ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07638254Updated Jun 10, 2026

Buffered Versus Conventional Local Anesthesia for Pain and Anxiety Reduction in School-Aged Children With Pulpitis

An interventional study of Buffered Lidocaine with Epinephrine and idocaine with Epinephrine (Conventional) in Pulpitis, sponsored by Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí. Recruiting at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether buffered local anesthesia is more effective than conventional local anesthesia in reducing pain responses in school-aged children requiring dental treatment for pulpitis. The study will also assess differences in physiological and self-reported indicators of pain and anxiety, as well as anesthetic onset and duration.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does buffered local anesthesia reduce behavioral pain scores measured by the FLACC scale compared to conventional local anesthesia? Does buffered local anesthesia improve physiological and psychometric indicators of pain and anxiety during dental procedures?

Methodology: The researchers will compare buffered local anesthesia with conventional local anesthesia during routine dental treatment procedures such as pulpotomy or pulpectomy in primary molars.

Participants will:

Receive either buffered or conventional local anesthesia during dental treatment Undergo pulpotomy or pulpectomy depending on clinical diagnosis Be monitored for pain and anxiety using FLACC scale, heart rate, skin conductance, and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale at different stages of treatment Have the onset and duration of anesthesia recorded during and after the procedure Be followed until recovery of soft tissue sensation after treatment

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulpitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Anesthesia, Dental
  • Anesthesia, Local
  • Buffers
03

In context

Pulpitis

316 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulpitis; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 64 across 288 interventional studies indexed under Pulpitis.

Browse Pulpitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 6 to 12 years
  • Diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis due to dental caries in primary maxillary molars
  • (ASA) Physical Status Classification I
  • Cooperative or definitely cooperative behavior according to Frankl Behavioral Scale (Frankl III or IV)
  • Written provided by parent or legal guardian, and child assent when applicable
  • No use of analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication within 24 hours prior to the procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to any component of local anesthetic solution
  • History of negative or traumatic dental experiences within the previous 12 months that may interfere with behavioral assessment
  • Radiographic evidence of periapical pathology associated with the affected tooth
  • Presence of localized abscess or acute spreading infection at the injection site
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Buffered Local Anesthesia

    Participants will receive buffered local anesthesia during dental treatment for pulpitis. The local anesthetic solution will consist of lidocaine with epinephrine combined with sodium bicarbonate to increase pH prior to administration. The intervention will be applied via local infiltration or nerve block as clinically indicated for pulpotomy or pulpectomy procedures in primary maxillary molars

    Drug: Buffered Lidocaine with Epinephrine

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Local Anesthesia

    Participants will receive conventional local anesthesia during dental treatment for pulpitis. The anesthetic solution will consist of lidocaine with epinephrine administered without buffering. The intervention will be applied via local infiltration or nerve block according to clinical indication for pulpotomy or pulpectomy procedures in primary maxillary molars.

    Drug: idocaine with Epinephrine (Conventional)

Interventions

  • DrugBuffered Lidocaine with Epinephrine

    Drug pages: Buffered Lidocaine · Epinephrine

    Local anesthetic solution buffered with sodium bicarbonate prior to administration in order to increase pH and potentially improve onset and patient comfort during dental procedures.

  • Drugidocaine with Epinephrine (Conventional)

    Standard commercially available local anesthetic solution used in routine dental practice without pH modification

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. FLACC PAIN SCORE

    Pain behavior will be assessed using the FLACC(Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability) Scale score, during different phases of dental treatment in children with pulpitis receiving local anesthesia. The scale ranges from 0 to 10 points, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates severe pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (before local anesthetic administration), during anesthetic injection, cavity access (pulpotomy/pulpectomy), and final restoration phase (immediately during procedure)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physiological indicators (Heart Rate)

    Description: Heart rate will be recorded using a blood volume pulse (BVP) sensor during dental treatment. Unit of Measure: Beats per minute (bpm)

    Time frame: Baseline, during anesthetic injection, cavity access (pulpotomy/pulpectomy), and final restoration phase (immediately during procedure)

  2. Physiological indicators (Skin Conductance)

    Description: Skin conductance will be measured using electrodermal activity (EDA) sensors during dental treatment. Unit of Measure: MicroSiemens (µS)

    Time frame: Baseline, during anesthetic injection, cavity access (pulpotomy/pulpectomy), and final restoration phase (immediately during procedure)

  3. Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale Score

    Self-reported pain whit Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale will be recorded at predefined clinical stages of treatment. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 points, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain possible

    Time frame: Baseline (before local anesthetic administration, during anesthetic injection, cavity access (pulpotomy/pulpectomy), and final restoration phase (immediately during procedure)

  4. Onset of local anesthesia

    Description: Time elapsed from completion of local anesthetic injection until confirmation of pulpal anesthesia. Pulpal anesthesia will be verified using cold testing (Endo Ice) after confirmation of soft tissue anesthesia. Unit of Measure: Minutes and seconds

    Time frame: From completion of anesthetic injection until confirmation of pulpal anesthesia during the treatment visit.

  5. Duration of soft tissue anesthesia

    Description: Time elapsed from confirmed loss of soft tissue sensation following local anesthetic administration until complete recovery of sensation as reported by the participant's caregiver. Unit of Measure: Minutes

    Time frame: From confirmation of soft tissue anesthesia immediately after injection until complete recovery of sensation, assessed up to 6 hours after treatment.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
    San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí 78290, Mexico
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aulestia-Viera PV, Braga MM, Borsatti MA. The effect of adjusting the pH of local anaesthetics in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2018 Aug;51(8):862-876. doi: 10.1111/iej.12899. Epub 2018 Feb 21. PubMed 29377171 ↗
  • Kurien RS, Goswami M, Singh S. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Spring;12(2):102-109. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.016. Epub 2018 Jun 20. PubMed 30087760 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07638254
Lead sponsor
Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí
Responsible party
Daniela Guzmán Uribe (Clinical Professor, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 10, 2026
Start date
Mar 2, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Study contacts

Mayte A Condori Chambi, Cirujano Dentista
Contact
maytecondori97@gmail.com
+524446641295

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Buffered Lidocaine · Epinephrine

Start the discussion