ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03389555Updated Feb 16, 2021Results posted

Ascorbic Acid, Corticosteroids, and Thiamine in Sepsis (ACTS) Trial

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of vitamin C, vitamin B1, hydrocortisone and Normal saline in Sepsis, Septic Shock and Metabolic Disturbance, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Completed at 13 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-16.

Primary conditionShock, SepticRegistry: SepsisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sepsis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Shock, Septic
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Shock, Septic, a narrower term within Sepsis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
205
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, we aim to determine whether the combination of Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Thiamine (Vitamin B1), and Corticosteroids improves the trajectory of organ failure and reduces mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock as compared to placebo.

Read the detailed description

Sepsis and Septic Shock are common and highly morbid clinical conditions without any specific therapy aside from antibiotics. A recent quasi-experimental study (Marik et. al., PMID 27940189) demonstrated a remarkable benefit when the combination of Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Corticosteroids, and Thiamine (Vitamin B1) were given to patients with sepsis. In particular, patients who received this combination of medications required a shorter amount of time on vasopressors, suffered less organ failure, and had improved mortality. Vitamin C has long been suggested for treatment of patients with severe infection as it exerts significant anti-oxidant effects and reduces endothelial permeability. Corticosteroids, a mainstay of therapy for refractory shock in sepsis, have also been shown to enhance the beneficial cellular effects of vitamin C. Finally, thiamine has been shown to be an effective mitochondrial resuscitator in sepsis, especially for the \~30% of septic shock patients who present with thiamine deficiency (Donnino et. al, PMID 26771781).

In this study, we aim to reproduce the findings of Marik et. al. using a more rigorous study design (i.e. a blinded, randomized clinical trial) and focus on the important clinical outcomes of organ failure and death.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Septic Shock
  • Metabolic Disturbance

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sepsis
  • Metabolic Resuscitation
03

In context

Shock, Septic Reclassified

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 205 is above the median of 79 across 636 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 76 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (82%) have results posted.

Compared within Shock, Septic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult patient (age ≥ 18 years)
  2. Suspected (cultures drawn and antibiotic given) or confirmed (via culture results) infection
  3. Receiving vasopressor (norepinephrine, phenylephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, angiotensin II or vasopressin)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Member of a protected population (pregnant, prisoner)
  2. Known kidney stones within the past 1 year (except for asymptomatic, incidentally noted stones on imaging)
  3. End stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis
  4. Known Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase deficiency
  5. Known Hemachromatosis
  6. Comfort Measures Only status
  7. Anticipated death within 24-hours despite maximal therapy (as determined by the enrolling physician)
  8. Receiving supplemental thiamine in a dose greater than that contained in a multivitamin
  9. Clinical indication for (e.g. chronic use) as determined by the clinical team providing this drug
  10. Clinical indication for thiamine as determined by the clinical team providing this drug
  11. Clinical indication for ascorbic acid as determined by the clinical team providing this drug
  12. Known allergy to vitamin C, hydrocortisone, or thiamine
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
205 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids

    The combination of vitamin C, vitamin B1, hydrocortisone : * Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) 1.5g every 6 hours x 4-days * Vitamin B1 (thiamine) 100mg every 6 hours x 4-days * Hydrocortisone 50mg every 6 hours x 4-days

    Drug: vitamin C, vitamin B1, hydrocortisone

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Normal Saline Solution (0.9%NaCl) in a volume to match all experimental arm components

    Drug: Normal saline

Interventions

  • Drugvitamin C, vitamin B1, hydrocortisone

    Drug pages: Ascorbic Acid · Thiamine · Hydrocortisone

    Vitamin C (1.5g) plus vitamin B1 (100mg) will be diluted in 100ml 0.9% NACL(normal saline) and administered IV every 6 hours for 4 days or until participant is discharged from the ICU. Hydrocortisone 50mg/ml will be administered via IV push over 1-2 minutes every 6hours for 4 days or until the patient is discharged from the ICU.

    Also known as: Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine

  • DrugNormal saline

    Normal saline (0.9% NaCl solution) volume to match all components

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score at Baseline and 72 Hours

    Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score at Baseline and 72 Hours. The SOFA score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Enrollment to 72-hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Renal Failure

    Development of renal failure as defined by a Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes \[KDIGO\] stage 3 or higher. There are 3 stages in the KDIGO scale with stage 3 being the worst (corresponds to renal failure). Stage 1- serum creatinine 1.5 to 1.9 times baseline OR an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL OR urine output \< 0.5ml/kg/hour for 6-12 hours. Stage 2- serum creatinine 2.0-2.9 times baseline OR urine output \<0.5mg/kg/hour for ≥ 12 hours Stage 3- serum creatinine 3.0 times baseline (or serum creatinine of more than or equal to 4.0 mg/dl with an acute increase of at least 0.5 mg/dl) (OR) Urine output less than 0.3 ml/kg/hour for 24 hours or anuria for 12 hours or new renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: Enrollment until 7-days or discharge from the ICU

  2. 30-day Mortality

    Mortality rate

    Time frame: Enrollment until 30-days after enrollment

Other outcomes

  1. Ventilator Free Days

    Days not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: Ventilator free days over the first 7-days after enrollment

  2. Shock Free Days

    Days not receiving vasopressor

    Time frame: Vasopressor free days over the first 7-days after enrollment

  3. ICU Free Days

    Number of days that the patient was not in the ICU. Timeframe listed below.

    Time frame: From enrollment until 28 days after enrollment

  4. Hospital Mortality

    Hospital mortality rate

    Time frame: Enrollment until hospital discharge, death, or 30-days. Whichever comes first.

  5. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Mortality

    ICU mortality rate

    Time frame: Enrollment until ICU discharge, death, or 30-days. Whichever comes first.

  6. Number of Participants With Delirium

    Describes if patient has delirium as defined by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)-ICU. The CAM-ICU method requires that the patient have 3 features to qualify for delirium: 1. Acute Onset of Changes or Fluctuations in the Course of Mental Status (AND ) 2. Inattention (AND) 3. Disorganized thinking (OR) Altered Level of Consciousness

    Time frame: On day 3 (at approximately 72 hours) after the first study drug dose

  7. Hospital Disposition: Survivors Discharged Home

    Home hospital disposition in patients who survive to discharge

    Time frame: Enrollment until hospital discharge, death, or 30-days, whichever comes first.

07

Results

Posted Jan 29, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Ongoing or planned corticosteroid use was the most common exclusion criterion, perhaps eliminating a subset of patients more likely to benefit from corticosteroids. Some patients were discharged alive from the ICU within 96 hours of enrollment; thus, many patients did not receive a full 4 days of study drug

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Started103102
Completed10199
Not completed23
Withdrew: Protocol violation13
Withdrew: Death10

Outcome measures

PrimarySequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score at Baseline and 72 Hours

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score at Baseline and 72 Hours. The SOFA score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes.

Time frame:
Enrollment to 72-hours
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score at Baseline and 72 Hours
Units on a scaleVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Enrollment SOFA score9.1 ± 3.59.2 ± 3.2
72 hour SOFA score4.4 ± 4.15.1 ± 4.3
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.12 (A priori threshold for significance, p-value \< 0.05) · Mean difference (net): -0.8 · 95% CI -1.7 to 0.2
SecondaryRenal Failure

Development of renal failure as defined by a Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes \[KDIGO\] stage 3 or higher. There are 3 stages in the KDIGO scale with stage 3 being the worst (corresponds to renal failure). Stage 1- serum creatinine 1.5 to 1.9 times baseline OR an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL OR urine output \< 0.5ml/kg/hour for 6-12 hours. Stage 2- serum creatinine 2.0-2.9 times baseline OR urine output \<0.5mg/kg/hour for ≥ 12 hours Stage 3- serum creatinine 3.0 times baseline (or serum creatinine of more than or equal to 4.0 mg/dl with an acute increase of at least 0.5 mg/dl) (OR) Urine output less than 0.3 ml/kg/hour for 24 hours or anuria for 12 hours or new renal replacement therapy

Time frame:
Enrollment until 7-days or discharge from the ICU
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Renal Failure
ParticipantsVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Renal Failure3227
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.58 · Risk difference (rd): 3.0 · 95% CI -10.0 to 20.0
Secondary30-day Mortality

Mortality rate

Time frame:
Enrollment until 30-days after enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
30-day Mortality
ParticipantsVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
30-day Mortality3529
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Regression, Cox · p = 0.05 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.3 · 95% CI 0.8 to 2.2
Other pre-specifiedVentilator Free Days

Days not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation

Time frame:
Ventilator free days over the first 7-days after enrollment
Reported as:
Median · Days
Ventilator Free Days
DaysVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Ventilator Free Days6 (2 to 7)6 (0 to 7)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Quantile Regression · p = >0.99 · Median difference (net): 0.0 · 95% CI -1.9 to 1.9
Other pre-specifiedShock Free Days

Days not receiving vasopressor

Time frame:
Vasopressor free days over the first 7-days after enrollment
Reported as:
Median · Days
Shock Free Days
DaysVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Shock Free Days5 (3 to 5)4 (1 to 5)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Quantile Regression · p = 0.02 · Median difference (net): 1.0 · 95% CI 0.2 to 1.8
Other pre-specifiedICU Free Days

Number of days that the patient was not in the ICU. Timeframe listed below.

Time frame:
From enrollment until 28 days after enrollment
Reported as:
Median · Days
ICU Free Days
DaysVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
ICU Free Days22 (3 to 25)21 (4 to 25)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Quantile Regression · p = 0.69 · Median difference (net): 1.0 · 95% CI -3.0 to 6.0
Other pre-specifiedHospital Mortality

Hospital mortality rate

Time frame:
Enrollment until hospital discharge, death, or 30-days. Whichever comes first.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Hospital Mortality
ParticipantsVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Hospital Mortality2823
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.55 · Risk difference (rd): 3.0 · 95% CI -10.0 to 20.0
Other pre-specifiedIntensive Care Unit (ICU) Mortality

ICU mortality rate

Time frame:
Enrollment until ICU discharge, death, or 30-days. Whichever comes first.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Mortality
ParticipantsVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Mortality2320
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.80 · Risk difference (rd): 2.0 · 95% CI -10.0 to 10.0
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Delirium

Describes if patient has delirium as defined by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)-ICU. The CAM-ICU method requires that the patient have 3 features to qualify for delirium: 1. Acute Onset of Changes or Fluctuations in the Course of Mental Status (AND ) 2. Inattention (AND) 3. Disorganized thinking (OR) Altered Level of Consciousness

Time frame:
On day 3 (at approximately 72 hours) after the first study drug dose
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Delirium
ParticipantsVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Number of Participants With Delirium3135
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.16 · Risk difference (rd): -12 · 95% CI -25 to 4
Other pre-specifiedHospital Disposition: Survivors Discharged Home

Home hospital disposition in patients who survive to discharge

Time frame:
Enrollment until hospital discharge, death, or 30-days, whichever comes first.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Hospital Disposition: Survivors Discharged Home
ParticipantsVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
Hospital Disposition: Survivors Discharged Home3435
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids vs Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.82 · Risk difference (rd): -1.8 · 95% CI -18 to 14

Adverse events

Collected over Time from enrollment to hospital discharge, an average of 13.5 days for all patients. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, Corticosteroids35/101 (34.7%)13/101 (12.9%)0/101 (0%)
Placebo29/99 (29.3%)12/99 (12.1%)0/99 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventVitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlacebo
New Hospital Acquired InfectionInfections and infestations13/10112/99
HyperglycemiaEndocrine disorders12/1017/99
HypernatremiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders11/1017/99

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlaceboTotal
Mean68.9 ± 15.067.7 ± 13.968.2 ± 14.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlaceboTotal
Female444589
Male5754111
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlaceboTotal
White6873141
Black181634
Asian538
More than one Race011
BMI, mean (SD)
BMI, mean (SD)(kg/m^2)Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlaceboTotal
Mean28.8 ± 10.127.9 ± 8.428.3 ± 9.3
Medical History,
Medical History,(Participants)Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlaceboTotal
# with Malignancy263258
# with Coronary Artery Disease262652
# with Congestive Heart Failure142337
Liver Disease11718
Primary Infectious Source
Primary Infectious Source(Participants)Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlaceboTotal
Pneumonia312859
Intra-abdominal302353
Urinary Tract Infection202242
Other132033
Volume of Intravenous Fluids Prior to Study Drug
Volume of Intravenous Fluids Prior to Study Drug(mL)Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlaceboTotal
Median2000 (1062 to 3000)2000 (1125 to 3000)2000 (1093.5 to 3000)
Time from Vasopressor Initiation to First Study Drug
Time from Vasopressor Initiation to First Study Drug(hours)Vitamin C, Vitamin B1, CorticosteroidsPlaceboTotal
Median14.5 (8.1 to 19.1)13.0 (7.5 to 20.5)13.5 (8.0 to 19.8)

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

13 sites
  • Mayo Clinic - Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Mount Auburn Hospital
    Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
  • Detroit Receiving Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Harper University Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Henry Ford Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Sinai Grace Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48235, United States
  • Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • North Shore University Hospital
    Manhasset, New York 11030, United States
  • Long Island Jewish Hospital
    New York, New York 11040, United States
  • University Of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R, Hooper MH, Catravas J. Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Before-After Study. Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1229-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036. Epub 2016 Dec 6. PubMed 27940189 ↗
  • Moskowitz A, Andersen LW, Cocchi MN, Karlsson M, Patel PV, Donnino MW. Thiamine as a Renal Protective Agent in Septic Shock. A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 May;14(5):737-741. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-656BC. PubMed 28207287 ↗
  • Donnino MW, Andersen LW, Chase M, Berg KM, Tidswell M, Giberson T, Wolfe R, Moskowitz A, Smithline H, Ngo L, Cocchi MN; Center for Resuscitation Science Research Group. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thiamine as a Metabolic Resuscitator in Septic Shock: A Pilot Study. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):360-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001572. PubMed 26771781 ↗
  • Grossestreuer AV, Moskowitz A, Andersen LW, Holmberg MJ, Konacki V, Berg KM, Chase M, Cocchi MN, Donnino MW. Effect of Ascorbic Acid, Corticosteroids, and Thiamine on Health-Related Quality of Life in Sepsis. Crit Care Explor. 2020 Nov 23;2(12):e0270. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000270. eCollection 2020 Dec. PubMed 33251516 ↗
  • Moskowitz A, Huang DT, Hou PC, Gong J, Doshi PB, Grossestreuer AV, Andersen LW, Ngo L, Sherwin RL, Berg KM, Chase M, Cocchi MN, McCannon JB, Hershey M, Hilewitz A, Korotun M, Becker LB, Otero RM, Uduman J, Sen A, Donnino MW; ACTS Clinical Trial Investigators. Effect of Ascorbic Acid, Corticosteroids, and Thiamine on Organ Injury in Septic Shock: The ACTS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):642-650. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11946. PubMed 32809003 ↗
  • Moskowitz A, Yankama T, Andersen LW, Huang DT, Donnino MW, Grossestreuer AV; ACTS Clinical Trial Investigators. Ascorbic Acid, Corticosteroids and Thiamine in Sepsis (ACTS) protocol and statistical analysis plan: a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e034406. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034406. PubMed 31852712 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2019, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2021, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 13 phase 2/3 interventional studies under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40. This study's 21 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 27, 2017
First posted
Jan 3, 2018
StartActual
Feb 9, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 26, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 28, 2020
Results first posted
Jan 29, 2021
Last update
Feb 16, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 16, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03389555
Collaborators
Open Philanthropy
Responsible party
Michael Donnino (Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 3, 2018
Start date
Feb 9, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 26, 2019
Completion
Feb 28, 2020
Results posted
Jan 29, 2021
Last update
Feb 16, 2021

Study contacts

Michael W Donnino, MD
principal investigator · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Ascorbic Acid · Thiamine · Hydrocortisone

Start the discussion