ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05480982Updated May 7, 2026

Cognitive Functional Therapy Compared With Pilates in Elderly Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Cognitive functional therapy via tele rehabilitation and Pilates via tele rehabilitation in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2022; still recruiting 4 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is evidence of three randomized controlled trials that face-to-face CFT reduces disability compared with active interventions for adults with chronic low back pain. The pandemic enabled the popularization of tele rehabilitation around the globe, but there are still no clinical trial testing the effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) via tele rehabilitation for elderly people with chronic low back pain. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of CFT compared with Pilates, both via tele rehabilitation in elderly patients with chronic low back pain.

Read the detailed description

This will be a parallel-group randomized controlled trial with intention to treat analysis conducted via tele rehabilitation in Brazil. Two hundreds elderly people with chronic low back pain (except low risk on STartback screening tool) will be randomized to receive CFT (2 individualized sessions and 4-8 group sessions) or group Pilates (6-10 sessions) up to 12 weeks treatment. Participants will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks) 24 and 48 weeks after randomization. The trial will include cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses. Data of quality of life, healthcare costs, patient and family costs, and absenteism costs will be collected. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using disability and pain intensity as outcomes. Costs and quality-adjusted life years will be used to calculate cost-utility.

Three qualitative studies will be conducted during the trial. The first will be performed by means of the interviews with a subsample of the participants before randomization. The aim will be to investigate how elderly people with chronic low back pain perceive their condition. The second will be performed by means of the analysis of a subsample of video recordings of CFT treatments. The aim will be to investigate the narratives of elderly people with chronic low back pain during CFT treatment sessions. The third will be performed after the last follow up by means of an interview with a subsample of participants that received CFT treatment. The aim will be to investigate the perceptions of elderly people with chronic low back pain about the impact of CFT via telerehabilitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • low back pain
  • cognitive functional therapy
  • telehealth
  • Pilates
  • behavioral therapy
  • exercise therapy
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 60 across 2,364 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A main complaint of pain in the area between the 12th rib and buttock crease with or without accompanying non-radicular leg pain;
  • Episode of ongoing low back pain for at least 12 weeks' duration;
  • Presenting to a primary care clinician at least 6 weeks ago for this episode of LBP;
  • Being able to walk independently (with or without aids);
  • Ability to understand Portuguese well enough to be able to fill in the questionnaires.
  • Medium or high risk score on STartback screening tool.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected red flag disorders like fracture, /cancer, cauda equina syndrome or progressive neurological disorder, inflammatory or infective diseases of the spine;
  • Suspected radicular pain (dominant leg pain, positive neural tissue provocation tests and/or any two of altered strength, reflexes or sensation for the same nerve root, assessed clinically);
  • Spinal surgery \< 6 months previously;
  • Invasive procedures for pain relief (ex: epidural injection, rhizotomy) in the last three months;
  • Scoliosis (if considered the primary cause of pain);
  • Unstable heart conditions;
  • Chikungunya or Dengue virus disease transmitted by mosquitoes;
  • Relevant cognition deficit measured by 10 point cognitive screener, with a cut-off point of less than 8 points, 18 for participants with elementary education, and 26 for participants with secondary and/or higher education;
  • Post Covid-19 sequelae of pain.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive functional therapy (CFT) via tele rehabilitation

    Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a physiotherapy-led intervention which has evolved from an integration of foundational behavioral psychology and neuroscience within the physiotherapy practice directed at the multidimensional biopsychosocial nature of low back pain. The clinical journey is adapted to the individual's profile following three main components: (i) making sense of pain, (ii) exposure with control and (iii) lifestyle changes. The first 2 one-hour treatment sessions of CFT will be delivered individually and via videoconference in a weekly basis. The following one-hour treatment sessions (from 6 to 9 sessions) will be delivered in groups (up to 6 participants). One group booster session will be delivered 20 weeks after randomization

    Behavioral: Cognitive functional therapy via tele rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Pilates

    Participants in the comparison group will receive Pilates method using classic principles and exercises recommended by Joseph Pilates. No specific accessories or equipment will be used, allowing the exercises to be performed under any circumstances. Based on Pilates, 10 exercises were selected: Leg Pull Front, One Leg Circle, One Leg Kick, One leg stretch, Shoulder bridge, Side bend, Spine Stretch , Swimming, The hundred and The Saw. The main objective of the exercises is to improve physical capacities, including mobility, flexibility, muscle strength and activation of the "power house" center of force, with the therapeutic aim of a positive evolution of chronic non-specific low back pain. The one-hour sessions will be delivered once a week. Participants will be instructed to perform the set of exercises once a week without the supervision of the physiotherapist. The number of group sessions (up to 6 participants) will vary between 8 to 12.

    Other: Pilates via tele rehabilitation

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive functional therapy via tele rehabilitation

    Participants in the CFT group will be treated by a physiotherapist with seventeen years of clinical experience and that has attended six CFT workshops with three of the international tutors of the method. She has completed 212 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study under the supervision of a physiotherapist with more than seven years of clinical experience in CFT. Another two physiotherapists, one with more than fifteen years and the other with more than ten years of clinical experience, and both with more than 106 hours of CFT training including CFT via tele physiotherapy, will complete the staff.

  • OtherPilates via tele rehabilitation

    Physiotherapist will have the freedom to judge about the exercises´ progression and the need of adaptation considering both the level of difficulty to perform each exercise according to the original proposal and the individual´s demands. The treating physiotherapists will have at least 2 years of clinical practice in Pilates and clinical experience in Pilates via teleconference.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disability

    Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (0-100), higher scores mean worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  2. Disability

    Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (0-100), higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  3. Function

    Patient Specific Functional Scale (0-10), higher scores mean better outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  4. Anxiety

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  5. Depression

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10),higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  6. Catastrophization

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  7. Fear of movement

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  8. Social isolation

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  9. Stress

    Brief Psychosocial Questions (0-10), higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  10. Sleep disturbance

    Subjective Health Complaints Inventory (0-3), higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  11. Costs

    Assessments of healthcare costs, patients and family costs, and absenteeism costs by a specific questionnaire (total costs in £)

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

  12. Quality-adjusted life years

    SF-6D questionnaire (0-1), higher scores mean a better outcome

    Time frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Keeffe M, O'Sullivan P, Purtill H, Bargary N, O'Sullivan K. Cognitive functional therapy compared with a group-based exercise and education intervention for chronic low back pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT). Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;54(13):782-789. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100780. Epub 2019 Oct 19. PubMed 31630089 ↗
  • Castro J, Correia L, Donato BS, Arruda B, Agulhari F, Pellegrini MJ, Belache FTC, de Souza CP, Fernandez J, Nogueira LAC, Reis FJJ, Ferreira AS, Meziat-Filho N. Cognitive functional therapy compared with core exercise and manual therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2022 Dec 1;163(12):2430-2437. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002644. Epub 2022 Apr 4. PubMed 35384931 ↗
  • Belache FTC, Souza CP, Fernandez J, Castro J, Ferreira PDS, Rosa ERS, Araujo NCG, Reis FJJ, Almeida RS, Nogueira LAC, Correia LCL, Meziat-Filho N. Trial Protocol: Cognitive functional therapy compared with combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for people with non-specific chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial. J Physiother. 2018 Jul;64(3):192. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Jun 11. PubMed 29903598 ↗
  • Caneiro JP, Smith A, Bunzli S, Linton S, Moseley GL, O'Sullivan P. From Fear to Safety: A Roadmap to Recovery From Musculoskeletal Pain. Phys Ther. 2022 Feb 1;102(2):pzab271. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab271. PubMed 34971393 ↗
  • Fernandez J, Ferreira AS, Castro J, Correia LCL, Meziat-Filho N. Comment on the paper "Cognitive functional therapy in patients with non specific chronic low back pain", by Vibe Fersum et al. Eur J Pain. 2019 Sep;23(8):1574-1575. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1441. Epub 2019 Jun 26. No abstract available. PubMed 31190411 ↗
  • Miki T, Kondo Y, Kurakata H, Buzasi E, Takebayashi T, Takasaki H. The effect of cognitive functional therapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biopsychosoc Med. 2022 May 21;16(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13030-022-00241-6. PubMed 35597961 ↗
  • Vibe Fersum K, O'Sullivan P, Skouen JS, Smith A, Kvale A. Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2013 Jul;17(6):916-28. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00252.x. Epub 2012 Dec 4. PubMed 23208945 ↗
  • American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Jun;30(6):992-1008. PubMed 9624662 ↗
  • Kent P, Mirkhil S, Keating J, Buchbinder R, Manniche C, Albert HB. The concurrent validity of brief screening questions for anxiety, depression, social isolation, catastrophization, and fear of movement in people with low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2014 Jun;30(6):479-89. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000010. PubMed 24281277 ↗
  • GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. PubMed 28919117 ↗
  • Fernandez J, Lunkes LC, Meziat-Filho N. Biopsychosocial approaches to telerehabilitation for chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A real possibility for physical therapists, that is here to stay. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022 Jan-Feb;26(1):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 9. No abstract available. PubMed 34001421 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 58 months after the start.

Of 1,231 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26. This study's planned 58 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,286 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 27, 2022
First posted
Jul 29, 2022
StartActual
Sep 2, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
May 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05480982
Lead sponsor
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 29, 2022
Start date
Sep 2, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2026

Study contacts

Jessica Fernandez, PhD Student
Contact
jessicafmg@gmail.com
+5521988778037
Ney Meziat-Filho, PhD
Contact
neymeziat@gmail.com
+5521998051386
Ney Meziat-Filho, PhD
study director · Centro Universitario Augusto Motta - UNISUAM

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion