ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07892183SPADEUpdated Oct 23, 2026

SPADE Clinical Trial.

An interventional study of Spade-Shaped Anastomosis after Laparoscopic or Robotic Proximal Gastrectomy Using Double Suture Anchoring between the Posterior Wall of the Esophagus and the Anterior Wall of the Stomac in Early Gastric Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Proximal Gastric Cancer, sponsored by National Cancer Center, Korea. Recruiting at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by National Cancer Center, Korea · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2025, registered Oct 2026).
  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
159
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of the SPADE operation (Spade-Shaped Anastomosis) in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer located in the upper stomach

. Background: While proximal gastrectomy (removing only the upper part of the stomach) offers nutritional advantages over total gastrectomy, it often leads to significant postoperative reflux esophagitis

  • The SPADE technique was developed to prevent this by creating an artificial anti-reflux mechanism (angle of His and pseudo-fornix) using double suture anchoring between the esophagus and the stomach

Study Plan:

Participants: The study will enroll approximately 159 patients with tumors (size ≤ 4 cm) located in the upper third of the stomach who are eligible for gastric function-preserving surgery . Intervention: All participants will undergo laparoscopic or robotic proximal gastrectomy followed by the SPADE reconstruction method

. Primary Objective: The primary goal is to determine the incidence of endoscopic reflux esophagitis at one year postoperatively

. Secondary Objectives: Investigators will also monitor postoperative reflux symptoms, nutritional parameters (such as weight, hemoglobin, and vitamin B12 levels), surgical complications, quality of life, and 3-year survival rates

. Hypothesis: The researchers hypothesize that the SPADE operation is a safe and effective surgical approach that can provide equivalent reflux prevention (a target rate of approximately 2.9%) compared to existing complex reconstruction methods, while maintaining the benefits of preserving gastric function

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale: Total gastrectomy has been the standard treatment for proximal gastric cancer, but it often results in a significant decline in quality of life (QoL) due to malnutrition, weight loss, and malabsorption

  • Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is an alternative that preserves gastric function; however, conventional reconstruction methods frequently lead to severe reflux esophagitis
  • To address this, the SPADE (Spade-Shaped Anastomosis) technique was developed. It aims to prevent reflux by creating an artificial anti-reflux mechanism, including the angle of His and a pseudo-fornix, through double suture anchoring between the posterior wall of the esophagus and the anterior wall of the stomach
  • This study is designed to validate the safety and clinical efficacy of this newly developed procedure

Study Design and Population: This is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial

  • The study will enroll a total of 159 patients (including a 10% dropout rate) diagnosed with early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach
  • Eligible participants must have a tumor size of 4 cm or less and meet specific preoperative clinical stages (e.g., T1-T2N0/1 or T3N0/1 depending on differentiation) with an expected remnant stomach of 60% or more

Surgical Procedure (SPADE Operation):

Resection: Surgeons will perform laparoscopic or robotic proximal gastrectomy with D1+ lymph node dissection

  • The esophagus is resected just above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ)

Reconstruction: The proximal remnant stomach and the distal esophagus (3 cm above the transected edge) are fixed with interrupted sutures on both sides to create the "spade" shape . Anastomosis: A linear opening is made in the stomach, and the anterior and posterior walls of the esophagus and stomach are sutured using continuous barbed sutures to secure the intra-abdominal positioning of the anastomosis

. Evaluation and Follow-up: Patients will undergo a structured follow-up protocol at 3 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months postoperatively

. Primary Endpoint: The incidence of endoscopic reflux esophagitis at 12 months, graded by the Los Angeles (LA) classification

. Secondary Endpoints: Postoperative reflux symptoms (Visick score), changes in nutritional parameters (body weight, hemoglobin, albumin, vitamin B12, etc.), surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), and Quality of Life (using EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22)

. Survival: 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) will also be monitored

.

02

Conditions studied

  • Early Gastric Cancer
  • Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach
  • Proximal Gastric Cancer
  • SPADE Operation
  • Reflux Esophagitis Prevention
  • Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy
  • Quality of Life
  • Gastric Function Preservation

Keywords

  • SPADE Operation (Spade-Shaped Anastomosis)
  • Early Gastric Cancer
  • Proximal Gastrectomy
  • Reflux Esophagitis
  • Angle of His Reconstruction
  • Double Suture Anchoring
  • Gastric Function Preservation
  • Quality of Life (QoL)
  • Phase 2 Feasibility Study
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

2,914 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 881 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 159 is above the median of 66 across 2,143 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Center, Korea is the lead sponsor of 203 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

① Histologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma by biopsy.

  • Adult patients aged 20 years or older.

    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2.

      ④ American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of class I to III.

      ⑤ Patients who have received a full explanation of the study purpose and procedures, and voluntarily signed the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board.

      ⑥ Patients eligible for proximal gastrectomy satisfying the following oncologic characteristics on preoperative evaluation:

      • Tumor location: Upper third of the stomach (High body, cardia, fundus, gastroesophageal junction [Siewert III])
      • Tumor size: 4 cm or less
      • Preoperative clinical stage: T1N0, T1N1, T2N0, T2N1 (any differentiation)
      • Preoperative clinical stage: T3N0, T3N1 (well or moderate differentiation)
      • Expected residual stomach: 60% or more after surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients for whom total gastrectomy is the only appropriate treatment (e.g., presence of additional gastric cancer lesions in the distal stomach).

    ② Patients requiring concomitant resection of other organs due to other diseases.

    ③ Patients with other malignancies that may affect gastric function preservation indicators:

    • History of cancer in other organs.
    • Presence of concurrent cancer in other organs.
    • History of previous gastric resection surgery. ④ Vulnerable populations: patients lacking decision-making capacity, pregnant women, or those planning pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
159 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SPADE Operation Arm

    All participants enrolled in this single-arm study will undergo the SPADE operation (Spade-Shaped Anastomosis). This procedure is performed following a laparoscopic or robotic proximal gastrectomy with D1+ lymph node dissection for patients with early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach . The intervention specifically focuses on a unique reconstruction technique designed to prevent reflux: Anti-reflux Mechanism: The surgeons fix the posterior wall of the distal esophagus (approximately 3 cm above the transected edge) to the proximal part of the residual stomach using single interrupted sutures on both sides * This creates a "spade" shape and reconstructs an artificial angle of His and a pseudo-fornix to maintain the anastomosis in an intra-abdominal position Anastomosis: The opening is created 3 cm inferior to the proximal end of the remnant stomach, and the anterior and posterior walls of the esophagus and stomach are joined using continuous barbed sutures.

    Procedure: Spade-Shaped Anastomosis after Laparoscopic or Robotic Proximal Gastrectomy Using Double Suture Anchoring between the Posterior Wall of the Esophagus and the Anterior Wall of the Stomac

Interventions

  • ProcedureSpade-Shaped Anastomosis after Laparoscopic or Robotic Proximal Gastrectomy Using Double Suture Anchoring between the Posterior Wall of the Esophagus and the Anterior Wall of the Stomac

    The SPADE operation (Spade-Shaped Anastomosis) is a specialized reconstruction technique performed following a laparoscopic or robotic proximal gastrectomy for patients with upper-third early gastric cancer * The intervention involves several key technical steps designed to preserve gastric function and prevent postoperative reflux: Surgical Approach and Resection: The procedure begins with a laparoscopic or robotic proximal gastrectomy accompanied by D1+ lymph node dissection * Surgeons must preserve the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve in all patients * The esophagus is resected just above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) using a linear stapler Anchoring and Fixation: To create an anti-reflux mechanism, the proximal part of the residual stomach and the distal esophagus (3 cm above the transected edge) are fixed using single interrupted sutures on both sides * This "double suture anchoring" ensures the anastomosis remains in an intra-abdominal position and creates an ar

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Endoscopic Reflux Esophagitis at 1 Year

    The primary goal is to determine the rate of reflux esophagitis exactly 12 months postoperatively * This will be assessed via endoscopy and graded according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification (Grades A, B, C, and D)

    Time frame: 1 Year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Cancer Center, Korea
    Goyang, Gyeonggido 10408, South Korea
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cho M, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH, Choi S, Seo WJ, Roh CK, Hyung WJ. Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1757-1768. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6448-x. Epub 2018 Sep 10. PubMed 30203207 ↗
  • Jung DH, Lee Y, Kim DW, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3961-3969. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5429-9. Epub 2017 Mar 24. PubMed 28342130 ↗
  • Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2013 Jul;16(3):282-9. doi: 10.1007/s10120-012-0178-x. Epub 2012 Jul 22. PubMed 22821182 ↗
  • Huh YJ, Lee HJ, Oh SY, Lee KG, Yang JY, Ahn HS, Suh YS, Kong SH, Lee KU, Yang HK. Clinical Outcome of Modified Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy Compared to Conventional Proximal Gastrectomy or Total Gastrectomy for Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer with Special References to Postoperative Reflux Esophagitis. J Gastric Cancer. 2015 Sep;15(3):191-200. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.3.191. Epub 2015 Sep 30. PubMed 26468417 ↗
  • Khalayleh H, Kim YW, Man Yoon H, Ryu KW, Kook MC. Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis Among Adults With Gastric Adenocarcinoma Managed With Total Gastrectomy. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035810. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35810. PubMed 33566106 ↗
  • Tanioka T, Waratchanont R, Fukuyo R, Saito T, Umebayashi Y, Kanemoto E, Kobayashi K, Nakagawa M, Inokuchi M. Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1061-1069. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07352-2. Epub 2020 Jan 13. PubMed 31932938 ↗
  • Masuzawa T, Takiguchi S, Hirao M, Imamura H, Kimura Y, Fujita J, Miyashiro I, Tamura S, Hiratsuka M, Kobayashi K, Fujiwara Y, Mori M, Doki Y. Comparison of perioperative and long-term outcomes of total and proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study. World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1100-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2370-5. PubMed 24310733 ↗
  • Information Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Korean Gastric Cancer Association-Led Nationwide Survey on Surgically Treated Gastric Cancers in 2019. J Gastric Cancer. 2021 Sep;21(3):221-235. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e27. Epub 2021 Oct 1. PubMed 34691807 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 4, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 42 months after the start.

Of 309 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stomach Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 42 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 318 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 7, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartActual
Jun 25, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07892183
Responsible party
Young-Woo Kim (Professor, Department of Cancer Policy and Population Health, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy Staff Surgeon, Center for Gastric Cancer and Department of Surgery, Hospital, National Cancer Center, National Cancer Center, Korea) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Jun 25, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Young-Woo Kim, Ph.D
Contact
youngwookim@ncc.re.kr
+82-31-920-1635

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion