ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07429929SELAUpdated Feb 24, 2026

Saudi Emergency Laparotomy Audit

An observational study in Laparotomy, Laparotomy Surgery and Emergency Treatment, sponsored by King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
10,000
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Saudi Emergency Laparotomy Audit (SELA) is a national, multicenter observational clinical audit designed to evaluate outcomes and quality of care for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in Saudi Arabia. The audit will collect standardized data on patient characteristics, comorbidities, perioperative processes, and postoperative outcomes through a retrospective baseline phase followed by a prospective registry phase. SELA aims to establish national benchmarks, assess applicability of international risk models, support development of a Saudi-specific risk prediction tool, and drive quality improvement through systematic feedback and benchmarking across participating hospitals.

Read the detailed description

The Saudi Emergency Laparotomy Audit (SELA) is a national, multicenter observational clinical audit designed to systematically evaluate outcomes and quality of care for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in Saudi Arabia. Emergency laparotomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, yet outcome data within the country are currently fragmented, heterogeneous, and largely limited to single-center reports. SELA aims to address this gap by establishing a standardized national audit framework based exclusively on retrospective data collection.

SELA will be conducted as a retrospective annual audit, with participating hospitals submitting data on all eligible emergency laparotomy cases performed during defined audit periods. Data will be extracted from routinely collected clinical records, including emergency department documentation, operative notes, anesthesia records, laboratory systems, and inpatient and critical care charts. No prospective recruitment, real-time data entry, or deviation from standard clinical care will occur.

The audit will capture standardized variables covering patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative physiological and biochemical status, operative characteristics, perioperative process measures, and postoperative outcomes, including short- and intermediate-term mortality and morbidity. A unified data dictionary with predefined variable definitions will be used to ensure consistency across centers and audit cycles. SELA is strictly non-interventional, with no assigned treatments or modifications to existing clinical pathways.

SELA is designed as a recurring quality improvement initiative. Annual retrospective audit cycles will allow benchmarking of hospital-level and national outcomes, assessment of variations in care delivery, and monitoring of trends over time. De-identified aggregated data will be used to evaluate the applicability of established international risk models and to support development and refinement of Saudi-specific risk stratification tools based on local population characteristics.

The long-term objective of SELA is to establish a sustainable national audit infrastructure that supports continuous quality improvement, informs health system planning and resource allocation, enables multicenter research, and contributes to evidence-based policy and guideline development for emergency general surgery in Saudi Arabia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laparotomy
  • Laparotomy Surgery
  • Emergency Treatment
  • Abdominal Diseases
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases
  • Intestinal Obstruction
  • Intestinal Obstruction and Ileus
  • Intestinal Perforation
  • Intestinal Ischemia
  • Peritonitis Infectious, Gastrointestinal Perforation, Surgical Infection, Postoperative Complications
  • Peritonitis Bacterial
  • Peritonitis Caused by Perforated Left-sided Colon Diverticulitis
  • Peritonitis Infectious
  • Sepsis
  • Postoperative Complications After Gastrointestinal Operations
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative
  • Mortality

Keywords

  • Emergency laparotomy
  • Surgical audit
  • Postoperative outcomes
  • Perioperative care
  • Mortality
  • Morbidity
  • Quality improvement
  • Risk stratification
  • Retrospective audit
  • Saudi Arabia
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Diseases

548 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Diseases; 101 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10,000 is above the median of 350 across 147 observational studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Diseases.

Browse Gastrointestinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of all eligible patients aged 14 years and older who underwent emergency laparotomy or emergency laparoscopic abdominal surgery at participating hospitals in Saudi Arabia during the defined retrospective audit period. Patients are identified through hospital records and include those operated on for acute intra-abdominal surgical conditions such as gastrointestinal perforation, obstruction, ischemia, bleeding, sepsis, and related emergencies requiring non-elective abdominal surgery. The audit includes consecutive cases meeting predefined inclusion criteria and excludes elective procedures and non-eligible surgical specialties, with data collected retrospectively from routinely documented clinical, operative, and postoperative records.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥14 years
  • Undergoing an emergency (E1-E4) laparotomy, laparoscopy, or laparoscopically-assisted abdominal operation
  • Procedures involving the stomach, small bowel, large bowel, or rectum for acute pathology (e.g., perforation, ischemia, abscess, bleeding, or obstruction)
  • Washout/evacuation of intra-peritoneal abscess or hematoma (excluding those secondary to appendicitis or cholecystitis)
  • Bowel resection or repair for obstructed/incarcerated hernias with acute presentation (incisional, umbilical, inguinal, femoral)
  • Adhesiolysis (open or laparoscopic)
  • Trauma-related emergency abdominal procedures
  • Inoperable pathology where a definitive operative procedure was intended (not purely diagnostic)
  • Return to theatre for major wound dehiscence ("burst abdomen")
  • Complications requiring general surgical intervention following interventional radiology procedures
  • Complications requiring general surgical intervention following gynecological oncology surgery
  • Complications following elective or non-elective general/upper GI surgery, where the above criteria are met

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<14 years
  • Elective laparotomy or laparoscopy
  • Diagnostic-only laparotomy or laparoscopy (unless abandoned due to inoperable disease)
  • Appendicectomy or cholecystectomy (including their complications), unless incidental to a more major non-elective gastrointestinal procedure
  • Non-elective hernia repair without bowel resection or adhesiolysis
  • Minor wound dehiscence repair (unless bowel resection is required)
  • Stoma formation via trephine or laparoscopic approach (include only if midline laparotomy is the primary procedure)
  • Vascular, obstetric, gynecological (except gynecological oncology complications requiring general surgery input), transplant, hepatobiliary, urological, renal, pancreatic, or splenic procedures
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
10,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Emergency Laparotomy Cohort

    This cohort includes all eligible patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at participating hospitals during the defined retrospective audit period. Patients are identified through hospital records and include non-elective abdominal surgical procedures performed for acute intra-abdominal pathology, with data collected retrospectively from routinely documented clinical, operative, and postoperative records.

    Procedure: Emergency Laparotomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureEmergency Laparotomy

    Emergency laparotomy performed as part of routine clinical care for acute intra-abdominal surgical conditions. This audit observes outcomes following emergency laparotomy without altering standard perioperative management, with data collected retrospectively from existing clinical records.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 30-day all-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality occurring within 30 days of emergency laparotomy, determined from hospital records and follow-up documentation as part of the retrospective audit.

    Time frame: 30 days following the date of emergency laparotomy

Secondary outcomes

  1. 90-day all-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality occurring within 90 days of emergency laparotomy, identified through hospital records and follow-up documentation during the retrospective audit period.

    Time frame: 90 days following the date of emergency laparotomy

  2. Postoperative complications

    Occurrence of postoperative complications following emergency laparotomy, as documented in inpatient records, including surgical, medical, and critical care-related complications.

    Time frame: From date of emergency laparotomy until hospital discharge or in-hospital death (up to 90 days)

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Total duration of hospital stay following emergency laparotomy, calculated from the date of surgery to the date of discharge or in-hospital death.

    Time frame: From date of emergency laparotomy until hospital discharge or in-hospital death, assessed up to 90 days

  4. Postoperative ICU admission

    Requirement for postoperative admission to the intensive care unit following emergency laparotomy, as documented in clinical and critical care records.

    Time frame: From date of emergency laparotomy until hospital discharge or in-hospital death, assessed up to 90 days

  5. Repeat Laparotomy

    Requirement for unplanned return to the operating theatre for re-laparotomy following the index emergency laparotomy.

    Time frame: From date of emergency laparotomy until hospital discharge or in-hospital death, assessed up to 90 days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251-67. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.003. PubMed 20919525 ↗
  • Vester-Andersen M, Lundstrom LH, Moller MH, Waldau T, Rosenberg J, Moller AM; Danish Anaesthesia Database. Mortality and postoperative care pathways after emergency gastrointestinal surgery in 2904 patients: a population-based cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2014 May;112(5):860-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet487. Epub 2014 Feb 10. PubMed 24520008 ↗
  • GlobalSurg Collaborative. Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Br J Surg. 2016 Jul;103(8):971-988. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10151. Epub 2016 May 4. PubMed 27145169 ↗
  • Saunders DI, Murray D, Pichel AC, Varley S, Peden CJ; UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109(3):368-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes165. Epub 2012 Jun 22. PubMed 22728205 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. The study is a retrospective national clinical audit using de-identified routinely collected data, conducted under institutional approvals with strict data governance, confidentiality, and role-based access controls. Data sharing is restricted to aggregated and anonymized analyses for audit reporting and approved research outputs in accordance with institutional and regulatory policies.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 18 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 7, 2026
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Feb 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07429929
Lead sponsor
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
Responsible party
Haytham Alabbas (Consultant, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Haytham AlAbbas, FRCSC
Contact
HALABBAS@kfshrc.edu.sa
00966567323272

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion