A Phase 4 interventional study of Denosumab 60 MG/ML and Zoledronic Acid 5Mg/Bag 100Ml Infusion in Osteoporosis, sponsored by Chrissy Kistler. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.
Sponsored by Chrissy Kistler · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 64 studies testing denosumab in Osteoporosis — 8 open to participants now, 11 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Denosumab · Osteoporosis.
Among the 64 studies testing denosumab in Osteoporosis, this one is the 24th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 5 that started in 2024, is one of 19 in phase 4, reaches primary completion later than 9 of the 10 other live ones, and was the 55th registered.
1,601 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 209 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 155 is above the median of 88 across 1,084 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis.
Browse Osteoporosis studies →8 of the 64 studies testing denosumab in Osteoporosis are open now, in 8 countries. Each count lists the studies.
Denosumab: first FDA approval 2010 (PROLIA), first EMA approval 2010. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →
Of the 132 Osteoporosis studies recruiting now, 76 (58%) set no upper age limit and 20 (15%) stop at 75 or younger; 9 take children under 18; 36 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 65 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →64 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2024.
Median enrollment 90 across the 64 interventional studies. Of the 45 that completed or were terminated, 32 (71%) have results posted.
30 of 64 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
This is the only study on the registry with Chrissy Kistler as lead sponsor.
Chrissy Kistler has 1 study filed under Osteoporosis — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
6 of the studies testing denosumab in Osteoporosis that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 1 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07062978Phase 3Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.A Comparative Study to Valuating the Efficacy and Safety of QL1206 and Prolia® | 2027-01 |
| NCT06332014AmgenEvaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Prolia in Subjects of Male Osteoporosis in Mainland China | 2027-01-23 |
| NCT04608630Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research CentreBone Loss Prevention With Zoledronic Acid or Denosumab in Critically Ill Adults | 2027-02-28 |
| NCT04800367Columbia UniversityRomosozumab/Denosumab Study for Premenopausal IOP | 2027-03 |
| NCT07271771Aarhus University HospitalThe Effect of Denosumab on Muscle and Strength and Insulin Sensitivity | 2027-03-01 |
Among the 64 studies testing denosumab in Osteoporosis, from their registry updates:
Our goal is to demonstrate efficacy of the novel agent Denosumab to improve or preserve muscle health, strength, mobility and function in frail older adults.
Approximately one third of older adults in senior communities fall each year, and falls are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this age group. Falls are associated with poor quality of life, disability, and death; the medical cost is over $30 billion annually. Despite these statistics, fall reduction strategies have had limited impact for frail seniors. The most devastating fall-related outcome is a hip or other fracture. Over 90% of hip and nonvertebral fractures occur from a fall, and approximately 85% of long-term care (LTC) residents have osteoporosis. Recently, investigators have reported cross-talk between muscle and bone through mechanical and biochemical pathways. Osteosarcopenia, a newly described geriatric syndrome, involves the coexistence of osteoporosis (low bone mass) and sarcopenia (low muscle mass/function). The coexistence of these conditions puts patients at even greater risk for fall/fracture-related serious adverse outcomes. Denosumab(DEMAB), a medication approved for osteoporosis, acts on molecular targets shared between muscle and bone. In the DEMAB pivotal trial and a meta-analysis in healthy adults, investigators reported a reduction in recalled falls in addition to a decrease in fractures. Therefore, DEMAB has the potential to reduce both falls and fractures in a vulnerable population at high risk for both events. Our goal is to demonstrate efficacy of the novel agent DEMAB to improve or preserve muscle health, strength, mobility and function in frail older adults. If successful, this would lay the groundwork for a larger multicenter trial to examine the dual-action for fall and fracture prevention. To bridge this knowledge gap we propose to conduct a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial to test the efficacy of DEMAB (expected active muscle agent) versus zoledronic acid (ZOL, muscle control) in at least 155 underserved, LTC, frail institutionalized men and women (age≥65) with osteoporosis. Muscle strength, power, quality, markers, function and bone measures will be collected in a mobile lab. At trial completion, all participants receive ZOL for osteoporosis therapy and to prevent potential bone loss following DEMAB discontinuation. Our objectives include Aim 1: Evaluate efficacy of DEMAB to preserve/improve muscle strength, power, mass and structure. Aim 2: Examine the mechanistic biochemical components of the muscle-bone connection. Aim 3: Explore if the DEMAB effect extends to distal functional outcomes. This study includes a number of innovative features: 1) focus on the neglected LTC population of frail older men and women in whom we have a track record of successful enrollment, 2) inclusion of an approved osteoporosis agent feasible in the LTC setting with a novel focus on muscle strength, power, structure, and function, 3) mobile lab allowing onsite participation, 4) assessment of muscle and bone parameters by portable techniques, and 5) electronic alerts for falls and SAEs. This study will challenge the current paradigm of avoiding anti-fracture/fall therapy in vulnerable fallers and establish the necessary conditions to justify a large trial to maintain muscle and bone health to reduce falls and fractures.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Ambulatory male and female residents with osteoporosis or low bone mass (at risk for fracture) age 65 and older will be considered if: 1) they reside in an institution (nursing home, assisted living facility or senior community) and; 2) they have osteoporosis as diagnosed by a) BMD (spine, hip or forearm BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 SD), b) a previous adult fragility spine or hip fracture, or c) have osteopenia but would be treated based on FRAX and the BHOF treatment thresholds of a 10-year major fracture risk of ≥ 20% or ≥ 3% hip fracture risk using femoral neck BMD.
Exclusion Criteria:
We will exclude residents with subacute illnesses surviving or those with \<1 year. We will exclude those currently on a related therapy (including a bisphosphonate, Denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab) or who have been on a bisphosphonate for >1 year during the previous 2 years because some bisphosphonates are long acting. We will exclude subjects with a history of hypocalcemia or for treatment or those who are on systemic that may lower muscle strength. We will screen for these conditions by detailed history, chart review, and baseline laboratory analyses. Participants with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels \<25 ng/mL will be treated with vitamin D 50,000 IU/wk for 8 weeks. The patient will be enrolled if the follow-up vitamin D level is 25 ng/mL or more. Patients will be allowed to continue on anticonvulsants because use is common in this population. Women on hormone replacement, raloxifene, or residents prescribed protective hip pads will be allowed to participate and continue on these therapies. We will suggest participants stop calcitonin due to cancer concerns.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Corticosteroids (steroids)
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Denosumab 60mg SQ with placebo zoledronic acid
Drug: Denosumab 60 MG/ML
Zoledronic acid 5mg IV with Denosumab placebo
Drug: Zoledronic Acid 5Mg/Bag 100Ml Infusion
Drug page: Denosumab
Subjects to receive Denosumab 60mg SQ and Zoledronic acid placebo IV
Also known as: Prolia
Drug page: Zoledronic Acid
Subjects to receive Zoledronic Acid 5mg IV and Denosumab placebo
Also known as: Reclast
Knee extension strength change
The primary muscle strength outcome measure will be the peak muscle force generated by the dominant leg (same side as dominant hand) knee extensor muscles in the sitting position with the knee at 60 degrees of flexion.
Time frame: 12 Months
Started Feb 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2029, 60 months after the start.
Of 55 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Osteoporosis, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 71. This study's planned 60 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 71.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Denosumab