ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02829814RE-AFFIRMUpdated Feb 25, 2025Results posted

Repeat of: A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual TNX-102 SL Tablet Taken at Bedtime in Patients With Fibromyalgia

A Phase 3 interventional study of TNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mg and Placebo SL Tablet in Fibromyalgia, Myofascial Pain Syndromes and Muscular Diseases, sponsored by Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Terminated at 32 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-25.

Sponsored by Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
For business reason unrelated to safety or tolerability,Tonix discontinued this study.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present trial is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of TNX-102 SL 2.8 mg tablets, taken daily at bedtime after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with fibromyalgia.

The use of low-dose sublingual formulation of cyclobenzaprine (TNX-102 SL) dosed nightly for fibromyalgia is supported by the results of TNX-CY-F202 Phase 2b study -- the results provide strong evidence that TNX-102 SL 2.8 mg dosed nightly results in beneficial effects upon pain, sleep and other FM symptomatology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibromyalgia
  • Myofascial Pain Syndromes
  • Muscular Diseases
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Neuromuscular Diseases
  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Sleep
  • Fibromyalgia
  • FM
03

In context

Fibromyalgia

1,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibromyalgia; 256 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 60 across 937 interventional studies indexed under Fibromyalgia.

Browse Fibromyalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 12 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Primary Fibromyalgia (2010 ACR criteria)
  • Male or female 18-75 years old
  • Patients currently receiving pharmacologic treatment for depression should have been clinically stable for at least 3 months prior to randomization, and on stable doses of antidepressants during this 3 month time frame.
  • Willing and able to withdraw specific therapies (ask PI)
  • If female, medically acceptable form of or not of child bearing potential.
  • Provide written to participate.
  • Willing and able to comply with all protocol specified requirement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Arthritis, lupus and other systemic auto-immune diseases
  • Regional or persistent pain that could interfere with assessment of fibromyalgia pain
  • Bipolar and psychotic disorders
  • Increased risk of suicide
  • Significant clinical (cardiac, systemic infection, systemic requirement, drug/alcohol abuse) or laboratory abnormalities.
  • Inability to wash-out specific medications (ask PI)
  • Known to cyclobenzaprine
  • Others: seizure disorders, severe/untreated sleep apnea, >45
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mg

    1 x TNX-102 SL 2.8 mg Tablet taken sublingually each day at bedtime for 12 weeks

    Drug: TNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo SL Tablet

    1 x Placebo Tablet taken sublingually each day at bedtime for 12 weeks

    Drug: Placebo SL Tablet

Interventions

  • Patients will take 1 tablet of randomly assigned study drug sublingually each day at bedtime starting on Day 0 for 12 weeks.

    Also known as: Low dose cyclobenzaprine sublingual tablets

  • DrugPlacebo SL Tablet

    Patients will take 1 tablet of randomly assigned study drug sublingually each day at bedtime starting on Day 0 for 12 weeks.

    Also known as: Placebo sublingual tablets

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weekly Mean Pain Score

    The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients with a ≥30% improvement from baseline to Week 12 in the weekly average of the daily self-reported average pain severity score using an 11-point (0-10) numeric response scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates "no pain at all", and a score of 10 indicates "worst possible pain".

    Time frame: Day 1, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Proportion of patients with a PGIC rating of "very much improved" or "much improved" at Week 12.The PGIC is a 7-point scale (1=very much improved; 7=very much worse) that assesses the patient's perception of the overall change in his/her fibromyalgia symptoms since entering the study.

    Time frame: Week 12

  2. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Revised, Symptoms Domain

    Change from Baseline in the FIQR symptoms domain score at Week 12. The FIQ-R symptom domain is composed of 10 questions. All questions are based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0-10, with 10 being "worst." Symptom domain scores range from 0-100, with higher scores reflecting worse status.

    Time frame: Day 1, Week 12

  3. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Revised, Functional Domain Score

    Change from Baseline in the FIQR function domain score at Week 12. The FIQ-R functional domain score is composed of 9 questions which are rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0-10, with 10 being "worst." FIQ-R functional domain scores can range from 0-90, with higher scores reflecting worsening status.

    Time frame: Day 1, Week 12

  4. Daily Diary Sleep

    Change from Baseline in the weekly average of the daily diary assessment of sleep quality at Week 12. Daily sleep quality was measured using an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS), with higher scores representing worse sleep.

    Time frame: Week 12

  5. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS), Sleep Disturbance

    Change from Baseline in the PROMIS score for sleep disturbance at Week 12. The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sleep disturbance instrument consists of 8 items in which responses are scored 1 to 5 for each item. PROMIS scores are presented as T-scores in which the raw score has been rescaled into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores represent more of the concept being measured (in this case, sleep disturbance).

    Time frame: Day 1, Week 12

  6. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS), Fatigue

    Change from Baseline in the PROMIS score for fatigue at Week 12. The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue instrument consists of 8 items in which responses are scored 1 to 5 for each item. A higher score on 5 of the 8 items reflects a worse outcome, whereas a higher score on 3 items reflects an improved outcome; therefore, the directionality of the 8 item scores are first synchronized prior to calculation of the total raw score. PROMIS scores are presented as T-scores in which the raw score has been rescaled into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores represent more of the concept being measured (in this case, sleep disturbance).

    Time frame: Week 12

  7. Daily Diary Pain

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the weekly average of the daily self-reported average pain severity score. Average daily pain was measured using an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS), with higher scores representing worse pain. Weekly averages were calculated based on the reported daily scores.

    Time frame: Week -1 (Day -7 to Day -1), Week 12

07

Results

Posted Feb 25, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo SL TabletTNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mg
Started2724
Completed00
Not completed2724

Outcome measures

PrimaryWeekly Mean Pain Score

The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients with a ≥30% improvement from baseline to Week 12 in the weekly average of the daily self-reported average pain severity score using an 11-point (0-10) numeric response scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates "no pain at all", and a score of 10 indicates "worst possible pain".

Time frame:
Day 1, Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Proportion of patients with a PGIC rating of "very much improved" or "much improved" at Week 12.The PGIC is a 7-point scale (1=very much improved; 7=very much worse) that assesses the patient's perception of the overall change in his/her fibromyalgia symptoms since entering the study.

Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Revised, Symptoms Domain

Change from Baseline in the FIQR symptoms domain score at Week 12. The FIQ-R symptom domain is composed of 10 questions. All questions are based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0-10, with 10 being "worst." Symptom domain scores range from 0-100, with higher scores reflecting worse status.

Time frame:
Day 1, Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Revised, Functional Domain Score

Change from Baseline in the FIQR function domain score at Week 12. The FIQ-R functional domain score is composed of 9 questions which are rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0-10, with 10 being "worst." FIQ-R functional domain scores can range from 0-90, with higher scores reflecting worsening status.

Time frame:
Day 1, Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDaily Diary Sleep

Change from Baseline in the weekly average of the daily diary assessment of sleep quality at Week 12. Daily sleep quality was measured using an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS), with higher scores representing worse sleep.

Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS), Sleep Disturbance

Change from Baseline in the PROMIS score for sleep disturbance at Week 12. The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sleep disturbance instrument consists of 8 items in which responses are scored 1 to 5 for each item. PROMIS scores are presented as T-scores in which the raw score has been rescaled into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores represent more of the concept being measured (in this case, sleep disturbance).

Time frame:
Day 1, Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS), Fatigue

Change from Baseline in the PROMIS score for fatigue at Week 12. The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue instrument consists of 8 items in which responses are scored 1 to 5 for each item. A higher score on 5 of the 8 items reflects a worse outcome, whereas a higher score on 3 items reflects an improved outcome; therefore, the directionality of the 8 item scores are first synchronized prior to calculation of the total raw score. PROMIS scores are presented as T-scores in which the raw score has been rescaled into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores represent more of the concept being measured (in this case, sleep disturbance).

Time frame:
Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDaily Diary Pain

Change from baseline to Week 12 in the weekly average of the daily self-reported average pain severity score. Average daily pain was measured using an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS), with higher scores representing worse pain. Weekly averages were calculated based on the reported daily scores.

Time frame:
Week -1 (Day -7 to Day -1), Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Approximately 7 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo SL Tablet0/27 (0%)0/27 (0%)0/27 (0%)
TNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mg0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo SL TabletTNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mgTotal
Mean51.4 ± 10.1052.1 ± 7.4551.7 ± 8.87
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo SL TabletTNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mgTotal
Female242347
Male112
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo SL TabletTNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino325
Not Hispanic or Latino222244
Unknown or Not Reported202
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo SL TabletTNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American415
White192241
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported415
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Placebo SL TabletTNX-102 SL Tablet, 2.8 mgTotal
United States272451
08

Study locations

32 sites
  • Birmingham, Alabama 35216, United States
  • Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
  • Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Brandon, Florida 33511, United States
  • DeLand, Florida 32720, United States
  • Ocala, Florida 34471, United States
  • Orlando, Florida 32801, United States
  • Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, United States
  • Evansville, Indiana 47714, United States
  • Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • Jackson, Mississippi 39202, United States
  • Las Vegas, Nevada 89102, United States
  • Cedarhurst, New York 11516, United States
  • Williamsville, New York 14221, United States
  • Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • Fargo, North Dakota 58103, United States
  • Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • Salem, Oregon 97301, United States
  • Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104, United States
  • Warwick, Rhode Island 02888, United States
  • Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421, United States
  • Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, United States
  • Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Kenosha, Wisconsin 53142, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2016 to primary completion in Sep 2016, 1 month.

Results were first posted in Feb 2025, 8 years 5 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Apr 2018.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 8, 2016
First posted
Jul 12, 2016
StartActual
Jul 22, 2016
Primary completionActual
Sep 13, 2016
CompletionActual
Sep 13, 2016
Results delay requested
Apr 23, 2018
Results first posted
Feb 25, 2025
Last update
Feb 25, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02829814
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2016
Start date
Jul 22, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 13, 2016
Completion
Sep 13, 2016
Results posted
Feb 25, 2025
Last update
Feb 25, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cyclobenzaprine

Start the discussion