An observational study in Respiratory Pathogens, Influenza (Pandemic) and COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019), sponsored by University of British Columbia. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-12.
Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Observational
Among 157 studies in Influenza, Human with a site in Canada — 7 open to participants now, 12 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Influenza, Human · Canada.
Among the 157 studies in Influenza, Human with a site in Canada, this one is the 3rd largest by planned enrollment of the 26 observational ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 26 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 11 of the 11 other live ones, and was the 157th registered.
2,358 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 185 are open to participants now.
Browse Influenza, Human studies →7 of the 157 studies in Influenza, Human with a site in Canada are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Dalhousie University · Sites in Canada
Ages 18–45 · Healthy volunteers
Unity Health Toronto · Sites in Canada
Ages 18+
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · Sites in Canada
Ages 18+
AstraZeneca · Sites in Canada, United States, Argentina and 36 more countries
Ages 18+
UMC Utrecht · Sites in Canada, United States, Australia and 26 more countries
Ages 28 days+
A study can be open while its sites in Canada have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Canada →
Of the 120 Influenza, Human studies recruiting now, 64 (53%) set no upper age limit and 46 (38%) stop at 75 or younger; 33 take children under 18; 66 take healthy volunteers.
This study: all sexes · healthy volunteers too.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
157 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 20 · Phase 2 37 · Phase 3 42 · Phase 4 24
First in 2005; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2026.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's planned enrollment of 4,376 is above the median of 397 across 334 observational studies indexed under Influenza, Human.
Median enrollment 300 across the 131 interventional studies, 241 across the 26 observational. Of the 131 that completed or were terminated, 62 (47%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
78 of 157 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 260 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.
University of British Columbia has 7 studies filed under Influenza, Human — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
5 of the studies in Influenza, Human with a site in Canada that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 3 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07314905Phase 3Unity Health TorontoAdaptive Platform Trial of Treatments for Respiratory Infections in Community Settings (TreatResp) | 2027-03-31 |
| NCT07240558Phase 3University Health Network, TorontoPandemic Influenza Vaccine in Organ Transplantation (PIVOT Trial) | 2027-04-30 |
| NCT05624450Phase 3AstraZenecaEfficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Patients Hospitalised for Viral Lung Infection Requiring Supplemental Oxygen | 2027-11-04 |
| NCT07739719McMaster UniversitySAFE (Self-Administration of Flumist to ImprovE Uptake: A Household-Based Cluster Randomized Trial) | 2027-02-15 |
| NCT07305207Dalhousie UniversityEstablishing a Controlled Human Infection Model for Influenza H3N2 as a Foundation for Pandemic Preparedness | 2027-06-01 |
Add all 5 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 157 studies in Influenza, Human with a site in Canada, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
This study aims to help Canada be better prepared for future pandemics by improving how hospitals collect and use information about patients with respiratory infections, such as influenza, COVID-19, and RSV. Emergency departments are often the first place where new viruses appear, and they care for people from all walks of life. By collecting the same types of information from many hospitals across the country, we can better understand how these illnesses affect people and how to respond more quickly in future emergencies.
The study will build a national database that follows patients from the time they arrive by ambulance or walk into the emergency department through their hospital stay. Researchers will look at symptoms, treatments, test results, recovery, and how well vaccines and medications work in real-world settings.
We believe that people who come to emergency departments with respiratory infections will show important differences in how sick they become, what treatments they receive, and how they recover, depending on factors like age, health conditions, and where they live. We also think this information can help create accurate tools that predict who can safely go home from the emergency department and who is at higher risk of severe illness or death.
The registry will capture standardized clinical, sociodemographic, treatment, outcome, and linkage-ready identifiers for consecutive patients tested for influenza A/B, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV as the test cohort; the platform is designed to pivot rapidly to any emergent pandemic respiratory pathogen by adding pathogen-specific elements to a modular data dictionary. The registry harmonizes data from pre-hospital, ED, and in-hospital encounters across Canadian sites, and enables linkages to provincial and national administrative, vaccination, dispensing, genomics, and vital statistics datasets.
With this registry, we aim to:
Our research plan is to use these data to:
i) evaluate patient presentations, disease severity, treatments, procedures, health services utilization, and in-hospital mortality by subgroup, over time and by geographic region; ii) derive and validate prediction rules for safe ED discharge and mortality; iii) examine patient-reported outcomes and complications; iv) evaluate the uptake and real-world drug safety and effectiveness of antivirals; v) evaluate vaccine effectiveness in vulnerable subgroups of the population; and vi) investigate the feasibility of real-time data collection across Canada
We hypothesize that there will be variations in the patient presentations, disease severity, treatments provided, procedures, health services utilization, in-hospital mortality, treatment uptake and effectiveness among different subgroups of ED patients experiencing respiratory viral illness and that these characteristics could be used to derive a clinical decision rule to predict safe ED discharge and mortality.
Study Design:
We will develop and implement a pandemic data dictionary and map data elements to clinical information systems. We will pilot data extraction and program automated data extraction/uploads from clinical information systems before launching study protocols in preparation for emerging pandemic pathogens and seasonal influenza outbreaks.
We will create a single nationally-harmonized curated accessible dataset. It will capture the patient journey from ambulance arrival to hospital discharge filling critical gaps in administrative data, including individual-level sociodemographic variables, clinical signs and symptoms, investigations, pre-hospital, ED and hospital medications, interventions and clinical course.
Our research plan will generate data that will guide important patient care and health policy decisions for these respiratory illnesses. Importantly, we will be able to rapidly pivot our work and research infrastructure to any emerging pathogen, if needed, based on the advice of our Scientific \& Public Health and Indigenous Advisories or WHO recommendations.
Study Population:
The registry includes all emergency department patients tested for influenza A/B, SARS-CoV-2, or RSV. In future outbreaks, the registry will expand to include patients tested for the new pandemic pathogen. Those not tested are excluded.
Ethics:
The registry operates under a waiver of consent for retrospective data collection due to minimal risk, infeasibility of obtaining consent for all patients, and the risk of selection bias if vulnerable populations are excluded.
Database creation:
Data fields - we will develop and implement a pandemic data dictionary and map data elements to clinical information systems. We will pilot data extraction and program automated data extraction/uploads from clinical information systems before launching study protocols in preparation for emerging pandemic pathogens and seasonal influenza outbreaks. To refine our pandemic data dictionary, we have reviewed updated ISARIC data collection forms for variables necessary to capture sufficient information about our viral pathogens of interest. We will add genomic data specifications to support linkages with pathogen genomic data in the future. The inclusion of ISARIC variables will produce data that can be meta-analyzed using the same variables and outcomes collected on the same respiratory pathogens worldwide.
We will engage with team members, collaborators, PWLLE, Indigenous and Scientific \& Public Health Advisories, clinicians, and end-users to refine the scope, granularity, priority, and appropriateness of data elements in workshops. We will use an inclusive, open, and equity and diversity lens to reduce the risk of unconscious bias. For pre-existing data elements, we will note the times they were used and any usability issues encountered. We will consider the volume of data and weigh newly proposed/refined data elements against their anticipated use, impact and our ability to automate data extraction from clinical information systems.
Data Source - we will collect information that is normally ascertained by healthcare workers caring for patients with suspected or confirmed respiratory pathogens as part of routine care. This information can be accessed by patient chart review at each hospital site. We will obtain operational approvals for access to medical records (be they physical, electronic, or hybrid) at all participating sites.
Data Collection - we will reach out to each participating site's health authority or data analytics group to extract electronic health records (EHRs). We will extract patient information, demographics, vitals, emergency department treatments (i.e. time stamps, disposition) and medications, laboratory tests (i.e. pathogen testing, and blood work), hospital admission information, and discharge diagnoses. We will use computation and manual assessments to evaluate the conformance, completeness, and accuracy of key variables.
Patients who presented to one of the 56 Canadian Emergency Department Research Network's emergency department site.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients that were tested positive for influenza A \& B while in the emergency department
Patients that were suspected for influenza A \& B, but tested negative while in the emergency department
Number of patient presentations, disease severity, treatments, procedures, health services utilization, and in-hospital mortality by subgroup, over time and by geographic region.
We will use summary statistics with measures of variance will describe patients, symptoms, disease severity, treatments, procedures (e.g., mechanical ventilation), health services utilization (e.g., admission), and in-hospital mortality. We will assess associations between treatments and procedures, and outcomes (e.g., admission, in-hospital mortality) while adjusting for patient factors (e.g., age, comorbidities) and the 7-day mean incident case count of new infections in the patient's health region, a method developed for COVID-19. We will stratify analyses by biological sex to understand sex-based differences in outcomes, age to understand illness in adults versus children, and race/ethnicity and geographic factors to understand health disparities.
Time frame: From enrollment until patient is discharged from the emergency department or hospital within 7 days.
Derive and validate prediction rules for safe ED discharge and mortality.
We will randomly assign sites to the derivation or validation cohort, with \~75% of eligible patients and outcomes of interest (i.e., in-hospital mortality, and all-cause mortality) assigned to derivation. We will ascertain in-hospital mortality using data collected as part of the CEDRN Pandemic Preparedness Registry and all-cause mortality through linkage with Statistics Canada's Vital Statistics Deaths data. The initial logistic regression model will consider all candidate predictors. We will use a fast step-down procedure to reduce the model to key predictors. We will conduct internal bootstrapping to provide an optimism-corrected area under the receiver-operating curve. A nomogram will assign points to form a point score. We will calculate the sensitivity and specificity at different point thresholds, along with discrimination and calibration. Clinical decision rules require \>100 outcome events to achieve sufficiently narrow 95% CIs for high sensitivity.
Time frame: From enrollment until patient is discharged from the emergency department or hospital within 7 days
Vaccine effectiveness in vulnerable subgroups of the population
Patients with non-influenza viruses (e.g., RSV) may enter the study as controls, as influenza vaccinations do not confer protection against other respiratory viruses. We will ascertain vaccination status using data linkage with provincial vaccination registries. We will calculate vaccine effectiveness as: VE = (1 - OR) x 100%, where OR is the ratio of the odds of vaccination among cases over the odds of vaccination among test negative controls. We will use logistic regression to model outcomes of interest (e.g., severe disease) on the exposure (e.g., vaccination) in patients seeking ED care (e.g., homeless, ethnic subgroups, immune compromised).
Time frame: From enrollment until patient is discharged from the emergency department or hospital within 7 days.
Plan to share: No — Data is only available for CEDRN members. Non-member researchers interested in using any CEDRN data must be voted in by the CEDRN Executive Committee. For more information, please inquire https://cedrn.ca/collaborate/
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2035, 111 months after the start.
Of 98 non-industry observational studies under Influenza, Human, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 92. This study's planned 111 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 135 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 59.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of British Columbia →