CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03408119Updated Oct 7, 2022

Dried Plums Prevent Inflammation And Improve Bone Health in Osteopenic Men

An interventional study of Dried Plum and 800 IU vitamin D and 450mg elemental calcium in Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, sponsored by Florida State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-07.

Sponsored by Florida State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The goals of this study are 1) to investigate the extent to which dried plum improves bone health by measuring bone density (a measure of bone strength) of whole body, hip, and forearm, indicators of bone formation and bone breakdown, and 2) to determine the anti-inflammatory effects of dried plum by assessing biomarkers of inflammation. Additionally, relevant medical history and lifestyle variables will be recorded.

Read the detailed description

Osteoporosis in men is an important yet an understudied debilitating disease. To date, most therapies are directed towards postmenopausal osteoporosis, and the efficacy of these therapies is not established for male osteoporosis. Therefore, due to concerns regarding the increasing prevalence of male osteoporosis and minimal treatment options available, it is imperative to further investigate the role of readily available preventative therapies such as functional foods on improving bone health in men.

In general, consumption of fruits and vegetables has health-protective effects, in part, through the prevention of inflammation and its related conditions, including bone loss. These protective effects have been primarily attributed to their bioactive components, including polyphenols. Dried plums (Prunus domestica L.) have been ranked as having one of the highest oxygen radical absorbance capacities among the commonly consumed fruits and vegetables, likely due to the fact that they are a rich source of polyphenolic compounds, including chlorogenic acid and neochlorogenic acid, which are potent antioxidants. For these reasons, dried plums have been investigated to determine if they would have beneficial effects on bone health, and their bone-protective effects have been well-established in animal models and to some degree in humans by our laboratory as well as others.

The long-term goal of this proposed research is to develop new approaches to prevent chronic inflammation and subsequently to prevent and/or reverse bone loss in osteopenic men, thereby reducing the risk of osteoporotic fractures. The rationale for conducting this study is to test the extent to which dried plum prevents inflammation and improves bone health in osteopenic men. Based on the promising findings of our previous research studies and those of others, we hypothesize that chronic consumption of dried plum will prevent inflammation thereby preventing and/or reversing further bone loss at the lumbar spine in osteopenic men. Healthy men between the ages of 55 and 80 years old with a baseline lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) t-score between 1 and 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean, characterizing mild to moderate bone loss, will be recruited. The study participants must not have been on drug therapy for osteoporosis and must not have begun a new exercise regimen known to affect bone metabolism for at least six months prior to the start of the study. Evaluation will be based on quantitative assessments of serum and urinary markers of bone formation and bone resorption and bone density measurements. Nutrition indices that are known to influence skeletal mass such as dietary intakes of calcium, protein, fiber, and magnesium will also be assessed as well as relevant medical history and lifestyle variables.

The rationale for selecting osteopenic men rather than those with normal bone is to test our hypothesis that dried plum reverses bone loss similar to male rats. However, no further loss of BMD should also be considered a positive finding. Men with a t-score \< -2 SD will be excluded because they are close to being osteoporotic. Changes in BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine are the primary outcome variables. Secondary outcome variables are the changes in BMD and BMC of whole body, hip, and forearm; and biomarkers of inflammation and bone turnover. The rationale for choosing the lumbar spine as our primary outcome variable site, is due to the high rates of bone loss that typically occur first in the lumbar spine and other areas of high trabecular bone content where there are many metabolically active surfaces. To test our hypothesis, two specific aims are proposed as follows:

Aim 1: To investigate the extent to which dried plum improves bone health by measuring:

Aim 2: To determine the anti-inflammatory effects of dried plum by assessing:

Study Overview Two hundred men whose lumbar spine BMD t-score is between 1 and 2 SD below the mean will be recruited from primary care and specialty clinics and by advertisement at large. After an initial telephone screening, all participants will be requested to report to the study site for their first visit. On the first visit (screening), the Study Coordinator will provide the potential subjects with verbal and written explanation of the project and will answer any questions regarding the study. Then the individual will be asked to sign an informed consent form, followed by a DXA scan to confirm osteopenia. Baseline assessments will be performed for medical history, medications use, dietary intake, and physical activity. If volunteers meet the study criteria, they will be scheduled for their second visit two weeks later (actual baseline data collection) and randomly assigned to their treatment group: 50 g dried plum, 100 g dried plum, or control for one year. In order to provide some protection against further bone loss, all study participants will receive 500 mg elemental calcium and 400 IU vitamin D3 daily. They will be given a three-day food record to take home and bring back on the second visit. Additionally, subjects will be asked to collect a 24-hour urine sample the day prior to their next visit and bring this with them to the clinical research facility and they will repeat this the day prior to each subsequent visit. During each visit (baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months) between the hours of 6-10 A.M., venous blood will be drawn from the antecubital vein. Subjects' anthropometrics including height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences will be measured. Participants will be asked to complete a Physical Activity Questionnaire. Participants will undergo a DXA scan for bone density measurements (lumbar spine, whole body, hip, and forearm BMD and BMC) at screening (considered baseline for BMD and BMC values), 6 months, and 12 months.

Data Analyses - Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all variables and will include means, standard deviations, medians, minima and maxima. Distributions of outcome variables will be examined graphically for symmetry and for outliers. If a lack of symmetry is noted, the variable will be transformed before analysis, most probably by a logarithmic transformation. Extreme outliers will be investigated for technical or clerical errors. If the size of the measurement cannot be attributed to such an error, it will be included in the analysis and the effect of deleting the observation will also be reported. Baseline characteristics for the study groups will be compared and if differences occur in variables that could influence bone mass, subsequent analyses will adjust for the effects of these variables. The data will be analyzed using PC SAS version 9.3 and SAS PROC MIXED. The overall effect of treatments will be inspected. The primary outcomes of interest will be the changes observed in lumbar spine BMD and BMC from baseline. The secondary outcome variables will be change in hip, forearm, and total body BMD and BMC, and biochemical markers of bone formation and bone resorption. Some covariates such as initial bone mass and baseline characteristics identified in the preliminary analysis will be included. Other factors that might affect the results, such as physical activity, dietary intakes and ethnicity, will also be examined.

For statistical purposes, the study may be considered a factorial design (3 treatments)*(2 times) for density measurements and (3 treatments)*(4 times) for serum and urine analyses. It is a repeated measures on the time factor (2 levels for DXA and 4 levels for blood and urine analyses). Analysis of variance techniques appropriate for this design will provide the primary statistical hypothesis testing procedures. To directly address primary research questions, planned comparisons will be made between the changes from baseline in the control group with changes in the dried plum groups. These comparisons will be made using actual differences as response variable, with current values, values adjusted by covariance for baseline, and with change as % of baseline as response variable. Clearly these tests are not independent, but results may offer different insights. It is anticipated that some subjects may leave the study and dropout rates between the three groups; hence, Kaplan Myer time to event analysis will be used to examine for possible differences in time to dropout patterns. The comparison of changes will first be made using only data for subjects who finish the study. A second examination will be made as intent to treat analysis using the MIXED procedure to adjust for missing data.

The relationship between bone mass and biochemical markers of bone turnover will be investigated through linear correlation coefficients. The lumbar spine will be the primary site of interest although bone mass, i.e. BMD and BMC, at other sites will also be evaluated. Hip, forearm, and total body BMD and BMC, as well as serum and urinary biochemical indices of bone formation and resorption will comprise the secondary independent variables to be considered. Preliminary models will examine the effect of each biochemical index individually, and then stepwise methods of variable selection will be employed through the use of multiple regression models to determine which combination of indices is strongly associated with BMD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis, Osteopenia

Keywords

  • prune
  • dried plum
  • osteoporosis
  • osteopenia
  • men
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy men, between the ages of 55 and 80, whose lumbar spine BMD t-score is between 0.1 and 2.5 SD below the mean will be included. Participants who are not on testosterone and/or other pharmacological agents known to affect bone, or who have initiated an exercise program within the past 12 months known to influence bone (e.g. resistance training exercise), will be enrolled in this proposed study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subjects who will be recruited for the study should not be receiving endocrine (e.g. prednisone, other glucocorticoids) or neuroactive (e.g. dilantin, phenobarbital) drugs or any drugs known to influence bone and calcium metabolism. Men who have initiated regular exercise regimens known to influence bone within the past 12 months prior to the study, e.g. resistance exercise training will also be excluded. Men whose BMD t-score at any site that falls below 2.5 SD of the mean will be excluded from the study. Furthermore, subjects treated with calcitonin, bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene, anabolic agents, e.g. PTH and growth hormone, or steroids within a year prior to the start of the study will be excluded. In addition, subjects with metabolic bone disease, renal disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, liver disease, or other chronic diseases will be excluded. Potential subjects with a body mass index (BMI) \< 18 and > 40 will be excluded to avoid extremes in leanness/adiposity and to readily allow body composition assessment. If subjects smoke ≥ 20 cigarettes per day, they will be excluded. Also men who regularly consume dried plum or prune juice will not be accepted into the study.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A

    100g daily dried plum consumption, plus 800 IU vitamin D and 450 mg elemental calcium

    Dietary Supplement: Dried Plum · Dietary Supplement: 800 IU vitamin D and 450mg elemental calcium

  • Experimental
    Group B

    50g daily dried plum consumption, plus 800 IU vitamin D and 450 mg elemental calcium

    Dietary Supplement: Dried Plum · Dietary Supplement: 800 IU vitamin D and 450mg elemental calcium

  • Placebo comparator
    Group C

    800 IU vitamin D and 450 mg elemental calcium

    Dietary Supplement: 800 IU vitamin D and 450mg elemental calcium

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementDried Plum

    Dried plum fruit, 100g or 50g depending on treatment group randomized to

  • Dietary supplement800 IU vitamin D and 450mg elemental calcium

    Supplemental vitamin D and calcium to protect against further bone loss

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bone mineral density (spine)

    BMD of the lumbar (L1-L4) vertebrae

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bone mineral content (spine)

    BMC of the lumbar (L1-L4) vertebrae

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Bone mineral Density (other)

    BMD of the ulna, hip, and total body

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Bone Mineral Content (other)

    BMC of the ulna, hip, and total body

    Time frame: 1 year

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Florida State University
    Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03408119
Lead sponsor
Florida State University
Responsible party
Bahram Arjmandi (Dr. Bahram H. Arjmandi, PhD, RD, Florida State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 23, 2018
Start date
Nov 20, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2022
Completion
Aug 30, 2022
Last update
Oct 7, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion