An observational study in Cardiogenic Shock, sponsored by French Cardiology Society. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 0 Days and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.
Sponsored by French Cardiology Society · Observational
The aim of this observational study is to describe the baseline characteristics, management strategies, and early outcomes (during hospitalisation and at 30 days) of patients admitted to intensive care with cardiogenic shock, regardless of aetiology.
This prospective multicenter registry will enroll consecutive patients admitted to participating adult and pediatric critical care units in France, using current definitions and classifications of cardiogenic shock. The study aims to improve patient characterization and risk stratification and support the development of future interventional studies. 1,000 patients will be enrolled over 12 months, with follow-up at 30 days, 1 year, and through linkage with the French National Health Data System (SNDS) at 1 and 5 years.
281 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Cardiogenic; 128 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 180 across 146 observational studies indexed under Shock, Cardiogenic.
Browse Shock, Cardiogenic studies →French Cardiology Society is the lead sponsor of 85 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Adult or pediatric patients presenting with cardiogenic shock
Adult Inclusion Criteria:
Patients meeting the FRENSHOCK definition of cardiogenic shock, with at least one positive criterion in each of the three categories below:
Low cardiac output, defined by at least one of the following:
Elevated pulmonary filling pressures/congestion and/or elevated right-sided filling pressures, defined by at least one of the following:
End-organ hypoperfusion, defined by at least one of the following:
Pediatric inclusion criteria :
Children must meet a revised and age-adapted FRENSHOCK definition of cardiogenic shock as described below, taking into account age- and/or weight-specific normal values (blood pressure, cardiac output, and urine output).
Patients with cardiogenic shock, defined as meeting at least one positive criterion in each of the following three categories:
Low cardiac output, defined by at least one of the following:
Elevated pulmonary filling pressures/left-sided congestion and/or elevated right-sided filling pressures, defined by at least one of the following:
End-organ hypoperfusion, defined by at least one of the following:
Adult exclusion criteria :
Pediatric exclusion criteria :
Consecutive adult and pediatric patients hospitalized with cardiogenic shock of any etiology and enrolled during the index hospitalization.
All-cause mortality during hospitalization and at 30 days
All-cause mortality assessed during the index hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up among patients hospitalized with cardiogenic shock of any etiology, excluding post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock.
Time frame: 30 days
Use of in-hospital organ support therapies
Number and percentage of patients who received renal replacement therapy (dialysis), invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or acute circulatory support (ECMO, Impella, IABP, or other mechanical circulatory support devices) during the index hospitalization.
Time frame: Baseline
Cognitive impairment assessed by the Codex test
Time frame: Within 24 hours prior to hospital discharge
Use of long-term treatment for chronic heart failure among hospital discharge survivors
Time frame: Within 24 hours prior to hospital discharge, 1 year, and 5 years
albumin-to-creatinine ratio
Time frame: on admission, Within 24 hours prior to hospital discharge, and at 1 year
NYHA grade
Time frame: 1 year
FEVG
Time frame: 1 year
Number and percentage of patients receiving home hospitalization or admitted to a rehabilitation or palliative care unit
Time frame: From index hospitalization through 5 years of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients followed by a cardiologist and frequency of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients receiving cardiology follow-up and frequency of follow-up visits in the immediate period after the index hospitalization and throughout the 5-year follow-up period.
Time frame: From index hospitalization through 5 years of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography and frequency of examinations
Number and percentage of patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography, and frequency of examinations, in the immediate period after the index hospitalization and throughout follow-up.
Time frame: From index hospitalization through 5 years of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients receiving a LifeWest, pacemaker, cardiac resynchronization therapy device, or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Time frame: From index hospitalization through 5 years of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation/flutter and/or ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation
Time frame: From index hospitalization through 5 years of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients followed by a nephrologist and frequency of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients receiving nephrology follow-up and frequency of follow-up visits in the immediate period after the index hospitalization and throughout the 5-year follow-up period.
Time frame: From index hospitalization through 5 years of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients receiving chronic hemodialysis and type of hemodialysis
Number and percentage of patients who underwent one or more chronic hemodialysis sessions, and type of hemodialysis received, in the immediate period after the index hospitalization and throughout follow-up.
Time frame: From index hospitalization through 5 years of follow-up
Number and percentage of hospital discharge survivors receiving chronic dialysis
Time frame: From index hospitalization through 5 years of follow-up
Number and percentage of patients receiving durable mechanical circulatory support (LVAD, BiVAD, or TAH) or undergoing heart transplantation
Number and percentage of patients receiving durable mechanical circulatory support (left ventricular assist device \[LVAD\], biventricular assist device \[BiVAD\], or total artificial heart \[TAH\]) or undergoing heart transplantation.
Time frame: 30 days, 1 year, 5 years
Number and percentage of hospital discharge survivors rehospitalized for heart failure
Number and percentage of hospital discharge survivors with at least one rehospitalization for heart failure during follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year, 5 years
All-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years
Time frame: 30 days, 1 year and 5 years
Socioeconomic deprivation assessed by FDep indices
Socioeconomic deprivation assessed using the French Deprivation Index (FDep) derived from INSEE territorial units (municipalities and IRIS areas).
Time frame: Baseline
Socioeconomic deprivation assessed by F-EDI indices
Socioeconomic deprivation assessed using the French European Deprivation Index (F-EDI) derived from INSEE territorial units (municipalities and IRIS areas).
Time frame: baseline
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Feb 2028, 13 months later.
Of 73 non-industry observational studies under Shock, Cardiogenic, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27. This study's planned 13 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 77 studies reached it within 54 months; a quarter within 27.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
French Cardiology Society