ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07841587Updated Oct 6, 2026

Prediction of Latency Interval in Patients With Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes

An observational study in Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes (PPROM), sponsored by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-06.

Sponsored by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital · Observational

Updated Oct 6, 2026Primary outcomes revisedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Prediction of latency interval in Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) remains challenging in clinical practice, Myometrial thickness (MT) has emerged as a potential ultrasound marker for predicting the risk of preterm labor.

This study aims to prospectively evaluate the correlation between MT measurements at multiple uterine sites and latency interval in women with PPROM.

Read the detailed description

PPROM is a major obstetric complication, occurring in approximately 3% of pregnancies and accounting for 30-40% of preterm births worldwide. It is defined as rupture of the fetal membranes before the onset of labor and prior to 37 weeks of gestation, creating a clinical dilemma that balances the risks of prematurity against the dangers of prolonged membrane rupture. The condition carries significant perinatal morbidity and mortality, including respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and neonatal sepsis, alongside maternal complications such as chorioamnionitis and postpartum hemorrhage.

The latency period, defined as the interval between membrane rupture and delivery, is a critical determinant of neonatal outcomes. A longer latency permits completion of antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal lung maturation and antibiotic prophylaxis, thereby improving neonatal prognosis. Conversely, prolonged latency increases the risk of ascending infection, chorioamnionitis, and placental abruption, necessitating careful and individualized management, Current evidence indicates that approximately 50% of affected women deliver within 48 hours, and 70-90% within one week of membrane rupture, although latency may occasionally extend for several weeks in cases of very early PPROM according to recommendations of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Standard management between 24 and 34 weeks includes hospitalization, antibiotic prophylaxis, antenatal corticosteroids, and magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection before 32 weeks, alongside close maternal-fetal surveillance. Despite these well-established interventions, accurate prediction of latency duration remains a significant clinical challenge. Traditional predictors such as gestational age at rupture, amniotic fluid volume, cervical length, fetal fibronectin, and inflammatory markers have demonstrated variable sensitivity and specificity across different populations, limiting their widespread clinical utility.

Ultrasonographic assessment has become integral to PPROM management, and recent attention has focused on myometrial thickness (MT) as a potential non-invasive predictor of labor onset and delivery timing. The myometrium undergoes dynamic structural and functional changes throughout pregnancy, with thickness variations reflecting uterine contractility patterns, inflammatory responses, and the risk of imminent delivery. Studies in women with threatened preterm labor have shown that increased MT particularly at the lower uterine segment correlates with heightened uterine activity and a shorter interval to delivery . Ultrasonography provides a non-invasive method for assessing uterine morphology and myometrial activity, with increasing interest in its potential role in predicting the onset of preterm labor.

Despite encouraging preliminary findings, evidence regarding the predictive value of MT in women with PPROM remains limited, and further prospective studies are required before its routine clinical application. Furthermore, in middle-income countries, such as Egypt, where preterm birth remains a major contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality, the development of accessible, affordable, and non-invasive predictive tools for women with PPROM is of particular clinical importance. The wide availability of ultrasound equipment makes MT measurement a feasible and cost-effective addition to routine PPROM assessment, without requiring specialized biochemical assays or advanced technology.

This study therefore aims to prospectively evaluate the association between MT at multiple uterine sites and the latency interval in women with PPROM. Cut-off values predictive of imminent delivery can be incorporated into clinical management algorithms for this challenging obstetric condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes (PPROM)

Keywords

  • Myometrial thickness - Latency interval
  • Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes
03

In context

Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture

100 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 122 across 36 observational studies indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture.

Browse Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture studies →

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes presenting to Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gestational age 28-34 weeks at membrane rupture
  • Presenting to the hospital within 24 hours of PPROM

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with to conservative management. Clinical chorioamnionitis at presentation. Patients presenting in labor Intrauterine fetal death

Medical/Obstetric indications for immediate delivery at presentation:

Severe preeclampsia. Bleeding: placenta previa or placental abruption

  • Women with other risk factors for preterm birth. Fetal growth restriction with lost end-diastolic flow in umbilical artery Known uterine anomalies Multifetal gestation
  • Previous uterine surgery (e.g., myomectomy, classical cesarean section)
  • Morbidly obese women rendering sonographic assessment inaccurate
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Myometrial thickness as a predictor of latency interval in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

    Correlation between myometrial thickness at each uterine measurement site and latency interval in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

    Time frame: the period from membrane rupture to 24 hours after membrane rupture

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):e80-e97. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003700. PubMed 32080050 ↗
  • Anil, A., Srinivas, S. B., Hebbar, S., & Pai, M. V. (2020). The upper and lower uterine segment thickness ratio: A simple sonographic tool to triage for preterm delivery among women with threatened preterm labor. Current Women's Health Reviews, 16(3), 236-243. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404816666200309153236
  • Atarjavdan L, Khazaeipour Z, Shahbazi F. Correlation of myometrial thickness and the latency interval of women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Dec;284(6):1339-43. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1841-x. Epub 2011 Feb 5. PubMed 21298281 ↗
  • Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, Landoulsi S, Jampathong N, Kongwattanakul K, Laopaiboon M, Lewis C, Rattanakanokchai S, Teng DN, Thinkhamrop J, Watananirun K, Zhang J, Zhou W, Gulmezoglu AM. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e37-e46. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0. Epub 2018 Oct 30. PubMed 30389451 ↗
  • Feduniw S, Pruc M, Ciebiera M, Zeber-Lubecka N, Massalska D, Zgliczynska M, Pawlowska A, Szarpak L. Biomarkers for Pregnancy Latency Prediction after Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes-A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 28;24(9):8027. doi: 10.3390/ijms24098027. PubMed 37175733 ↗
  • Gupta R, Nagarsenkar A. Using Sonographically Estimated Myometrial Thickness in Prediction of Latency Interval in Cases of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM). J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Dec;66(6):431-435. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0711-z. Epub 2015 Jul 11. PubMed 27821983 ↗
  • Park JH, Bae JG, Chang YS. Neonatal Outcomes according to the Latent Period from Membrane Rupture to Delivery among Extremely Preterm Infants Exposed to Preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane: a Nationwide Cohort Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Apr 12;36(14):e93. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e93. PubMed 33847083 ↗
  • Ronzoni S, Boucoiran I, Yudin MH, Coolen J, Pylypjuk C, Melamed N, Holden AC, Smith G, Barrett J. Guideline No. 430: Diagnosis and management of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Nov;44(11):1193-1208.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Oct 2. PubMed 36410937 ↗
  • Schmitz T, Sentilhes L, Lorthe E, Gallot D, Madar H, Doret-Dion M, Beucher G, Charlier C, Cazanave C, Delorme P, Garabedian C, Azria E, Tessier V, Senat MV, Kayem G. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 May;236:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Mar 2. PubMed 30870741 ↗
  • Shynlova O, Nadeem L, Zhang J, Dunk C, Lye S. Myometrial activation: Novel concepts underlying labor. Placenta. 2020 Mar;92:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 4. PubMed 32056784 ↗
  • Singh, S., Sharma, R., Gupta, N., & Suneja, A. (2021). Sonographic evaluation of myometrial thickness at different gestations for prediction of labor in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 13(6), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1981
  • Tchirikov M, Schlabritz-Loutsevitch N, Maher J, Buchmann J, Naberezhnev Y, Winarno AS, Seliger G. Mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): etiology, diagnosis, classification, international recommendations of treatment options and outcome. J Perinat Med. 2018 Jul 26;46(5):465-488. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0027. PubMed 28710882 ↗
  • Thomson AJ; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Care of Women Presenting with Suspected Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes from 24+0 Weeks of Gestation: Green-top Guideline No. 73. BJOG. 2019 Aug;126(9):e152-e166. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15803. Epub 2019 Jun 17. No abstract available. PubMed 31207667 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Mar 2027, 5 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2026
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
Oct 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary outcomes
1 time frame changed
What changed in the outcomes
  • Time frameMyometrial thickness as a predictor of latency interval in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranesthe period from membrane rupture to 24 hrs after membrane rupture → the period from membrane rupture to 24 hours after membrane rupture
Oct 6, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 6, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 time frame changed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Time frameMyometrial thickness as a predictor of latency interval in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranesthe period from membrane rupture to 24 hrs after membrane rupture → the period from membrane rupture to 24 hours after membrane rupture
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Sep 25, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07841587
Responsible party
Ahmed Mohammed Elmaraghy (Associate Professor, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2026

Study contacts

Ahmed ElMaraghy, M.D,
Contact
ahmedelmaraghy@med.asu.edu.eg
+201010370980
Hamdy Alqenawy, M.D.,
Contact
hamdybakry@med.asu.edu.eg
Mohamed Serag
study chair · Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams university
Walid Tantawy, M.D.,
study director · Faculty of Medicine - Modern University for Technology and Information

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion