ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07522255Updated Oct 27, 2026

Rifaximin Treatment in Bloating Predominant Functional Bowel Disorders

A Phase 3 interventional study of Rifaximin (drug) and Placebo in Bloating, Rifaximin and Functional Bowel Disorder, sponsored by Mahidol University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Mahidol University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 27, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will evaluate the effects of a 14-day course of rifaximin on bloating symptoms, gut microbiota, microbial metabolites, and intestinal gases in adults with Rome V irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) or functional abdominal bloating (FAB). Participants with predominant, bothersome bloating despite adequate bowel movement management will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rifaximin 550 mg three times daily or matching placebo for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants with a bloating response, defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline on a 7-point Likert bloating scale at the end of treatment. Additional assessments will include other gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, psychological symptoms, gut microbiota diversity and composition, fecal short-chain fatty acids, plasma bile acids and gut-derived uremic toxins, and breath hydrogen and methane levels. Associations between biological changes and clinical response will also be examined.

Read the detailed description

Abdominal bloating is a common and bothersome symptom in disorders of gut-brain interaction, including irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and functional abdominal bloating (FAB). Its mechanisms may include altered gastrointestinal motility, visceral hypersensitivity, microbial fermentation, and changes in intestinal microbiota. Symptoms may persist despite adequate management of constipation, and treatment options specifically targeting bloating remain limited.

Rifaximin is a minimally absorbed oral antibiotic that may improve bloating by modifying intestinal microbiota and microbial metabolic activity. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial will evaluate its effects on bloating and associated biological measures in adults aged 18-80 years with Rome V IBS-C or FAB. Eligible participants must have predominant, bothersome bloating, with a score of at least 3 on a 7-point Likert scale, despite adequate bowel movement management.

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rifaximin 550 mg three times daily or matching placebo for 14 days. Computer-generated randomization will use blocks of four, with stratification by diagnostic subgroup. Participants, treating physicians, and investigators will remain blinded to treatment allocation.

Baseline assessments will include demographic and clinical characteristics, gastrointestinal symptoms, bowel habits, quality of life, and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Stool samples will be collected for gut microbiota profiling using shotgun metagenomics and measurement of fecal short-chain fatty acids. Blood samples will be collected to measure plasma bile acids and gut-derived uremic toxins. Lactulose breath testing will assess hydrogen and methane levels. Clinical and laboratory assessments will be repeated at the end of treatment.

During treatment, participants will record daily bloating and abdominal pain scores, bowel movement frequency, stool consistency using the Bristol Stool Form Scale, and rescue medication use. Prespecified rescue medications will be permitted for breakthrough symptoms. A telephone assessment at week 1 will evaluate symptoms, quality of life, psychological symptoms, treatment satisfaction, medication adherence, and adverse events.

The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants with a bloating response, defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline on the 7-point Likert bloating scale at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes include abdominal pain, IBS symptom severity, bowel habits, quality of life, depression, anxiety and stress scores, treatment satisfaction, and rescue medication use. Biological outcomes include changes in gut microbiota diversity and composition, fecal short-chain fatty acids, plasma bile acids and gut-derived uremic toxins, and breath hydrogen and methane levels. Analyses will also examine associations between biological measures and clinical outcomes and identify baseline factors associated with treatment response.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bloating
  • Rifaximin
  • Functional Bowel Disorder
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Constipation
  • Microbiota
  • Metabolomic Profile

Keywords

  • Rifaximin
  • Bloating
  • Functional bowel disorder
  • Gut microbiota
  • Metabolome
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,116 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 78 is above the median of 70 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Mahidol University is the lead sponsor of 747 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Oct 27, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 80 years.
  • Rome V diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, or functional abdominal bloating.
  • Bothersome bloating with baseline severity of at least 3 on a 7-point Likert scale after adequate constipation treatment, defined as stool frequency from at least 3 times/week to 3 times/day and Bristol Stool Form Scale type 3-5.
  • Colonoscopy, CT colonography, or barium enema performed if clinically indicated as part of standard evaluation for bowel symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of major gastrointestinal surgery, except appendectomy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • Inflammatory bowel disease or other inflammatory gastrointestinal conditions.
  • Current use of, or inability to discontinue, medications that may affect intestinal microbiota or gas measurements, including antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, probiotics, lactulose, NSAIDs, or metformin.
  • Current use of, or inability to discontinue, medications that may affect bloating symptoms, including simethicone, simethicone-containing antispasmodics, or antidiarrheal medications.
  • Underlying conditions known to affect intestinal microbiota composition, including cirrhosis, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, obesity, , or psychiatric disorders.
  • Opioid-induced constipation.
  • Known allergy to rifaximin.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
78 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rifaximin

    Participants randomized to this arm receive rifaximin 550 mg orally three times daily for 2 weeks.

    Drug: Rifaximin (drug)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants randomized to this arm receive an identical placebo orally three times daily for 2 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Participants randomized to this arm receive rifaximin 550 mg orally three times daily for 2 weeks. Allocation is randomized and double-blinded.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Matching placebo administered orally three times daily for 14 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bloating responder rate

    Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline to week 2 in bloating symptom severity measured using a 7-point Likert scale for bothersomeness of bloating (range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms). Score categories are 0 = not at all, 1 = hardly, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = a good deal, 5 = a great deal, and 6 = a very great deal.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Abdominal pain response rate

    Abdominal pain responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline to week 2 in abdominal pain severity measured using a 7-point Likert scale for bothersomeness of abdominal pain (range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms). Score categories are 0 = not at all, 1 = hardly, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = a good deal, 5 = a great deal, and 6 = a very great deal.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  2. Change in Global IBS Symptoms (IBS-C patients)

    Change in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) from baseline, assessing overall IBS symptom burden, abdominal pain, bloating, and bowel habit changes. The IBS-SSS scale ranges from 0 to 500, with higher scores indicating more severe IBS symptoms.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  3. Treatment satisfaction

    Overall treatment satisfaction, measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10: 0 = Completely Dissatisfied 10 = Completely Satisfied Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with treatment. The difference between baseline and post-intervention scores will be analyzed.

    Time frame: End of treatment at 2 weeks

  4. Change in Psychological Symptoms

    Change in Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scores (DASS-21), a validated self-reported scale measuring psychological distress. The DASS-21 consists of three subscales: Depression (0-21) Anxiety (0-21) Stress (0-21) Each subscale score ranges from 0 (normal) to 21 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress. The total score is calculated by summing individual subscale scores.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  5. Change in Quality of Life (IBS-C patients)

    Change in IBS-specific Quality of Life (IBS-QoL) score, which assesses the impact of IBS on daily activities, emotional well-being, and social functioning. The IBS-QoL score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  6. Change in quality of life (FAB patients)

    The quality of life of patients with FAB/D was measure with 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The SF-36 assesses health-related quality of life across 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. Each domain score is transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  7. Stool microbiota diversity and composition

    Change from baseline in stool microbiota alpha diversity, beta diversity, and taxonomic abundance measured by shotgun metagenomics.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  8. Change in intestinal gas measurement (hydrogen)

    Change from baseline in hydrogen gas production measured in part per million unit during lactulose hydrogen breath testing.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  9. Change in intestinal gas measurement (methane)

    Change from baseline in methane gas production measured in part per million unit during lactulose hydrogen breath testing.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  10. Proportion of patients with positive lactulose hydrogen breath test

    A positive lactulose hydrogen breath test is defined as either a rise in breath hydrogen of 20 ppm or more above baseline within 90 minutes or a breath methane concentration of 10 ppm or more at any time during the test after ingestion of 10 g lactulose. Breath samples are collected every 15 to 30 minutes for up to 180 minutes. Higher proportions indicate a worse outcome (more abnormal breath test results).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  11. Rescue medication use

    Frequency and dose of rescue medications used for breakthrough symptoms during the treatment period.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  12. Adverse events

    Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  13. Association between baseline bloating symptom severity score and bloating response at 2 weeks

    Exploratory analysis of whether baseline bloating symptom severity predicts treatment response. Baseline bloating symptom severity is assessed using a 7-point Likert scale for bothersomeness of bloating (score range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms). The association between baseline score and bloating responder status at 2 weeks will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in bloating symptom severity score.

    Time frame: Baseline predictor with treatment response assessed at 2 weeks

  14. Association between baseline fecal microbiota alpha diversity and bloating response at 2 weeks

    Exploratory analysis of whether baseline fecal microbiota alpha diversity predicts treatment response. Baseline stool microbiota is assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing. Alpha diversity will be assessed using the Shannon diversity index. The association between baseline Shannon diversity index and bloating responder status at 2 weeks will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in bloating symptom severity score.

    Time frame: Baseline predictor with treatment response assessed at 2 weeks

  15. Association between baseline positive diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and bloating response at 2 weeks

    Exploratory analysis of whether baseline small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) status predicts treatment response. Baseline SIBO status will be assessed using a lactulose hydrogen-methane breath test after ingestion of 10 g lactulose, with breath samples collected every 15 to 30 minutes for up to 180 minutes. A positive SIBO diagnosis is defined as a rise in breath hydrogen of 20 parts per million or more above baseline within 90 minutes. The association between baseline positive SIBO status (yes/no) and bloating responder status at 2 weeks will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in bloating symptom severity score.

    Time frame: Baseline predictor with treatment response assessed at 2 weeks.

  16. Association between baseline positive diagnosis of intestinal methanogen overgrowth and bloating response at 2 weeks

    Exploratory analysis of whether baseline intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO) status predicts treatment response. Baseline IMO status will be assessed using a lactulose hydrogen-methane breath test after ingestion of 10 g lactulose, with breath samples collected every 15 to 30 minutes for up to 180 minutes. A positive IMO diagnosis is defined as a breath methane concentration of 10 parts per million or more at any time during the test. The association between baseline positive IMO status (yes/no) and bloating responder status at 2 weeks will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in bloating symptom severity score.

    Time frame: Baseline predictor with treatment response assessed at 2 weeks.

  17. Changes in fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations

    Between-group differences in changes from baseline in fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations following rifaximin or placebo treatment.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  18. Changes in plasma bile acid concentrations

    Between-group differences in changes from baseline in plasma bile acid concentrations following rifaximin or placebo treatment.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  19. Changes in gut-derived uremic toxin concentrations

    Between-group differences in changes from baseline in plasma gut-derived uremic toxin concentrations following rifaximin or placebo treatment.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

  20. Bloating response at weeks 4

    Proportion of participants in each treatment group with at least a 1-point reduction from baseline on the 7-point Likert bloating scale, assessed by telephone at weeks 4.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 4 weeks

  21. Bloating response at weeks 8

    Proportion of participants in each treatment group with at least a 1-point reduction from baseline on the 7-point Likert bloating scale, assessed by telephone at weeks 8.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mearin F, Lacy BE, Chang L, Chey WD, Lembo AJ, Simren M, Spiller R. Bowel Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 18:S0016-5085(16)00222-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031. Online ahead of print. PubMed 27144627 ↗
  • Lacy BE, Chang L, Rao SSC, Heimanson Z, Sayuk GS. Rifaximin Treatment for Individual and Multiple Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea: An Analysis Using New End Points. Clin Ther. 2023 Mar;45(3):198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Mar 14. PubMed 36922331 ↗
  • Chey WD, Shah ED, DuPont HL. Mechanism of action and therapeutic benefit of rifaximin in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a narrative review. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 23;13:1756284819897531. doi: 10.1177/1756284819897531. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32047534 ↗
  • Melchior C, Hammer H, Bor S, Barba E, Horvat IB, Celebi A, Drug V, Dumitrascu D, Kalkan IH, Hauser G, Lionis C, Livovsky D, Mari A, Mulak A, Surdea-Blaga T, Tack J, Vanuytsel T, Savarino EV, Zarate-Lopez N, Hammer J, Dickman R. European Consensus on Functional Bloating and Abdominal Distension-An ESNM/UEG Recommendations for Clinical Management. United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 Nov;13(9):1613-1651. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.70098. Epub 2025 Aug 22. PubMed 40844856 ↗
  • Moshiree B, Drossman D, Shaukat A. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Evaluation and Management of Belching, Abdominal Bloating, and Distention: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2023 Sep;165(3):791-800.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.039. Epub 2023 Jul 13. PubMed 37452811 ↗
  • Arora U, Sachdeva K, Garg P, Baitha U, Kedia S, Kalaivani M, Ahuja V, Kumar A, Ranjan P, Vikram NK, Sinha S, Biswas A, Wig N. Efficacy of Rifaximin in Patients With Abdominal Bloating or Distension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 1;58(4):360-369. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001872. PubMed 37310270 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — To protect participant confidentiality and comply with institutional and regulatory requirements, no IPD will be shared unless with reasonable request.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Jun 2028, 18 months later.

