CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00000534Updated Mar 13, 2017

Calcium for Pre-Eclampsia Prevention (CPEP)

A Phase 3 interventional study of calcium and dietary supplements in Cardiovascular Diseases, Eclampsia and Heart Diseases, sponsored by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-13.

Sponsored by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To evaluate the efficacy of 2 grams per day of oral calcium supplementation in reducing the combined incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and the HELLP Syndrome (hypertension, thrombocytopenia, hemolysis, and abnormal liver function). The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) initiated the trial in 1991, with joint funding provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in fiscal years 1992, 1993, and 1995.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

A considerable body of data has associated lower blood pressures with higher levels of dietary calcium. Epidemiologic studies, laboratory evaluations, and clinical trials have also indicated that the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is affected similarly by calcium intake. A meta-analysis of five controlled clinical trials of calcium supplementation in pregnancy suggested a significant reduction in proteinuric pre-eclampsia of 46 percent. Several of the trials, however, suffered from 'pitfalls' in the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, including lack of blinding, uncertain definition of endpoints, and unknown techniques of measurement. Most trials have not assessed the role of dietary nutrients or the possibility that a subgroup with low baseline urinary calcium may benefit most from calcium supplementation. In no trial has the potential for increased risk of kidney stones in the treatment group been examined systematically. Moreover, the daily schedule for administration of calcium, has generally not been reported. There was a great need, therefore, to evaluate the efficacy of calcium supplementation for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in a large multicenter controlled clinical trial. The trial considered the role of dietary nutrients, establish whether treatment is beneficial only for those with low baseline urinary calcium, conduct systematic surveillance for urolithiasis, and employ standardized terminology, techniques of measurement, and diagnostic criteria. The NHLBI provided funding to NICHD for three years by means of an Intraagency Agreement (Y01HC20154).

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter. Healthy nulliparous patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 grams of supplemental calcium daily ((n = 2,295) or placebo (n = 2,294) in a double-blind study. Study tablets were administered beginning from 13 to 21 completed weeks of gestation and continued until the termination of pregnancy. Eligible patients entered a run-in period of 6 to 14 days to exclude highly noncompliant subjects. During the run-in, obstetrical ultrasound was performed if it had not been obtained previously, and blood was drawn for serum calcium and creatinine. Follow-up visits were scheduled every four weeks through the 29th week of gestation, then every two weeks through the 35th week, and weekly thereafter. Blood pressure and urine-protein were obtained at each clinic visit, during labor and delivery, and during the first 24 hours postpartum. Primary endpoints included pregnancy-associated hypertension, pregnancy-associated proteinuria, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, or hypertension. Other endpoints included placental abruption, cerebral hemorrhage or thrombosis, elevated liver enzymes, acute renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Surveillance was conducted for renal calculi. Recruitment began in May 1992 and ended in March 1995. Follow-up was completed in October of 1995. Data analysis continued through March 2000 under the NICHD contract N01HD13121.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Eclampsia
  • Heart Diseases
  • HELLP Syndrome
  • Hypertension
  • Pre-Eclampsia
  • Pregnancy Toxemias
  • Vascular Diseases
03

In context

Toxemia

936 studies on the registry are indexed under Toxemia; 155 are open to participants now.

Browse Toxemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) is the lead sponsor of 416 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (77%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Nulliparous, normotensive, pregnant women.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Double

Interventions

  • Drugcalcium
  • Behavioraldietary supplements
06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Levine RJ, Esterlitz JR, Raymond EG, DerSimonian R, Hauth JC, Ben Curet L, Sibai BM, Catalano PM, Morris CD, Clemens JD, Ewell MG, Friedman SA, Goldenberg RL, Jacobson SL, Joffe GM, Klebanoff MA, Petrulis AS, Rigau-Perez JG. Trial of Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP): rationale, design, and methods. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Oct;17(5):442-69. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00106-7. PubMed 8932976 ↗
  • Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, Klebanoff MA, Esterlitz J, Catalano PM, Goldenberg RL, Joffe G. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;177(5):1003-10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70004-8. PubMed 9396883 ↗
  • Mills JL, DerSimonian R, Raymond E, Morrow JD, Roberts LJ 2nd, Clemens JD, Hauth JC, Catalano P, Sibai B, Curet LB, Levine RJ. Prostacyclin and thromboxane changes predating clinical onset of preeclampsia: a multicenter prospective study. JAMA. 1999 Jul 28;282(4):356-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.4.356. PubMed 10432033 ↗
  • Joffe GM, Esterlitz JR, Levine RJ, Clemens JD, Ewell MG, Sibai BM, Catalano PM. The relationship between abnormal glucose tolerance and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in healthy nulliparous women. Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;179(4):1032-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70210-8. PubMed 9790393 ↗
  • Levine RJ, Hauth JC, Curet LB, Sibai BM, Catalano PM, Morris CD, DerSimonian R, Esterlitz JR, Raymond EG, Bild DE, Clemens JD, Cutler JA. Trial of calcium to prevent preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 10;337(2):69-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707103370201. PubMed 9211675 ↗
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00000534
Lead sponsor
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 1999
Start date
Mar 1991
Completion
Jun 2000
Last update
Mar 13, 2017

Study contacts

Patrick Catalano
Case Western Reserve University
Luis Curet
University of New Mexico
John Hauth
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Cynthia Morris
Oregon Health and Science University
Baha Sibai
University of Tennessee
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion