An interventional study of Handheld cough device in Head and Neck Cancers, sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.
Sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility
This preliminary study will examine the feasibility of a cough skill training treatment approach to rehabilitate voluntary cough function in people with head and neck cancer. Cough skill training focuses on practicing cough as a compensatory strategy for when food or liquid enters the airway. Primary outcomes will be feasibility and immediate treatment effects. The investigators hypothesize that the treatment will be feasible and will result in improvements to voluntary cough peak expiratory flow rate.
Participants will complete an initial in-person baseline evaluation of voluntary cough function, followed by five weekly telehealth treatment sessions for five weeks with home practice, before completing a post-treatment in-person evaluation. During each treatment session with study personnel and during home practice, they will complete 25 repetitions (5 sets of 5) of voluntary coughs.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will use a handheld cough device to produce voluntary coughs during 5 one hour treatment sessions.
Device: Handheld cough device
During each treatment session with study personnel and during home practice, participants will complete 25 repetitions (5 sets of 5) of a voluntary coughs.
Feasibility of cough skill training
Feasibility of cough skill training will be defined as the percentage of trials completing during treatment sessions.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Change in voluntary cough peak expiratory flow rate
Peak expiratory flow rate is a measure of cough strength. Changes in cough strength from pretraining to post training will be recorded.
Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks
Acceptability assessed by the System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a quick, 10-item questionnaire used to measure how people feel about the ease of use of a product, app, or website. Users reply using a 5-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree, resulting in an overall score from 0 to 100, with higher scores associated with greater acceptability.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Satisfaction assessed by the Beck Satisfaction Scale
The 5-item satisfaction and acceptability scale used by Beck et al. (2017) measures treatment experience across five domains on a 5-point scale from 1=very unsatisfied to 5=very satisfied. It evaluates technology/tools, treatment tasks, convenience, organization/clinician interaction, and overall treatment satisfaction. Scores can range from 5 to 25 with higher scores associated with greater satisfaction.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified analysis data will be stored in a public repository (Open Science Framework) upon publication. This data will only be used to reproduce the primary results of the study.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Boston University Charles River Campus