ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07924579Updated Nov 9, 2026

Balance Exergame Training in Older Adults With a History of Falls

An interventional study of Nintendo Wii Fit Balance Exergame Training and Conventional Balance Training in Falls (Accidents) in Old Age, sponsored by Mahidol University. Recruiting at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Mahidol University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Nov 2026).
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Falls are a major health concern among older adults and can affect mobility, independence, and quality of life. Balance training is commonly used to improve postural control and reduce fall risk. However, conventional balance training mainly focuses on physical movement, whereas balance exergames combine physical exercise with cognitive challenges that may help improve both motor control and executive function.

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of balance exergame training on cortical excitability, cortical inhibition, and functional performance in older adults with a history of falls.

A total of 42 Thai older adults aged 65-85 years with at least one fall during the previous 12 months will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups: a balance exergame group or a conventional balance training group.

The balance exergame group will participate in game-based balance training using Nintendo Wii Fit, including Ski Slalom, Table Tilt, Tightrope Tension, Balance Bubble, and Penguin Slide. Participants will perform weight-shifting activities on a balance board while responding to visual and auditory challenges during gameplay. The conventional balance training group will perform structured balance exercises involving sitting, standing, and walking activities.

Both groups will participate in supervised training sessions lasting 60 minutes, three times per week, for eight weeks. Participants will undergo assessments before and after the intervention period.

Study outcomes will include fear of falling, cognitive function, executive function, balance and movement performance, and neurophysiological measures of cortical excitability and inhibition assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Additional assessments will examine sensory function and biomechanical characteristics of movement.

The findings are expected to provide further understanding of the effects of balance exergame training on brain function and functional performance in older adults with a history of falls.

02

Conditions studied

  • Falls (Accidents) in Old Age

Keywords

  • Falls
  • Older Adults
  • Balance Training
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mahidol University is the lead sponsor of 747 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female individuals aged 65 to 85 years.
  • Ability to walk or perform daily activities independently without the use of an assistive device.
  • Stable health over the past 6 months, including well-controlled chronic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, or benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), with consistent medication use.
  • A history of at least one fall within the past year (i.e., the past 365 days), assessed on the day of evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent or severe abnormal symptoms (e.g., muscle weakness, joint limitations, headaches, or numbness) that may present during data collection or training.
  • Presence or history of vestibular disease, such as Meniere's disease.
  • Presence of skin diseases, such as psoriasis.
  • Presence of metal implants, such as pacemakers.
  • History of neurological disorders, such as advanced Parkinson's disease or stroke.
  • History of previous upper limb surgery, such as radial osteotomy.
  • History of previous lower limb surgery, such as total knee replacement.
  • History of musculoskeletal disorders, such as severe osteoarthritis.
  • History of severe cognitive disorders, such as dementia.
  • History of epilepsy or seizure disorders.
  • Severe vision or hearing deficits.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Balance Training Group

    Participants will undergo an 8-week conventional balance training program consisting of supervised 60-minute sessions, three times per week. Each session includes a 5-minute warm-up with lower-limb stretching, 50 minutes of balance training, and a 5-minute cool-down. Balance training comprises sitting exercises (15-20 minutes), including maintaining balance on a Swiss ball and performing arm and leg movements, throwing and catching a ball, and kicking a ball; standing exercises (15-20 minutes), including standing balance activities and standing on a foam pad or cushion; and walking exercises (15-20 minutes), including marching in place, walking lunges, zigzag walking, obstacle navigation, and walking while performing cognitive or carrying tasks.

    Behavioral: Conventional Balance Training

  • Experimental
    Balance Exergame Group

    Participants will undergo an 8-week balance exergame training program using the Nintendo Wii Fit platform and balance board. The available games include Ski Slalom, Table Tilt, Tightrope Tension, Balance Bubble, and Penguin Slide. Participants will stand barefoot on the balance board and perform multidirectional weight-shifting activities to challenge postural stability. Participants may select any available game during each training session. Training will consist of supervised 60-minute sessions, three times per week, for eight weeks.

    Behavioral: Nintendo Wii Fit Balance Exergame Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralNintendo Wii Fit Balance Exergame Training

    An 8-week structured balance exergame training program using the Nintendo Wii Fit platform and balance board. Participants perform barefoot multidirectional weight-shifting exercises using five available games: Ski Slalom, Table Tilt, Tightrope Tension, Balance Bubble, and Penguin Slide. Participants may choose any available game during each session. Each supervised 60-minute session consists of a 5-minute lower-limb stretching warm-up, 50 minutes of balance exergame training, and a 5-minute cool-down with stretching exercises. Training is conducted three times per week for eight weeks. A researcher oversees the intervention, and participants may take breaks as needed.

  • BehavioralConventional Balance Training

    An 8-week structured conventional balance training program consisting of supervised 60-minute sessions, three times per week. Each session includes a 5-minute warm-up with lower-limb stretching, 50 minutes of balance training, and a 5-minute cool-down. The balance training comprises three components: (1) Sitting balance training (15-20 minutes), including sitting on a Swiss ball to maintain balance, moving the arms or legs, throwing and catching a ball, and kicking a ball; (2) Standing balance training (15-20 minutes), including standing with feet together, shifting body weight side to side, standing on one leg, throwing and catching a ball, and standing on a foam pad or cushion; and (3) Walking training (15-20 minutes), including marching in place, walking lunges, zigzag walking, obstacle navigation, walking on a foam pad, cognitive dual-task walking, and walking while carrying a tray of water. Training intensity is adjusted according to each participant's capability.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fear of Falling (FES-I)

    The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is a 16-item questionnaire assessing participants' concerns about falling during daily activities. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 16 to 64, with higher scores indicating greater fear of falling.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  2. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Cognitive function is assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), covering memory, language, attention, visuospatial function, executive function, and calculation. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  3. Forward Digit Span Test

    The time required to complete the forward Digit Span test is recorded in seconds (sec). This assessment evaluates the time required to perform the forward digit repetition task.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  4. Percentage of Correct Responses in the Forward Digit Span Test

    Cognitive performance is evaluated using the forward Digit Span test. The percentage of correct responses (%) is recorded to assess performance in the forward digit repetition task.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  5. Backward Digit Span Test

    The time required to complete the backward Digit Span test is recorded in seconds (sec). This assessment evaluates the time required to perform the backward digit repetition task.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  6. Percentage of Correct Responses in the Backward Digit Span Test

    Cognitive performance is evaluated using the backward Digit Span test. The percentage of correct responses (%) is recorded to assess performance in the backward digit repetition task.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  7. Stroop Test

    The time required to complete the Stroop test is recorded in seconds (sec) to evaluate the time required to perform the cognitive task involving attention and inhibitory control.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  8. Percentage of Correct Responses in the Stroop Test

    Cognitive performance is evaluated using the Stroop test. The percentage of correct responses (%) is recorded to assess attention and inhibitory control performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  9. Sway Area During Functional Performance Assessments

    Postural movement is evaluated using a marker-based three-dimensional motion capture system (Vicon). Sway area is calculated from the recorded movement trajectories during functional performance assessments and expressed in square centimeters (cm²).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  10. Acceleration Time During Functional Performance

    Movement acceleration time is evaluated using biomechanical data obtained from a marker-based three-dimensional motion capture system during functional performance assessments. Acceleration time is recorded in seconds (sec).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  11. Deceleration Time During Functional Performance

    Movement deceleration time is evaluated using biomechanical data obtained from a marker-based three-dimensional motion capture system during functional performance assessments. Deceleration time is recorded in seconds (sec).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  12. Foot Clearance During Functional Performance

    Foot clearance is evaluated using marker-based three-dimensional motion capture during functional performance assessments. The vertical clearance of the foot during movement is recorded in millimeters (mm).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  13. Cortical Silent Period (CSP) Duration

    Cortical inhibition is assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Single-pulse TMS is delivered at 130% of resting motor threshold while participants maintain approximately 20% maximum voluntary contraction. CSP duration is measured as the interval between the end of the motor-evoked potential and the resumption of baseline muscle activity, expressed in seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  14. Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) Threshold

    Intracortical inhibition is assessed using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The change (Δ) in the threshold of short-interval intracortical inhibition is evaluated and expressed as a percentage (%). This parameter represents the SICI threshold change specified as a primary outcome in the study protocol.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  15. Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT)

    Central motor conduction time is assessed using peripheral nerve stimulation and measurement of M-waves and F-waves. The measurements are used to evaluate motor pathway conduction. CMCT is recorded in seconds (sec).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cold Detection Threshold (CDT)

    Cold detection threshold is assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST) with an air-cooled probe applied to the dorsum of the right foot. The baseline temperature is set at 32°C, and the cold detection threshold is determined using the standardized 4-2-1 stepping algorithm. Results are expressed in degrees Celsius (°C).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  2. Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT)

    Vibration detection threshold is assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST). A vibration stimulus probe is applied to the right metatarsal bone, and the detection threshold is determined using the standardized 4-2-1 stepping algorithm. Results are expressed in micrometers (µm).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  3. Lower-Limb Angular Velocity During Walking

    Lower-limb angular velocity is evaluated during walking using a marker-based three-dimensional motion capture system. Angular velocity is calculated from the recorded lower-limb movement data and expressed in degrees per second (°/sec).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  4. Resting Motor Threshold (RMT)

    Resting motor threshold is assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is defined as the minimum stimulation intensity required to elicit a motor-evoked potential greater than 50 µV in at least 5 of 10 consecutive trials while the target muscle is relaxed. Results are expressed as a percentage (%) of maximum stimulator output.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

  5. Active Motor Threshold (AMT)

    Active motor threshold is assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while participants maintain a 10-20% maximum voluntary contraction. It is defined as the minimum stimulation intensity required to elicit a motor-evoked potential greater than 200 µV in at least 5 of 10 consecutive trials. Results are expressed as a percentage (%) of maximum stimulator output.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 9)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Siebner HR, Funke K, Aberra AS, Antal A, Bestmann S, Chen R, Classen J, Davare M, Di Lazzaro V, Fox PT, Hallett M, Karabanov AN, Kesselheim J, Beck MM, Koch G, Liebetanz D, Meunier S, Miniussi C, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Popa T, Ridding MC, Thielscher A, Ziemann U, Rothwell JC, Ugawa Y. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Aug;140:59-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022. Epub 2022 May 18. PubMed 35738037 ↗
  • Klomjai W, Katz R, Lackmy-Vallee A. Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Sep;58(4):208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Aug 28. PubMed 26319963 ↗
  • Liu HH, Wang RY, Cheng SJ, Liao KK, Zhou JH, Yang YR. Balance Training Modulates Cortical Inhibition in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Sep;36(9):613-620. doi: 10.1177/15459683221119761. Epub 2022 Aug 25. PubMed 36004820 ↗
  • Pacheco TBF, de Medeiros CSP, de Oliveira VHB, Vieira ER, de Cavalcanti FAC. Effectiveness of exergames for improving mobility and balance in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 18;9(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01421-7. PubMed 32682439 ↗
  • Montero-Odasso M, van der Velde N, Martin FC, Petrovic M, Tan MP, Ryg J, Aguilar-Navarro S, Alexander NB, Becker C, Blain H, Bourke R, Cameron ID, Camicioli R, Clemson L, Close J, Delbaere K, Duan L, Duque G, Dyer SM, Freiberger E, Ganz DA, Gomez F, Hausdorff JM, Hogan DB, Hunter SMW, Jauregui JR, Kamkar N, Kenny RA, Lamb SE, Latham NK, Lipsitz LA, Liu-Ambrose T, Logan P, Lord SR, Mallet L, Marsh D, Milisen K, Moctezuma-Gallegos R, Morris ME, Nieuwboer A, Perracini MR, Pieruccini-Faria F, Pighills A, Said C, Sejdic E, Sherrington C, Skelton DA, Dsouza S, Speechley M, Stark S, Todd C, Troen BR, van der Cammen T, Verghese J, Vlaeyen E, Watt JA, Masud T; Task Force on Global Guidelines for Falls in Older Adults. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing. 2022 Sep 2;51(9):afac205. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac205. PubMed 36178003 ↗
09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07924579
Lead sponsor
Mahidol University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Jan 9, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 23, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 23, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Phunsuk Kantha
Contact
phunsuk.kan@mahidol.ac.th
+66932951646

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion