ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07308977Updated Aug 17, 2026

Practice of Assisted Vaginal Birth in Egypt

An observational study in Vaginal Delivery, sponsored by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 28 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
150
Ages
28 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In Egypt, the proportion of CSs has been steadily increasing in recent years and has reached an alarming level. According to data from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), approximately 6% of caesarean sections (CS) are performed on average because of inadequate supervision from junior staff members or a lack of training, particularly during the critical decision-making phase of this second stage. The unfamiliarity and lack of experience with operative vaginal delivery is a major cause for the rise in the rate of second stage caesarean section. This survey targets obstetricians with different levels of experience to find practical solutions to increase the rate of assisted vaginal delivery which subsequently will decrease the rate of second stage CS.

Read the detailed description

Egypt is a populous African country with a population of about 102 million people in 2020. Egypt has the highest cesarean section (CS) rate in the Middle East, which has increased from 20% in 2005 to 52% in 2014. Globally, the estimated number of births by Cesarean section (CS) increased from 16 million (12%) in 2000 to 29.1 million (21%) in 2015. Furthermore, during the same period, several studies have demonstrated a remarkable increase in the rate of second-stage cesarean section.

Whereas forceps-assisted vaginal delivery represented 38% of deliveries in rural areas of Egypt, in the United States, operative vaginal delivery in the form of either forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (FAVD) or ventouse-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) has declined remarkably since 1990. The utilization of operative vaginal delivery in live births decreased from 9.0% in 1990 to 3.1% in 2016. During the same period, the percentage of VAVD deliveries fell from 3.9 to 2.6%, and FAVD from 5.1 to just 0.5%. The declining rate of assisted vaginal delivery contributed to the rise in the cesarean section rate from 22.7% in 1990 to 31.9% in 2016.

The performance of AVB by physicians with a high level of experience and certified training courses should be considered a safe alternative to second-stage cesarean section. This does not only depend on the physician, but it also depends on the patient's preference. In this survey, the investigators explore Egyptian obstetricians 'attitudes and perceptions on AVB.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaginal Delivery

Keywords

  • Assisted vaginal delivery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
28 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Obstetricians from three tertiary maternity hospitals in Cairo, Egypt. The three hospitals are Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, El Hussein University Hospital, and El Kasr Alaini Hospital

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Obstetricians with at least 3 years of experience in practicing obstetrics
  • Obstetricians with their primary health care facility being one of the three Tertiary centres, Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, El Hussein University Hospital, and El Kasr Alaini Hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherSurvey using a questionnaire.

    This cross-sectional study aims to identify the obstacles preventing an increase in AVB performance in Egypt. Obstetricians from three tertiary care centers in Egypt will be invited to participate in this Online web-based survey over the study period. The questions in this survey are included in 5 sections; demographics, workload and AVB practice, obstetrician-related factors, service provision factors, and what changes could be implemented to increase the rate of uptake of AVB by Egyptian obstetricians. The link to the survey will be sent to the study participants, and the data will be collected for analysis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Obstacles preventing the increase in the performance of assisted vaginal birth in Egypt by a questionnaire directed to obstetricians in three maternity tertiary centers in Cairo, Egypt

    Time frame: through the study completion, an average of 4 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):693-711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d. PubMed 24553167 ↗
  • Becker DA, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Rogers SL, Brumfield CG, Subramaniam A. Resident Operative Vaginal Delivery Volume after Educational Curriculum Implementation. Am J Perinatol. 2020 Nov;37(13):1296-1300. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710543. Epub 2020 May 26. PubMed 32455468 ↗
  • Darmstadt GL, Hussein MH, Winch PJ, Haws RA, Gipson R, Santosham M. Practices of rural Egyptian birth attendants during the antenatal, intrapartum and early neonatal periods. J Health Popul Nutr. 2008 Mar;26(1):36-45. PubMed 18637526 ↗
  • Banerjee A, Al-Dabbach Z, Bredaki FE, Casagrandi D, Tetteh A, Greenwold N, Ivan M, Jurkovic D, David AL, Napolitano R. Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;60(3):396-403. doi: 10.1002/uog.26027. PubMed 35809243 ↗
  • Jadoon B, Assar TM, Nucier AAAR, Raziq HEA, Abd El-Azym Saad AS, Megahed Amer W. Analysis of the caesarean section rate using the 10-Group Robson classification at Benha University Hospital, Egypt. Women Birth. 2020 Mar;33(2):e105-e110. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 13. PubMed 30987799 ↗
  • Fasseeh A, ElEzbawy B, Adly W, ElShahawy R, George M, Abaza S, ElShalakani A, Kalo Z. Healthcare financing in Egypt: a systematic literature review. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2022 Jan 7;97(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s42506-021-00089-8. PubMed 34994859 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 12 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 4, 2025
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
StartActual
Jan 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 15, 2027
Last update
Aug 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07308977
Responsible party
Ahmed Mohammed Elmaraghy (Assistant professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
Start date
Jan 15, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Study contacts

Ahmed M Elmaraghy, M.D,
Contact
ahmedelmaraghy@med.asu.edu.eg
+201010370980
Hamdy BM Alqenawy, M.D.,
Contact
hamdybakry@med.asu.edu.eg
Alaa S Elsewafy, M.D.,
study chair · Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams university
Mohamed A Haroun
principal investigator · Faculty of Medicine - Modern University for Technology and Information
Ahmed M Sweidan
study chair · Faculty of Medicine - Suez University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion