ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07178821SFP-POEMUpdated Oct 22, 2025

Sling-Fiber Preservation POEM vs. Conventional POEM for Reducing Post-POEM GERD

An interventional study of Conventional POEM and Sling Fiber-Preserving POEM in Achalasia, Esophageal and GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease), sponsored by University of California, Irvine. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-22.

Sponsored by University of California, Irvine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 52 studies in Esophageal Achalasia with a site in United States — 18 open to participants now, 18 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Esophageal Achalasia · United States.

Planned enrollment
8th of 33
120 · median 42
Started
2025
the only one that year
No phase
23 of 52
6 open now
Primary completion
2027-12
later than 8 of 17 live
Registered
47th of 52
by date

Among the 52 studies in Esophageal Achalasia with a site in United States, this one is the 8th largest by planned enrollment of the 33 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2025, is one of 23 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 8 of the 17 other live ones, and was the 47th registered.

Esophageal Achalasia

143 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Achalasia; 44 are open to participants now.

Browse Esophageal Achalasia studies →

Open to participants now

18 of the 52 studies in Esophageal Achalasia with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

12 more — sign in →

All 18 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 31 Esophageal Achalasia studies recruiting now, 20 (65%) set no upper age limit and 5 (16%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 1 takes healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 52 studies in Esophageal Achalasia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective, minimally invasive treatment for achalasia, offering excellent rates of symptom relief. However, a significant drawback is the high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following the procedure. One proposed technical modification, the selective preservation of the sling fibers during gastric myotomy (SFP-POEM), may reduce this risk without compromising efficacy as compared to a conventional POEM procedure, which includes myotomy of the sling fibers. In this study, adults with achalasia will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two POEM technical approaches. Researchers will monitor whether preserving sling fibers reduces the rates of reflux esophagitis (classified as Los Angeles Grade B or higher) on follow-up endoscopy. Participants will be followed for up to 1 year after the procedure.

Read the detailed description

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder treated effectively with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). However, post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common complication, reported in up to 65% of cases. One proposed technical modification - the selective preservation of gastric sling fibers - may help reduce reflux by maintaining part of the native anti-reflux mechanism.

This is a single-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing sling fiber preservation (SFP) POEM versus conventional POEM in adult patients with achalasia. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either technique. The primary endpoint is the incidence of significant reflux esophagitis (LA esophagitis grade B or higher) at 3 months post-procedure endoscopy. Secondary outcomes include acid exposure time on pH impedence monitoring, symptomatic reflux (GerdQ), PPI usage, technical and clinical success, and adverse events. Follow-up continues for 12 months.

The study aims to determine whether the SFP-POEM technique reduces acid reflux without compromising treatment efficacy.

03

Conditions studied

  • Achalasia, Esophageal
  • GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)

Keywords

  • Achalasia
  • POEM
  • Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy
  • Sling Fiber Preservation
  • SFP-POEM
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux
  • GERD
  • Reflux Esophagitis
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (Participants must meet all of the following):

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of achalasia (Type I-III) per Chicago Classification v3.0
  • Deemed appropriate candidates for POEM
  • Ability to provide

Exclusion Criteria (Participants will be excluded if any of the following apply):

  • Spastic motility disorders other than achalasia type I-III (e.g. diffuse esophageal spasm, jackhammer esophagus, EGJ outflow obstruction)
  • Sigmoid esophagus
  • Prior surgical myotomy (e.g., Heller myotomy)
  • to endoscopy or general anesthesia
  • Pregnancy or actively breastfeeding
  • Significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities that preclude safe endoscopic intervention
  • Coagulopathy or portal hypertension
  • Unwillingness or inability to complete follow-up assessments
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional POEM

    Participants in this arm will undergo standard peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), including myotomy of circular and sling muscle fibers at the gastric side.

    Procedure: Conventional POEM

  • Experimental
    Sling Fiber-Preservation POEM

    Participants in this arm will undergo posterior POEM with selective preservation of the gastric sling fibers. Myotomy is performed to the right of the second penetrating vessel to spare the sling fibers. The double scope technique will be employed to confirm that the tunnel ends on the lesser curve, which confirms sparing of the sling fibers.

    Procedure: Sling Fiber-Preserving POEM

Interventions

  • ProcedureConventional POEM

    Standard posterior POEM with full-thickness myotomy, including both circular and gastric sling muscle fibers.

  • ProcedureSling Fiber-Preserving POEM

    Posterior POEM with selective preservation of gastric sling fibers by limiting myotomy to the right of the second penetrating vessel.

    Also known as: SFP-POEM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Significant Reflux Esophagitis (Los Angeles Grade B or Higher)

    Reflux esophagitis will be assessed by upper endoscopy (EGD) at 3 months post-POEM. Grading will be based on the Los Angeles (LA) Classification. Significant reflux is defined as LA Grade B or higher.

    Time frame: 3 months post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Esophageal Acid Exposure

    Esophageal acid exposure will be measured by 24-hour Bravo pH monitoring performed off PPIs for at least 2 weeks. Reflux severity is quantified using acid exposure time (%) and the DeMeester composite score. The DeMeester score has no fixed maximum; higher values indicate greater esophageal acid exposure. Pathologic reflux is defined as acid exposure time \>6% and/or a DeMeester score \>14.72.

    Time frame: 3 months post-procedure

  2. Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux (GerdQ Score)

    Symptom-based GERD assessment will be measured using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ), which ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate more frequent or severe reflux symptoms, while lower scores indicate fewer or no symptoms. A score \>7 is considered clinically significant.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months post-procedure

  3. Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) Use

    Assessment of ongoing PPI therapy and symptom-guided discontinuation based on reflux control.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months post-procedure

  4. Clinical Success (Eckardt Symptom Score ≤ 3)

    Symptom improvement will be measured using the Eckardt Symptom Score, which ranges from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms (dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, and weight loss), while lower scores indicate symptom improvement. A score ≤ 3 is considered a successful clinical outcome.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post-procedure

  5. Technical Success

    Technical success defined as completion of full-length myotomy as planned.

    Time frame: During procedure

  6. Adverse Events

    Monitoring of intra- and post-procedural complications, including bleeding, perforation, capno-peritoneum, leak, infection, and other unexpected events.

    Time frame: Within 1 month post-procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Irvine - UCI Medical Center
    Orange, California 92868, United States
    • Frances Dang, MD · Contactdangf1@hs.uci.edu · 714-456-7447
    • Jason Samarasena, MD, MBA · Principal investigator
    • Frances Dang, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nabi Z, Chandran V, Basha J, Ramchandani M, Inavolu P, Kalpala R, Goud R, Jagtap N, Darisetty S, Gupta R, Tandan M, Lakhtakia S, Kotla R, Devarasetty R, Rao GV, Reddy DN. Conventional versus oblique fiber-sparing endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: a randomized controlled trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jan;99(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Aug 19. PubMed 37598863 ↗
  • Fujiyoshi Y, Fujiyoshi MRA, Khalaf K, May GR, Teshima CW. Sling fiber preservation during POEM reduces incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. Dis Esophagus. 2025 Jan 7;38(1):doae097. doi: 10.1093/dote/doae097. PubMed 39586589 ↗
  • Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Kawara F, Watanabe D, Hoshi N, Abe H, Ariyoshi R, Ohara Y, Takao T, Morita Y, Umegaki E, Kodama Y. Novel per-oral endoscopic myotomy method preserving oblique muscle using two penetrating vessels as anatomic landmarks reduces postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;34(12):2158-2163. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14814. Epub 2019 Aug 23. PubMed 31373050 ↗
  • Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Shiwaku A, Okada H, Hasegawa S. Safety and effectiveness of sling fiber preservation POEM to reduce severe post-procedural erosive esophagitis. Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4255-4264. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08763-w. Epub 2021 Oct 29. PubMed 34716481 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared outside the study team. The current protocol does not include provisions for public or external data sharing.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2025; primary completion for Dec 2027, 24 months later.

Of 32 interventional studies with no phase under Esophageal Achalasia, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 63. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 10, 2025
First posted
Sep 17, 2025
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2028
Last update
Oct 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07178821
Collaborators
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, University of Ottawa, Vancouver General Hospital, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Responsible party
Frances Dang (Assistant Clinical Professor, University of California, Irvine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 17, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2025

Study contacts

Frances Dang, MD, MSc
Contact
dangf1@hs.uci.edu
714-456-6745
Jason Samarasena, MD
Contact
jsamaras@hs.uci.edu
714-456-7447
Jason Samarasena, MD, MBA
principal investigator · University of California, Irvine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion