ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07357506MCTPUTUpdated Jan 22, 2026

Reducing Skin Side Effects in Patients Receiving Radiation on Tomotherapy

An interventional study of Fragrance-Free Emollient (Glycerol-Based); A fragrance-free, glycerol-based emollient applied to the skin from day 1 of TomoTherapy. and Mepitel Film (Silicone-Based Semi-Permeable Barrier Film) in Head and Neck Cancer, sponsored by King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-22.

Sponsored by King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  • Radiation dermatitis is a common side effect in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving radiotherapy, especially with advanced techniques like TomoTherapy. The use of 6 MegaVoltage (MV) Flattening Filter-Free (FFF) beams and shorter Source to Skin Distance (SSD) in TomoTherapy may increase skin dose, leading to higher rates of skin reactions such as redness, irritation, and pain. These reactions can affect patient comfort, increase the risk of infection, and even interrupt treatment.
  • Although radiation dermatitis is frequent, there is no widely accepted standard for preventing or managing it. Supportive care programs, like the Dermatitis Control Program (DeCoP), and other supportive care programs using silicone-based semi-permeable barrier film have shown that simple measures-such as good skin hygiene and keeping the skin moist, can help reduce skin damage during treatment.
  • This study will evaluate the effectiveness of fragrance-free emollient (glycerol-based) + absorbent polyurethane foam dressing versus silicone-based semi-permeable barrier film dressing in preventing or reducing skin toxicity in HNC patients receiving TomoTherapy. These products are easy to apply, affordable, and widely available, making them practical options for routine care.
Read the detailed description

Background/Introduction; Head and neck cancers (HNC) are frequently treated with definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, which are effective modalities for tumor control and organ preservation. However, these treatments are often associated with significant acute toxicities, particularly incidence of radiation dermatitis which is as high as 84%. Radiation-induced skin reactions are typically classified as acute, consequential-late, or chronic, with acute dermatitis being the most immediate and impactful during treatment. Studies reveal that acute radiation-dermatitis (ARD) occur within 24 hours but usually begin within days to weeks of initiating radiotherapy and is responsible for discomfort, pain, aesthetic changes, increased risk of infection, and potentially, treatment interruptions, thereby affecting both the patient's quality of life and therapeutic outcomes.

  • Despite the clinical burden of radiation dermatitis, there is currently no universally accepted standard for its prevention or management. Established evidence supports the effectiveness of simplified, supportive care approaches, such as the Dermatitis Control Program (DeCoP), which focus on basic skin hygiene and maintaining a moist wound-healing environment during radiotherapy. This program demonstrated favorable outcomes in managing radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer.
  • Clinical studies demonstrated that Moisturized skin care effectively reduced the severity and delayed the onset of radiation dermatitis, while also slowing down the decrease in skin moisture during radiotherapy.
  • Additionally, barrier films such as Mepitel Film have shown promise in reducing ARD severity and moist desquamation. Systematic reviews and feasibility trials report benefit in breast and head/neck cancer patients. Including Mepitel Film as a comparator allows direct head-to-head testing of two evidence-based, guideline-consistent strategies.
  • TomoTherapy, is a highly conformal and image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique. The system has shorter Source to Skin Distance (SSD) of 85cm and uses 6 MegaVoltage (MV) Flattening Filter-Free (FFF) energy which will increase the low energy photon contribution. Subsequently, one of the common side effects associated with this treatment is cutaneous toxicity, which can lead to skin irritation, erythema, and ulceration.

Hypothesis

  • Use of fragrance-free emollient with absorbent dressing OR silicone barrier film, will reduce the severity of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) with differential effects between interventions.
  • While ARD significantly impacts patient well-being and clinical outcomes, standardized preventive care protocols remain inconsistent or under-researched in TomoTherapy. This study addresses that gap by evaluating a practical, low-cost intervention- fragrance-free emollient (glycerol-based) from day 1 + absorbent polyurethane foam dressing versus silicone-based semi-permeable barrier film applied from day 1-for its effectiveness in reducing skin toxicity and improving patient quality of life during TomoTherapy.

Methodology This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, two-arm clinical trial evaluating strategies to mitigate radiation-induced skin toxicity in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing TomoTherapy.

Design:

Parallel-group design with 1:1 allocation using computer-generated block randomization, stratified by chemotherapy status.

Masking:

Open-label design; outcome assessors (radiation oncologists grading dermatitis) will be blinded where feasible.

Sample Size:

Approximately 104 patients (52 per arm) to detect a 20% absolute reduction in Grade ≥2 dermatitis incidence (from 55% to 35%) with 80% power and α = 0.05, accounting for 10% attrition.

Data Collection:

Weekly (Day 1,7,14,21,28,35) CTCAE skin assessments documented in MOSAIQ. QoL instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3 and QLQ-HN35) administered at Baseline (Day 1), mid-treatment (Day 17), and end-of-treatment (Day 35).

Clinical and treatment data recorded in an encrypted Excel database.

Ethical Considerations:

All participants receive at least standard of care (STDoC). Written informed consent required prior to radiotherapy. Data are anonymized and securely stored.

02

Conditions studied

  • Head and Neck Cancer

Keywords

  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Radiotherapy
  • Dermatitis
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,710 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 594 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 104 is above the median of 46 across 2,032 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 to 80 with newly diagnosed head and neck (H\&N) carcinoma (confirmed by pathology)
  • Must be receiving radiotherapy using Tomotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior H\&N radiotherapy
  • pre-existing skin disease
  • allergy to study products.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
104 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A: STDoC + fragrance-free emollient (glycerol-based) from day 1 + absorbent polyurethane foam dr

    Participants in Arm A will receive standard treatment during TomoTherapy (STDoC) plus a fragrance-free, glycerol-based emollient applied to skin starting day 1 of treatment. If participants develop Grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis, an absorbent polyurethane foam dressing (PolyMem-equivalent) will be applied to the affected area. This arm serves as the active comparator for evaluating the efficacy of the experimental intervention (Mepitel).

    Other: Fragrance-Free Emollient (Glycerol-Based); A fragrance-free, glycerol-based emollient applied to the skin from day 1 of TomoTherapy.

  • Experimental
    Arm B: STDoC + silicone-based semi-permeable barrier film (Mepitel Film-equivalent) applied from day

    A silicone-based semi-permeable barrier film applied to the skin from day 1 of TomoTherapy. Evaluated as the experimental intervention to prevent or reduce radiation-induced skin toxicity.

    Device: Mepitel Film (Silicone-Based Semi-Permeable Barrier Film)

Interventions

  • OtherFragrance-Free Emollient (Glycerol-Based); A fragrance-free, glycerol-based emollient applied to the skin from day 1 of TomoTherapy.

    A foam dressing applied to areas of Grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis for skin protection during TomoTherapy. Part of Arm A.

  • DeviceMepitel Film (Silicone-Based Semi-Permeable Barrier Film)

    A silicone-based semi-permeable barrier film applied to the skin from day 1 of TomoTherapy. Evaluated as the experimental intervention to prevent or reduce radiation-induced skin toxicity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients developing Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grade ≥2 dermatitis by completion of radiotherapy.

    Clinical evaluation of radiation-induced dermatitis will be measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version \[v5.0\], focusing specifically on radiation dermatitis grading (21). * Radiation dermatitis will be assessed weekly (Day 7,14,21,28,35) by the attending radiation oncologist throughout the course of treatment, with documentation in MOSAIQ (radiation oncology information system) of onset, peak severity, and any treatment-related complications or interruptions. * CTCAE grading will be used to classify skin reactions as follows: * Grade 1: Faint erythema or dry desquamation * Grade 2: Moderate to brisk erythema; patchy moist desquamation mostly in skin folds * Grade 3: Moist desquamation in non-skin-fold areas; bleeding with minor trauma * Grade 4: Skin necrosis or ulceration of full-thickness dermis * Grade 5: Death (extremely rare in this context)

    Time frame: Day 7,14,21,28,35 of radiotherapy for all patients registered in the study

Secondary outcomes

  1. -Number of days to start of Grade ≥2 dermatitis between arms.

    Clinical evaluation of radiation-induced dermatitis will be measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version \[v5.0\], focusing specifically on radiation dermatitis grading (21). * Radiation dermatitis will be assessed weekly (Day 1,7,14,21,28,35) by the attending radiation oncologist throughout the course of treatment, with documentation in MOSAIQ (radiation oncology information system) of onset, peak severity, and any treatment-related complications or interruptions. * CTCAE grading will be used to classify skin reactions as follows: * Grade 1: Faint erythema or dry desquamation * Grade 2: Moderate to brisk erythema; patchy moist desquamation mostly in skin folds * Grade 3: Moist desquamation in non-skin-fold areas; bleeding with minor trauma * Grade 4: Skin necrosis or ulceration of full-thickness dermis * Grade 5: Death (extremely rare in this context)

    Time frame: Day 7,14,21,28,35 during the course of radiotherapy

  2. Number of patients with maximum dermatitis grade during treatment.

    Number of patients with maximum dermatitis grade during treatment.

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 of radiotherapy

  3. Number of patients with incidence of moist desquamation.

    Incidence of moist desquamation will be assessed weekly by the attending radiation oncologist throughout the course of treatment, with documentation in MOSAIQ (radiation oncology information system)

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 of radiotherapy treatment

  4. Number of patients with treatment interruptions >3 days due to skin toxicity.

    Any interruptions in radiotherapy treatment \>3 days due to skin toxicity

    Time frame: From beginning to end of radiotherapy treatment (Day 1 to Day 35)

  5. Patient-reported outcomes from EORTC QLQ-HN35 for each participant

    * The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) H\&N35 is a questionnaire developed specifically for patients with head and neck cancer. It includes 35 questions grouped into 7 subscales covering pain, swallowing, senses (taste/smell), speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality. * In addition, there are 10 individual items addressing issues such as dental problems, dry mouth, coughing, difficulty opening the mouth, sticky saliva, weight loss or gain, use of nutritional supplements, feeding tubes, and pain medication. * Interpretation of scores: Scores are from 1 to 4, where 1 reflects "not at all" and 4 is "very much". Higher scores on the functional and global health scales indicate better functioning and well-being, whereas higher scores on the symptom scales reflect greater symptom burden or difficulty.

    Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), mid-treatment (Day 17) at end of radiotherapy treatment (Day 35).

  6. Global health/quality of life impact (QLQ-C30) for every participant

    • The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30. This questionnaire includes 30 items, that describe 5 functioning scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items symptoms (dyspnoea, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhoea, and financial difficulties). Interpretation of scores. Scores are from 1 to 4, where 1 reflects "not at all" and 4 is "very much". Higher scores on the symptom scales reflect greater symptom burden or difficulty.

    Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), mid-treatment (Day 17) at end of radiotherapy treatment (Day 35).

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF, Biorklund A, de Leeuw JR, Fayers PM, Jannert M, Westin T, Kaasa S. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;17(3):1008-19. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.1008. PubMed 10071296 ↗
  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. PubMed 8433390 ↗
  • Tayyib NA. Prophylactic Use of Mepitel(R) Film to Prevent Radiation-Induced Moist Desquamation in Cancer Patients. Cureus. 2023 Jul 20;15(7):e42186. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42186. eCollection 2023 Jul. PubMed 37601988 ↗
  • Wong HCY, Lee SF, Caini S, Chan AW, Kwan JYY, Waddle M, Sonis S, Herst P, Alcorn S, Bonomo P, Wong C, Corbin K, Choi JI, Rembielak A, AlKhaifi M, Marta GN, Rades D, van den Hurk C, Wolf JR, Chan RJ, Schmeel LC, Lock M, Hijal T, Cao J, Kim H, Chow E. Barrier films or dressings for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Oct;207(3):477-496. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07435-2. Epub 2024 Aug 7. PubMed 39112742 ↗
  • Yee C, Lam E, Gallant F, Karam I, Czarnota G, Soliman H, Wong G, Drost L, Vesprini D, Rakovitch E, Wronski M, Leung E, Szumacher E, Carothers K, Pon K, Gonzales G, Easton L, Lewis D, Zhang L, Chow E. A Feasibility Study of Mepitel Film for the Prevention of Breast Radiation Dermatitis in a Canadian Center. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan-Feb;11(1):e36-e45. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 17. PubMed 32949772 ↗
  • Fernandez-Castro M, Martin-Gil B, Pena-Garcia I, Lopez-Vallecillo M, Garcia-Puig ME. Effectiveness of semi-permeable dressings to treat radiation-induced skin reactions. A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12685. Epub 2017 Apr 18. PubMed 28417508 ↗
  • Iacovelli NA, Torrente Y, Ciuffreda A, Guardamagna VA, Gentili M, Giacomelli L, Sacerdote P. Topical treatment of radiation-induced dermatitis: current issues and potential solutions. Drugs Context. 2020 Jun 12;9:2020-4-7. doi: 10.7573/dic.2020-4-7. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32587626 ↗
  • Tsai PC, Liu YC, Li TS, Hsu FT, Lee YH, Chiang IT, Chang Y, Lee CH. Clinical Effect of Moisturized Skin Care on Radiation Dermatitis of Head and Neck Cancer. In Vivo. 2023 Nov-Dec;37(6):2776-2785. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13389. PubMed 37905662 ↗
  • Zenda S, Ishi S, Kawashima M, Arahira S, Tahara M, Hayashi R, Kishimoto S, Ichihashi T. A Dermatitis Control Program (DeCoP) for head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a prospective phase II study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr;18(2):350-5. doi: 10.1007/s10147-012-0385-9. Epub 2012 Feb 15. PubMed 22350025 ↗
  • Zenda S, Ishi S, Akimoto T, Arahira S, Motegi A, Tahara M, Hayashi R, Asanuma C. DeCoP, a Dermatitis Control Program using a moderately absorbent surgical pad for head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 May;45(5):433-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv010. Epub 2015 Feb 11. PubMed 25673153 ↗
  • Agnihotri V, Kshirsagar AY. To assess the incidence of radiation dermatitis among the cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Int J Nurs Med Invest. 2018;3(3):107-110.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07357506
Lead sponsor
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
Responsible party
Zaheeda Mulla (Supervisor, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 22, 2026
Start date
Feb 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion