CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02737527Updated Jun 10, 2016

Comparison of the Efficacy of the Ultrasound With Fluoroscopy in Guidance of Lumbar Sympathetic Block

An interventional study of 24G intravenous route for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB): and 15-cm Chiba needle for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Postherpetic Neuralgia and Diabetic Polyneuropathy, sponsored by Seoul National University. Status unknown at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-10.

Sponsored by Seoul National University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares the efficacy of the ultrasound with fluoroscope in guidance of lumbar sympathetic block (LSB). The goals of the study are; 1) To show that US-guided LSB results in shorter performance time compared to fluoroscope-guided LSB, 2) To evaluate the efficacy and safety of US-guided LSB, and 3) To verify that US-guided LSB has similar success rates to fluoroscope-guided LSB. 50 patients who are supposed to undergo LSB due to sympathetically maintained pain, satisfy criteria of inclusion and exclusion, and voluntarily sign the informed consent will be enrolled.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
  • Postherpetic Neuralgia
  • Diabetic Polyneuropathy
  • Peripheral Neuropathy

Keywords

  • ultrasound
  • lumbar sympathetic block
03

In context

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

1,003 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 60 across 768 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Peripheral Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have sympathetically-mediated pain and are supposed to undergo LSB procedure (e.g. pain with asymmetric skin temperature of lower limb in previous thermography, small fiber disorder in previous quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART), vascular insufficiency in lower extremities, diabetic polyneuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, complex regional pain syndrome, cancer-related neuropathic pain such as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, other lower extremity neuropathies, lower extremity crush injury etc.)
  • Numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4/10
  • Failure of previous conservative treatments, such as physiotherapy, oral medication, or other noninvasive treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous lumbar sympathetic neurolysis
  • Bleeding tendency
  • Local infection
  • Allergy to local anesthetics or contrast media
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe variation near procedure site-scoliosis, tumor, abdominal aneurysm, etc.
  • BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
  • Cognitive dysfunction
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ultrasound with Fluoroscope

    This group undergoes lumbar sympathetic block using ultrasound and fluoroscope. Preparation: Inserts 24G intravenous route for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) Device: Uses 15-cm Chiba needle for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) Device: Uses Ultrasound for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) Drug: 10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine injection for LSB Intervention: Temperature measurement for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) Intervention: Postprocedure care for LSB

    Procedure: 24G intravenous route for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB): · Device: 15-cm Chiba needle for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) · Device: Ultrasound for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) · Drug: 10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine injection for LSB · Procedure: Temperature measurement for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) · Procedure: Postprocedure care for LSB

  • Active comparator
    Fluoroscope only

    This group undergoes lumbar sympathetic block using fluoroscope only. Device: Inserts 24G intravenous route for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) Device: Uses 15-cm Chiba needle for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) Device: Uses Fluoroscope for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) Drug: 10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine injection for LSB Intervention: Temperature measurement for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) Intervention: Postprocedure care for LSB

    Procedure: 24G intravenous route for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB): · Device: 15-cm Chiba needle for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) · Device: Fluoroscope for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) · Drug: 10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine injection for LSB · Procedure: Temperature measurement for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB) · Procedure: Postprocedure care for LSB

Interventions

  • Procedure24G intravenous route for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB):

    Enrolled subjects enter the operative room with a 24G intravenous route, and then non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oxygen saturation level are continuously monitored during and after the procedure.

    Also known as: lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB), lumbar sympathetic chain block

  • Device15-cm Chiba needle for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB)

    The skin entry point is infiltrated using 1% lidocaine. A curved 21 G, 15-cm Chiba needle (Cook Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) is then advanced toward the anterolateral edge of target vertebral body by posterolateral approach in patients with prone position.

  • DeviceUltrasound for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB)

    Using Ultrasound, the L3 is identified by locating the lumbosacral junction on a paramedian sagittal scan and then counting cranially. After marking the level of L3 vertebra, the modified transverse scan through lumbar intertransverse space (ITS) is obtained with the transducer positioned 4-6 cm lateral to the mid-line at the L2-L3 intervertebral level. The needle is inserted from a lateral to medial direction using in-plane technique. The needle tip is inserted towards the anterior fascia of the psoas major muscle as close as paravertebral space.

  • DeviceFluoroscope for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB)

    Briefly, fluoroscopic guided LSBs are performed at the lower third of the L2 or the upper third of the L3 vertebra. A targeted lumbar vertebral is identified by AP fluoroscopic imaging and the fluoroscopic C-arm is adjusted 25-35° laterally to avoid the transverse process over the needle pathway. After the skin infiltration, the needle is advanced toward the anterolateral edge of the target lumbar vertebra under fluoroscopic guidance using the tunnel vision technique.

  • Drug10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine injection for LSB

    After excluding vascular injection with contrast media by a C-arm image intensifier on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view, 10 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine is injected through the Chiba needle.

  • ProcedureTemperature measurement for Lumbar Sympathetic Block (LSB)

    Temperature monitoring and measurement: skin-surface temperatures are monitored with small, adhesive thermocouple probes attached bilaterally to the plantar surface of the feet using transparent patches at 1-min intervals for a maximum of 20 min.

  • ProcedurePostprocedure care for LSB

    Adverse events such as genitofemoral nerve block, lumbar plexus block (transient unilateral leg weakness), or others are documented during and after the procedure for 30 min.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Procedure time (I1)

    U group: the time interval between the contact of the US probe with the patient's skin and the completion of the injection of levobupivacaine F group: the time interval between the first radiographic image and the end of the injection of levobupivacaine

    Time frame: through the LSB procedure completion (day 0)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Success rate

    Definition of successful LSB: temperature rises as high as 2℃ from initial temperature on an ipsilateral sole in 20 min after the injection of levobupivacaine. Temperatures are measured at 1-min intervals and recorded from the time of administration of levobupivacaine onwards. Assessments are continued for a maximum of 20 min.

    Time frame: through the LSB procedure completion (day 0)

  2. Onset time of block (I2)

    Definition of successful LSB: temperature rises as high as 2℃ from initial temperature on an ipsilateral sole in 20 min after the injection of levobupivacaine. Temperatures are measured at 1-min intervals and recorded from the time of administration of levobupivacaine onwards. Assessments are continued for a maximum of 20 min.

    Time frame: through the LSB procedure completion (day 0)

  3. The number of needle passes

    In both groups, the initial needle insertion counted as one pass; any subsequent needle advancement that is preceded by a withdrawal of more than 1 cm counts as an additional pass

    Time frame: through the LSB procedure completion (day 0)

  4. The number of the needle contact to bone during the procedure

    Time frame: through the LSB procedure completion (day 0)

  5. Spreading pattern of contrast dye during the procedure

    Spreading pattern of contrast dye will be measured by 3 patterns (normal/muscular spread pattern/ intravascular spreading).

    Time frame: through the LSB procedure completion (day 0)

  6. An 11-pointed NRS pain score related to the procedure only

    measured twice -1) just after the procedure at OR, and 2) at recovery room just before discharge

    Time frame: through the LSB procedure completion (day 0)

  7. Any adverse events

    genitofemoral nerve block, lumbar plexus block (transient unilateral leg weakness, or other events

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after the procedure

  8. Changes of an 11-pointed NRS pain score from baseline for their lower extremity pain

    Time frame: performs telephone follow-up in 72 hours.

  9. Procedure-related NRS pain score

    Time frame: performs telephone follow-up in 72 hours.

  10. Changes of dose in analgesics

    NSAIDs, paracetamol, and opioids

    Time frame: performs telephone follow-up in 72 hours.

  11. Any adverse events remained

    Time frame: performs telephone follow-up in 72 hours.

  12. A 5-pointed Likert satisfaction scale related to the procedure

    Time frame: performs telephone follow-up in 72 hours.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
    • Jee Youn . Moon, M.D. · Contact · jymoon0901@gmail.com · 82-10-5299-2036
    • Jee Youn Moon, M.D. · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ryu JH, Lee CS, Kim YC, Lee SC, Shankar H, Moon JY. Ultrasound-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block: A Prospective and Randomized Study. Anesth Analg. 2018 Apr;126(4):1362-1368. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002640. PubMed 29189275 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02737527
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University
Responsible party
Jeeyoun Moon (Clinical Associate Professor, Seoul National University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 14, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Nov 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2016

Study contacts

Jee Youn Moon, MD, PhD
Contact
jymoon0901@gmail.com
82-10-5299-2036
Chang Soon Lee, MD
Contact
iparid@gmail.com
82-2-2072-0881

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion