Fluid Responsiveness and the Six Guiding Principles of Fluid Resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):1920-2. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001483. No abstract available. PubMed 26571187 ↗
  • Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7. Epub 2016 Nov 17. PubMed 27858374 ↗
  • Marik PE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Bittner EA, Sahatjian J, Hansell D. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;43(5):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y. Epub 2017 Jan 27. PubMed 28130687 ↗
  • Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18. PubMed 28101605 ↗
  • ProCESS Investigators; Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, Barnato AE, Weissfeld LA, Pike F, Terndrup T, Wang HE, Hou PC, LoVecchio F, Filbin MR, Shapiro NI, Angus DC. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602. Epub 2014 Mar 18. PubMed 24635773 ↗
  • Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, Jahan R, Harvey SE, Bell D, Bion JF, Coats TJ, Singer M, Young JD, Rowan KM; ProMISe Trial Investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1301-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. Epub 2015 Mar 17. PubMed 25776532 ↗
  • ARISE Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group; Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Higgins AM, Holdgate A, Howe BD, Webb SA, Williams P. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380. Epub 2014 Oct 1. PubMed 25272316 ↗
  • de Azevedo JR, Torres OJ, Beraldi RA, Ribas CA, Malafaia O. Prognostic evaluation of severe sepsis and septic shock: procalcitonin clearance vs Delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):219.e9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Sep 10. PubMed 25241933 ↗
  • Ruiz-Rodriguez JC, Caballero J, Ruiz-Sanmartin A, Ribas VJ, Perez M, Boveda JL, Rello J. Usefulness of procalcitonin clearance as a prognostic biomarker in septic shock. A prospective pilot study. Med Intensiva. 2012 Oct;36(7):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.11.024. Epub 2012 Jan 16. PubMed 22257436 ↗
  • Flannery AH, Adkins DA, Cook AM. Unpeeling the Evidence for the Banana Bag: Evidence-Based Recommendations for the Management of Alcohol-Associated Vitamin and Electrolyte Deficiencies in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1545-52. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001659. PubMed 27002274 ↗
  • Mancl EE, Muzevich KM. Tolerability and safety of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving intravenous vasopressor therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013 Sep;37(5):641-51. doi: 10.1177/0148607112470460. Epub 2012 Dec 27. PubMed 23270986 ↗
  • Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, Gordon AC, Hebert PC, Cooper DJ, Holmes CL, Mehta S, Granton JT, Storms MM, Cook DJ, Presneill JJ, Ayers D; VASST Investigators. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373. PubMed 18305265 ↗
  • Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29. PubMed 3928249 ↗
  • Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0. PubMed 16540951 ↗
  • Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10. doi: 10.1007/BF01709751. No abstract available. PubMed 8844239 ↗
  • Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Melot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754. PubMed 11594901 ↗
  • Iglesias J, Vassallo AV, Patel VV, Sullivan JB, Cavanaugh J, Elbaga Y. Outcomes of Metabolic Resuscitation Using Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine, and Glucocorticoids in the Early Treatment of Sepsis: The ORANGES Trial. Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):164-173. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.049. Epub 2020 Mar 17. PubMed 32194058 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2019, 16 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2021, 2 years 3 months after primary completion.

Of 36 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 42. This study's 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 41 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 25, 2018
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
StartActual
Feb 5, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 5, 2019
CompletionActual
Aug 27, 2019
Results first posted
Sep 21, 2021
Last update
Sep 21, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03422159
Lead sponsor
Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
Start date
Feb 5, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 5, 2019
Completion
Aug 27, 2019
Results posted
Sep 21, 2021
Last update
Sep 21, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Ascorbic Acid · Thiamine

Start the discussion