ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07802041Updated Sep 3, 2026

Planned Early Induction of Labor vs Expectant Management for PROM

An interventional study of Induction of labor with PGE2 and Expectant management in Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM), sponsored by Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2026, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
734
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare planned early induction of labor with expectant management in women with term premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at 37-42 weeks of gestation. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does planned early induction of labor reduce maternal and fetal complications compared with expectant management? Is there a difference in the frequency of cesarean section, chorioamnionitis, and fetal distress between the two management strategies? Researchers will compare active management (induction of labor within 24 hours) with expectant management (observation for 24 hours while awaiting spontaneous onset of labor).

Participants will:

Be women aged 18-45 years with singleton pregnancies and PROM at 37-42 weeks. Be randomly assigned to either active or expectant management. Receive routine monitoring and intravenous antibiotics until delivery. Be followed until delivery, with maternal and fetal outcomes recorded.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial will compare planned early induction of labor (active management) with expectant management in women with term premature rupture of membranes (PROM).

PROM is defined as rupture of the fetal membranes before the onset of labor. At term, the optimal timing of delivery remains an important clinical consideration because prolonged rupture of membranes may increase the risk of maternal and neonatal infection, while early delivery may increase interventions such as induction of labor and cesarean section.

The study will be conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PIMS Hospital, Islamabad, over a period of six months after approval of the synopsis. A total of 734 women will be enrolled using consecutive sampling and randomly allocated into two equal groups of 367 participants each.

Group A - Active Management:

Labor will be induced within 24 hours of diagnosis of PROM. Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel (1 mg) will be used for cervical ripening/induction, with repeat doses at 6-hour intervals when required, up to a maximum of three doses.

Group B - Expectant Management:

Participants will undergo observation for 24 hours following diagnosis of PROM while awaiting spontaneous onset of labor. An endocervical swab will be collected for microscopy, culture, and sensitivity. Participants will be monitored for signs of infection and fetal compromise.

Both groups will receive intravenous antibiotics according to the study protocol (ceftriaxone 1 g every 24 hours and metronidazole 500 mg every 8 hours until delivery) and will be followed until delivery.

The study will compare maternal and fetal outcomes between the two groups, particularly:

Cesarean section Chorioamnionitis Fetal distress Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, gestational age, parity, BMI, socioeconomic status, educational level, and residential status, will also be recorded.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether planned early induction of labor or expectant management is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes in women with term PROM.

02

Conditions studied

  • Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM)

Keywords

  • PROM
  • Chorioamnionitis
  • Cesearan section
  • Expectant management
03

In context

Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture

100 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 734 is above the median of 150 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture.

Browse Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture studies →

Lead sponsor

Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women age 18 to 45 years
  • Singleton pregnancy on ultrasound
  • Gestational age 37 to 42 weeks on LMP
  • Any parity
  • Premature rupture of membrane as per operational definition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • H/o active infection.
  • H/o placental abruption
  • H/o preeclampsia
  • Fetal anomalies on ultrasound
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
734 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active management

    Induction of labor within 24 hours of diagnosis of term premature rupture of membranes.

    Procedure: Induction of labor with PGE2

  • Active comparator
    Expectant management

    Observation for 24 hours following diagnosis of term premature rupture of membranes while awaiting spontaneous onset of labor.

    Behavioral: Expectant management

Interventions

  • ProcedureInduction of labor with PGE2

    Induction of labor within 24 hours of diagnosis of term PROM, using prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel as per study protocol.

  • BehavioralExpectant management

    Observation for 24 hours while awaiting spontaneous onset of labor, with maternal and fetal monitoring.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cesearan section rate

    Proportion of participants who undergo cesarean delivery in the active management group compared with the expectant management group.

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery

  2. Chorioamnionitis

    Proportion of participants developing clinical chorioamnionitis during labor or before delivery.

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery.

  3. Fetal distress

    Proportion of participants developing fetal distress during labor requiring intervention.

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 6 months after the start.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2026
First posted
Sep 3, 2026
StartActual
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Last update
Sep 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07802041
Lead sponsor
Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Zohashaa Shahid (Postgraduate Resident (PGR), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 3, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion