ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06848140STIM-CTBIUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation to Treat Word Finding Difficulty in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury

An interventional study of Active Transcranial direct current stimulation and Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation in Traumatic Brain Injury, Word Finding Difficulty and Cognitive Symptom, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Updated Nov 10, 2026Enrollment updatedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about how brain stimulation affects word finding problems in people who have a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The type of brain stimulation used is called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS delivers low levels of electric current to the brain and high definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) delivers the current with multiple electrodes on the scalp. This current is delivered with HD-tDCS to parts of the brain that may help with remembering things. The investigators hope that this can help to improve word finding and memory problems in people with TBI.

Read the detailed description

The investigators plan to recruit English-speaking participants aged 18-85 years with a history of chronic TBI (> 1 year since injury prior to enrollment), all of whom have problems with cognition. The participants will be randomized to receive (1) active first followed by sham HD-tDCS condition, or (2) sham first followed by active condition in order to assess the efficacy of HD-tDCS on improving verbal retrieval function. The randomization will be double-blinded to the participants and the research personnel who administer the procedures. The study therefore adopts a double-blind randomized cross-over design. The proposed study will measure response to HD-tDCS treatment over the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) region when compared to sham with verbal retrieval function (verbal fluency, naming, verbal learning) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures include cognitive performance other than verbal retrieval function and electroencephalography (EEG) measures. The participants will receive two phases of 10 sessions of active stimulation (1 mA anodal HD-tDCS targeting preSMA for 20 min) or sham across 2 weeks. All participants will be blinded to their condition. EEG and neuropsychological tasks will be completed at baseline, immediate follow-up after session 10, and a 2-month follow-up. The participants will also undergo an MRI session at baseline. Those participants randomized into the active or sham group will have the opportunity to return after 2 months and receive sham (if active first) or active (if sham first) treatment and will undergo the EEG and neuropsychological tests again immediately following the last HD-tDCS session and at a 2-month follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Word Finding Difficulty
  • Cognitive Symptom
  • Cognitive Change
  • Acquired Brain Injury
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,721 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 14 is below the median of 52 across 1,088 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 76 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 85
  • Fluent in speaking and reading English
  • Able to provide
  • Has a TBI at least one year prior to enrollment and not related to military experience
  • Has a confirmation of verbal retrieval difficulties as measured by the Verbal Retrieval Difficulty Interview questions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lifetime major or active neurologic conditions (e.g., stroke, epilepsy, brain tumor, dementia, seizure occurrence less than one year ago)
  • Lifetime major or active cardiovascular conditions (e.g., cardiac arrythmia, heart failure, heart attack)
  • Current substance use disorder
  • Lifetime major psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder)
  • Severe depression at the time of enrollment (BDI-II >= 29) or psychiatric ER visits or hospitalization less than 6 months ago prior to enrollment
  • Current sensory (e.g., blind, deaf) or physical (e.g., severe motor weakness) impairment that interferes with testing
  • for tDCS or MRI
  • The person cannot be left alone for 8+ hours.
  • Not verbally communicative.
  • Currently undergoing and not wishing to discontinue speech and cognitive therapy during study participation.
  • Incapable of understanding the consent or unable to consent for oneself.
  • Unable to travel to BIDMC's Berenson-Allen Center
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
14 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active to Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation

    Subjects in this arm will first be randomly assigned to receive active stimulation. After completion of active stimulation, subjects will be assigned to sham stimulation.

    Device: Active Transcranial direct current stimulation · Device: Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation

  • Experimental
    Sham to Active transcranial direct current stimulation

    Subjects in this arm will first be randomly assigned to receive sham stimulation. After completion of sham stimulation, subjects will be assigned to active stimulation.

    Device: Active Transcranial direct current stimulation · Device: Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceActive Transcranial direct current stimulation

    Transcranial direct current stimulation will be delivered via a Neuroelectrics Starstim 20 or 32. Stimulation will consist of 1 milliamp stimulation, with anodal stimulation delivered at electrode Fz (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes F7, FP1, FP2, and F8 as returns. All electrodes are 1 cm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes and make contact with the scalp via connective gel. Stimulation will linearly ramp up from 0 milliamps to 1 milliamp over 60 seconds, then remain at 1 milliamp of stimulation over 20 minutes, and finally ramping down at to 0 milliamps over 60 seconds.

    Also known as: tDCS, 1 milliamp tDCS, High definition tDCS, High definition transcranial direct current stimulator, Neuroelectrics Starstim 20 or 32

  • DeviceSham Transcranial direct current stimulation

    Sham transcranial direct current stimulation will be delivered via a Neuroelectrics Starstim 20 or 32. The sham setup will consist of anodal electrode Fz (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes F7, FP1, FP2, and F8 as returns. All electrodes are 1 cm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes and make contact with the scalp via connective gel. Stimulation will linearly ramp up from 0 milliamps to 1 milliamp over 60 seconds, ramp down to 0 milliamps over 60 seconds and then be left off for 20 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Controlled Oral Word Association Test - letter fluency

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change on the Control Word Association Test. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  2. The Controlled Oral Word Association Test - category fluency

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change on Category Fluency. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  3. The Boston Naming Test

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change on The Boston Naming Test. Metric: Number of Correct Items Generated.

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  4. The Delis Kaplan Color Word Interference Test

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change on the Delis Kaplan Color Word Interference Test. Metric: Time to Name Items

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  5. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and alternative lists

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Metric: Number of Total learning items and Correct Recalls.

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Trail Making Test (Parts A & B)

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change on the Trail Making Test (Parts A\&B). Metric: Time to Solution

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  2. Digit Span Forward & Backward

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change in Digit Span Forward \& Backward. Metric: Memory Span

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  3. Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test scores. Metric: Score

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  4. The Digit Symbol Substitution Test

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in change on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Metric: Number of Items

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  5. Task-based electroencephalography (EEG) markers during a Go-NoGo task

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in EEG change on a Go-NoGo task with different levels of perceptual/semantic complexity. Metric: event-related potentials and time frequency changes.

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

  6. Task-based electroencephalography (EEG) markers during a Semantic Object Memory Retrieval task

    Evaluation of treatment differences (active versus sham) in EEG change on a Semantic Object Retrieval task. Metric: event-related potentials and time frequency changes.

    Time frame: Treatment differences (active versus sham) in change from Baseline to immediately and 2-months Post-Treatment.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data (IPD) will be shared in a de-identified format in accordance with NIH data-sharing policies and institutional guidelines.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data will be available after publication of primary results or 12 months following study completion, whichever occurs first. The data will be accessible for at least 5 years post-publication.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers may request access by submitting a data request with a description of the intended use.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Enrollment
24→14
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Enrollment 24→14
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06848140
Responsible party
Hsueh-Sheng Chiang (Assistant Professor, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Iris Hall, BS
Contact
ihall1@bidmc.harvard.edu
617-667-0289
Hsueh-Sheng Chiang, MD, PhD
Contact
hchiang3@bidmc.harvard.edu
Hsueh-Sheng Chiang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion