ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06130514Updated May 29, 2024

The Comparison of Sympathetic Blockade of Stellate Ganglion Block and Thoracic Sympathetic Ganglion Block

An interventional study of Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy in Chronic Pain, Neuropathic Pain and Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, sponsored by Seoul National University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-29.

Sponsored by Seoul National University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

For patients scheduled to undergo upper limb sympathetic nerve block due to chronic neuropathic pain in the upper limb lasting more than 3 months, the ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block group (S group) and the fluoroscopy-guided thoracic sympathetic nerve block group (T) Patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to one of the groups, and the procedure is performed. To evaluate the effectiveness of sympathetic nerve blockade, temperature changes in both palms are measured twice, 20 minutes before and 20 minutes after the procedure, using an infrared thermographer. Other variables related to the procedure are surveyed by outpatient visit or telephone before the procedure, after the procedure, before returning home, and 1 week and 1 month after the procedure.

Read the detailed description

Patients aged 19 to 85 with upper limb pain are directly informed about the study, recruited, and enrolled at the Seoul National University Hospital Pain Center.

Before and after the procedure, continuous monitoring of electrocardiography, blood pressure, pulse rate, and oxygen saturation is carried out.

Before undergoing thoracic sympathetic ganglion block (TSGB) guided by fluoroscopy or ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (SGB), the temperature of both palms is measured using an infrared thermometer. Prior to the procedure, Doppler mode ultrasound equipment is used to measure blood flow velocity in the upper limb arteries (brachial artery).

In the case of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block, the patient is placed in a supine position, and the procedure is performed using ultrasound guidance to inject 5 mL of 1% mepivacaine at the level of C6. For fluoroscopy-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block, the patient is positioned prone, and 3 mL of 1% mepivacaine is injected at the level of T3. In both cases, the procedure is performed by a specialist with a rank of professor or higher who specializes in pain management.

After the procedure, the palm temperature is measured again 20 minutes later using an infrared thermometer.

Blood flow velocity in the upper limb arteries (brachial artery) is also measured 20 minutes post-procedure using Doppler mode ultrasound equipment.

Additionally, various procedure-related variables are assessed through outpatient visits or telephone surveys conducted before the procedure, at discharge, one week post-procedure, and four weeks post-procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
  • Post Herpetic Neuralgia
  • Post Laminectomy Syndrome
03

In context

Chronic Pain

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 118 is above the median of 60 across 2,388 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with 19 - 85 years
  • Patients with chronic upper extremity pain that lasts for more than 3 months
  • Neuropathic pain conditions such as postherpetic neuralgia, complex regional pain syndrome, post laminectomy syndrome of cervical spine
  • Patients judged to require sympathetic blockade by pain physician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Presence of upper limb vascular disorders
  • History of previous thoracic sympathetic ganglion removal or neurolysis
  • Abnormal findings in blood coagulation tests
  • Systemic infection or local injection site infection
  • Anatomical deformities at the injection site
  • Allergic reactions to the injected medications
  • Higher baseline hand temperature on the procedure side than the tympanic temperature (36.5°C) on pre-procedure thermography
  • Other cases deemed inappropriate by the investigator
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
118 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (US-guided SGB)

    In the case of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block, the patient is made to lie down and stellate ganglion block is performed by injecting 5 mL of 1% mepivacaine at the level of the 6th cervical vertebra using ultrasound.

    Device: Ultrasound

  • Active comparator
    Fluoroscopy-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block (FS-guided TSGB)

    In the case of fluoroscopic device-guided thoracic sympathetic nerve block, place the patient prone and inject 3 mL of 1% mepivacaine at the level of the third thoracic vertebra to perform thoracic sympathetic nerve block.

    Device: Fluoroscopy

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound

    Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block with 1% mepivacaine 5 mL

  • DeviceFluoroscopy

    Fluoroscopic-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block with 1% mepivacaine 3 mL

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. (1) Proportion of patients reaching > 1.5°C rise of temperature in the ipsilateral hand compared to the contralateral hand

    \[ipsilateral hand temperature after the block - ipsilateral hand temperature before the block\] - \[contralateral hand temperature after the block - contralateral hand temperature before the block\]

    Time frame: 20 minutes after FS-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block or US-guided stellate ganglion block

Secondary outcomes

  1. (1) Difference of temperature change (°C) between ipsilateral hand and contralateral hand

    \[ipsilateral hand temperature after the block - ipsilateral hand temperature before the block\] - \[contralateral hand temperature after the block - contralateral hand temperature before the block\]

    Time frame: 20 minutes after FS-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block or US-guided stellate ganglion block

  2. (2) Severity of pain

    11-point numerical rating scale (NRS)

    Time frame: Time before block and 20 minutes and 1 week and 4weeks after FS-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block or US-guided stellate ganglion block

  3. (3) Patient satisfaction (PGIC scale)

    5-point Likert Scale

    Time frame: 20 minutes and 1 week and 4 weeks after FS-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block or US-guided stellate ganglion block

  4. (4) Comparison of Korean version CISS(Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity) Questionnaire

    Time frame: Time before block and 4 weeks after FS-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block or US-guided stellate ganglion block

  5. (5) Blood flow velocity measurement in upper extremity vessel(ipsilateral brachial artery) using ultrasound

    cm/s

    Time frame: Time before block and 20minutes after FS-guided thoracic sympathetic ganglion block or US-guided stellate ganglion block

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kim YH, Kim SY, Lee YJ, Kim ED. A Prospective, Randomized Cross-Over Trial of T2 Paravertebral Block as a Sympathetic Block in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain Physician. 2019 Sep;22(5):E417-E424. PubMed 31561653 ↗
  • Kim J, Yun M, Han AH, Pauzi MF, Jeong JH, Yoo Y, Moon JY. Thoracic sympathetic ganglion blocks: real-world outcomes in 207 chronic pain patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jul 8;49(7):528-535. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104624. PubMed 37726196 ↗
  • Kim J, Lee HJ, Lee YJ, Lee CS, Yoo Y, Moon JY. Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block as a Sympathetic Blockade for Upper Extremity Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Pain Res. 2020 Dec 14;13:3395-3403. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S285998. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33363406 ↗
  • Yoo HS, Nahm FS, Lee PB, Lee CJ. Early thoracic sympathetic block improves the treatment effect for upper extremity neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg. 2011 Sep;113(3):605-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182274803. Epub 2011 Jul 21. PubMed 21778335 ↗
  • Day M. Sympathetic blocks: the evidence. Pain Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):98-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00177.x. Erratum In: Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):335-6. PubMed 18366465 ↗
  • Rocha Rde O, Teixeira MJ, Yeng LT, Cantara MG, Faria VG, Liggieri V, Loduca A, Muller BM, Souza AC, de Andrade DC. Thoracic sympathetic block for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Pain. 2014 Nov;155(11):2274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Aug 19. PubMed 25149143 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2024; primary completion for Dec 2025, 17 months later.

Of 1,295 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Chronic Pain, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,378 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 8, 2023
First posted
Nov 14, 2023
StartEst.
Jul 10, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 10, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jan 10, 2026
Last update
May 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06130514
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University
Responsible party
Jeeyoun Moon (Professor, Seoul National University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2023
Start date
Jul 10, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 29, 2024

Study contacts

Jee Youn Moon, MD, PhD
Contact
jymoon0901@gmail.com
821052992036
Jeongsoo Kim, MD
Contact
dreamsu4@snu.ac.kr
821047346422
Jee Youn Moon, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Seoul National University Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion