ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07455760Updated Mar 9, 2026

Investigating Subcortical Contributions to Speech Sequencing in Deep Brain Stimulator Recipients

An interventional study of Phoneme sequence learning and Cessation and re-enabling of stimulation of the STN in Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Essential Tremor, sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-09.

Sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine how two important brain circuits - one involving the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and one involving the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) - contribute to learning and producing speech sequences. Participants will include two groups: 1. individuals with Parkinson's disease who have deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices targeting the STN and 2. individuals with essential tremor who have DBS devices targeting the VIM.

Participants will complete speech tasks involving the learning and repetition of novel sound sequences. During some parts of the study, DBS stimulation will be temporarily turned on or off in a controlled research setting. This will allow researchers to examine how stimulation affects both the learning of new speech sequences and the production of previously learned sequences. All STN participants and most VIM participants will also be equipped with a cutting-edge DBS system, the Percept PC, which will enable the recording of deep brain activity during the tasks.

The results of this study will improve our understanding of how different brain circuits support speech learning and production. In particular, this study will help to differentiate the roles of the STN and VIM in learning the ordering of speech sounds within a syllable from learning of speech sequences containing multiple syllables. This knowledge may help guide future approaches to optimizing DBS settings to improve both movement and speech outcomes in individuals with neurological disorders, as well as provide greater general insight into how these brain structures contribute to speech production and learning.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson's Disease (PD)
  • Essential Tremor

Keywords

  • Deep Brain Stimulation
  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Essential Tremor
  • Speech Disorders
  • Neurocomputational Modeling
  • Stuttering
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 40 across 3,353 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston University Charles River Campus is the lead sponsor of 159 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Native speakers of American English
  • Adults at least 18 years of age
  • A clinically established diagnosis of Parkinson's disease or essential tremor
  • Able to provide in the judgment of the investigator
  • Treated with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (Parkinson's disease) or ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (essential tremor)
  • Stable Parkinson's disease or essential tremor medication regimen for at least one month
  • Stable DBS program settings for at least one month
  • Nominal DBS system function, including normal impedances at therapeutic DBS contacts, and adequate battery life or adequate IPG charging status for therapy
  • For DBS sensing, implanted with Medtronic Percept PC or Percept RC implantable pulse generator
  • Corrected vision adequate to easily read text presented during speech motor task

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment ( (MoCA; Nesreddine et al., 2005) score \< 25) or active psychotic or behavioral symptoms that would, in the judgment of the investigator, preclude proper participation in the study
  • Hearing impairment that interferes with accurate perception of the speech motor learning stimulus (25dB hearing level threshold at 500, 1k, 2k, and 4kHz frequencies)
  • Language impairment (aphasia) or speech articulation impairment (dysarthria) that precludes performance of the speech motor learning task
  • Neurological disorder that interferes with speech motor learning
  • Inability to tolerate symptoms when DBS is off
  • Orthodontia or atypical oral structure (e.g., cleft palate) that interferes with speech
  • Pregnancy
  • For participants in the sub-syllabic sequence learning study (Study C.2.1), experience with the following languages: Hebrew, Polish, Lithuanian, Romanian, Georgian, Tepehua, Hungarian, and Pima
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Subthalamic nucleus with subsyllabic learning arm

    Arm 1: subjects with implanted STN deep brain stimulators will undergo learning tasks involving non-English sound sequences while their stimulators are turned on and off

    Behavioral: Phoneme sequence learning · Other: Cessation and re-enabling of stimulation of the STN

  • Experimental
    Subthalamic nucleus with multisyllabic learning arm

    Arm 2: subjects with implanted STN deep brain stimulators will undergo learning tasks involving syllable sequences while their stimulators are turned on and off

    Other: Cessation and re-enabling of stimulation of the STN · Behavioral: Multisyllabic sequence learning

  • Experimental
    Ventral intermediate thalamus with subsyllabic learning arm

    Arm 3: subjects with implanted VIM deep brain stimulators will undergo learning tasks involving non-English sound sequences while their stimulators are turned on and off

    Behavioral: Phoneme sequence learning · Other: Cessation and re-enabling of stimulation of the VIM thalamic nucleus

  • Experimental
    Ventral intermediate thalamus with multisyllabic learning arm

    Arm 4: subjects with implanted VIM deep brain stimulators will undergo learning tasks involving syllable sequences while their stimulators are turned on and off

    Other: Cessation and re-enabling of stimulation of the VIM thalamic nucleus · Behavioral: Multisyllabic sequence learning

Interventions

  • BehavioralPhoneme sequence learning

    Approximately half of subjects enrolled in the study will participate in this intervention. Subjects will read aloud monosyllabic sequences that are presented orthographically on a screen. Each sequence is formed by a non-native consonant cluster followed by a vowel and final consonant (CCVC). Speech trials will be grouped into blocks. After a Familiarization block, subjects will produce a set of twelve CCVCs in a Pretest block. Subjects will then repeatedly produce two of those CCVCs in one Training block, and two other CCVCs in a subsequent Training block. Following training, subjects will produce all four trained CCVCs and four additional novel CCVCs in each of two Test blocks. Washout blocks, during which no speech task trials are completed, will follow the Pretest, Training, and first Test block to allow subjects to rest and to complete standardized testing.

  • OtherCessation and re-enabling of stimulation of the STN

    20 adults with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have deep brain stimulator (DBS) implants in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Stimulation of the STN will be intermittently turned off while subjects complete speech sequence learning tasks. After no more than 35 minutes, stimulation will be re-enabled with normal clinical parameters for each participant.

  • OtherCessation and re-enabling of stimulation of the VIM thalamic nucleus

    20 adults with essential tremor who have deep brain stimulator (DBS) implants in the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus will participate in this intervention. Stimulation of the VIM will be intermittently turned off (DBS OFF state) while subjects complete speech sequence learning tasks. After no more than 35 minutes, stimulation will be re-enabled with normal clinical parameters for each participant.

  • BehavioralMultisyllabic sequence learning

    Approximately half of subjects enrolled in the study will participate in this intervention. Subjects will read aloud sequences that are presented orthographically on a screen. Speech trials will be grouped into blocks. After a Familiarization block, subjects will produce 2- and 7-syllable sequences in an Assessment block to determine the appropriate length sequence for the remainder of the intervention. Subjects will produce a set of eight sequences in a Pretest block. Subjects will then repeatedly produce two of those sequences in one Training block and two other sequences in a subsequent Training block. Following training, subjects will produce all four trained sequences and two additional novel sequences in each of two Test blocks. Washout blocks, during which no speech task trials are completed, will follow the Pretest, Training, and first Test Block to allow subjects to rest and to complete standardized testing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in speech sequencing accuracy

    Investigators will evaluate recordings of speech productions to identify errors. This will be used to compare sequence accuracy before and after practice of novel sequences with DBS in the ON and OFF states.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Speech production duration

    Investigators will inspect recordings of speech productions to identify production duration. This will be used to test hypotheses regarding differences in sequence duration before and after practice of novel sequences and with DBS in the ON and OFF states.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Beta power during speech production

    Investigators will extract beta band (12-20 Hz) power from neural recordings taken while subjects practice and rehearse novel speech sequences. This will be used to test hypotheses regarding differences in beta power before and after practice of novel sequences and with DBS in the ON and OFF states.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Assessment

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) test will be administered to all participants. Scores will be used to determine study eligibility and to identify correlations between cognitive capacity and other outcome measures. Score range: 0-30, higher score indicates higher cognitive performance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Forward Digit Span

    The forward digit span subtest of the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Awareness, 2nd Edition will be administered to all participants. Scores will be used to identify correlations between working memory capacity and other outcome measures.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Essential tremor severity

    Participants with essential tremor will complete The Essential Tremor Rating and Assessment Scale (TETRAS) in both the DBS ON and OFF states to assess disease severity and to identify correlations between severity and other outcome measures. Score range: 0-64, lower score indicates less severe tremor.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Parkinson's disease severity

    Part III (motor examination) of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's disease Ratings Scale (UPDRS part 3) will be administered to participants with Parkinson's disease in both the DBS ON and OFF states to assess disease severity and to identify correlations between severity and other outcome measures. Score range: 0-132, lower scores indicate lower motor symptom severity.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Boston University
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Recruiting
    • Frank H Guenther, Ph.D. · Contactguenther@bu.edu · 617-353-5765
    • Barbara G Holland, MA · Contactbobbieh@bu.edu
    • Frank H Guenther, Ph.D. · Principal investigator
    • Alfonso Nieto-Castanon, Ph.D. · Sub investigator
    • Andrew Meier, Ph.D. · Sub investigator
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Recruiting
    • Todd Herrington, MD, PHD · Contacttherrington@mgh.harvard.edu · 6177265532
    • Zeyang Yu, PHD · Sub investigator
    • Robert Richardson, MD, PHD · Sub investigator
    • Todd Herrington, MD, PHD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All planned analyses will be carried out by research staff who are already facilitating the study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2030, 54 months after the start.

Of 1,291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Parkinson Disease, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 54 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,367 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 3, 2026
First posted
Mar 6, 2026
StartActual
Feb 18, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2030
CompletionEst.
Aug 2030
Last update
Mar 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07455760
Responsible party
Frank Guenther (Professor, Boston University Charles River Campus) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2026
Start date
Feb 18, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 9, 2026

Study contacts

Frank H Guenther, Ph.D.
Contact
guenther@bu.edu
617-353-5765
Barbara G Holland, MA
Contact
bobbieh@bu.edu
617-353-6181
Frank H Guenther, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Boston University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion