ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07779148Updated Aug 21, 2026

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Irrigation Activation Methods During Endodontic Retreatment

An interventional study of Xp Finisher R file in Endodontic Inflammation, sponsored by Minia University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by Minia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
13 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The persistent and secondary intraradicular infections are the primary causes of post-treatment disease following endodontic treatment of any tooth. When conventional root canal treatment fails, endodontic retreatment is often the preferred option, as it represents one of the most conservative approaches.

Endodontic retreatment involves removing old root canal filling material followed by cleaning, shaping, and refilling the canals. It may be associated with postoperative pain due to periapical tissue irritation and apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation.

Read the detailed description

Endodontic retreatment involves removing old root canal filling material followed by cleaning, shaping, and refilling the canals. It may be associated with postoperative pain due to periapical tissue irritation and apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation.

Also, the retreatment procedure plays a critical role in enhancing periapical healing and improving long-term outcomes in failed initial treatments.

Activation of irrigants during endodontic retreatment enhances the removal of residual gutta-percha, sealers, and debris, especially in lateral canals and complex areas. It also boosts disinfectant effectiveness, improving canal cleanliness and retreatment outcomes.

Ultrasonic activation uses high frequency vibrations to enhance irrigant penetration and fluid dynamics during endodontic retreatment. It improves the removal of residual filling materials and debris more effectively than conventional irrigation. The technique promotes cavitation and acoustic streaming, boosting disinfectant effectiveness and reducing bacterial load. Overall, ultrasonic activation enhances canal cleaning and contributes to better retreatment outcomes.

XP endo Finisher R is a specialized endodontic instrument designed for retreatment to improve removal of residual root filling materials from canals that conventional files cannot fully clean, especially in oval or curved anatomies. It uses flexible MaxWire alloy that expands in the canal, increasing contact with walls and enhancing removal of remnants and debris. Studies using micro CT imaging show that XP endo Finisher R significantly reduces filling material volume compared to some conventional techniques and is effective as a supplementary step after primary retreatment files .

CBCT provides three dimensional imaging that allows more accurate assessment of periapical healing and detection of residual pathology following endodontic retreatment compared with conventional 2 D radiographs. It is more sensitive in identifying persistent apical lesions and missed anatomy that may impact retreatment success. CBCT evaluation can influence clinical decision making and treatment planning by revealing details not seen in traditional imaging.

Systematic reviews show CBCT based outcome assessments often report different success rates due to this increased diagnostic sensitivity. Overall, CBCT contributes to a more comprehensive evaluation of retreatment outcomes and helps guide management further.

Despite the increasing use of irrigation activation techniques during endodontic retreatment, limited clinical evidence exists comparing XP-endo Finisher R with ultrasonic activation regarding postoperative pain and periapical healing outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endodontic Inflammation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pulpitis

316 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulpitis; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 34 is below the median of 64 across 288 interventional studies indexed under Pulpitis.

Browse Pulpitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Minia University is the lead sponsor of 370 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with mature teeth.
  • Patients with failed previous Endo treatment related by periapical periodontitis
  • Single Rooted with single root canal.
  • Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect predictable outcome.
  • Patients who agree to the consent and will commit to follow-up period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with immature roots.
  • Patients with any systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
  • Patients with swelling.
  • Pregnant females.
  • Patients who could/would not participate in follow-up.
  • Patients with old age.
  • Teeth with periodontal involvement.
  • Teeth with vertical root fractures.
  • Non-restorable teeth
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Xp Finisher R file Group

    About 17 cases suffering from caries then the Caries will be removed with a sterile stone will undergo Xp Shaper R file for irrigation activation during retreatment procedure

    Procedure: Xp Finisher R file

  • Active comparator
    Ultrasonic activation Group

    About 17 cases suffering from caries then the Caries will be removed with a sterile stone will undergo Ultrasonic activation of irrigation activation during retreatment procedure

    Procedure: Xp Finisher R file

Interventions

  • ProcedureXp Finisher R file

    to evaluate the incidence and severity of postoperative pain using a numeric rating scale at 24, 48, and 72 hours and periapical healing via CBCT following retreatment with two different irrigation activation techniques: 1. Xp Finisher R file activation of irrigation. 2. Ultrasonic activation of irrigation.

    Also known as: Ultrasonic activation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post Operative Pain

    Assessing the post operative pain measured by a numerical pain rating scale (NRS) where the level of pain will be recorded as follows: 0 reading represents "no pain" ; 1- 3 reading represents "mild pain" ; 4- 6 reading represents "moderate pain" and 7- 10 reading representative sever pain.

    Time frame: from 6 hours to 48 hours after the procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Dentistery Hospital, Minia University
    Minya, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07779148
Lead sponsor
Minia University
Responsible party
Magdy Mohy Eldeen (Assistant Lecturer at Endodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 10, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Magdy Mohy Eldeen Abdulrazzak, MSC
Contact
Dentist.magdy@gmail.com
+201153661666
Wael Hussien kamel, professor
Contact
waelkamel.26@azhar.edu.eg
+201001251094
Wael Hussien kamel, M.D
study chair · Professor of Endodontics Head of Endodontic Department,Faculty of Dentistry,Future University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion