CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02169102Updated Apr 14, 2015

Effect of Low Power Laser in Tooth Pain Modulation Caused by Irreversible Inflammation

An interventional study of No additional Intervention (control) and Sham Laser Irradiation in Pulpitis and Acute Pain, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-14.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Anxiety, pain and discomfort are common stressful situations that occur during the dentistry practice, especially in the urgency endodontic practice. Studies have concluded that low intensity laser therapy is effective in treating pain. However, most studies have reported the low intensity laser therapy in chronic pain, few studies have shown its application on acute pain and none have evaluated the low intensity laser´s analgesic effect in acute pain of the pulp inflammation. Since the pulp tissue has the peculiar characteristic to be surrounded by dentin, in acute pulpits, the inflammatory reaction is more complicated than usual. Furthermore, during the inflammatory process, sometimes anesthesia is not always completely effective. Thus, this present study aims to evaluate whether previous therapy with low intensity laser could, by its analgesic effect, promote greater comfort especially to this type of patient. 60 patients with acute pulpits pain will be selected to this study (randomized and double-blinded) and they will be divided in 4 groups:

Group 1 ( n=15) - Control Group; Group 2 (n=15) - Laser 1: 780 nanometers (nm); 40 milliwatts (mW); 4 seconds per point; 0.16 Joules/point; total irradiated points: 02; Group 3 (n=15) - Laser 2: 780nm; 40 mW; 40 seconds per point; 1.6 Joules/point, total irradiated points: 02; Group 4 (n=15) - Placebo group - Sham Laser Irradiation.

The pain will be evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS) in 3 different times: initial pain, pain immediately after and 15 minutes after interventions (laser irradiation, or sham laser irradiation). After that, patients with acute pulp irreversible inflammation will be submitted to conventional endodontic urgency treatment. Data concerning the need of complimentary local anesthesia will be also taken into account. Data of different groups and times will be statistically compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulpitis
  • Acute Pain

Keywords

  • Low power laser
  • Pulpitis
  • Pain
03

In context

Pulpitis

302 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulpitis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 62 across 275 interventional studies indexed under Pulpitis.

Browse Pulpitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,005 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with acute pain due to irreversible inflammation of the a vital pulp tooth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-Intact Pulp chamber
  • Necrotic pulp
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Control

    Other: No additional Intervention (control)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Laser

    Radiation: Sham Laser Irradiation

  • Experimental
    Laser 1

    Low Power Laser applied at 0.16 Joules/point. 2 points of laser irradiation

    Radiation: Laser 1 (at 0,16 Joules/point of irradiation)

  • Experimental
    Laser 2

    Low Power Laser applied at 16 Joules/point. 2 points of laser irradiation

    Radiation: Laser 2 (1,6 Joules/point of irradiation)

Interventions

  • OtherNo additional Intervention (control)

    No additional intervention previously to the urgency endodontic treatment (Control)

  • RadiationSham Laser Irradiation

    Fifteen minutes previously the urgency endodontic treatment, sham laser irradiation was performed in the tooth with irreversible inflammation in pulp.

  • RadiationLaser 1 (at 0,16 Joules/point of irradiation)

    Fifteen minutes previously the urgency endodontic treatment, laser irradiation will be performed in the tooth with irreversible inflammation in pulp at 0,16 Joules/point at 2 points (perpendicularly to tooth crown and in periapex region)

  • RadiationLaser 2 (1,6 Joules/point of irradiation)

    Fifteen minutes previously the urgency endodontic treatment, laser irradiation will be performed in the tooth with irreversible inflammation in pulp at 1,6 Joules/point at 2 points (perpendicularly to tooth crown and in periapex region)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tooth pain modulation during irreversible pulp inflammation after low power laser irradiation

    Pain will be measured through VAS (Visual Analog Scale).

    Time frame: Immediately after low power laser irradiation and 15 minutes after low power laser irradiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Need of anesthetic supplementation during urgency endodontic treatment

    15 minutes after low power laser irradiation, patients will be submitted to endodontic urgency treatment adopted in School of Dentistry of University of São Paulo. The need of local anesthetic supplementation will be observed between the patients

    Time frame: 15 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo
    São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02169102
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Responsible party
Karen Müller Ramalho (PhD, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2014
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2014
Completion
Oct 2014
Last update
Apr 14, 2015

Study contacts

Larissa MP Souza, DDS
study chair · School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo
Carlos A Adde, PhD
study chair · School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo
Karen M Ramalho, PhD
principal investigator · School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo
Isabel P Tortamano, PhD
principal investigator · School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo
Carlos P Eduardo, PhD
study director · School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo
Rodney G Rocha, PhD
study director · School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion