CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01680783Updated Jul 14, 2020Results posted

Non-Invasive Ventilation Via a Helmet Device for Patients Respiratory Failure

An interventional study of Non invasive ventilation using a helmet hyperbaric device and Noninvasive ventilation via facemask in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Shock and Ventilatory Failure, sponsored by University of Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-14.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of helmet ventilation as compared with Face mask in patients with respiratory failure.

Read the detailed description

Respiratory failure is often treated with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Although, the institution of mechanical ventilation is considered life saving, the associated complications of tracheal stenosis, ventilator associated pneumonia, barotrauma , and neuromuscular weakness are not without considerable morbidity and mortality.

Non-invasive ventilation has demonstrated significant benefit in patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure from COPD, acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and hypoxemic respiratory failure in immunocompromised patients.

Despite the advantages of non-invasive ventilation via facemask, some patients fail because of mask intolerance and severity of disease. Further limitation to facemask non-invasive ventilation is that the seal integrity is lost when higher pressures are required. Unfortunately, certain types of respiratory failure such as that due to hypoxemia or shock may require such higher pressures.

In an attempt to improve patient tolerability and deliver higher pressures, a transparent helmet has been proposed as a novel interface for non-invasive ventilation. It encloses the entire head and neck of the patient. The design of the helmet confers some important advantages: 1) the transparency allows the patient to interact with the environment; 2) the lack of contact to the face lowers the risk of skin necrosis; 3) the helmet avoids problems of leaking with higher airway pressures that are seen with the face mask; 4) it can be applied to any patient regardless of facial contour.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Shock
  • Ventilatory Failure
  • Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Keywords

  • noninvasive ventilation
  • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • shock
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 907 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 99 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 68 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥18 years of age who require noninvasive ventilation via facemask for >8hours
  • Intact airway protective gag reflex
  • Able to follow instructions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiopulmonary arrest
  • Glasgow coma scale \<8
  • Absence of airway protective gag reflex
  • Elevated intracranial pressure
  • Tracheostomy
  • Upper airway obstruction
  • Pregnancy.
  • Patients who refuse to undergo endotracheal intubation, whatever the initial therapeutic approach
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Usual Care

    Patients who require noninvasive ventilation via Face mask for more than 8 hours will continue using noninvasive ventilation via facemask.

    Other: Noninvasive ventilation via facemask

  • Experimental
    Non invasive ventilation via helmet

    Patients requiring more than 8 hours of noninvasive ventilation via facemask will switch to non-invasive ventilation using a helmet instead of face mask for treatment of respiratory failure

    Device: Non invasive ventilation using a helmet hyperbaric device

Interventions

  • DeviceNon invasive ventilation using a helmet hyperbaric device

    Patients randomized to the intervention group will receive noninvasive ventilation delivered via a latex-free helmet connected to the ventilator by conventional tubing. If endotracheal intubation is required, the helmet will be removed and the patient will be intubated without delay.

    Also known as: Sea-Long medical treatment hood

  • OtherNoninvasive ventilation via facemask

    Patients assigned to the conventional ventilation group will continue noninvasive ventilation via facemask

    Also known as: mechanical ventilation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Need for Endotracheal Intubation

    Number of patients requiring endotracheal intubation after application of helmet device

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital Length of Stay

    Days spent in hospital at time of enrollment

    Time frame: Duration of hospital stay

  2. Number of Participants Functional Status After Discharge

    Telephone survey of patients 1, 6, and 12 months after discharge to assess need for re-hospitalization, admission to nursing home, and functional status (ability to complete ADLs and IADLs independently)

    Time frame: Measured at 1, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge (to span time frame of up to 80 weeks depending on length of hospitalization)

  3. Ventilator-free Days

    Duration of mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube

    Time frame: number of days in the hospital

  4. Hospital Mortality

    Death from any cause during hospitalization at time of enrollment

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay

    Number of days admitted to a medical intensive care unit

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. ICU Complications

    ICU complications will include rates of Ventilator associated pneumonia, Barotrauma, Gastrointestinal hemorrhage, Pulmonary embolism, Sacral Decubitus ulcer, Delirium, ICU acquired weakness

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit

    Measure the need for readmission to the intensive care unit during initial hospitalization at time of enrollment

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Discharge Location

    Measure the location (ie home, rehabilitation center, nursing home) that patients are discharged to

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Improvement of Oxygenation

    Improvement of oxygenation-defined as PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 200 or increase from baseline by 100

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 2, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUsual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via Helmet
Started3944
Completed3944
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNeed for Endotracheal Intubation

Number of patients requiring endotracheal intubation after application of helmet device

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Need for Endotracheal Intubation
ParticipantsUsual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via Helmet
Need for Endotracheal Intubation248
SecondaryHospital Length of Stay

Days spent in hospital at time of enrollment

Time frame:
Duration of hospital stay
Reported as:
Median · days
Hospital Length of Stay
daysUsual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via Helmet
Hospital Length of Stay15.2 (7.8 to 19.7)10.1 (6.5 to 15.9)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Functional Status After Discharge

Telephone survey of patients 1, 6, and 12 months after discharge to assess need for re-hospitalization, admission to nursing home, and functional status (ability to complete ADLs and IADLs independently)

Time frame:
Measured at 1, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge (to span time frame of up to 80 weeks depending on length of hospitalization)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Functional Status After Discharge
ParticipantsUsual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via Helmet
Number of Participants Functional Status After Discharge622
SecondaryVentilator-free Days

Duration of mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube

Time frame:
number of days in the hospital
Reported as:
Median · days
Ventilator-free Days
daysUsual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via Helmet
Ventilator-free Days12.5 (0.49 to 28)28 (13.7 to 28)
SecondaryHospital Mortality

Death from any cause during hospitalization at time of enrollment

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Hospital Mortality
ParticipantsUsual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via Helmet
Hospital Mortality1912
SecondaryIntensive Care Unit Length of Stay

Number of days admitted to a medical intensive care unit

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Median · days
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay
daysUsual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via Helmet
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay7.8 (3.9 to 13.8)4.7 (2.5 to 8.7)
Other pre-specifiedICU Complications

ICU complications will include rates of Ventilator associated pneumonia, Barotrauma, Gastrointestinal hemorrhage, Pulmonary embolism, Sacral Decubitus ulcer, Delirium, ICU acquired weakness

Time frame:
6 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedReadmission to the Intensive Care Unit

Measure the need for readmission to the intensive care unit during initial hospitalization at time of enrollment

Time frame:
6 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedDischarge Location

Measure the location (ie home, rehabilitation center, nursing home) that patients are discharged to

Time frame:
6 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedImprovement of Oxygenation

Improvement of oxygenation-defined as PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 200 or increase from baseline by 100

Time frame:
2 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Usual Care22/39 (56.4%)0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)
Non Invasive Ventilation Via Helmet12/44 (27.3%)0/44 (0%)0/44 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Usual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via HelmetTotal
Median60.9 (56.4 to 71.1)58 (49.8 to 67.8)59 (52 to 69)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Usual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via HelmetTotal
Female182038
Male212445
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Usual CareNon Invasive Ventilation Via HelmetTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American222850
White161430
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Chicago Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS, Hall JB, Kress JP. Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation Delivered by Helmet vs Face Mask on the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Jun 14;315(22):2435-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6338. PubMed 27179847 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01680783
Lead sponsor
University of Chicago
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2012
Start date
Sep 2012
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Results posted
Jul 2, 2017
Last update
Jul 14, 2020

Study contacts

John P Kress, MD
principal investigator · University of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion