ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06912477EPICSUpdated Sep 4, 2026

Endothelial Dysfunction for Prognosis In Patients With preeClampSia

An observational study in Preeclampsia (PE) and Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy, sponsored by Heidelberg University. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Sponsored by Heidelberg University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
385
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific hypertensive disorder and can progress rapidly to severe adverse outcomes affecting both the mother and the fetus. Endothelial and microcirculatory dysfunction mediate systemic preeclampsia-related organ dysfunctions. Changes in endothelial and vascular function in preeclampsia have been demonstrated through reduced flow-mediated vasodilation as a result of reduced availability of nitric oxide, which potentially persists up to several years postpartum. Hyperspectral imaging is a new innovative technology that allows to assess the peripheral microcirculation and perfusion non-invasively and contactless, but has never been evaluated in the context of preeclampsia before.

This EPICS project (Endothelial dysfunction for Prognosis In patients with preeClampSia) is a prospective observational study and aims to investigate hyperspectral imaging as a new potential diagnostic and prognostic marker in preeclampsia.

Read the detailed description

Preeclampsia is defined as hypertension combined with features of multi-organ dysfunction and can progress rapidly to severe adverse outcomes affecting both the mother and the fetus. Endothelial dysfunction is a key driver in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia mediating the systemic complications of this multi-organ disease. Changes in endothelial and vascular function in preeclampsia have been observed through reduced flow-mediated vasodilation, which occurs due to diminished nitric oxide availability and may persist for years after childbirth. Although symptoms of preeclampsia often resolve spontaneously after delivery, affected women will face a significantly increased risk of long-term cardiovascular complications. Thus, preeclampsia is viewed as an individual female-specific cardiovascular risk factor.

Beyond this background, hyperspectral imaging as an assessment of peripheral microcirculation and tissue perfusion appears to be a suitable method. Hyperspectral imaging is an innovative technique that visualizes hemodynamic changes by displaying the oxygen saturation of hemoglobin in the capillary system, the distribution of hemoglobin in the tissue, and the relative tissue water content. Hyperspectral imaging has not yet been studied in obstetrics or in the context of preeclampsia before. Given the well-documented microcirculatory disturbances associated with preeclampsia, the investigators hypothesize hyperspectral analysis as a valuable tool to bridge a diagnostic gap that might be useful to tailor individualized obstetric care of patients with preeclampsia.

Recently the "Endothelial Activation and Stress Index" (EASIX) was evaluated as prognostic marker in preeclampsia by the investigator group. EASIX is based on lactate dehydrogenase, platelets, and creatinine and was originally developed as simple score to predict endothelial-related complications after allogenic stem cell transplantation. However, the exact relationship of EASIX to endothelial cell biology and microcirculation requires further clarification. The investigators hypothesize that a reduced peripheral microcirculation will mediate direct interactions of platelets with endothelial cells, resulting in cellular damage (increased LDH), loss of platelets due to activation and microembolism, and lead to kidney damage.

The EPICS study (Endothelial dysfunction for Prognosis In patients with preeClampSia) is the first prospective study to investigate hyperspectral imaging in women with preeclampsia. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether and how changes in microcirculation in women with preeclampsia can be detected with hyperspectral imaging compared to women with pregnancy-induced hypertension, normotensive pregnant women and non-pregnant controls and whether microcirculatory perfusion quality is associated with other biochemical markers such as EASIX or markers of endothelial dysfunction. Furthermore, the EPICS study aims to evaluate the predictive performance of hyperspectral imaging with or without combination of other biochemical markers for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes and the remaining time until delivery in patients with preeclampsia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preeclampsia (PE)
  • Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • preeclampsia
  • hyperspectral imaging
  • endothelial dysfunction
03

In context

Pre-Eclampsia

916 studies on the registry are indexed under Pre-Eclampsia; 243 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 385 is above the median of 165 across 397 observational studies indexed under Pre-Eclampsia.

Browse Pre-Eclampsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Heidelberg University is the lead sponsor of 287 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who are admitted to the Department of obstetrics at Heidelberg University Hospital

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • singleton pregnancies
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient's ability to provide consent
  • written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of consent
  • Language barrier
  • Dark to very dark skin type
  • Severe fetal chromosomal/genetic/structural anomalies
  • Laboratory changes in LDH, creatinine, or due to other causes (e.g., isolated thrombocytopenia, e.g., immune thrombocytopenia, carcinoma)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
385 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Preeclampsia

    patients with diagnosis of preeclampsia according to definitions by the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (n=110)

    Diagnostic Test: Hyperspectral imaging · Diagnostic Test: Further markers of endothelial dysfunction

  • Pregnancy induced Hypertension and chronic Hypertension

    patients with hypertension in pregnancy without fulfilling criteria of preeclampsia (n=110)

    Diagnostic Test: Hyperspectral imaging · Diagnostic Test: Further markers of endothelial dysfunction

  • Normotensive pregnant control group

    normotensive pregnancies (n=110)

    Diagnostic Test: Hyperspectral imaging · Diagnostic Test: Further markers of endothelial dysfunction

  • Non-pregnant control group

    normotensive, non-pregnant women (n=55)

    Diagnostic Test: Hyperspectral imaging · Diagnostic Test: Further markers of endothelial dysfunction

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testHyperspectral imaging

    Hyperspectral imaging will be performed at study inclusion and will be repeated longitudinally every 1-2 days until delivery and on the first and second day after delivery. After a baseline measurement, a blood pressure cuff is inflated on the upper arm to 50 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure for 5 minutes, and then the hyperspectral imaging measurement is repeated. Blood samples are collected at study inclusion and on the first and second day after delivery and are processed within the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the Heidelberg University Hospital.

  • Diagnostic testFurther markers of endothelial dysfunction

    At study inclusion: 1. blood samples will be collected for the measurement of EASIX and cardiac/endothelial markers; 2. sublingual in vivo microscopy will be performed (requires about 20 minutes and can be compared to a sublingual temperature measurement); 3. Doppler ultrasound will be performed to evaluate uterine and ophthalmic arteries. Blood samples will also be collected at the first and second day after delivery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time Until Delivery

    Time period between date of study inclusion (diagnostic tests) to delivery

    Time frame: observation period until 6 months after delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. maternal adverse event

    composite adverse maternal outcome (categorical, yes/no): death, acute kidney injury, cardiorespiratory complication (e.g. pulmonary edema), eclampsia, cerebrovascular event, hematological complication, hepatic complication, postpartum hemorrhage, the Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome, placental abruption

    Time frame: observation period until 6 months after delivery

  2. perinatal adverse event

    composite perinatal endpoint (categorical, yes/no): neonatal mortality, stillbirth, preeclampsia-related preterm delivery, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal seizures, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, birthweight \<10th percentile, admission to neonatal unit, respiratory support

    Time frame: observation period until 6 months after delivery

  3. maternal cardiovascular outcome: persistence of hypertension

    number of participants with persisting hypertension

    Time frame: observation period until 6 months after delivery

  4. maternal cardiovascular outcome: blood pressure

    blood pressure (mmHg)

    Time frame: observation period until 6 months after delivery

  5. maternal cardiovascular outcome: antihypertensive medication

    number of participants who required antihypertensive medication initiation or dose adjustment

    Time frame: observation period until 6 months after delivery

  6. maternal cardiovascular outcome: readmission

    number of participants who required readmission for hypertension

    Time frame: observation period until 6 months after delivery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 19 months after the start.

Of 191 non-industry observational studies under Pre-Eclampsia, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 200 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 25, 2025
First posted
Apr 4, 2025
StartActual
May 8, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
Sep 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06912477
Responsible party
Anna Scholz (Dr. med. Anna Scholz, Heidelberg University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 4, 2025
Start date
May 8, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Study contacts

Dr. med. Anna Scholz
Contact
anna.scholz@med.uni-heidelberg.de
+49 6221 56 32080
Dr. med. Alexandra von Au
principal investigator · University Heidelberg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion