ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07793630Updated Nov 6, 2026

Foam Sclerotherapy With or Without Transdermal Laser for Reticular Veins and Telangiectasias

A Phase 4 interventional study of Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy and Transdermal 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser in Telangiectasias, Reticular Veins and Chronic Venous Disease, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Oct 5, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective, randomized, controlled, intraindividual split-leg clinical trial will compare isolated polidocanol foam sclerotherapy with the Cryo-Laser After Foam (CLaF) technique for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias of the lower limbs. The study will include 70 women aged 18 to 60 years with bilateral CEAP C1 telangiectasias and/or reticular veins. Each participant will receive CLaF in one lower limb and isolated foam sclerotherapy in the contralateral limb, with treatment laterality determined by randomization. The CLaF technique consists of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy followed immediately by transdermal 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser under continuous cold-air cooling. The study will evaluate vascular clearance, residual vascular area, hyperpigmentation, retained thrombi and need for drainage, pain, adverse events, aesthetic improvement, patient satisfaction, and quality of life during follow-up through 180 days.

Read the detailed description

Telangiectasias and reticular veins are common manifestations of chronic venous disease classified as CEAP C1. Although they are frequently considered primarily aesthetic findings, they may be associated with local symptoms and may negatively affect quality of life and body perception.

Foam sclerotherapy with polidocanol is widely used for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias. However, post-treatment hyperpigmentation, retained thrombi, telangiectatic matting, superficial phlebitis, prolonged ecchymosis, and the need for drainage may occur.

The Cryo-Laser After Foam (CLaF) technique combines polidocanol foam sclerotherapy with subsequent transdermal laser treatment under continuous cold-air cooling. In this technique, polidocanol foam is injected first, followed immediately by application of a long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser over the treated vessels while continuous cold-air cooling is applied to the skin. Foam sclerotherapy remains the primary therapeutic component of the procedure. The proposed rationale is that combining chemical and photothermal mechanisms may enhance vascular occlusion and potentially reduce residual intravascular blood, retained thrombi, and hyperpigmentation, while cold-air cooling provides epidermal protection and improves patient comfort during laser application.

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, intraindividual, split-leg, assessor-blinded, single-center clinical trial. Seventy women aged 18 to 60 years with bilateral relatively symmetrical CEAP C1 telangiectasias and/or reticular veins will be included. Randomization will determine which lower limb receives CLaF, while the contralateral limb receives isolated polidocanol foam sclerotherapy. Each participant will therefore serve as her own control.

Polidocanol 0.5% foam will constitute the primary sclerosing treatment in both lower limbs. For very small telangiectasias, liquid polidocanol 0.25% may be used as a complementary intravascular microinjection according to the study protocol. The same sclerotherapy criteria will be applied bilaterally.

In the CLaF-treated limb, the Nd:YAG laser will be applied immediately after sclerotherapy under continuous cold-air cooling. For telangiectasias smaller than 1 mm, the laser parameters will be a 2-mm spot size, fluence of 200 J/cm², and pulse duration of 15 ms. For reticular veins measuring 1-3 mm, a 6-mm spot size, fluence of 70 J/cm², and pulse duration of 30 ms will be used. A maximum of 150 laser shots per standardized treatment area is planned.

Treatment will be performed in standardized bilateral 20 × 15 cm areas of the lateral thigh-leg region. Standardized digital photographs and semiautomated image analysis will be used to assess residual vascular area and vascular clearance. Skin pigmentation will also be evaluated clinically, photographically, and instrumentally using a Mexameter®. Additional outcomes will include the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), pain, retained thrombi, need for drainage, telangiectatic matting, superficial phlebitis, other adverse events, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. Follow-up assessments are planned through 180 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Telangiectasias
  • Reticular Veins
  • Chronic Venous Disease

Keywords

  • CEAP C1
  • Foam Sclerotherapy
  • Polidocanol
  • Laser After Foam
  • Nd:YAG Laser
  • LAAF
  • Hyperpigmentation
03

In context

Telangiectasis

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Telangiectasis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 30 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Telangiectasis.

Browse Telangiectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,035 studies on the registry; 95 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants aged 18 to 60 years.
  • Fitzpatrick skin phototype I, II, or III.
  • CEAP clinical class C1.
  • Bilateral relatively symmetrical presence of telangiectasias and reticular veins on the lateral thigh.
  • Presence of telangiectasias and reticular veins measuring 0.1 to 3 mm in diameter.
  • (BMI) ≤ 30 kg/m²
  • Willingness to participate in the complete study follow-up and provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Saphenous or perforator venous reflux.
  • Varicose veins greater than 3 mm in diameter (CEAP C2-C6).
  • Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV, V, or VI.
  • Recent venous thrombosis or known thrombophilia.
  • Use of anticoagulant therapy.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known allergy to polidocanol.
  • Peripheral arterial disease with ankle-brachial index (ABI) \< 0.8.
  • Diabetes mellitus.
  • Local dermatitis in the treatment area.
  • Previous venous treatment within the last 6 months.
  • Failure to attend the treatment session or scheduled follow-up visits.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Isolated Foam Sclerotherapy

    The lower limb allocated to the control treatment will receive isolated sclerotherapy with 0.5% polidocanol foam within the standardized treatment area. The contralateral lower limb of the same participant will receive Laser After Foam (LAAF). Treatment laterality will be determined by randomization

    Drug: Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy

  • Experimental
    Cryo-Laser After Foam (CLaF)

    The lower limb allocated to CLaF will receive 0.5% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy followed immediately by long-pulsed transdermal 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser treatment under continuous cold-air cooling. For very small telangiectasias, 0.25% liquid polidocanol may be used as a complementary intravascular microinjection according to the study protocol. The contralateral lower limb of the same participant will receive isolated polidocanol foam sclerotherapy. Treatment laterality will be determined by randomization.

    Drug: Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy · Device: Transdermal 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser

Interventions

  • DrugPolidocanol foam sclerotherapy

    Polidocanol 0.5% foam will be prepared immediately before application using the Tessari technique by mixing 1 mL of 0.5% polidocanol with 4 mL of room air in a 1:4 ratio, using two syringes connected by a three-way stopcock and approximately 20 passages for homogenization. A maximum foam volume of 2 mL per treated area will be used. Intravascul ar microinjections will be performed with a fine needle, preferably 25G, in fractionated volumes and at a controlled rate. For very small telangiectasias, 0.25% liquid polidocanol may be used as a complementary intravascular microinjection. After treatment, standardized light local compression will be maintained for approximately 24 hours.

    Also known as: Polidocanol 0.5% Foam

  • DeviceTransdermal 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser

    Immediately after polidocanol sclerotherapy, a long-pulsed transdermal 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser will be applied over the treated vessels under continuous cold-air cooling at approximately -20°C, characterizing the Cryo-Laser After Foam (CLaF) technique. Approximately 10% spot overlap may be used, with up to two passes over the target vessel. A maximum of 150 laser shots per standardized 20 × 15 cm treatment area is planned, unless earlier interruption is required for safety. For telangiectasias smaller than 1 mm, the laser parameters will be a 2-mm spot size, fluence of 200 J/cm², and pulse duration of 15 ms. For reticular veins measuring 1-3 mm, the parameters will be a 6-mm spot size, fluence of 70 J/cm², and pulse duration of 30 ms. Continuous cold-air cooling will be maintained throughout laser application for epidermal protection and patient comfort.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Residual Vascular Area From Baseline to Days 60, 90 and 180

    Residual vascular area will be quantified from standardized digital photographs using semiautomated image analysis, preferably with ImageJ/Fiji, within the standardized 20 × 15 cm treatment area. Change in residual vascular area will be expressed as a percentage relative to baseline at each follow-up time point. The paired intraindividual comparison will be performed between the area treated with CLaF and the contralateral area treated with isolated foam sclerotherapy.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 60,90 and 180

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vascular Clearance by Blinded Photographic Assessment

    Standardized digital photographs will be independently assessed by two blinded outcome assessors. Vascular clearance will be evaluated by comparing follow-up images with baseline images within the standardized treatment area. In case of clinically relevant disagreement, a third blinded assessor will perform adjudication.

    Time frame: Day 60, Day 90, and Day 180

  2. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Score

    Global aesthetic improvement will be assessed using the protocol-adapted Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), ranging from -1 to 3. A score of -1 indicates worsening, 0 indicates no change, 1 indicates improvement, 2 indicates marked improvement, and 3 indicates very marked improvement or excellent aesthetic result

    Time frame: Day 60, Day 90, and Day 180

  3. Incidence and Intensity of Hyperpigmentation

    Post-treatment hyperpigmentation will be assessed clinically and photographically in the treated area. Hyperpigmentation will be recorded as present or absent and its clinical intensity will be documented. Results will be compared between the ClaF-treated limb and the contralateral limb treated with isolated foam sclerotherapy.

