ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07786324MHTS-ONSDUpdated Aug 25, 2026

Comparison of Hyperosmolar Agent in Reduction of Increased Intracranial Pressure in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Using Ultrasonography

An interventional study of Mannitol (20%) and Hypertonic Saline ( 3% Sodium Chloride Saline) in TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), ICP (Intracranial Pressure) Increase and Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study to compare the efficacy of hypertonic saline and mannitol in reducing intracranial pressure, as assessed by serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) ultrasound measurements, in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Read the detailed description

Introduction :- Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a primary driver of global trauma-related mortality and severe long-term neurological disability. The pathophysiological trajectory of severe TBI involves a primary mechanical insult followed by a complex cascade of secondary brain injury evolving over subsequent hours and days. Primary injury arises directly from mechanical forces-inducing focal contusions, lacerations, or diffuse axonal disruption. Secondary brain injury develops through cellular and metabolic dysfunction, characterized by blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, neuroinflammation, microvascular ischemia, cellular energy failure, and severe cytotoxic and vasogenic cerebral edema. Within the non-yielding osseous structure of the adult cranium, progressive cerebral edema and expanding traumatic lesions directly precipitate pathological elevations in intracranial pressure (ICP).

The volumetric dynamics of the cranium are governed by the Monro-Kellie doctrine, which dictates that the sum of brain tissue, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes within the intracranial vault remains constant. Because the intracranial volume is fixed, any increase in parenchymal or hemorrhage volume must be compensated by an equal reduction in CSF and venous blood volume. Once these physiological buffering mechanisms are exhausted, intracranial compliance drops sharply, causing exponential surges in ICP. Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines define intracranial hypertension as sustained ICP elevations exceeding 22 mmHg. Sustained intracranial hypertension directly compromises cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP = MAP - ICP), precipitating secondary ischemic insults, tissue hypoxia, loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation, and life-threatening transtentorial or tonsillar herniation syndromes. Clinical evidence demonstrates a strong correlation between unmanaged intracranial hypertension and adverse outcomes; mortality rates increase significantly when ICP exceeds 20 mmHg and can surpass 50% when ICP rises above 40 mmHg.

Hyperosmolar therapy is the standard medical management strategy for ICH after supportive care which is most important for neuroprotection (sedation, analgesia, position, and so on). Currently, only 2 osmotic agents are utilized for this purpose: mannitol and HTS. Mannitol has been the primary hyperosmolar agent for nearly a century and remains a common treatment for ICH. Guidelines currently recommend mannitol as the mainstay in the treatment of ICH.

Hyperosmolar therapy, remains a cornerstone of ICP management . Mannitol, a 6 carbon inert sugar alcohol approved by the FDA, reduces ICP by increasing plasma osmolality and promoting water efflux. It is routinely used to treat cerebral edema following brain insults and neurosurgical procedures. Despite its widespread use, some concerns persist due to its systemic effects. Case reports and small clinical series have described complications such as transient heart failure triggered by rapid intravascular volume shifts, impaired cardiac function in the elderly, hypotension, dehydration, acute kidney injury, and hypernatremia. Mannitol-induced diuresis may also cause hypovolemia in vulnerable patients.

For several decades, 20% Mannitol has been the primary osmotic agent in neurocritical care. Mannitol is a sugar alcohol solution with an osmolarity of approximately 1098 mOsm/L. Administered as intermittent IV boluses (0.5 - 1.0 g/kg), mannitol produces rapid intravascular volume expansion followed by pronounced renal osmotic diuresis. Although mannitol reduces ICP within 15 to 30 minutes, its diuretic mechanism can lead to systemic hypovolemia, arterial hypotension, hyperosmolality, electrolyte depletion, and acute tubular necrosis. Moreover, repeated dosing or continuous exposure can disrupt the blood-brain barrier, allowing mannitol to enter the brain parenchyma and induce rebound intracranial hypertension.

3% Hypertonic Saline (HTS) provides an alternative hyperosmolar strategy that expands intravascular volume without causing systemic diuresis. is available from 2 to 23.4% and can be administered as a bolus alone or with mannitol. Concentrations of HTS greater than 7.5% should be given through a central venous catheter. Concentrations less than 7.5% can be bolused via a peripheral line; however, infusions should be given in a large vessel. Administered as boluses (3 mL/kg or 150 mL) or continuous infusions, 3% NaCl has an osmolarity of approximately 1026 mOsm/L (513 mEq/L Na+). Hypertonic saline enhances cardiac preload and maintains mean arterial pressure, offering hemodynamic benefits in trauma patients susceptible to hypotension or hemorrhagic shock. Furthermore, hypertonic saline maintains blood-brain barrier integrity more effectively than mannitol, producing sustained ICP reduction with a lower frequency of rebound spikes. Potential adverse risks include hypernatremia, hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, fluid overload, and osmotic demyelination syndrome if serum sodium shifts are unmonitored.

Neuromonitoring Modalities: Invasive Gold Standards and the Sonographic ONSD Window:

Accurate measurement of ICP is fundamental to neurocritical care, guiding hyperosmolar therapy, adjusting ventilator parameters, and preventing secondary ischemic injury. Invasive intracranial monitoring-utilizing intraventricular catheters connected to external ventricular drains (EVD) or parenchymal strain-gauge microtransducers-remains the diagnostic gold standard. Intraventricular catheters provide continuous pressure monitoring alongside the unique capacity for therapeutic CSF drainage to manage acute ICP spikes. Nevertheless, invasive modalities involve substantial clinical challenges, including risks of intracranial hemorrhage, bacterial ventriculitis, localized brain parenchymal trauma, and technical malposition. Furthermore, invasive placement requires neurosurgical expertise and specialized critical care resources that are frequently unavailable in pre-hospital environments, low-resource regional hospitals, or remote emergency units.

These diagnostic limitations have driven the development of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) techniques, with measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) emerging as a non-invasive surrogate for ICP monitoring. Anatomically, the optic nerve is an extension of the central nervous system, encased in a dural sheath that represents a direct continuation of the intracranial meninges. The subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerve communicates directly with the intracranial subarachnoid cavity, allowing CSF to flow freely between the two regions. Increases in ICP transmit hydrostatic pressure through the subarachnoid CSF, expanding the retrobulbar optic nerve sheath. Because the dural sheath is most elastic and distensible 3 mm posterior to the eye globe, high-frequency ultrasonographic measurements taken at this specific landmark correlate closely with invasively measured ICP.

Clinical studies indicate that an ONSD cutoff between 4.8 mm and 5.5 mm reliably detects intracranial pressure exceeding 20 mmHg with high sensitivity and specificity . Sonographic ONSD assessment is non-invasive, cost-effective, rapidly repeatable at the bedside, and free from surgical risks.

Clinical literature directly comparing 3% Hypertonic Saline versus 20% Mannitol specifically in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) patients using bedside Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD) ultrasonography in Egyptian medical centers is limited, primarily consisting of small, single-center pilot studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
  • ICP (Intracranial Pressure) Increase
  • Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement

Keywords

  • mannitol
  • hypertonic saline
  • ICP
  • ONSD
  • TBI
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,721 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 52 across 1,088 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Age ≥18 years.

      • Acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) (GCS 3-8) confirmed by CT brain.
      • Elevated ONSD suggestive of raised ICP (ONSD cutoff value ≥5.6 mm ).(14)
      • Initiation of hyperosmolar therapy within 24 hours of injury.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Penetrating head injury.

      • Hypotension.
      • Previous ocular trauma or orbital surgery.
      • Glaucoma or optic nerve pathology.
      • Bilateral ocular injuries preventing ultrasound assessment.
      • Pregnancy.
      • Chronic renal failure requiring dialysis.
      • Initial serum sodium >150mmol/L or Patients reaching a sodium level >160mmol/L during hypertonic administration.
      • Previous hyperosmolar therapy before enrollment.
      • Refusal of consent by legal surrogate.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group M (Mannitol)

    used ultrasonography to assess the optic nerve sheath diameter from Baseline or Immediately before mannitol therapy. Then added mannitol with Follow-up ONSD, 2 hours, 6 hours,24 hours using 20% Mannitol Dose: 0.5-1 g/kg IV over 15-20 minutes.

    Drug: Mannitol (20%)

  • Active comparator
    Group H (Hypertonic Saline)

    used ultrasonography to assess the optic nerve sheath diameter from Baseline or Immediately before hypertonic saline therapy. Then added hypertonic saline with Follow-up ONSD, 2 hours, 6 hours,24 hours used 3% Hypertonic saline at dose: 2-3 mL/kg IV over 15-20 minutes

    Drug: Hypertonic Saline ( 3% Sodium Chloride Saline)

Interventions

  • compare the efficacy of mannitol in reducing intracranial pressure, as assessed by serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) ultrasound measurements, in patients with traumatic brain injury.

  • DrugHypertonic Saline ( 3% Sodium Chloride Saline)

    compare the efficacy of hypertoic saline in reducing intracranial pressure, as assessed by serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) ultrasound measurements, in patients with traumatic brain injury.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in ONSD (mm) from baseline, after treatment (e.g., at 2 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours).

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. reduction of icp

    1\. Time to achieve target ICP reduction following administration of the hyperosmolar agent., hemodynamic stability and the frequency of secondary rebound hypertension during acute resuscitation.

    Time frame: 1 hours, 6 hours, 24hours

  2. GCS

    Change in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) after treatment.

    Time frame: 24HOURS

  3. serum electrolyte

    Changes in serum electrolyte. sodium and osmolarity

    Time frame: 6hours, 24hours

  4. surgery

    Requirement for surgical intervention.

    Time frame: 24hours

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Trocha G, Bonilla A, Romero C, Palacios J, Molano-Gonzalez N. Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in a healthy adult Colombian population. BMC Neurol. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03062-4. PubMed 36639617 ↗
  • Ramasamy A. Advanced trauma life support 2025: A brief review of updates. Injury. 2026 Apr;57(4):113079. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113079. Epub 2026 Feb 3. PubMed 41671886 ↗
  • Khalid S, Kim H, Kim HS. Recent trends in diabetes mellitus diagnosis: an in-depth review of artificial intelligence-based techniques. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;224:112221. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112221. Epub 2025 May 4. PubMed 40328407 ↗
  • Hegde, Gayathri, P. Deepa Shenoy, and Arvind Canchi. "A deep learning framework for chronic kidney disease stage classification." Healthcare Analytics 7 (2025): 100398.
  • Rehman S, Afzal M. Blood Pressure Measurement. 2026 Feb 15. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482189/ PubMed 29489154 ↗
  • Hakeem A, Anwer M, Khan AV, Kumar H, Karthikeyan V, Sridhar R, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar S. Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Estimation to Detect Increased Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury patients at a Level I Trauma Center in Eastern India. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2025 Apr 24;21(2):93-101. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e15. eCollection 2025 Apr. PubMed 40353282 ↗
  • Zhang N, Liang M, Shao T, Li N, Wang K, Sun S, Sun T. Clinical implications of real-time optic nerve sheath diameter assessment via critical care ultrasound in intracranial hypertension. Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 13;16:1488482. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1488482. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40027162 ↗
  • Fahmy, H., A. Mohamady, and A. Abdelaziz. "Optic nerve sheath diameter: an ultrasonographic window for comparing between hypertonic saline and mannitol in severe traumatic brain injuries." Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research 10.4 (2019): 888-894.
  • Robba C, Picetti E, Vasquez-Garcia S, Abulhasan YB, Ain A, Adeleye AO, Aries M, Brasil S, Badenes R, Bertuccio A, Bouzat P, Bustamante L, Calabro' L, Njimi H, Cardim D, Citerio G, Czosnyka M, Geeraerts T, Godoy DA, Hirzallah MI, Devi BI, Jibaja M, Lochner P, Mijangos Mendez JC, Meyfroidt G, Munusamy T, Portilla JP, Prabhakar H, Rasulo F, Sanchez Parra DM, Sarwal A, Shrestha GS, Shukla DP, Sung G, Tirsit A, Vasquez F, Videtta W, Wang YL, Paiva WS, Taccone FS, Rubiano AM. The Brussels consensus for non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are not available in the care of TBI patients (the B-ICONIC consensus, recommendations, and management algorithm). Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):4-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07756-2. Epub 2025 Jan 23. PubMed 39847066 ↗
  • Jiang X, Guo H, Xiao W, Wang L, Wu D, Liu J, Zhao Q, Shao Y. Advancements in Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring via Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement. Med Sci Monit. 2025 May 25;31:e947237. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947237. PubMed 40413578 ↗
  • Patel S, Maria-Rios J, Parikh A, Okorie ON. Diagnosis and management of elevated intracranial pressure in the emergency department. Int J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 13;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00540-x. PubMed 37833652 ↗
  • Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432. PubMed 27654000 ↗
  • Kareemi H, Pratte M, English S, Hendin A. Initial Diagnosis and Management of Acutely Elevated Intracranial Pressure. J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;38(7):643-650. doi: 10.1177/08850666231156589. Epub 2023 Feb 19. PubMed 36802976 ↗
  • Bianchini L, de Matos PMPG, Roepke RML, Besen BAMP. Management of intracranial hypertension with and without invasive intracranial pressure monitoring. World J Crit Care Med. 2025 Sep 9;14(3):105645. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105645. eCollection 2025 Sep 9. PubMed 40880574 ↗
  • Viarasilpa T. Managing Intracranial Pressure Crisis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s11910-024-01392-5. PubMed 39699775 ↗
  • Benson JC, Madhavan AA, Cutsforth-Gregory JK, Johnson DR, Carr CM. The Monro-Kellie Doctrine: A Review and Call for Revision. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Jan;44(1):2-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7721. Epub 2022 Dec 1. PubMed 36456084 ↗
  • Georges A, Das JM. Traumatic Brain Injury (Archive). 2024 Feb 24. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459300/ PubMed 29083790 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07786324
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Mostafa Hassan Mostafa Abdellah (doctor (assisstant lecturer), Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 25, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Mostafa Hassan Abdellah, assisstant lecturer
Contact
mostafa.abdellah95@aun.edu.eg
00201552590309
Khaled Abd Elbaki Abd Elrahman, professor
Contact
khaledbaky@aun.edu.eg
00201008182061

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mannitol

Start the discussion