An interventional study of French method and Foot Abduction Brace and French Method only in Club Foot, sponsored by Riphah International University. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 12 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.
Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The current study will be a randomized control trial. Data will be collected from the Pakistan Society for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled, Lahore (PSRD) and the Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore. The study will include 18 patients, equally divided into two groups and randomly allocated. Inclusion criteria will be children aged 0 to 12 months diagnosed with CTEV of either gender. Patients with neurological conditions, other orthopedic issues, previous surgical history related to the foot, severe systemic disorders, or neuromuscular disorders will be excluded from the study. The experimental group will receive the French method along with a foot abduction brace, while the control group will receive only the French method without the brace. Outcomes to be analyzed will include foot position, severity of deformity, and functional mobility. Data collection will occur before and after the intervention, utilizing clinical assessments for foot position, the Pirani score for severity of deformity, and standardized mobility assessments. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 23.00.
Clubfoot, or talipes equinovarus, is a structural deformity of the foot and ankle characterized by hind foot equinus (plantar flexion), Varus of the heel (internal rotation), supination, and forefoot adduction (plantar cavus). The severity can range from mild to extremely rigid, manipulation-resistant cases. The incidence of clubfoot varies geographically, with a prevalence ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 cases per 1,000 live births across different regions. Early and effective intervention is crucial to prevent long-term disability, gait abnormalities, and functional limitations The French method, a conservative approach is widely used in treating CTEV. This approach involved daily manipulation of the newborn's foot, muscle stimulation (especially of the peroneal muscles), and temporary immobilization with adhesive strapping. However, the need for prolonged foot abduction bracing as a complement to the French method remains debatable. This study aims to compare the effects of the French method with and without the use of a foot abduction brace in managing CTEV in children.
The current study will be a randomized control trial. Data will be collected from the Pakistan Society for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled, Lahore (PSRD) and the Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore. The study will include 18 patients, equally divided into two groups and randomly allocated. Inclusion criteria will be children aged 0 to 12 months diagnosed with CTEV of either gender. Patients with neurological conditions, other orthopedic issues, previous surgical history related to the foot, severe systemic disorders, or neuromuscular disorders will be excluded from the study. The experimental group will receive the French method along with a foot abduction brace, while the control group will receive only the French method without the brace. Outcomes to be analyzed will include foot position, severity of deformity, and functional mobility. Data collection will occur before and after the intervention, utilizing clinical assessments for foot position, the Pirani score for severity of deformity, and standardized mobility assessments. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 23.00.
69 studies on the registry are indexed under Clubfoot; 15 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 18 is below the median of 38 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Clubfoot.
Browse Clubfoot studies →Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,193 studies on the registry; 650 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The experimental group will receive the French method with a foot abduction brace worn to maintain correction.
Other: French method and Foot Abduction Brace
The control group will receive the French method only, without a foot abduction brace.
Other: French Method only
The experimental group will follow the French method with the addition of a foot abduction brace, which is worn after each session.
The control group will receive the French method only, without a foot abduction brace. The intervention includes manual manipulation to correct deformities through soft tissue stretching and joint mobilization; stretching exercises for dorsiflexion, abduction, and eversion to maintain range of motion; and taping for stabilization after manipulation. Gentle calf and foot massage will reduce stiffness and promote relaxation. Daily sessions of 30-45 minutes will be conducted for 2-3 months. Parents will be trained to perform gentle stretches, monitor foot position, recognize signs of poor circulation or discomfort, and apply taping correctly. They will be advised to continue exercises at home between follow-up visits to maintain correction and ensure continued improvement.
Pirani Scoring System for Clubfoot Assessment & Demeglio Classification System for Clubfoot Severity
Pirani Scoring System for Clubfoot Assessment:The Pirani Score is a widely used clinical tool to assess the severity of congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot). This scoring system helps in evaluating the extent of deformity and in monitoring the progress of treatment, especially when using methods like the Ponseti method or the French method. It focuses on six key aspects of the foot, Each of these six components is scored from 0 to 1.The total score ranges from 0 (normal foot) to 6 (severely affected foot). The higher the score, the more severe the clubfoot.
Time frame: Baseline,12 weeks
Demeglio Classification System for Clubfoot Severity
DimS is based on correction after applying a gentle reduction force.6 Four parameters are evaluated: varus (VA), equinus (E-Dim), derotation of calcaneo-forefoot block (DER) and midfoot adduction (ADD). Each is scored on a five-point scale (0 to 4 points) resulting in a maximum score of 16 points for the most severe deformity. An additional four points result from the absence/presence (0/1 point) of four pejorative items: posterior crease (PC-Dim), medial crease (MC-Dim), cavus and abnormal musculature (MUSC). Once a total score (0 to 20 points) is calculated, feet are divided in four grades: grade I (0-5 points), II (6-10), III (11-15) and IV (16-20 points).
Time frame: Baseline,12 weeks
Plan to share: No
Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2026, 3 months after the start.
Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Clubfoot, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 3 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Riphah International University →