ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07624383RELIEFUpdated Jul 10, 2026

New Topical tReatment Options for Symptomatic patiEnts With Nonerosive gastroesophageaL Reflux dIsease (The RELIEF Trial)

An interventional study of Esophageal barrier medical device and Placebo oral formulation in GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease), NERD and Heartburn, sponsored by Cellmedis. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Cellmedis · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial RELEIF is to learn if medical devices work to decrease symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in adults' patients. It will also teach us about safety, tolerability and improvement of patient's quality of life during and after taking medical device. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does medical device relieve reflux symptoms?
  • Does medical device improve the quality of life of patients with GERD symptoms? Researchers will compare medical device to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if medical device works in GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease .

Participants will:

  • Take medical device or a placebo every day (4 times a day) for 14 days
  • Stop taking medical device or placebo for 7 days (wash out period)
  • Switch the therapy for medical device or placebo for next 14 days
  • Visit the clinic 4 times during 35 days of this study for checkups and tests
  • Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use a medical device
  • Fill out the form to collect all necessary data.
Read the detailed description

This medical device was developed as a modern therapeutic alternative, offering rapid symptom relief and long-term protective effects on the esophageal mucosa. The introduction of medical device aims to expand the available therapeutic options for patients suffering from GERD symptoms and to support physicians in selecting optimal therapy. Thanks to its innovative formula, medical device can avoid the rising the symptoms, provide improved well-being and reduce the frequency of acute medication use.

02

Conditions studied

  • GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)
  • NERD
  • Heartburn
  • Regurgitation, Gastric

Keywords

  • gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • reflux
  • heartburn
  • medical device in reflux
  • regurgitation
  • quality of life in reflux disease
  • reflux symptoms
  • non erosive reflux disease
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,211 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 202 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 68 across 796 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

Cellmedis is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease based on the presence of typical symptoms such as heartburn and or regurgitation for at least 6 months prior to the screening visit, confirmed by the investigator
  • Exclusion of erosive reflux disease, Barrett esophagus, and other esophageal abnormalities by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within the last 6 months, confirmed by the investigator based on medical documentation
  • No use within 1 month prior to screening of proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists, prokinetics such as itopride or prucalopride, GLP1 or GIP analogues, antibiotics, baclofen, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin and or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and no use within 1 week prior to screening of sucralfate, antacids, or esophageal mucosal protective agents
  • Presence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms that negatively impact quality of life, as subjectively reported by the patient and confirmed by the investigator
  • Age 18 years or older at the time of screening
  • Women of must not be pregnant confirmed by a negative urine pregnancy test and must not be breastfeeding, or must be of non childbearing potential defined as surgically sterile, physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, or at least 12 months post menopause
  • Women of childbearing potential with a male partner of must use a highly effective method of from screening until 18 weeks after the last dose of the medical device
  • Sexually active men with women of childbearing potential must agree to use barrier contraception such as condoms or abstain from sexual intercourse throughout the study period and for at least 7 days after the last dose of the investigational medical device
  • Ability to comply with all aspects of the clinical study
  • Male patients eligible for participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are breastfeeding or have a positive urine pregnancy test at the baseline visit
  • Introduction of significant changes in diet or lifestyle during the study period
  • Presence of alarm symptoms at baseline including dysphagia or odynophagia, unintentional weight loss greater than 5 percent of baseline body weight, signs of gastrointestinal bleeding, anemia, palpable epigastric mass, or persistent vomiting lasting 7 to 10 days
  • Planned use during the study of antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, short chain fatty acids, proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists, prokinetics such as itopride or prucalopride, GLP1 or GIP analogues, baclofen, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin and or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and use within 1 week prior to study start of sucralfate, antacids, or esophageal mucosal protective agents
  • Diagnosis of a severe disease such as
  • Planned hospitalization for any reason or presence of any severe comorbidity that in the opinion of the investigator constitutes a to study participation or may compromise patient safety
  • Current or recent history within 1 year prior to randomization of alcohol dependence or substance abuse
  • Active psychiatric disorders that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with compliance with study procedures
  • Presence of unstable or uncontrolled cardiovascular disorders, moderate or severe heart failure classified as class III or IV, or any pulmonary, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, hematological, coagulation, immunological, endocrine or metabolic disorder, or any other medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator could affect study results or patient safety
  • Individuals who are employees of the study site, investigator, contract research organization, or sponsor
  • First degree relatives of employees of the study site, investigator, contract research organization, or sponsor
  • Individuals unable to attend all study visits or comply with study procedures.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Placebo Followed by Esophageal Barrier Medical Device Arm

    Participants receive Placebo oral formulation during the first treatment period followed by esophageal barrier medical device during the second treatment period with a washout interval.

    Device: Esophageal barrier medical device · Device: Placebo oral formulation

  • Experimental
    Esophageal Barrier Medical Device Followed by Placebo Arm

    Participants receive esophageal barrier medical device during the first treatment period followed by Placebo oral formulation during the second treatment period with a washout interval.

    Device: Esophageal barrier medical device · Device: Placebo oral formulation

Interventions

  • DeviceEsophageal barrier medical device

    Esophageal barrier medical device designed to form a bioadhesive protective barrier over gastric contents and the esophageal mucosa. The mechanism of action is local and physical, reducing exposure of the esophagus to refluxate without systemic absorption. The product is administered orally according to the study protocol and evaluated in a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled crossover design, distinguishing it from pharmacological acid suppressive therapies.

  • DevicePlacebo oral formulation

    Oral placebo formulation designed to match the investigational product in appearance, taste, and administration schedule, without containing active components. It does not form a protective barrier and has no therapeutic effect. The placebo is administered according to the same protocol as the active intervention within a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled crossover design to ensure blinding and allow comparative assessment.

    Also known as: Placebo, Matching placebo, Inactive comparator formulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in reflux symptom severity score

    Change from baseline in patient reported gastroesophageal reflux symptoms assessed using the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Clinical response is defined as a reduction of at least 50 percent in the total GERD-HRQL score after 14 days of treatment with esophageal barrier medical device compared with placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 14 days of treatment in each treatment period of the crossover study.

  2. Proportion of patients with complete clinical remission

    Proportion of patients achieving complete clinical remission of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms assessed using the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Complete remission is defined as a total score of 0 points in questions 1 to 15 of the GERD-HRQL after 14 days of treatment with esophageal barrier medical device compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After 14 days of treatment in each treatment period of the crossover study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Onset and duration of action of the investigational device.

    Assessment of the onset and duration of action of the esophageal barrier medical device using a patient reported questionnaire. Onset of action is defined as the subjective relief of heartburn within two predefined time intervals: up to 15 minutes classified as very rapid onset and 16 to 30 minutes classified as rapid onset. Duration of action is defined as the time period free from reflux symptoms following administration of the investigational product.

    Time frame: During the 14 day treatment period, assessed after each administration throughout each treatment phase.

  2. Proportion of patients with complete clinical remission of heartburn.

    Proportion of patients achieving complete clinical remission of heartburn assessed using the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Complete remission of heartburn is defined as a total score of 0 points in questions 1 to 6 of the GERD-HRQL after 14 days of treatment with esophageal barrier medical device compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After 14 days of treatment in each treatment period of the crossover study.

  3. Proportion of patients with clinical response of heartburn.

    Proportion of patients achieving clinical response of heartburn assessed using the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Clinical response is defined as a reduction of at least 50 percent in the total score of questions 1 to 6 of the GERD-HRQL after 14 days of treatment with esophageal barrier medical device compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After 14 days of treatment in each treatment period of the crossover study.

  4. Proportion of patients with complete clinical remission of regurgitation.

    Proportion of patients achieving complete clinical remission of regurgitation assessed using the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Complete remission of regurgitation is defined as a total score of 0 points in questions 10 to 15 of the GERD-HRQL after 14 days of treatment with esophageal barrier medical device compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After 14 days of treatment in each treatment period of the crossover study.

  5. Proportion of patients with clinical response of regurgitation.

    Proportion of patients achieving clinical response of regurgitation assessed using the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Clinical response is defined as a reduction of at least 50 percent in the total score of questions 10 to 15 of the GERD-HRQL after 14 days of treatment with esophageal barrier medical device compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After 14 days of treatment in each treatment period of the crossover study.

  6. Change in heartburn and regurgitation severity on Likert scale

    Change in severity of heartburn and regurgitation assessed using a five point Likert scale. Improvement is defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in the combined symptom severity score after 14 days of treatment with esophageal barrier medical device compared with placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 14 days of treatment in each treatment period of the crossover study.

  7. Proportion of patients with improvement in quality of life

    Proportion of patients achieving improvement in quality of life assessed using the 36 Item Short Form Survey SF 36. Improvement is defined as a reduction of at least 5 points in the total SF 36 score after 14 days of treatment with esophageal barrier medical device compared with placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 14 days of treatment in each treatment period of the crossover study.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to privacy considerations and applicable data protection regulations. Aggregated and anonymized results will be reported in scientific publications. Data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional approval and data sharing agreements.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07624383
Lead sponsor
Cellmedis
Collaborators
Medical Network Sp. z o.o.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2026
Start date
May 28, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Anna Zaorska, MD
Contact
anna.zaorska@cellmedis.com
+48 602 229 443

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion