ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07898462FLUDRO-SHOCKUpdated Oct 30, 2026

A Trial of Adjunctive Fludrocortisone (50mcg, 100mcg or Placebo) in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock Receiving Hydrocortisone, Evaluating Survival and Functional Recovery and the Influence of Transcriptomic Response

A Phase 3 interventional study of Fludrocortisone 50 mcg daily and Fludrocortisone 100 mcg daily in Septic Shock, sponsored by The George Institute. Recruiting at 8 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Sponsored by The George Institute · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 30, 2026Newly registered5 sites addedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The FLUDRO-SHOCK trial is a large international randomised controlled double-blinded study aiming to improve treatment for people with septic shock, a life-threatening condition caused by severe infection. Patients with septic shock receive a steroid called hydrocortisone, but it is unclear whether adding another steroid, fludrocortisone, improves their chances of recovery and survival. This study will test two doses of fludrocortisone (50 mcg and 100 mcg) against a placebo to see which works best. It will also explore whether a person's unique immune response, based on their genes, affects how well the treatment works. The trial will involve up to 2,200 critically ill adults in intensive care units across Australia and other countries. Researchers will track survival, organ recovery, and quality of life for up to a year. The goal is to find the most effective and personalised way to use steroids in septic shock, potentially saving lives and improving long-term outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock

Keywords

  • Septic shock
  • Fludrocortisone
  • Sepsis
  • Corticosteroids
03

In context

Shock, Septic

895 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 212 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,200 is above the median of 78 across 549 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

The George Institute is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Shock presumed due to infection
  2. Treatment with vasopressors to maintain a Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) >90mmHg or Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) > 65mmHg, after having received adequate fluid resuscitation (in the opinion of the treating clinician)
  3. Plasma lactate concentration >2mmol/L
  4. Being treated with hydrocortisone 200mg/day as adjunctive treatment for septic shock
  5. Being treated with one of the following:

    1. Invasive Mechanical Ventilation OR
    2. Non-invasive ventilation (CPAP or BiPAP) OR
    3. Oxygen supplementation with an oxygen flow of >10L/min independent of delivery system and an FiO2 of 0.5 or above., OR
    4. Use of Veno-venous ECMO

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Met all inclusion criteria for more than 12 hours
  2. Death is deemed imminent or inevitable by treating ICU specialist
  3. Patients with documented systemic fungal infection at the time of randomisation
  4. Patients with documented allergy to fludrocortisone
  5. Patients unable to receive enteral medications
  6. An underlying disease process with a life expectancy of less than 28 days
  7. Pregnancy (confirmed or suspected)
  8. Receiving hydrocortisone (HC) or fludrocortisone (FC) for conditions other than septic shock
  9. Prior enrolment in this trial
  10. Known or documented objections to research participation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Fludrocortisone 50 mcg daily

    The intervention will be fludrocortisone acetate 50 mcg daily, administered orally or via an in situ gastric tube for 7 days or until discharge from ICU, whichever is sooner.

    Drug: Fludrocortisone 50 mcg daily

  • Active comparator
    Fludrocortisone 100 mcg daily

    The intervention will be fludrocortisone acetate 100 mcg daily, administered orally or via an in situ gastric tube for 7 days or until discharge from ICU, whichever is sooner.

    Drug: Fludrocortisone 100 mcg daily

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Matching placebo tablet dosed daily, administered orally or via an in situ gastric tube for 7 days or until discharge from ICU, whichever is sooner.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • The intervention will be fludrocortisone acetate 50 mcg daily, administered orally or via an in situ gastric tube for 7 days or until discharge from ICU, whichever is sooner.

  • The intervention will be fludrocortisone acetate 100 mcg daily, administered orally or via an in situ gastric tube for 7 days or until discharge from ICU, whichever is sooner.

  • DrugPlacebo

    The intervention will be placebo tablet administered orally or via an in situ gastric tube for 7 days or until discharge from ICU, whichever is sooner.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Days alive and free of organ support to day 28

    Number of days during the first 28 days after randomisation on which the participant is alive and receives none of the protocol-defined forms of organ support. Organ support is defined as treatment with a vasopressor or inotropic infusion, the need for respiratory support or the need for new renal replacement therapy.

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 28 after randomisation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    Percentage of participants who have died from any cause by each specified follow-up time point. Mortality will be assessed separately at 28 days, 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation.

    Time frame: 28 days, 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation

  2. Days alive and free of organ support to day 90

    Number of days during the first 90 days after randomisation on which the participant is alive and receives none of the protocol-defined forms of organ support. Organ support is defined as treatment with a vasopressor or inotropic infusion, the need for respiratory support or the need for new renal replacement therapy.

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 90 after randomisation.

  3. Proportion of patients treated with new-onset renal replacement therapy

    Percentage of participants who commence renal replacement therapy after randomisation and on or before day 90.

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 90 after randomisation.

  4. Days alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation through day 90

    Number of days during the first 90 days after randomisation on which the participant is alive and does not receive invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 90 after randomisation

  5. Days alive and outside the intensive care unit through day 90

    Number of days during the first 90 days after randomisation on which the participant is alive and is not admitted to an intensive care unit

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 90 after randomisation

  6. Days alive outside hospital through day 90

    Number of days during the first 90 days after randomisation on which the participant is alive and is not admitted to hospital.

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 90 after randomisation

  7. Number of hospital readmissions through day 90

    Number of hospital readmissions per participant following discharge from the index hospital admission and occurring on or before day 90 after randomisation.

    Time frame: 90 days after randomisation

  8. Number of new-onset infections during the index hospital admission

    Number of new-onset infections per participant during the index hospital admission, defined by commencement of new antibiotic treatment at least 2 days after randomisation. Antibiotics commenced for perioperative prophylaxis are excluded. Includes new-onset bacteraemia.

    Time frame: From 2 days after randomisation until discharge from the index hospital admission.

  9. Functional status assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)

    Functional status will be assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Each item is scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (extreme difficulty or inability to perform the activity), giving a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater disability and worse functional status.

    Time frame: 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation.

  10. Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) index score

    EuroQol (Quality of life) 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the country-appropriate EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. '5-D' Refers to the five dimensions of health it measures: Mobility, Usual activities, Self-care, Pain/discomfort, Anxiety/depression. '5-L' refers to the five response levels for each dimension, which are: no problems, slight, moderate, severe, extreme/unable to. Responses will be converted into an index score using the applicable country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation.

  11. Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) index score

    Measuring the participant's self-rated overall health on a 0-100 scale, with 100 being the best and 0 the worst.

    Time frame: 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation.

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of participants with hypokalaemia

    Percentage of participants with at least one measured blood potassium concentration \<3.5 mmol/L

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 8 after randomisation.

  2. Percentage of participants with hyperkalaemia

    Percentage of participants with at least one measured blood potassium concentration \>5.0 mmol/L

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 8 after randomisation.

  3. Percentage of participants with hyponatraemia

    Percentage of participants with at least one measured blood sodium concentration \<135 mmol/L.

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 8 after randomisation.

  4. Percentage of participants with hypernatraemia

    Percentage of participants with at least one measured blood sodium concentration \>150 mmol/L during the assessment period.

    Time frame: From randomisation through day 8 after randomisation.

  5. Average daily net fluid balance in millilitres

    Daily net fluid balance is calculated as total recorded fluid input minus total recorded fluid output during each daily recording interval, expressed in millilitres

    Time frame: Daily measurements from baseline through day 8 after randomisation.

07

Study locations

2 of 8 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Mar 2030, 41 months later.

Of 40 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 41 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 41 studies reached it within 42 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 59.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 14, 2026
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 16, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2030
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2031
Last update
Oct 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
5 sites added
Show 5 added (5 Australia)
  • Nepean Hospital · Penrith, Australia
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's hospital · Brisbane, Australia
  • Caboolture Hospital · Caboolture, Australia
  • Gold Coast University Hospital · Gold Coast, Australia
  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital · Adelaide, Australia
Oct 30, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 added, 2 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedHealth-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) index scoreTime frame: 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation.
  • DescriptionFunctional status assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionHealth-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) index score: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 30, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    5 sites added
    Show 5 added (5 Australia)
    • Nepean Hospital · Penrith, Australia
    • Royal Brisbane and Women's hospital · Brisbane, Australia
    • Caboolture Hospital · Caboolture, Australia
    • Gold Coast University Hospital · Gold Coast, Australia
    • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital · Adelaide, Australia
    Secondary outcomes 1 added, 2 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedHealth-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) index scoreTime frame: 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation.
    • DescriptionFunctional status assessed using the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionHealth-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) index score: how it is measured was reworded
  2. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07898462
Lead sponsor
The George Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Oct 16, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Senior Project Manager
Contact
fludroshock@georgeinstitute.org.au
+61 2 8052 4460
Professor Balasubramanian (Bala) Venkatesh
principal investigator · The George Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fludrocortisone

Start the discussion