    Time frame: Day 60, Day 90, and Day 180

  4. Change in Melanin Index Measured With Mexameter

    Skin pigmentation will be objectively measured using the Mexameter. Standardized measurement points will include the area of greatest pigmentation, when present, and adjacent untreated control skin. Each point will be measured three consecutive times and the arithmetic mean will be used. Change in melanin index will be compared with baseline and adjacent untreated skin.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 60, Day 90, and Day 180

  5. Incidence of Retained Thrombus and Need for Drainage

    Retained thrombus will be assessed clinically and defined as palpable or visible thrombotic material within the treated venous segment. The presence or absence, approximate size, associated pain, and need for drainage will be recorded. The need for drainage of retained thrombus will be recorded. Drainage may be indicated in the presence of a dark superficial thrombus, painful palpable cord, intravascular nodule, or local pain equal to or greater than 4 on the pain scale, according to the clinical assessor. When performed, the treated limb, date, approximate drained volume, and complications will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 21

  6. Procedure-Related Pain

    Pain will be assessed using a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Pain will be recorded for the sclerotherapy stage, the transdermal laser stage when applicable, and the overall procedure

    Time frame: Day 0

  7. Incidence of Telangiectatic Matting, Superficial Phlebitis, Persistent Ecchymosis, Skin Necrosis or Wound, Thromboembolic Events

    Telangiectatic matting will be defined as the appearance of new fine network-like telangiectasias within the treated area. Presence or absence and extension of matting will be recorded and compared between treatment techniques. Superficial phlebitis will be assessed clinically based on pain, erythema, and induration along the treated venous segment. Severity and any treatment instituted will be recorded. Persistent ecchymosis will be assessed clinically and defined as ecchymosis persisting beyond the expected post-treatment period or considered clinically relevant during follow-up. Its extent and resolution will be documented. Skin necrosis or wound will be defined as loss of skin integrity within the treated area. When present, lesion dimensions, treatment instituted, and clinical evolution will be recorded. Suspected thromboembolic events, including deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, will be investigated and recorded. Diagnostic confirmation, clinical management, and notifi

    Time frame: Day 60, Day 90 and Day 180

  8. Change in Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire-14 (CIVIQ-14) Global Index Score From Baseline to Days 90 and 180

    Quality of life related to chronic venous disease will be assessed using the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire-14 (CIVIQ-14). The questionnaire contains 14 items. Scores will be calculated according to the prespecified scoring method and expressed on a 0 to 100 Global Index Score, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change from baseline will be assessed at Day 90 and Day 180. This is a participant-level outcome and will not be attributed separately to either lower limb or intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180

  9. Change in VEINES-QOL Score From Baseline to Days 90 and 180

    Venous disease-specific quality of life will be assessed using the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life/Symptoms questionnaire (VEINES-QOL/Sym). The VEINES-QOL score is derived from 25 items included in questions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8; question 2 is descriptive and is not included in the score. The score will be calculated using intrinsic scoring. After orienting item responses so that higher values indicate a better health status, each item response will be transformed using (i-1)/(k-1), where i is the response category and k is the number of response categories for that item. The mean of the available transformed items will then be multiplied by 100. The VEINES-QOL score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better venous disease-specific quality of life. The score will not be calculated when more than 50% of the relevant items are missing. Change from baseline will be assessed at Day 90 and Day

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180

  10. Change in VEINES-Sym Score From Baseline to Days 90 and 180

    Venous symptoms will be assessed using the VEINES-Sym component of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life/Symptoms questionnaire (VEINES-QOL/Sym). The VEINES-Sym score is derived from 10 items: the nine venous symptom items included in question 1 and the leg pain item included in question 7. The score will be calculated using intrinsic scoring. After orienting item responses so that higher values indicate a better health status, each item response will be transformed using (i-1)/(k-1), where i is the response category and k is the number of response categories for that item. The mean of the available transformed items will then be multiplied by 100. The VEINES-Sym score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer or less severe venous symptoms and a better symptom status. The score will not be calculated when more than 50% of the relevant items are missing. Change from baseline will be assessed at

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 90, and Day 180

Other outcomes

  1. Patient Treatment Preference

    At the final follow-up visit, the participant's preference regarding the aesthetic result of the two treated lower limbs will be recorded

    Time frame: Day 180

  2. Need for Retreatment of the Treated Area

    The need for additional treatment of residual or recurrent reticular veins and telangiectasias within the standardized treated area will be assessed at the final follow-up visit

    Time frame: Day 180

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Clínica Civil - FAEPA USP
    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14040-900, Brazil
    Recruiting
    • Cecília S Ulacia, MD · Contactceciliasalazarulacia@usp.br · (16) 3963-6500
    • Cecília S Ulacia, MD · Principal investigator
    • Mauricio Serra Ribeiro, PHD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ribeiro-Samora GA, Carvalho MLV, de Moura RMF, Pereira DAG. Limitations of VEINES QOL/SYM for discriminating chronic venous insufficiency severity. J Vasc Bras. 2019 Nov 29;19:e20180096. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.180096. PubMed 31839797 ↗
  • Moreno-Moraga J, Pascu ML, Alcolea JM, Smarandache A, Royo J, David F, Trelles MA. Effects of 1064-nm Nd:YAG long-pulse laser on polidocanol microfoam injected for varicose vein treatment: a controlled observational study of 404 legs, after 5-year-long treatment. Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Sep;34(7):1325-1332. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02736-1. Epub 2019 Feb 1. PubMed 30707327 ↗
  • Moreno-Moraga J, Hernandez E, Royo J, Alcolea J, Isarria MJ, Pascu ML, Smarandache A, Trelles M. Optimal and safe treatment of spider leg veins measuring less than 1.5 mm on skin type IV patients, using repeated low-fluence Nd:YAG laser pulses after polidocanol injection. Lasers Med Sci. 2013 May;28(3):925-33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1180-6. Epub 2012 Aug 11. PubMed 22886138 ↗
  • Moreno-Moraga J, Smarandache A, Pascu ML, Royo J, Trelles MA. 1064 nm Nd:YAG long pulse laser after polidocanol microfoam injection dramatically improves the result of leg vein treatment: a randomized controlled trial on 517 legs with a three-year follow-up. Phlebology. 2014 Dec;29(10):658-66. doi: 10.1177/0268355513502786. Epub 2013 Aug 29. PubMed 23989971 ↗
  • Tessari L, Cavezzi A, Frullini A. Preliminary experience with a new sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins. Dermatol Surg. 2001 Jan;27(1):58-60. PubMed 11231246 ↗
  • Nakano LC, Cacione DG, Baptista-Silva JC, Flumignan RL. Treatment for telangiectasias and reticular veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD012723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012723.pub2. PubMed 34637138 ↗
  • Fonseca MM, Mocelin FJ, Poltronieri LR, Guimaraes Filho JL. Treatment of varicose veins using the Cryo laser after foam technique. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2024 May 29;10(4):101549. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101549. eCollection 2024 Aug. PubMed 39027725 ↗
  • Bertanha M, Yoshida WB, Bueno de Camargo PA, Moura R, Reis de Paula D, Padovani CR, Sobreira ML. Polidocanol Plus Glucose Versus Glucose Alone for the Treatment of Telangiectasias: Triple Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial (PG3T). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;61(1):128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Aug 7. PubMed 32778489 ↗
  • Bertanha M, Jaldin RG, Moura R, Pimenta REF, Mariuba JVO, Lucio Filho CEP, Alcantara GP, Padovani CR, Yoshida WB, Sobreira ML. Sclerotherapy for Reticular Veins in the Lower Limbs: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Dec 1;153(12):1249-1255. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3426. PubMed 28973414 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No individual participant data (IPD) sharing is planned under the current study protocol. Participant data will be kept confidential and identified only by an alphanumeric study code. Study results will be reported in aggregate form without identification of individual participants.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Active, not recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 5, 2026
Sites
Clínica Civil - FAEPA USP is now Recruiting
Oct 5, 2026
Interventions
Arm changed Laser After Foam (LAAF)→Cryo-Laser After Foam (CLaF)
Oct 5, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionPercent Change in Residual Vascular Area From Baseline to Days 60, 90 and 180: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 5, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionIncidence and Intensity of Hyperpigmentation: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 5, 2026
Contact
Study contact now listed: added c•••@usp.br · •••6500. See the current contact
Oct 5, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • Clínica Civil - FAEPA USP · Ribeirão Preto, BrazilContact added c•••@usp.br · •••6500Contact added (no phone or email listed)Contact added (no phone or email listed)
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Recruiting
    Clínica Civil - FAEPA USP is now Recruiting
    Primary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionPercent Change in Residual Vascular Area From Baseline to Days 60, 90 and 180: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionIncidence and Intensity of Hyperpigmentation: how it is measured was reworded
    Interventions Arm changed Laser After Foam (LAAF)→Cryo-Laser After Foam (CLaF)
    Contact Study contact now listed: added c•••@usp.br · •••6500. See the current contact
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • Clínica Civil - FAEPA USP · Ribeirão Preto, BrazilContact added c•••@usp.br · •••6500Contact added (no phone or email listed)Contact added (no phone or email listed)
    + 3 other changes: verification date, description and design details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07793630
Responsible party
Cecília Salazar Ulacia (Principal Investigator, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Cecília S Ulacia, MD
Contact
ceciliasalazarulacia@usp.br
+55 (16) 3963-6500
Cecília S Ulacia, MD
principal investigator · University of Sao Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion