An observational study in Reflux Esophagitis, sponsored by Jilin University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.
Sponsored by Jilin University · Observational
To prospectively enroll participants undergoing gastroscopy at Zaduo County People's Hospital and perform paired analyses with matched cases from Jilin Province. This aims to characterize the endoscopic features of esophageal diseases specific to the high-altitude population in Zaduo County.
83 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophagitis, Peptic; 16 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 535 across 22 observational studies indexed under Esophagitis, Peptic.
Browse Esophagitis, Peptic studies →Jilin University is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
patients scheduled for gastroscopy at the Endoscopy Center of Zaduo County People's Hospital
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
All eligible patients presenting to the Endoscopy Center of Zaduo County People's Hospital during the recruitment period (December 1, 2025, to October 30, 2026) will be consecutively enrolled. Located at an average altitude of \>4,200 m, Zaduo County presents a unique environment for this study. Eligible patients undergoing gastroscopy within the specified timeframe will be screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Endoscopic pathological findings will be compared to identify characteristics specific to the high-altitude cohort.
Diagnostic Test: Sedated gastroscopy
All enrolled patients underwent sedated gastroscopy.
Proportion of reflux esophagitis
The severity of reflux esophagitis (RE) was evaluated according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification\[1\]. Mucosal breaks were defined as visible discontinuities of the esophageal squamous epithelium. The grading criteria were as follows: LA Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks, each no longer than 5 mm, confined to the mucosal folds. LA Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks longer than 5 mm, but not continuous between the tops of two mucosal folds. LA Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between the tops of two or more mucosal folds, involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference. LA Grade D: Mucosal breaks involving at least 75% of the esophageal circumference. The proportion of reflux esophagitis was defined as the number of patients diagnosed with reflux esophagitis divided by the total number of enrolled participants.
Time frame: Within 1 week after gastroscopy
the proportion of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG)
The extent of gastric atrophy was determined by tracing the endoscopic atrophic border (the "cut-off line"). Based on the location of the endoscopic atrophic border, Kimura and Takemoto proposed an endoscopic classification of gastric atrophy comprising two main types: closed type (C type) and open type (O type). These two main types are further subdivided into three closed types (C-1, C-2, and C-3) and three open types (O-1, O-2, and O-3). Closed type C-1 is characterized by endoscopic atrophic changes confined to the antrum. In types C-2 and C-3, the atrophic changes extend parabolically above the angulus. The differentiation between C-2 and C-3 is based on the location of the atrophic border in relation to the middle of the lesser curvature of the stomach: in C-2, the atrophic border lies below this level, whereas in C-3, it lies above it. In the open types, the atrophic border lies between the lesser curvature and the anterior wall in O-1, on the anterior wall in O-2, and between
Time frame: Within 1 week post-gastroscopy
Grade of gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) according to the Hill classification;
Assessment of the Gastroesophageal Flap Valve (GEFV) The appearance and compliance of the GEFV during quiet respiration were graded according to the Hill classification: Grade I: The GEFV appears as a well-defined, symmetrical fold compressing the tip of the endoscope. Grade II: The GEFV appears as a poorly defined, wavy fold that opens with respiration, allowing partial visualization of the cardia. Grade III: The GEFV is absent; the cardia is clearly visible and opens widely with respiration, exposing the gastric fundus. Grade IV: The cardia is permanently open, exhibiting a hiatal hernia appearance with retrograde prolapse of the gastric mucosa into the esophagus.
Time frame: Within 1 week post-gastroscopy
Status of Helicobacter pylori infection
Based on the urea breath test results, endoscopic findings, and the history of H. pylori eradication therapy, infec-tion status was divided into three groups: negative, positive, and eradication. Positive status was defined as a positive urea breath test or endoscopic features suggestive of current Helicobacter pylori infection. Eradication status was defined as negative urea breath test together with either a documented his-tory of eradication therapy or definite endoscopic atrophy (Kimura-Takemoto grade ≥ C-II, that is, the atrophic border extending beyond the gastric angle). The remaining cases were considered to be H. pylori-negative.
Time frame: Within two weeks post-gastroscopy
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Jilin University