ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06470581Updated Jun 26, 2024

Thoracic Sympathetic Ganglion Block With Botulinum Toxin Type A

An interventional study of Botulinum toxin A in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, sponsored by Seoul National University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-26.

Sponsored by Seoul National University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Thoracic sympathetic ganglion block is a percutaneous procedure that paralyzes the action of sympathetic nerves transiently by injecting a local anesthetic around the ganglion. It is performed to diagnose and treat sympathetically maintained pain in phantom limb pain or complex reginal pain syndrome patient. The temperature of the affected arm is often lower than that of the opposite side. As a result of the procedure, the patient may experience sympathetic pain relief, such as coldness, stinging, numbness of the upper extremity. If the procedure does not last long, repetitive block or chemical neurolysis or radiofrequency thermocoagulation for the sympathetic ganglion is performed.

However, even though in rare cases, chemical neurolysis is known to cause permanent plexus injury radiofrequency thermocoagulation is known to be less successful than chemical neurolysis because it is difficult to identify and stimulate the exact location of the ganglion. Therefore, it is expected that there will be a benefit to the patients if there is a procedure with long-lasting and avoiding injury.

Recently, it has been reported that botulinum toxin (BTX) has been successfully used for the treatment of pain disorders. BTX plays a role with blocking the secretion of acetylcholine from the cholinergic nerve endings. Therefore, the use of BTX is expected to prolong the effect of neural blockade because pre-ganglia sympathetic nerves are cholinergic. It is also known that the action of BTX is not permanent and BTX does not exhibit cytotoxicity or neurotoxicity. Therefore, Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is recommended for the treatment of migraine, myofascial pain syndrome, and neuropathic pain accompanied by allodynia. This study would like show whether thoracic sympathetic ganglion block using BTA has a longer duration than conventional local anesthesia by using prospective randomized, double-blind, parallel group, and comparative clinical trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
03

In context

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

205 studies on the registry are indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 78 is above the median of 40 across 152 interventional studies indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes.

Browse Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. aged 19-80 years
  2. Diagnosed with a complex regional pain syndrome (type 1 or 2) in unilateral upper extremity
  3. 11-point numerical-rating-scale (NRS) pain score of 4 or higher in upper extremity
  4. Temperature increase at diagnostic thoracic sympathetic ganglion block
  5. Patients taking medication stably (without change in dosage/recipe) for more than 4 weeks prior to administration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refusal of the patient
  2. Vascular disease at upper extremity
  3. previous thoracic sympathetic neurolysis (thermocoagulation, chemical neurolysis)
  4. coagulopathy
  5. systemic infection or local infection at thoracic puncture site
  6. significant deformity at thoracic spine
  7. neoplasm
  8. known allergic reaction with amide type local anesthetics
  9. cognitive dysfunction (not understanding of numerical-rating-scale)
  10. known allergic reaction with botulinum toxin
  11. pregnant or feeding women
  12. If the patient has participated in another clinical trial within 30 days before screening, or if passed no longer than 5-fold half-life of the clinical trial drug of the participating clinical trial
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
78 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Local anesthetics

    Total volume of 0.375% ropivacaine 3 mL will be injected in phase 2.

    Drug: Botulinum toxin A

  • Experimental
    Botulinum toxin A

    Total volume of BTX-A 75U in normal saline 3ml will be injected in phase 2.

    Drug: Botulinum toxin A

Interventions

  • Patients were assigned 1:1 to a control group using only local anesthetics (Group A) and a BTX-A group (Group B). In Phase 1, the needle is inserted near the vertebrae T3 under fluoroscopic guidance. An 1 ml of non-ionized contrast medium is injected to evaluate the diffusion pattern, and 3ml of 0.75% ropivacaine is injected. After identifying a temperature increase in the ipsilateral palm within 20 min in the operating room with the prone position, 3 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine and botulinum toxin type A 75 IU mixed with 3 ml of non-preserved saline solution are injected in the patients in the control and botulinum toxin groups, respectively.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The changes in average pain intensity in 4weeks

    Comparison between groups of the average change in 11-point numerical rating scale pain score (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain imaginable) over the past 24 hours

    Time frame: 4 weeks after procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. The changes in average pain intensity in 12weeks

    Comparison between groups of the average change in 11-point numerical rating scale pain score (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain imaginable) over the past 24 hours

    Time frame: 12 weeks after procedure

  2. The changes in maximum pain intensity

    Comparison between groups of the mamimum change in 11-point numerical rating scale pain score (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain imaginable) over the past 24 hours

    Time frame: 4 and 12 weeks after procedure

  3. The changes in pain related to procedure

    Inter- and intra-group comparison of the change in procedure-related 11-point numerical rating scale pain score (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain imaginable)

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the procedure

  4. The change in the temperature difference

    the change in the relative temperature difference on the blocked palm compared with the contralateral palm

    Time frame: 30 minutes, 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure

  5. Blood flow velosity

    Comparison between groups of blood flow velosity at brachial artery using ultrasound

    Time frame: 30 minutes, 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure

  6. Korean CISS (Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity) Questionnaire

    Inter- and intra-group comparison of the change in Korean CISS score from 4 to 100 (mild, 4-25; moderate, 26-50; severe, 51-75; and extremely severe, 76-100)

    Time frame: 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure

  7. Paindetect questionare (PD-Q)

    Inter- and intra-group comparison of the change in PD-Q score from 0 to 38 (total scores of less than 12 considered to represent nociceptive pain, 13-18 possible NeP, and \>19 representing \>90% likelihood of NeP)

    Time frame: 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure

  8. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction related to procedure using 5-pointed Likert scale (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, and Very dissatisfied)

    Time frame: after procedure

  9. Medication change (Opioids)

    Comparison between groups of change with Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD)

    Time frame: 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure

  10. Additional intervention

    Comparison between groups of total number of additional executed sympathetic blocks

    Time frame: 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06470581
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University
Responsible party
Jeeyoun Moon (Professor, Seoul National University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 24, 2024
Start date
Jul 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 25, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 25, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 26, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Botulinum toxin type A

Start the discussion