Of 23 phase 3 interventional studies under Irritable Bowel Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 27, 2026: start Apr 2026 → Dec 2026, primary completion Oct 2027 → Jun 2028 and completion Dec 2027 → Dec 2028.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 23, 2026
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026was Apr 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2028was Oct 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028was Dec 2027
Last update
Oct 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Apr 2026→Dec 2026
Oct 27, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2027→Jun 2028
Oct 27, 2026
Study completion
Dec 2027→Dec 2028
Oct 27, 2026
Eligibility
1 inclusion criterion edited
What changed in the criteria
Inclusion criteria
  • EditedRome IVV diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, functional with constipation, or functional abdominal bloating/distension.
Oct 27, 2026
Secondary outcomes
3 edited, 5 added, 2 removed, 1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedChange in Global IBS Symptoms (IBS-C patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
  • EditedChange in global constipation symptomsQuality of Life (constipationIBS-C patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
  • EditedChange in Qualityquality of Lifelife (IBSFAB patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
  • AddedChanges in fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrationsTime frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
  • AddedChanges in plasma bile acid concentrationsTime frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
  • AddedChanges in gut-derived uremic toxin concentrationsTime frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
  • AddedBloating response at weeks 4Time frame: From enrollment to 4 weeks
  • AddedBloating response at weeks 8Time frame: From enrollment to 8 weeks
  • RemovedChange in Quality of Life (constipation patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
  • RemovedChange in quality of life (FAB/D patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
  • DescriptionStool microbiota diversity and composition: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Start date Apr 2026→Dec 2026
    Primary completion Oct 2027→Jun 2028
    Study completion Dec 2027→Dec 2028
    Eligibility 1 inclusion criterion edited
    What changed in the criteria
    Inclusion criteria
    • EditedRome IVV diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, functional with constipation, or functional abdominal bloating/distension.
    Secondary outcomes 3 edited, 5 added, 2 removed, 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedChange in Global IBS Symptoms (IBS-C patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
    • EditedChange in global constipation symptomsQuality of Life (constipationIBS-C patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
    • EditedChange in Qualityquality of Lifelife (IBSFAB patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
    • AddedChanges in fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrationsTime frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
    • AddedChanges in plasma bile acid concentrationsTime frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
    • AddedChanges in gut-derived uremic toxin concentrationsTime frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
    • AddedBloating response at weeks 4Time frame: From enrollment to 4 weeks
    • AddedBloating response at weeks 8Time frame: From enrollment to 8 weeks
    • RemovedChange in Quality of Life (constipation patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
    • RemovedChange in quality of life (FAB/D patients)Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
    • DescriptionStool microbiota diversity and composition: how it is measured was reworded
    + 4 other changes: identifiers, verification date, description and conditions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07522255
Lead sponsor
Mahidol University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Monthira Maneerattanaporn, M.D.
Contact
monthira.man@mahidol.ac.th
+66 24197281
Pubet Weeranawin, M.D.
Contact
pubet.w@gmail.com
+66 832958042
Monthira Maneerattanaporn, M.D.
principal investigator · Mahidol University
Pubet Weeranawin, M.D.
study chair · Mahidol University
Somchai Leelakusolvong, M.D.
study chair · Mahidol University
Tanawat Geeratragool, M.D.
study chair · Mahidol University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Rifaximin

Start the discussion