ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06118905Updated Sep 23, 2026

Preserving Geriatric Muscle With an Osteoporosis Medication

A Phase 4 interventional study of Denosumab 60 MG/ML and Zoledronic Acid 5Mg/Bag 100Ml Infusion in Osteoporosis, sponsored by Chrissy Kistler. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Chrissy Kistler · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
155
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 64 studies testing denosumab in Osteoporosis — 8 open to participants now, 11 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Denosumab · Osteoporosis.

Planned enrollment
24th of 64
155 · median 90
Started
2024
with 4 others
Phase 4
19 of 64
5 open now
Primary completion
2029-02
later than 9 of 10 live
Registered
55th of 64
by date

Among the 64 studies testing denosumab in Osteoporosis, this one is the 24th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 5 that started in 2024, is one of 19 in phase 4, reaches primary completion later than 9 of the 10 other live ones, and was the 55th registered.

By phase

64 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 324 · 2 open
Phase 4this study19 · 5 open
Phase 214 · 1 open
Phase 15 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2024.

Size and results

Median enrollment 90 across the 64 interventional studies. Of the 45 that completed or were terminated, 32 (71%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 64 studies testing denosumab in Osteoporosis, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Our goal is to demonstrate efficacy of the novel agent Denosumab to improve or preserve muscle health, strength, mobility and function in frail older adults.

Read the detailed description

Approximately one third of older adults in senior communities fall each year, and falls are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this age group. Falls are associated with poor quality of life, disability, and death; the medical cost is over $30 billion annually. Despite these statistics, fall reduction strategies have had limited impact for frail seniors. The most devastating fall-related outcome is a hip or other fracture. Over 90% of hip and nonvertebral fractures occur from a fall, and approximately 85% of long-term care (LTC) residents have osteoporosis. Recently, investigators have reported cross-talk between muscle and bone through mechanical and biochemical pathways. Osteosarcopenia, a newly described geriatric syndrome, involves the coexistence of osteoporosis (low bone mass) and sarcopenia (low muscle mass/function). The coexistence of these conditions puts patients at even greater risk for fall/fracture-related serious adverse outcomes. Denosumab(DEMAB), a medication approved for osteoporosis, acts on molecular targets shared between muscle and bone. In the DEMAB pivotal trial and a meta-analysis in healthy adults, investigators reported a reduction in recalled falls in addition to a decrease in fractures. Therefore, DEMAB has the potential to reduce both falls and fractures in a vulnerable population at high risk for both events. Our goal is to demonstrate efficacy of the novel agent DEMAB to improve or preserve muscle health, strength, mobility and function in frail older adults. If successful, this would lay the groundwork for a larger multicenter trial to examine the dual-action for fall and fracture prevention. To bridge this knowledge gap we propose to conduct a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial to test the efficacy of DEMAB (expected active muscle agent) versus zoledronic acid (ZOL, muscle control) in at least 155 underserved, LTC, frail institutionalized men and women (age≥65) with osteoporosis. Muscle strength, power, quality, markers, function and bone measures will be collected in a mobile lab. At trial completion, all participants receive ZOL for osteoporosis therapy and to prevent potential bone loss following DEMAB discontinuation. Our objectives include Aim 1: Evaluate efficacy of DEMAB to preserve/improve muscle strength, power, mass and structure. Aim 2: Examine the mechanistic biochemical components of the muscle-bone connection. Aim 3: Explore if the DEMAB effect extends to distal functional outcomes. This study includes a number of innovative features: 1) focus on the neglected LTC population of frail older men and women in whom we have a track record of successful enrollment, 2) inclusion of an approved osteoporosis agent feasible in the LTC setting with a novel focus on muscle strength, power, structure, and function, 3) mobile lab allowing onsite participation, 4) assessment of muscle and bone parameters by portable techniques, and 5) electronic alerts for falls and SAEs. This study will challenge the current paradigm of avoiding anti-fracture/fall therapy in vulnerable fallers and establish the necessary conditions to justify a large trial to maintain muscle and bone health to reduce falls and fractures.

03

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Ambulatory male and female residents with osteoporosis or low bone mass (at risk for fracture) age 65 and older will be considered if: 1) they reside in an institution (nursing home, assisted living facility or senior community) and; 2) they have osteoporosis as diagnosed by a) BMD (spine, hip or forearm BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 SD), b) a previous adult fragility spine or hip fracture, or c) have osteopenia but would be treated based on FRAX and the BHOF treatment thresholds of a 10-year major fracture risk of ≥ 20% or ≥ 3% hip fracture risk using femoral neck BMD.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

We will exclude residents with subacute illnesses surviving or those with \<1 year. We will exclude those currently on a related therapy (including a bisphosphonate, Denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab) or who have been on a bisphosphonate for >1 year during the previous 2 years because some bisphosphonates are long acting. We will exclude subjects with a history of hypocalcemia or for treatment or those who are on systemic that may lower muscle strength. We will screen for these conditions by detailed history, chart review, and baseline laboratory analyses. Participants with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels \<25 ng/mL will be treated with vitamin D 50,000 IU/wk for 8 weeks. The patient will be enrolled if the follow-up vitamin D level is 25 ng/mL or more. Patients will be allowed to continue on anticonvulsants because use is common in this population. Women on hormone replacement, raloxifene, or residents prescribed protective hip pads will be allowed to participate and continue on these therapies. We will suggest participants stop calcitonin due to cancer concerns.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
155 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Denosumab

    Denosumab 60mg SQ with placebo zoledronic acid

    Drug: Denosumab 60 MG/ML

  • Active comparator
    Zoledronic acid

    Zoledronic acid 5mg IV with Denosumab placebo

    Drug: Zoledronic Acid 5Mg/Bag 100Ml Infusion

Interventions

  • DrugDenosumab 60 MG/ML

    Drug page: Denosumab

    Subjects to receive Denosumab 60mg SQ and Zoledronic acid placebo IV

    Also known as: Prolia

  • DrugZoledronic Acid 5Mg/Bag 100Ml Infusion

    Drug page: Zoledronic Acid

    Subjects to receive Zoledronic Acid 5mg IV and Denosumab placebo

    Also known as: Reclast

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knee extension strength change

    The primary muscle strength outcome measure will be the peak muscle force generated by the dominant leg (same side as dominant hand) knee extensor muscles in the sitting position with the knee at 60 degrees of flexion.

    Time frame: 12 Months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • St. Barnabas Woodlands
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 16059, United States
    Recruiting
    • Joanie Gorman · Contact
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2029, 60 months after the start.

Of 55 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Osteoporosis, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 71. This study's planned 60 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 71.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2023
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
StartActual
Feb 8, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2029
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2029
Last update
Sep 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06118905
Lead sponsor
Chrissy Kistler
Responsible party
Chrissy Kistler (MD, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Start date
Feb 8, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Susan Greenspan, MD
Contact
greenspn@pitt.edu
+14128554806
Nicholas Gatto, BS
Contact
NJG29@PITT.EDU
4126089525

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Denosumab

Start the discussion