ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07158359Chew DailyUpdated Sep 5, 2025

Chewing Gum as a Therapeutic Intervention for the Management of Hypersalivation

An interventional study of chewing gum mastication in Hypersialorrhea (Excessive Salivation) and Psychiatric Disorders, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier de Cadillac. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-05.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier de Cadillac · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Psychiatric disorders often require specific treatments, usually involving medications called psychotropic drugs. While effective, these medications can cause significant side effects. One of the most common is hypersalivation (excess saliva), which can make swallowing difficult and be very uncomfortable in daily life.

Current medication-based solutions are often not very effective and may cause additional side effects. For this reason, we are exploring a different approach: using chewing gum as a form of rehabilitation.

The goal of this study is to determine whether chewing gum can help reduce excessive saliva. To do this, we will compare two groups: one that will follow a swallowing rehabilitation program including chewing gum, and another that will not.

We hope this simple, non-drug-based approach will improve the management of hypersalivation. More broadly, this research aims to highlight innovative and accessible solutions in psychiatry, showing that alternative strategies-sometimes very simple ones-can also be effective.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Psychiatric disorders necessitate highly specific therapeutic approaches. Psychotropic medications, which are frequently prescribed in these settings, are well known for their substantial burden of adverse drug reactions. Among these, hypersialorrhea (excessive salivation) is a particularly common and disabling side effect, often associated with swallowing disturbances. Current pharmacological alternatives proposed to address this condition remain of limited efficacy and may themselves induce additional adverse effects. In light of these limitations, a rehabilitative, non-pharmacological intervention such as chewing gum mastication may represent a promising strategy.

Objective The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the effect of chewing gum mastication on hypersialorrhea in patients receiving psychotropic medications.

Methods A randomized controlled trial will be conducted, comparing two groups: an experimental group undergoing a swallowing rehabilitation program incorporating chewing gum mastication, and a control group receiving no chewing-gum-based intervention.

Expected Results This study is expected to provide preliminary evidence supporting the clinical utility of chewing gum mastication as a non-pharmacological approach for the management of hypersialorrhea. Beyond its direct clinical implications, the study aims to promote awareness of innovative, unconventional, yet potentially effective therapeutic strategies in psychiatry, thereby fostering further research in this field.

Keywords Rehabilitation; occupational therapy; psychiatry; pilot study; chewing gum mastication; clinical management; non-pharmacological treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypersialorrhea (Excessive Salivation)
  • Psychiatric Disorders

Keywords

  • Rehabilitation
  • occupational therapy
  • pilot study
  • chewing gum mastication
  • non-pharmacological treatment
03

In context

Sialorrhea

60 studies on the registry are indexed under Sialorrhea; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 46 is above the median of 31 across 44 interventional studies indexed under Sialorrhea.

Browse Sialorrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier de Cadillac is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Hospitalized at Cadillac Hospital, either in full inpatient care or at the rehabilitation facility, excluding the UHSA.
  • Experiencing iatrogenic hypersalivation induced by psychotropic medications.
  • Salivary flow causing functional impairment for the patient, or observed by family members or healthcare providers.
  • With or without pharmacological management of hypersalivation.
  • Individuals under legal protective measures may be included.
  • Provided written prior to participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anatomical/morphological anomaly affecting mastication/swallowing
  • Swallowing disorder of organic etiology (e.g., neurological deficit due to stroke, neurodegenerative disease, oropharyngeal surgery, etc.)
  • Known risk of aspiration with liquids
  • Patient refusal of chewing gum or inability to obtain consent (e.g., non-communicative patients)
  • Oral/dental condition preventing mastication
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group assigned to a swallowing rehabilitation program involving chewing gum mastication

    Each participant will receive a rehabilitation session (including chewing gum mastication) three times per week over a four-week period. Each session will last 15 minutes (i.e., 10 minutes of mastication followed by a 5-minute waiting period prior to reassessment). The 10-minute mastication period was determined based on clinical feedback from patients regarding this practice. Rehabilitation sessions will always take place at least 30 minutes after meals. During each mastication session, the participant will be observed in a quiet room, with a comic book available for distraction. Hypersialorrhea will be assessed three times per session using the DSFS scale: immediately before chewing gum mastication, at the end of the mastication period, and 5 minutes thereafter. The rehabilitation program will run over four weeks, from Monday to Friday, corresponding to 12 non-consecutive days. The four-week duration was chosen in accordance with standard occupational therapy clinical practice. In

    Behavioral: chewing gum mastication

  • No intervention
    Control group

    For the control group, which will not receive any rehabilitation, the same schedule will be followed. Each participant will be seen three times per week for 15 minutes. During these observation sessions (no intervention, absence of any rehabilitation), hypersialorrhea will be assessed three times using the DSFS scale: immediately before, at the end of the 10-minute period, and 5 minutes thereafter. During these observation sessions, participants will be placed in a quiet room with a comic book available for distraction. The observation period will span four weeks, corresponding to 12 non-consecutive days. In parallel, the healthcare team will be asked to respond three times per week to a single adherence-related question during the scheduled sessions.

Interventions

  • Behavioralchewing gum mastication

    chewing gum mastication

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Salivary flow measured using the Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) in relation to chewing gum mastication

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life, evaluated with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), was assessed pre- and post-experimental phase

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Patient adherence to medication will be assessed weekly by the healthcare team using a single dichotomous question: "Did the patient demonstrate opposition to taking their medication related to hypersalivation?"

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Use of pharmacological agents associated with adverse effects will be monitored through prescription tracking.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Tolerance and safety of chewing gum as a therapeutic intervention will be evaluated by the investigative team at each session using two dichotomous questions: "Did you observe any tolerance or safety issues during chewing gum mastication in this session?

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2025; primary completion for Sep 2026, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2025
First posted
Sep 5, 2025
StartEst.
Sep 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Sep 5, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07158359
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier de Cadillac
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 5, 2025
Start date
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 5, 2025

Study contacts

Alix AL Lavandier, PhD
Contact
alix.lavandier@ch-cadillac.fr
+33556765148 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion