ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07406087Updated Jul 6, 2026

Navigation Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of Adapted patient navigation program targeting adolescent and young adult cancer survivors in Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer and Cervical Cancer, sponsored by Kaiser Permanente. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-06.

Sponsored by Kaiser Permanente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators propose to: 1) Adapt an evidence-based cancer-focused patient navigation (PN) program for the Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) cancer survivor population; and 2) Plan and conduct an effectiveness-implementation trial of this program within Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). PLEASE NOTE: This study is awarded in two phases. The UG3 phase has been awarded for the first two years; upon successful completion of this phase by meeting pre-defined milestones, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) will provide funding for the second phase of the study (Years 3-6), which will allow our team to conduct a trial to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of the adapted PN program for the AYA cancer survivor population. This application is focused on the initial UG3 phase and will update the protocol for the UH3 trial upon successful completion of the UG3 milestones and receipt of the UH3 award.

The primary objectives in the UG3 phase of the study are to adapt and tailor an existing PN program to meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors and the local clinical context via (a) interviews with key stakeholders (patients, clinicians, administrators) and (b) guidance from our AYA Primary Care Survivorship Council. The investigators will conduct a pilot study of the adapted PN program and refine the program to enhance acceptability to patients and clinicians, enhance feasibility and effectiveness, and develop and pilot evaluation tools and methods prior to the start of the UH3 phase of the trial, which will be a larger trial. Objectives will be updated for the UH3 phase once awarded.

Read the detailed description

In the UG3 phase, the investigators will be adapting a patient navigation (PN) intervention to suit adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors and conducting a single-site pilot test of the adapted intervention. In the UH3 phase, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic stepped wedge hybrid effectiveness implementation trial evaluating (1) clinical effectiveness and (2) implementation outcomes, across a range of data sources.

Intervention:

Navigator-level: For the pilot test in the UG3 phase, the investigators will provide PN training for the adapted AYA PN program to at least one navigator. The investigators anticipate that navigators will undergo a comprehensive training curriculum that draws on existing Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) PN program trainings and includes primary care and cancer survivorship/surveillance components and established recommendations for cancer survivorship navigation from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and others. These resources include core navigation competencies for survivorship, patient assessment, scope of practice, etc. These trainings will be completed with additional focus areas/domains identified during the adaptation processes. Based on the structure of the existing PN program, it is anticipated that monthly review meetings will be held.

Patient-level: For the pilot test in the UG3 phase, the investigators will identify eligible patients from a single clinical site within KPSC. The investigators anticipate enrolling 15-25 patients in the pilot. Patients will receive a letter and brochure describing the adapted AYA PN program with a bio of their assigned navigator and how the program will help integrate primary care and cancer survivorship needs. It is strongly anticipated that navigation 'touches' will include progressive steps via a combination of delivery modes as with the existing PN programs: 1) email: patients with KP.org patient portal accounts will receive email communication from navigators; 2) text: patients with registered mobile phone in KP membership files will receive text-based communications; 3) calls: patients will receive calls from their navigator to discuss scheduling, overdue recommended care, and motivational coaching; 4) letters: patients may receive letters if unable to be reached via email, text, and calls. Navigators will work with the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify need for recommended healthcare services and gaps in care, working with the care team to pend orders for physician review and work directly with the patient using motivational interviewing skills to encourage participation in care, address social needs, and identify care goals. PN program milestones, developed based on established recommendations for survivorship navigation metrics and the input from our adaptation processes, will likely include patients contacted, engagement activities, and pending orders for physician review for overdue services.

System-level: As part of the UG3 phase, the investigators will work closely with our partners to adapt the PN program to suit existing clinical needs and workflows. 2-3 focus groups will be held with care teams (nurses/physicians/advanced practice providers) and department administrators (DAs) using a semi-structured focus group format. These groups will provide feedback on the team-based care focus for the PN program, how to integrate seamlessly into existing clinical workflows, suggestions for use and/or expansion of existing KPSC information technology (IT) tools (e.g., the Complete Care Model tools), and clinical needs of the patient population. Using adapted health IT tools, flags may be created for patients due for recommended services.

In the UG3 phase, the study will open enrollment for the prospective single-arm pilot study by month 18, after focus group data and program adaptation is complete. Completion of data collection for the pilot is estimated at month 24.

In the UG3 phase, the patients in the single site pilot will complete all study tasks by 6 months.

Following the structure of the NCI two-phase cooperative agreement, the investigators propose to: 1) Adapt an existing evidence-based, cancer-focused PN program to the AYA survivor population and to the clinical setting; and 2) Conduct a pragmatic stepped wedge hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial within a large integrated healthcare system, Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). The investigators hypothesize that the adapted PN program will lead to increased uptake of high-quality, guideline-recommended primary care and cancer surveillance services for AYA survivors (clinical outcomes), and high levels of acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption, penetration, fidelity, and sustainment. The investigators have defined measurable, feasible milestones for both the UG and UH phases of the proposal.

The UG3 phase is a three-step process to achieve study goals:

  1. Intervention refinement via context assessment including multilevel barriers and facilitators to guide adaptation; adaptation and tailoring to local contexts.
  2. Demonstrate feasibility of program implementation with pilot testing of recruitment, data collection, evaluation plans and methods, and data sources.
  3. Develop and demonstrate the feasibility of logistical and administrative arrangements for conducting the pragmatic trial in the UH3 phase including finalizing agreements with sites, IRB approvals, and development of a manual of operations for the trial.

Step 1: rigorous exploration and documentation of adaptation processes via a combined use of implementation and adaptation frameworks, representing a significant contribution to the field. Intentional adaptation provides an opportunity for implementation flexibility, potentially improving the overall fit of an evidence-based intervention to a new population and/or context (Kirk et. al, 2020), such as AYA survivors care in the primary care setting. Several adaptation frameworks have been proposed over the past decade, with a collective recognition of the importance of rigorous research on adaptation processes and the distinction between the function (e.g., core elements) and form (e.g., delivery type) of evidence-based interventions. The investigators will follow the overarching steps of adaptation processes with extensive stakeholder engagement throughout. The investigators will supplement this with a novel application of the RE-AIM framework for guidance on the 'who, why, how' of adaptation a nascent and exciting application of RE-AIM to adaptation processes. The investigators will use the FRAME to guide thorough documentation of adaptation activities throughout the eleven steps. This blend of Escoffery's eleven steps, RE-AIM, and FRAME provides a stepwise, thoughtful approach for capturing the rationale for adaptation, the internal and external context of adaptation, and for cataloguing adaptation elements.

Recent work from leaders in the field have combined RE-AIM with adaptation frameworks, although not in this specific combination which is more appropriate to address our research questions. The investigators propose a multilevel adaptation process, tailoring PN program components to meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors, primary care teams, and the organizational setting (and leveraging available supportive resources). The investigators will be adapting KPSC's existing PN program for patients newly diagnosed with cancer, which includes KPSC's robust 'Complete Care' model and health IT tools shown to be effective at managing cancer (diagnosis and initial treatment) and other chronic conditions. Step 2: conduct a pilot study of the adapted PN program with a single clinic, collecting patient, clinician, and clinic-level data and iteratively refining the PN program as appropriate. Step 3: develop our trial manual of operations and obtain administrative and other approvals so that the trial is set to launch at start of Year 3.

In the UH3 phase, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic stepped wedge hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial with extensive quantitative and qualitative process evaluation activities to examine mechanisms of effect, moderators and other contextual factors. This protocol will be updated once the UH3 phase is awarded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Testicular Cancer
  • Colon Rectal Cancer
  • Melanoma (Skin Cancer)
  • Endometrial Cancer
  • Sarcoma
  • Thyroid Cancer

Keywords

  • Adolescent and Young Adult
  • Cancer Survivors
  • Patient Navigation
  • Adaptations
  • Implementation Science
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,829 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,318 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 25 is below the median of 72 across 10,900 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Kaiser Permanente is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Received diagnosis of local or regional breast, ovarian, cervical, testicular, colon/rectal, melanoma, endometrial, sarcoma, or thyroid cancer between the ages of 15-39 years ("index cancer")
  • Current age 21-45 years
  • Diagnosed and treated for index cancer within Kaiser Permanente Southern California adult medical oncology and/or surgery
  • Current Kaiser Permanente insurance coverage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of or current diagnosis of leukemia or lymphoma
  • Patients with disease at diagnosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adapted Patient Navigation Program

    The primary objectives in the UG3 phase of the study are to adapt and tailor an existing patient navigation program to meet the needs of AYA cancer survivors and the local clinical context. Adolescent and young adult cancer survivors will be enrolled in a single arm pilot study of the adapted navigation program.

    Behavioral: Adapted patient navigation program targeting adolescent and young adult cancer survivors

Interventions

  • BehavioralAdapted patient navigation program targeting adolescent and young adult cancer survivors

    In the UG3 phase, the investigators will be adapting a patient navigation intervention to suit adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and conducting a single-site pilot test of the adapted intervention. The investigators will conduct a pilot test of the adapted AYA PN program at a single participating site, focusing on the perceptual implementation outcomes of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and the hypothesized patient navigation program outcomes of increased motivation, capability, and opportunity for care. The pilot will also include testing of the patient identification algorithm, patient enrollment/engagement methods, clinical workflow, survey recruitment methods, and health IT elements (e.g., access, ease of use).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perceived Health Competence Scale

    Patient survey outcome; 8 items measured on a Likert scale (1-5) with higher scores associated with higher health competence

    Time frame: From enrollment to completion at 6 months post-enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Weiner's Appropriateness, Acceptability, and Feasibility

    Patient Survey Outcome measured on a 5-item Likert scale of agreement (1=low, 5=high) for each of the three constructs (appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility) with 4 questions per construct. Average score will be created for each construct. No items are reverse coded.

    Time frame: From enrollment to completion at 6 months post-enrollment

  2. Weiner's Appropriateness, Acceptability, and Feasibility

    Clinician/Administrator Survey Outcome, measured on a 5-item Likert scale of agreement (1=low, 5=high) for each of the three constructs (appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility) with 4 questions per construct. Average score will be created for each construct. No items are reverse coded.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-patient enrollment into navigation program

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • KP Southern California - Department of Research & Evaluation
    Pasadena, California 91101, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nekhlyudov L, O'malley DM, Hudson SV. Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):e30-e38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30570-8. PubMed 28049575 ↗
  • McCabe MS, Partridge AH, Grunfeld E, Hudson MM. Risk-based health care, the cancer survivor, the oncologist, and the primary care physician. Semin Oncol. 2013 Dec;40(6):804-12. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.09.004. PubMed 24331199 ↗
  • DiMartino L LP, Mittman B. Increasing the quantity and quality of coordinating center activity in implementation science: A novel application of core function/form concepts. . presented at: Paper accepted at 16th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and implementation; December 10-13, 2023 Washington, DC;.
  • Lengnick-Hall R, Stadnick NA, Dickson KS, Moullin JC, Aarons GA. Forms and functions of bridging factors: specifying the dynamic links between outer and inner contexts during implementation and sustainment. Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 1;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01099-y. PubMed 33794956 ↗
  • Esmail LC, Barasky R, Mittman BS, Hickam DH. Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):875-881. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6. Epub 2020 Oct 26. PubMed 33107006 ↗
  • Perez Jolles M, Lengnick-Hall R, Mittman BS. Core Functions and Forms of Complex Health Interventions: a Patient-Centered Medical Home Illustration. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):1032-1038. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4818-7. Epub 2019 Jan 8. PubMed 30623387 ↗
  • Khor S, Heagerty PJ, Basu A, Haupt EC, Lyons LJL, Hahn EE, Bansal A. Racial Disparities in the Ascertainment of Cancer Recurrence in Electronic Health Records. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Jun;7:e2300004. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00004. PubMed 37267516 ↗
  • Hahn EE, Munoz-Plaza CE, Pounds D, Lyons LJ, Lee JS, Shen E, Hong BD, La Cava S, Brasfield FM, Durna LN, Kwan KW, Beard DB, Ferreira A, Padmanabhan A, Gould MK. Effect of a Community-Based Medical Oncology Depression Screening Program on Behavioral Health Referrals Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Jan 4;327(1):41-49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22596. PubMed 34982119 ↗
  • Xie F, Lee J, Munoz-Plaza CE, Hahn EE, Chen W. Application of Text Information Extraction System for Real-Time Cancer Case Identification in an Integrated Healthcare Organization. J Pathol Inform. 2017 Dec 14;8:48. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_55_17. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29416911 ↗
  • Cook AJ, Delong E, Murray DM, Vollmer WM, Heagerty PJ. Statistical lessons learned for designing cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trials from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory Biostatistics and Design Core. Clin Trials. 2016 Oct;13(5):504-12. doi: 10.1177/1740774516646578. Epub 2016 May 13. PubMed 27179253 ↗
  • NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Rethinking Clinical Trials: A Living Textbook of Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Accessed on 1/30/2024: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/.
  • Tuzzio L, Larson EB. The Promise of Pragmatic Clinical Trials Embedded in Learning Health Systems. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Apr 3;7(1):10. doi: 10.5334/egems.285. PubMed 30972359 ↗
  • Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015 May 8;350:h2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147. No abstract available. PubMed 25956159 ↗
  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. PubMed 22310560 ↗
  • Kanter MH, Lindsay G, Bellows J, Chase A. Complete care at Kaiser Permanente: transforming chronic and preventive care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Nov;39(11):484-94. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39064-3. PubMed 24294676 ↗
  • Henry SL, Shen E, Ahuja A, Gould MK, Kanter MH. The Online Personal Action Plan: A Tool to Transform Patient-Enabled Preventive and Chronic Care. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Jan 27. PubMed 26826751 ↗
  • Cohen AJ, Russell LE, Elwy AR, Mitchell KM, Cornell PY, Silva JW, Moy E, Kennedy MA. Adaptation of a social risk screening and referral initiative across clinical populations, settings, and contexts in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health System. Front Health Serv. 2023 Jan 30;2:958969. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.958969. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36925883 ↗
  • Rabin BA, McCreight M, Battaglia C, Ayele R, Burke RE, Hess PL, Frank JW, Glasgow RE. Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adaptations Across Four Diverse Health Systems Interventions. Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 9;6:102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00102. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29686983 ↗
  • Escoffery C, Lebow-Skelley E, Udelson H, Boing EA, Wood R, Fernandez ME, Mullen PD. A scoping study of frameworks for adapting public health evidence-based interventions. Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx067. PubMed 29346635 ↗
  • Chambers DA. Advancing adaptation of evidence-based interventions through implementation science: progress and opportunities. Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 5;3:1204138. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1204138. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37342795 ↗
  • Kirk MA, Moore JE, Wiltsey Stirman S, Birken SA. Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations' impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 20;15(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01021-y. PubMed 32690104 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 15 months after the start.

Of 2,662 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,772 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 5, 2026
First posted
Feb 12, 2026
StartActual
Mar 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2027
Last update
Jul 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07406087
Lead sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2026
Start date
Mar 15, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 6, 2026

Study contacts

Erin E Hahn, PhD
Contact
Erin.E.Hahn@kp.org
626-564-3505
Corrine E. Munoz-Plaza, MPH
Contact
Corrine.E.Munoz-Plaza@kp.org
626-564-3094
Erin E Hahn, PhD
principal investigator · Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Department of Research & Evaluation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion