ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00369265Updated Aug 24, 2012Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of Lansoprazole 30mg Twice Daily in Treatment of Laryngitis Associated With Gastroesophageal Reflux

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lansoprazole and Sugar pill in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, sponsored by American Institute for Voice and Ear Research. Terminated at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-24.

Sponsored by American Institute for Voice and Ear Research · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Pharmaceutical company purchased by another company and funding was terminated.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Lansoprazole 30mg taken twice daily is effective in the treatment of laryngitis due to gastroesophageal reflux.

Read the detailed description

The investigators propose to study the effect of Lansoprazole 30 mg bid therapy vs. placebo in patients who present with symptoms characteristic of reflux laryngitis. The efficacy of Lansoprazole 30 mg bid in healing and improving reflux laryngitis will be determined. For the purpose of this study, healed reflux laryngitis will be defined as an improvement or resolution of arytenoid erythema and improvement in symptoms. Improved reflux laryngitis will be defined as improvement in any two of the following areas: arytenoid erythema; voice quality as assessed by the patients or health care provider; or, improvement/resolution of related symptoms (throat clearing, cough, etc.). The impact of Lansoprazole 30 mg bid therapy on quality of life will be evaluated in a preliminary fashion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Keywords

  • Gastroesophageal reflux
  • Laryngitis
  • Hoarseness
  • Dysphonia
  • Proton pump inhibitor
03

In context

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

56 studies on the registry are indexed under Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 72 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Browse Laryngopharyngeal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with American Institute for Voice and Ear Research as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Vocal skills necessary to complete test procedures reliably.
  • Voice complaints and/or other symptoms suggestive of reflux laryngitis
  • Signed
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • Complete medical history and physical examination within 30 days prior to initiation of the study drug.
  • Laryngoscopy documenting laryngeal pathology compatible with moderate to severe reflux laryngitis (> grade 3 arytenoid erythema) within 30 days of initiation of the study drug.
  • Gastroesophageal reflux confirmed by 24-hour (a minimum of 16 hours required for inclusion) pH impedance monitor.
  • Ambulatory outpatient status.
  • If female, a negative pregnancy test at the screening visit or either: i) surgically sterilized (bilateral tubal ligation or hysterectomy), or ii) at least 1 year , or iii) using acceptable methods of in the presence of .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent laryngeal disease, if such disease or its treatment would interfere with evaluation of study results. For example, patients with mass lesions such as laryngeal cysts or laryngeal carcinoma will be excluded. Patients with acute laryngeal infections or acute laryngeal allergies will be excluded until these conditions have been resolved; but they may be considered for inclusion thereafter.
  • Any upper gastroenterological or esophageal surgery except simple over-sewing of a perforated ulcer.
  • Active substance abuse.
  • Tobacco use.
  • Known or allergy to any protein pump inhibitor.
  • (SGPT) or AST (SGOT) greater than 2 times the .
  • Renal impairment (serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl).
  • Any , unstable medical condition.
  • Use of any proton pump inhibitor within 7 days prior to 24-hour pH impedance monitoring or baseline strobovideolaryngoscopy, or use of H2 receptor antagonist during the 48 hours prior to 24-hour pH impedance monitoring or baseline strobovideolaryngoscopy.
  • Use of an drug or participation in an investigational study, within 30 days prior to starting study drug.
  • Previous participation in this study.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Women breast feeding infants.
  • Inability or refusal to follow directions.
  • Open label sub-study has same inclusion and exclusion criteria, with exception that subjects should have: 1) Clinical diagnosis of non-acid reflux, with less than 5 episodes of proximal acid reflux, and 2) Symptoms and signs consistent with gastroesophageal reflux.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lansoprazole

    Lansoprazole 30 mg Twice Daily

    Drug: Lansoprazole

  • Placebo comparator
    Sugar pill

    placebo

    Dietary Supplement: Sugar pill

Interventions

  • Lansoprazole 30mg twice daily

  • Dietary supplementSugar pill

    placebo twice daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Improvement or Resolution of Arytenoid Erythema

    Improvement was measured by score on an arytenoid erythema grading scale assigned by member of research staff and independent observers at 6 weeks

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 17, 2012
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated due to inadequate subject recruitment.

Participant flow

Inadequate recruitment during this study; therefore, the study was terminated.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSugar PillLansoprazole
Started47
Completed00
Not completed47
Withdrew: Study terminated47

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement or Resolution of Arytenoid Erythema

Improvement was measured by score on an arytenoid erythema grading scale assigned by member of research staff and independent observers at 6 weeks

Time frame:
6 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sugar Pill—0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Lansoprazole—0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sugar PillLansoprazoleTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years4610
>=65 years011
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Sugar PillLansoprazoleTotal
Mean33.0 ± 11.5640.1 ± 17.3337.5 ± 15.83
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sugar PillLansoprazoleTotal
Female369
Male112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sugar PillLansoprazoleTotal
United States4711
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology
    Detroit, Michigan 48202-2699, United States
  • American Institute for Voice and Ear Research
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, United States
  • Cornell University, Van Lawrence Voice Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002 Jun;16(2):274-7. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8. PubMed 12150380 ↗
  • Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms improve before changes in physical findings. Laryngoscope. 2001 Jun;111(6):979-81. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200106000-00009. PubMed 11404607 ↗
  • Bogdasarian RS, Olson NR. Posterior glottic laryngeal stenosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979). 1980 Nov-Dec;88(6):765-72. doi: 10.1177/019459988008800625. No abstract available. PubMed 7208045 ↗
  • Cherry J, Margulies SI. Contact ulcer of the larynx. Laryngoscope. 1968 Nov;78(11):1937-40. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196811000-00007. No abstract available. PubMed 5722896 ↗
  • Delahunty JE, Cherry J. Experimentally produced vocal cord granulomas. Laryngoscope. 1968 Nov;78(11):1941-7. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196811000-00008. No abstract available. PubMed 5722897 ↗
  • Eherer AJ, Habermann W, Hammer HF, Kiesler K, Friedrich G, Krejs GJ. Effect of pantoprazole on the course of reflux-associated laryngitis: a placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003 May;38(5):462-7. doi: 10.1080/00365520310001860. PubMed 12795454 ↗
  • El-Serag HB, Lee P, Buchner A, Inadomi JM, Gavin M, McCarthy DM. Lansoprazole treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic laryngitis: a placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Apr;96(4):979-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03681.x. PubMed 11316215 ↗
  • Koufman J, Sataloff RT, Toohill R. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: consensus conference report. J Voice. 1996 Sep;10(3):215-6. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(96)80001-4. No abstract available. PubMed 8865091 ↗
  • Morrison MD. Is chronic gastroesophageal reflux a causative factor in glottic carcinoma? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Oct;99(4):370-3. doi: 10.1177/019459988809900403. PubMed 3148885 ↗
  • Noordzij JP, Khidr A, Evans BA, Desper E, Mittal RK, Reibel JF, Levine PA. Evaluation of omeprazole in the treatment of reflux laryngitis: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. Laryngoscope. 2001 Dec;111(12):2147-51. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200112000-00013. PubMed 11802014 ↗
  • Vaezi MF, Richter JE, Stasney CR, Spiegel JR, Iannuzzi RA, Crawley JA, Hwang C, Sostek MB, Shaker R. Treatment of chronic posterior laryngitis with esomeprazole. Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):254-60. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000192173.00498.ba. PubMed 16467715 ↗
  • Wetmore RF. Effects of acid on the larynx of the maturing rabbit and their possible significance to the sudden infant death syndrome. Laryngoscope. 1993 Nov;103(11 Pt 1):1242-54. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199311000-00006. PubMed 8231577 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00369265
Lead sponsor
American Institute for Voice and Ear Research
Responsible party
Robert T. Sataloff, MD (M.D., D.M.A., FACS, American Institute for Voice and Ear Research) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 29, 2006
Start date
Aug 2006
Primary completion
Nov 2009
Completion
Nov 2009
Results posted
Aug 17, 2012
Last update
Aug 24, 2012

Study contacts

Robert T Sataloff, MD, DMA
principal investigator · American Institute for Voice and Ear Research
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lansoprazole

Start the discussion