ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02102542Updated Apr 3, 2014

Efficacy of Intravenous Glyco-P® in Patients Undergoing Procedure That Require Anesthesia Service

An observational study in Hypersalivation, Prevention of Drooling and Bradycardia, sponsored by Mahidol University. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-04-03.

Sponsored by Mahidol University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study was designed to prove clinical efficacy of the well known "glycopyrrolate" which is considered an orphan drug in Thailand. Since the medication has never been officially used in Thai people and this particular brand "Glyco-P" which was made in India has never been officially proven of its efficacy in Thai people. The study was aimed to prove if this Glyco-P can modestly increase patient's heart rate, decrease secretion and safely used in combination with neostigmine for reversal of non-depo muscle relaxant drugs.

Read the detailed description

Background and rationale Glycopyrrolate has been long used since it's first discovery in 19602. The medication is generally available in both oral and injectable form. The uses of glycopyrrolate in anesthesia are mainly for reduction of salivation and secretion3, which plays significant role when airway instrumentation required. The widespread uses of neostigmine for reversal of muscle relaxant effects caused by non-depolarizing muscle relaxant also mandate the co-administration of anti-muscarinic4,5,6. Without availability of glycopyrrolate, atropine was used in Thailand, which results in excessive tachycardia and salivation7,8,9. Glycopyrrolate can also be used when mild bradycardia is encountered but the effects on heart rate is less dominant than atropine10,11.

Glycopyrrolate is considered an orphan drugs in Thailand. There was simply no availability until recently. The local company named "Masu" has decided to market and import the drug from India (Glyco-P®). The formulary has been approved by Thai Food and Drug Administration1. The preparation has also been tested in laboratory by third party well-known pharmacy institute, which proved the existence of an active ingredient. However, the uses of this medication officially have not been made and the appropriate action is to obtain IRB approval at local institution and consent the patients prior to drug administration. The appropriate record of clinical effect should also been made.

Objective

  1. Evaluate the clinical efficacy of glycopyrrolate on heart rate, anti-sialagogue effects and when used in conjunction with neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
  2. Evaluate the timing, onset and duration of glycopyrrolate injection at different dose.

Materials, participants and study method The study requires

  1. 100 patients who scheduled to undergo procedure or operation that require anesthesia service who meet criteria for the uses of glycopyrrolate which includes - requirement of anti-sialogogue, mild bradycardia and in whom receiving neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents.
  2. Glyco-P injection
  3. Monitorings that capable of HR, BP measurement
  4. Suctioning equipment with volumetric measurement
  5. Clinician evaluating the effects of medication
  6. Timer Participants:- 100 adult male or female patients, over 18 year old who consent to the study.

Exclusion Criteria : Children \< 18 yo, pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients, patients who refused or unable to give consent, patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm Study method

  1. The patient who meet inclusion criteria will be consent to receive medications.
  2. The medications will be administered only 1 of these criteria are met

    • To increase heart rate modestly
    • For reduction of secretion or salivation
    • To co-administration with neostigmine
  3. The medications will be given in the following fashion

    • Glyco-P 4 mcg/kg IV, repeatedly if no effects. Halt if HR > 100 bpm
    • Glyco-P 0.2 mg per each mg of neostigmine used
  4. The clinical effects i.e. heart rate, blood pressure, amount of secretion removed will be recorded along with timing of onset and offset.
  5. Collected data will be analyzed by statistician with appropriate statistical methods.

Data analysis

  1. Demographic data or each participants
  2. Dose and indication of treatment of studied drugs
  3. Timing of clinical effects
  4. Changes in heart rate and blood pressure
  5. Efficacy of reduction of saliva and secretion

Duration of study 3 months Benefit of the study Confirmation of clinical efficacy of this Indian made glycopyrrolate - Glyco-P® in Thai patients.

Other institutions participation None

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypersalivation
  • Prevention of Drooling
  • Bradycardia
  • Reversal of Muscle Relaxants

Keywords

  • glycopyrrolate
  • efficacy
  • antisialagogue
03

In context

Sialorrhea

60 studies on the registry are indexed under Sialorrhea; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 65 is below the median of 90 across 11 observational studies indexed under Sialorrhea.

Browse Sialorrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Mahidol University is the lead sponsor of 747 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants:- 100 adult male or female patients, over 18 year old who consent to the study.

Exclusion Criteria : Children \< 18 yo, pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients, patients who refused or unable to give consent, patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult over 18 years of age, undergoing procedure that require anesthesia service.
  • meet criteria for prevention of drooling, hypersalivation or bradycardia or require reversal of muscle relaxants.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children \< 18 years old,
  • pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients,
  • patients who refused or unable to give consent,
  • patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion (i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis),
  • patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65 participants (estimated)

Groups and cohorts

  • Antisialagouge

    A group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P for reduction of secretions.

  • Bradycardia

    A group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P for modest increase of heart rate.

  • For reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents

    Group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P when used in combination with neostigmine to reserve neuromuscular blocking agents.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Glyco-P as an antisialagogue

    Examine efficacy of Glyco-P for reduction of secretion and also for prevention of secretion. The secretions score ranges from 0-5 was evaluated by a person who was blinded to treatment before and after treatment.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Anesthesiology Department Siriraj Hospital
    Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Salem MG, Richardson JC, Meadows GA, Lamplugh G, Lai KM. Comparison between glycopyrrolate and atropine in a mixture with neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Studies in patients following open heart surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1985 Feb;57(2):184-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.2.184. PubMed 2857570 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2012, a primary completion of Mar 2013 and a completion of Apr 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 30, 2014
First posted
Apr 3, 2014
Start
Jul 2012
Primary completionActual
Mar 2013
CompletionActual
Apr 2013
Last update
Apr 3, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02102542
Lead sponsor
Mahidol University
Responsible party
Prasert Sawasdiwipachai (Attending physician, Mahidol University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 3, 2014
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Apr 2013
Last update
Apr 3, 2014

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion