ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00152347Updated May 17, 2018

A Double-Blind, Randomized Control Trial Comparing Botulinum Toxin Type A (Botox) and Placebo in the Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot

An interventional study of Botox in Idiopathic Clubfoot (Talipes Equinovarus), sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 2 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-17.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 2 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to continue the work from the previous review study and determine the effectiveness of Botox in treating patients with idiopathic clubfoot by comparing outcomes of subjects treated with manipulation and casting plus Botox (treatment group) to those treated with manipulation and casting plus placebo (control group).

The null hypothesis is that manipulation and casting plus Botox is not an effective treatment for idiopathic clubfoot. The alternate hypothesis is that manipulation and casting plus Botox is an effective treatment for idiopathic clubfoot.

Read the detailed description

The study timeline is divided into five phases which have been defined based on experiences with the previous review and with clubfoot treatment in general. These phases are as follows: 1) study treatment (Botox injection versus placebo); 2) post-treatment manipulation and casting; 3) bracing and full-time maintenance; 4) intent-to-treat intervention for management of first-time non-responders (NR1) and first-time recurrences (Rec1) post-study treatment; and 5) rescue intervention for management of second-time non-responders (NR2) and second-time recurrences (Rec2) post intent-to-treat intervention.

We will utilize a double-blind randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of Botox in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Patients, parents, both participating surgeons, and members of their clinical and research teams (physiotherapist, occupational therapist, orthopaedic technologist, orthotist, research assistant) will be blinded to the study group (Botox group versus control group) each subject belongs in. The pharmacist preparing the syringes for injection will not be blinded.

Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Botox (Treatment group) or placebo injection (Control group). Subjects in the treatment group will receive Botox injections dosed at 10 IU/kg prepared by diluting 100 IU of Botox in 1cc of unpreserved saline. If the child has bilateral clubfoot, the contents will be divided equally for injection into each gastrocnemius. Placebo injections for the control group will contain unpreserved saline at 0.1cc/kg (such that a 4.5 kg subject will receive 0.45cc).

02

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Clubfoot (Talipes Equinovarus)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Clubfoot

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Clubfoot; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is close to the median of 38 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Clubfoot.

Browse Clubfoot studies →

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 260 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 2 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. children presenting with idiopathic clubfoot at BC Children's Hospital and Hospital for Sick Children
  2. children ranging in age from 1 day to 2 months old
  3. children who have reached hindfoot stall
  4. children with complete pre-study data *From protocol, hindfoot stall is defined: "following initial manipulation and casting of clubfoot, when the forefoot can be abducted beyond 60 degrees but hindfoot equinus persists, requiring need for further intervention to correct the clubfoot deformity"

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • DrugBotox

    See Detailed Description

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome: Response to study treatment (as indicated by ankle dorsiflexion with knee in flexion of 15 degrees or greater)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient outcomes collected at every patient visit including:

  2. 1. Ankle dorsiflexion with knee in extension

  3. 2. Plantarflexion

  4. 3. Heel bisector scores

  5. 4. Occurrence of recurrence

07

Study locations

1 site
  • BC Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3V4, Canada
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2005, a primary completion of Sep 2015 and a completion of Sep 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 7, 2005
First posted
Sep 9, 2005
Start
Sep 2005
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2015
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2015
Last update
May 17, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 17, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00152347
Responsible party
Christine Alvarez (Principle Investigator, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2005
Start date
Sep 2005
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2015
Completion
Sep 30, 2015
Last update
May 17, 2018

Study contacts

Christine Alvarez, MD, FRCSC, MSc
principal investigator · University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Onabotulinum toxin A

Start the discussion