ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07453199Updated Mar 5, 2026

Resurfacing of Foot and Distal Leg Soft Tissue Defects Using Reversed Pedicled Peroneal Artery Flaps Augmented by Superficial Sural Artery

An interventional study of Reversed Pedicled Peroneal Artery Flap in Soft Tissue Injuries, Leg Injuries and Foot Injuries, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-05.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Wounds involving the skin and soft tissue of the lower leg, ankle, heel, and foot can be difficult to treat because there is very little skin and tissue available in that area to cover the wound. When the wound is large or involves exposed bone or tendon, a flap, which is a piece of skin and tissue moved from a nearby area, is needed to close it.

This study evaluates a surgical technique called the Reversed Peroneal Artery Flap (RPAF). In this procedure, a flap of skin and tissue from the outer side of the lower leg is lifted and rotated to cover the wound. The blood supply to the flap comes from the peroneal artery, which runs along the fibula bone, and is augmented by the superficial sural artery to improve flap survival. The study will include 30 adult patients who have soft tissue defects of the distal leg, ankle, heel, or foot. All patients will undergo the RPAF procedure at Assiut University Hospitals, Egypt. The main goal is to measure how well the flap survives after surgery. Secondary goals include assessing complications, functional recovery, and the condition of the donor site.

Read the detailed description

Soft tissue defects of the distal leg, ankle, and foot present a significant reconstructive challenge due to the limited availability of local soft tissue, the critical functional requirements of the area, and the high risk of complications such as osteomyelitis and unstable scarring. Traditional reconstructive options include local flaps, skin grafts, cross-leg flaps, and free tissue transfer. While free flaps offer robust coverage, they require specialized microvascular expertise, prolonged operative time, and are not suitable for all patients, particularly those with significant comorbidities or in resource-limited settings. The Reverse Peroneal Artery Flap (RPAF) is a distally-based fasciocutaneous or perforator-based flap supplied by the peroneal artery. Its survival relies on retrograde blood flow through anastomoses between the peroneal artery and the anterior and posterior tibial arteries around the ankle joint. Augmentation with the superficial sural artery has been proposed to further enhance flap perfusion and reliability. Pre-operative assessment includes clinical examination of the defect and peripheral pulses, Doppler ultrasonography to confirm patency of the anterior and posterior tibial arteries and to identify peroneal artery perforators, and plain X-rays to rule out osteomyelitis. CT angiography may be used in selected complex cases. The flap is designed along the axis of the peroneal artery perforators with the pivot point 5-7 cm above the tip of the lateral malleolus. The flap size is designed 1-2 cm larger than the defect. Elevation proceeds in a subfascial plane from proximal to distal, with ligation of the peroneal artery proximal to the most proximal perforator included. The flap is then rotated 180° to cover the defect. The donor site is closed primarily or with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Post-operative care includes limb elevation, close monitoring for venous congestion, and immobilization in a plaster of Paris splint for 3-4 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Soft Tissue Injuries
  • Leg Injuries
  • Foot Injuries
  • Ankle Injuries

Keywords

  • Reverse Peroneal Artery Flap
  • Soft Tissue Reconstruction
  • Distal Leg Defect
  • Superficial Sural Artery
  • Pedicled Flap
  • Reconstructive Surgery
03

In context

Soft Tissue Injuries

64 studies on the registry are indexed under Soft Tissue Injuries; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Soft Tissue Injuries.

Browse Soft Tissue Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with soft tissue defects of the distal third of the leg, ankle, heel, or foot requiring flap coverage.
  • Defect size greater than [Specify size, e.g., 5x5 cm] or involving exposed bone, tendon, or joint.
  • Palpable pulse in at least one of the major vessels Anterior Tibial Artery (ATA) or Posterior Tibial Artery (PTA)) at the ankle level.
  • obtained from the patient or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) or diabetes mellitus (DM) or smokers
  • Comminuted fractures of the tibia \& fibula
  • Patients requiring free flap coverage for massive defects or location beyond the RPAF's reach as the planter aspect of the foot
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Reversed Peroneal Artery Flap Group

    Patients with soft tissue defects of the distal leg, ankle, heel, or foot underwent reconstruction using a reversed pedicled peroneal artery fasciocutaneous flap augmented by the superficial sural artery. The flap was designed along the axis of peroneal artery perforators, elevated in a subfascial plane, and rotated 180° to cover the defect. The pivot point was placed 5-7 cm above the tip of the lateral malleolus. The donor site was closed primarily or with a split-thickness skin graft. Post-operative care included limb elevation and immobilization for 3-4 weeks.

    Procedure: Reversed Pedicled Peroneal Artery Flap

Interventions

  • ProcedureReversed Pedicled Peroneal Artery Flap

    A distally-based fasciocutaneous flap supplied by the peroneal artery, augmented by the superficial sural artery, used for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the distal leg, ankle, heel, and foot. The flap is designed along the peroneal artery perforators, elevated in a subfascial plane, and rotated 180° around a pivot point 5-7 cm above the lateral malleolus. Flap survival relies on retrograde blood flow through anastomoses between the peroneal artery and the anterior and posterior tibial arteries. The donor site is closed primarily or with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). Post-operative care includes limb elevation and immobilization in a plaster of Paris splint for 3-4 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Complete Flap Survival

    The number of participants whose reversed pedicled peroneal artery flap survives completely without total necrosis, requiring no further surgical coverage. Assessed via clinical examination of flap viability.

    Time frame: 6 weeks post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Post-Operative Complications

    The number of participants who develop at least one of the following post-operative complications following flap surgery: venous congestion, partial or total flap necrosis, wound infection, or dehiscence. Assessed via clinical examination.

    Time frame: 6 weeks post-operatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2026; primary completion for Apr 2027, 12 months later.

Of 18 interventional studies with no phase under Soft Tissue Injuries, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 12 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 19, 2026
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
StartEst.
Apr 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2027
Last update
Mar 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07453199
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Gelan Raif Hassan Nafady (Resident at Orthopaedic & Trauma Department, Assiut University, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 5, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion