ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07756684Updated Nov 4, 2026

Feasibility of Cough Skill Training in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer

An interventional study of Handheld cough device in Head and Neck Cancers, sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Updated Nov 4, 2026Now RecruitingStudy contact changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This preliminary study will examine the feasibility of a cough skill training treatment approach to rehabilitate voluntary cough function in people with head and neck cancer. Cough skill training focuses on practicing cough as a compensatory strategy for when food or liquid enters the airway. Primary outcomes will be feasibility and immediate treatment effects. The investigators hypothesize that the treatment will be feasible and will result in improvements to voluntary cough peak expiratory flow rate.

Read the detailed description

Participants will complete an initial in-person baseline evaluation of voluntary cough function, followed by five weekly telehealth treatment sessions for five weeks with home practice, before completing a post-treatment in-person evaluation. During each treatment session with study personnel and during home practice, they will complete 25 repetitions (5 sets of 5) of voluntary coughs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Head and Neck Cancers

Keywords

  • cough skill training
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,710 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 594 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 46 across 2,032 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston University Charles River Campus is the lead sponsor of 159 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Prior diagnosis of head and neck cancer at least 6 months post-diagnosis
  • Completed treatment for head and neck cancer, including surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy
  • Medically stable and able to follow commands and produce a voluntary cough
  • English speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide assessed by a (MoCA) score of \<20
  • Unable to follow study instructions
  • Unable to produce a voluntary cough
  • History of neurologic disease
  • Recent laryngeal surgery or vocal fold injury
  • Active respiratory infection or febrile illness within the past 14 days
  • Chronic, severe, or unstable respiratory disease
  • Asthma or bronchitis
  • Smoking within the past five years
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure within the past 6 months
  • Significant uncontrolled arrhythmia
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cough skill training

    Participants will use a handheld cough device to produce voluntary coughs during 5 one hour treatment sessions.

    Device: Handheld cough device

Interventions

  • DeviceHandheld cough device

    During each treatment session with study personnel and during home practice, participants will complete 25 repetitions (5 sets of 5) of a voluntary coughs.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of cough skill training

    Feasibility of cough skill training will be defined as the percentage of trials completing during treatment sessions.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in voluntary cough peak expiratory flow rate

    Peak expiratory flow rate is a measure of cough strength. Changes in cough strength from pretraining to post training will be recorded.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

  2. Acceptability assessed by the System Usability Scale

    The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a quick, 10-item questionnaire used to measure how people feel about the ease of use of a product, app, or website. Users reply using a 5-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree, resulting in an overall score from 0 to 100, with higher scores associated with greater acceptability.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Satisfaction assessed by the Beck Satisfaction Scale

    The 5-item satisfaction and acceptability scale used by Beck et al. (2017) measures treatment experience across five domains on a 5-point scale from 1=very unsatisfied to 5=very satisfied. It evaluates technology/tools, treatment tasks, convenience, organization/clinician interaction, and overall treatment satisfaction. Scores can range from 5 to 25 with higher scores associated with greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Airway Protection Research Lab at Boston University
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
    Recruiting
    • James Borders, PhD CCC-SLP · ContactAprlab@bu.edu · 617-353-3379
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified analysis data will be stored in a public repository (Open Science Framework) upon publication. This data will only be used to reproduce the primary results of the study.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 30, 2026
Sites
Airway Protection Research Lab at Boston University is now Recruiting
Oct 30, 2026
Contact
Study contact's phone or email changed: b•••@bu.edu→A•••@bu.edu. See the current contact
Nov 4, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • Airway Protection Research Lab at Boston University · Boston, United StatesContact b•••@bu.edu→A•••@bu.edu
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    Contact Study contact's phone or email changed: b•••@bu.edu→A•••@bu.edu. See the current contact
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • Airway Protection Research Lab at Boston University · Boston, United StatesContact b•••@bu.edu→A•••@bu.edu
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Oct 30, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Airway Protection Research Lab at Boston University is now Recruiting
    + 3 other changes: identifiers, verification date and date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07756684
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
Start date
Oct 28, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

James Borders, PhD CCC-SLP
Contact
Aprlab@bu.edu
617-353-3379
James Borders, PhD CCC-SLP
principal investigator · Boston University Charles River Campus

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion