ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07069257NOMES-CPUpdated Apr 15, 2026

Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Added to Oral Motor Therapy in Cerebral Palsy

An interventional study of Oral Motor Therapy and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in Cerebral Palsy (CP) and Drooling, sponsored by Aslinur Keles Ercisli, MD, PhD. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 4 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-15.

Sponsored by Aslinur Keles Ercisli, MD, PhD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, controlled, single-blind trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with oral motor therapy in reducing drooling severity among children with cerebral palsy. Participants will be allocated to an intervention group (oral motor therapy plus NMES), a control group (oral motor therapy alone) and a sham group (oral motor therapy with placebo NMES).

Read the detailed description

Drooling is a common and disabling problem in children with cerebral palsy, adversely affecting health, social participation, and quality of life. Oral motor therapy is frequently used to improve oral control, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been suggested as an adjunctive treatment to enhance orofacial muscle function.

This randomized, controlled, single-blind study will include children aged 4 to 17 years diagnosed with cerebral palsy and presenting with moderate to severe drooling (Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale score ≥3). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: oral motor therapy alone, oral motor therapy plus active NMES, and oral motor therapy with sham NMES. The intervention comprises twelve therapy sessions over four weeks, delivered by a trained therapist.

Oral motor therapy involves exercises targeting lips, tongue, cheeks, and jaw, in addition to thermal and tactile stimulation (using brushes, spoons, cold packs, and heat packs). NMES will be applied bilaterally to the masseter muscles and to the orbicularis oris muscle using a Chattanooga NMES device. Sham NMES will simulate the procedure without delivering active stimulation.

Outcome measures will be assessed before and after the intervention and will include both subjective and objective drooling scales: Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS), Drooling Impact Scale (DIS), Visual Analog Scale for drooling severity, Drooling Quotient (DQ5), and caregiver reports of bib usage. Orofacial muscle thickness will be measured with ultrasound imaging. Additional assessments will include functional classification systems (GMFCS, MACS, CFCS, VFCS, EDACS, FOIS) and the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (PEDI EAT-10).

This study is approved by the Ethics Committee of Istanbul Medipol University.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy (CP)
  • Drooling

Keywords

  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Drooling
  • Sialorrhea
  • Oral Motor Therapy
  • Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
  • Pediatric Rehabilitation
  • Ultrasound
  • Masseter Muscle
  • Orbicularis Oris Muscle
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,936 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 458 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 34 across 1,431 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Aslinur Keles Ercisli, MD, PhD is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of cerebral palsy (unilateral/bilateral spastic, ataxic, dyskinetic, or mixed type)
  • Presence of drooling control problems
  • Age between 4 and 17 years
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels 2, 3, 4, or 5
  • Stable drooling severity for at least one month prior to enrollment
  • Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) score of 3 or higher

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of dysphagia
  • Use of medications affecting drooling within the past 72 hours
  • Upper respiratory tract infection and/or salivary gland infection during the study period
  • History of botulinum toxin injection to the salivary glands
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Oral Motor Therapy Plus NMES

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive oral motor therapy combined with active neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) applied to the masseter and orbicularis oris muscles.

    Behavioral: Oral Motor Therapy · Device: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES)

  • Other
    Oral Motor Therapy

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive oral motor therapy without any NMES. This is a behavioral therapy.

    Behavioral: Oral Motor Therapy

  • Sham comparator
    Oral Motor Therapy Plus Sham NMES

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive oral motor therapy combined with sham NMES that does not deliver active stimulation.

    Behavioral: Oral Motor Therapy · Device: Sham Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (Sham NMES)

Interventions

  • BehavioralOral Motor Therapy

    Structured oral motor exercises will be applied to the lips, tongue, cheeks, and jaw. Facial massage and thermal stimulation (warm and cold) will be performed. Intraoral sensory stimulation will be applied using a brush, lemon juice, and a cold metal probe.

  • DeviceNeuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES)

    Active NMES will be applied bilaterally to the masseter muscles and to the orbicularis oris muscle in addition to oral motor therapy sessions, using a Chattanooga NMES device. Each application will be performed in cycles of 5 seconds of stimulation and 10 seconds of rest. The stimulation parameters will be set to a frequency of 10-15 Hz and a pulse width of 300 microseconds. The current intensity will be gradually increased to a level just above the motor threshold, sufficient to elicit a noticeable pulling sensation without causing discomfort, and will be adjusted according to each participant's tolerance. NMES will be delivered for a total duration of 15 minutes per session. For the electrical stimulation of the orbicularis oris muscle, a pen-type electrode will be used. In this procedure, four regions of the orbicularis oris muscle (upper, lower, right, and left) will be stimulated in two cycles of 45 pulses each.

  • DeviceSham Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (Sham NMES)

    Simulated neuromuscular electrical stimulation will be applied without delivering active electrical current after oral motor therapy sessions to mimic the treatment experience without producing physiological effects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) Score

    The Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) is a validated clinical tool that assesses drooling in two domains: severity and frequency. Severity is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (dry; never drools) to 5 (profuse; clothing, hands, tray, and objects wet). Frequency is rated on a 4-point scale from 1 (never) to 4 (constantly). Higher scores in each subscale indicate more severe and frequent drooling. The total score reflects the combined impact of both dimensions.

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)

  2. Change in Drooling Impact Scale (DIS) Score

    The Drooling Impact Scale (DIS) assesses the impact of drooling on daily life. It consists of 10 items, each scored from 1 (barely) to 10 (extremely), resulting in a total score range of 10 to 100. Higher scores indicate a greater negative impact of drooling on quality of life.

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Orofacial Muscle Thickness Measured by Ultrasound

    Ultrasound measurement of masseter and orbicularis oris muscle thickness to evaluate changes in muscle structure following intervention.

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)

  2. Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Drooling Severity Score

    Participants or caregivers rate the perceived severity of drooling using a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no drooling) to 10 (extremely severe drooling). Higher scores indicate greater severity of drooling. The VAS is a widely used subjective assessment tool in clinical settings.

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)

  3. Change in Drooling Quotient (DQ5)

    The Drooling Quotient (DQ5) is an observational measure used to quantify the frequency of drooling in individuals with drooling disorders. Observations are conducted during two separate 5-minute periods: one during rest (passive state) and one during activity (active state such as talking or playing). During each 5-minute period, the presence or absence of drooling is recorded every 15 seconds, for a total of 20 intervals per condition. The DQ5 is calculated as the percentage of intervals in which drooling is observed (e.g., drooling observed in 6 out of 20 intervals = 30%). Higher percentages indicate more frequent drooling. Scores from both rest and activity conditions are reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)

  4. Change in Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS) Score

    The Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS) evaluates chewing function in children with cerebral palsy, scored from Level 1 (normal chewing) to Level 4 (severely impaired chewing).

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)

  5. Change in Tongue Thrust Rating Scale (TTRS) Score

    The Tongue Thrust Rating Scale (TTRS) is a clinician-rated observational tool used to assess the severity of tongue thrust during swallowing. It is scored on a 3-point scale: 1. = No tongue thrust, 2. = Mild; tongue positioned between the teeth, 3. = Moderate; tongue positioned between the lips. Higher scores indicate more pronounced tongue thrust behavior during swallowing.

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)

  6. Change in Daily Number of Wet Bibs and Cloths

    The total number of bibs and cloths used daily due to drooling, recorded by caregivers. Higher counts reflect increased drooling severity.

    Time frame: At Baseline and at 4th Week (after completion of 12 therapy sessions)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
    Ataşehir, Istanbul 34758, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Zehra Aycan · Principal investigator
    • Esra Giray, Assoc. Prof. · Sub investigator
    • Aslinur Keles, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Assoratgoon I, Shiraishi N, Tagaino R, Ogawa T, Sasaki K. Sensory neuromuscular electrical stimulation for dysphagia rehabilitation: A literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Feb;50(2):157-164. doi: 10.1111/joor.13391. Epub 2022 Nov 28. PubMed 36357332 ↗
  • Sigan SN, Uzunhan TA, Aydinli N, Eraslan E, Ekici B, Caliskan M. Effects of oral motor therapy in children with cerebral palsy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2013 Jul;16(3):342-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.116923. PubMed 24101813 ↗
  • 2. Awan, W. A., Aftab, A., Janua, U. I., Ramzan, R., & Khan, N. (2017). EFFECTIVENESS OF KINESIO TAPING WITH OROMOTOR EXERCISES IN IMPROVING DROOLING AMONG CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY: soi: 21-2017/re-trjvol01iss02p21. The Rehabilitation Journal, 1(02), 21-27.
  • 1. Fatima et al (2019), Study of the effectiveness of oromotor exercises to reduce drooling in cerebral palsy children

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to confidentiality concerns and institutional data sharing policies.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Jul 2026, 2 months later.

Of 902 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cerebral Palsy, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 921 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 7, 2025
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
StartEst.
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2026
Last update
Apr 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07069257
Lead sponsor
Aslinur Keles Ercisli, MD, PhD
Responsible party
Aslinur Keles Ercisli, MD, PhD (Investigator, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2026

Study contacts

ZEHRA AYCAN
Contact
zehrabir.123@gmail.com
+90 553 450 00 22
Aslinur Keles
Contact
aslinur.ercisli@gmail.com
Zehra Aycan
principal investigator · Health Sciences University Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Esra Giray, Assoc. Prof.
study chair · Istanbul University of Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Aslinur Keles Ercisli, MD, PhD
study director · Istanbul University of Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion