ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07881744Updated Oct 19, 2026

Prediction of Intrapartum Fetal Compromise After Elective Induction of Labour

An observational study in Intrapartum Fetal Distress, sponsored by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-19.

Sponsored by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital · Observational

Updated Oct 19, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
182
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Each fetus has a different metabolic capacity at the onset of labor, and in cases of an imbalance between fetal demands and placental oxygen supply, fetal hypoxia occurs. In this scenario, and to avoid permanent fetal damage, a cesarean section (CS) for intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) might be needed to minimize the potential consequences of sustained hypoxia.

Read the detailed description

Acute fetal compromise is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. As well as being a major cause of fetal death, a reduction in the oxygen supply for the conceptus can lead to relevant neonatal complications. Intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) occurs in a significant proportion (10-15%) of cases of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia. In most cases, Intra-partum fetal compromise occurs in low-risk pregnancies, making adverse perinatal outcomes difficult to predict.

The placenta is the organ in charge of supplying the fetus with enough nutrition to allow its appropriate growth during pregnancy, and it also copes with different hypoxic insults. Labor is a physiological but stressful situation for the fetus and the mother, characterized by repeated transient episodes of uterine contractions, causing fetal intermittent hypoxia. Each uterine contraction is associated with an increase in intrauterine pressure by 25 to 70 mmHg, resulting in a 25% drop in the partial pressure of oxygen at the fetal side.

Cerebroplacental ratio is widely used to diagnose adverse perinatal outcomes as it assesses the correlation between fetal cerebral redistribution and hypoxemia, which is independent of birth weight.This, has consequences for assessing the well-being of small for gestational age(SGA) and appropriate for gestational age(AGA) fetuses close to the end of pregnancy.

A key clinical goal before labour onset is to predict fetal intolerance to labour, intrapartum fetal compromise from hypoxia, emergency caesarean delivery, and subsequent serious perinatal morbidity and mortality.

When the fetus suffers hypoxia, one of its multiple adaptive mechanisms is the centralization of blood flow to the most noble organs, such as the fetal brain. This situation can be evaluated with Doppler ultrasound measuring the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR), Calculated by dividing the Doppler flow rate of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) by the flow rate of the umbilical artery (UA). the CPR is an obstetric US measurement that demonstrates how elevated placental resistance and fetal hypoxia lead to the redistribution of cardiac output to the cerebral circulation.

The cerebroplacental ratio evaluation is used to detect and assess the fetal response to oxygen defciency in utero. With the progress of pregnancy, the resistance in fetal circulation decreases gradually. Nevertheless, the values of middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA PI) should remain higher than umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) values, which implicates that CPR, being the ratio of (MCA PI) to (UA PI), should be higher than 1 in uncomplicated pregnancies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intrapartum Fetal Distress
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women scheduled for elective induction of labour at term.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Gestational age ≥37 weeks
  • Intact membranes
  • Planned elective induction of labour

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in the study.
  • Multiple pregnancy
  • fetal anomalies
  • Fetal growth restriction
  • Contraindications for vaginal delivery(women with Contraindications for vaginal birth are not candidates for labour induction) 6. Medical diseases which could affect fetal growth (DM, HTN, etc)( maternal medical disorders may alter placental perfusion,fetal growth and Doppler indices)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
182 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intrapartum fetal distress

    Intrapartum fetal compromise requiring operative delivery (instrumental vaginal delivery or cesarean section)

    Time frame: At delivery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fracalozzi JL, Okido MM, Crott GC, Duarte G, Cavalli RC, Araujo Junior E, Peixoto AB, Marcolin AC. Maternal, obstetric, and fetal Doppler characteristics in a high-risk population: prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes and of cesarean section due to intrapartum fetal compromise. Radiol Bras. 2023 Jul-Aug;56(4):179-186. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0104. PubMed 37829588 ↗
  • Maity, A., Sonawane, B., Deshpande, A., & Bhutada, S. (2024). Diagnostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio in anticipating adverse perinatal outcome in uncomplicated appropriate for gestational age pregnancies at term. Journal of Indira Gandhi Institute Of Medical Science, 10(2), 125-132.
  • Mohamed, M.L., Mohamed, S.A. & Elshahat, A.M. Cerebroplacental ratio for prediction of adverse intrapartum and neonatal outcomes in a term uncomplicated pregnancy. Middle East Fertil Soc J 26, 45 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-021-00090-3
  • Mushtaq, S., Amin, M., & KHAN, M. (2025). PROGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CEREBROPLACENTAL RATIO FOR ADVERSE FETAL OUTCOMES AND FETAL DISTRESS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BIRTH. Pakistan Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 5(01), 86.
  • Novillo-Del Alamo B, Martinez-Varea A, Nieto-Tous M, Padilla-Prieto C, Modrego-Pardo F, Bello-Martinez de Velasco S, Garcia-Florenciano MV, Morales-Rosello J. Prediction of Cesarean Section for Intrapartum Fetal Compromise: A Multivariable Model from a Prospective Observational Approach. J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 20;14(6):658. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060658. PubMed 38929879 ↗
  • Novillo-Del Alamo B, Martinez-Varea A, Satorres-Perez E, Nieto-Tous M, Bello-Martinez de Velasco S, Garcia-Florenciano MV, Padilla-Prieto C, Modrego-Pardo F, Morales-Rosello J. Cerebroplacental Ratio as a Predictive Factor of Emergency Cesarean Sections for Intrapartum Fetal Compromise: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 17;13(6):1724. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061724. PubMed 38541949 ↗
  • Ortiz JU, Graupner O, Flechsenhar S, Karge A, Ostermayer E, Abel K, Kuschel B, Lobmaier SM. Prognostic Value of Cerebroplacental Ratio in Appropriate-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses Before Induction of Labor in Late-Term Pregnancies. Ultraschall Med. 2023 Feb;44(1):50-55. doi: 10.1055/a-1399-8915. Epub 2021 May 31. PubMed 34058782 ↗
  • Reale SC, Farber MK. The cerebroplacental ratio: a new standard diagnostic tool at term gestation to assess fetal risk in labour? Lancet. 2024 Feb 10;403(10426):506-508. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02453-4. Epub 2024 Jan 11. No abstract available. PubMed 38219771 ↗
09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 19, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 19, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07881744
Responsible party
Ahmed Mohammed Elmaraghy (Assistant professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2026

Study contacts

Ahmed M ElMaraghy, M.D,
Contact
ahmedelmaraghy@med.asu.edu.eg
+201010370980

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion