ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07930715BRIGHTUpdated Nov 12, 2026

Feasibility Trial of a Culturally Tailored Resilience Intervention for Underserved Breast Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of BRIGHT Resilience Intervention and BRIGHT Survivorship Resource Booklet in Breast Cancer and Cancer Survivorship, sponsored by University College Dublin. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-12.

Sponsored by University College Dublin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Nov 12, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this feasibility trial is to find out whether a culturally tailored resilience intervention, called BRIGHT, can be delivered and tested with breast cancer survivors from underserved communities in Ireland. These include women from minority ethnic groups (including Travellers), migrant women, women living in rural areas and women experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can enough women be recruited and kept in the study?
  • Do women attend the sessions and find the intervention acceptable?
  • Can facilitators deliver the intervention as planned? Researchers will compare the BRIGHT resilience intervention with usual survivorship care plus a resource booklet. The results will show whether a larger, definitive trial is possible and will give early signals of benefit for psychological distress, fear of cancer recurrence, resilience, quality of life and unmet supportive care needs.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to the BRIGHT resilience intervention or to usual care plus the BRIGHT Survivorship Resource Booklet
  • In the BRIGHT group, attend 8 weekly 90-minute facilitated group sessions, in the community or online
  • Complete questionnaires at the start, after 8 weeks and 3 months after the programme ends
  • Be invited to take part in an interview about their experience (some participants only) Women in the usual care group will be offered the BRIGHT programme after their final follow-up.
Read the detailed description

Background: Women from underserved communities in Ireland often experience higher psychological distress, fear of cancer recurrence, unmet supportive care needs and barriers to survivorship services. Few psychosocial survivorship interventions have been designed or culturally adapted for these groups.

Intervention development: The BRIGHT resilience intervention is being developed in earlier stages of Project BRIGHT, a 42-month mixed methods study submitted for funding to Breast Cancer Now. These stages include a national survey of breast cancer survivors, interviews with women from underserved communities and a structured co-design process with survivors, clinicians, researchers and community stakeholders. Cultural adaptation is guided by Resnicow's Cultural Adaptation Framework and documented using FRAME.

Intervention: An 8-week hybrid programme of weekly 90-minute facilitated group sessions, delivered face to face in the community and through secure online sessions, with a participant workbook. Planned modules, subject to the co-design findings, are psychoeducation; emotional adjustment; managing fear of recurrence; culturally responsive coping and resilience; self-advocacy; healthcare navigation; peer support; and signposting to community resources. Materials will be translated into 2 to 3 priority languages.

Design: A two-arm parallel feasibility randomised controlled trial with 80 participants, individually randomised 1:1. A computer-generated, concealed allocation sequence will be managed by an independent researcher not involved in recruitment or intervention delivery. The comparator is usual survivorship care plus the BRIGHT Survivorship Resource Booklet, with delayed access to the BRIGHT programme after the 3-month follow-up (waitlist crossover). Allowing for up to 25% attrition, at least 60 participants are expected to be evaluable at final follow-up.

Data collection: Questionnaires at baseline (T0), after the intervention (T1, Week 8) and 3 months after the intervention (T2).

Progression criteria: Progression to a definitive trial will be guided by pre-specified traffic light criteria: at least 80% retention, at least 75% session completion, at least 85% intervention fidelity and a recruitment rate of at least 4 participants per site per month.

Process evaluation: Guided by the MRC Process Evaluation Framework, semi-structured interviews with 15 to 20 participants and facilitators will explore acceptability, barriers and facilitators to implementation, mechanisms of impact, fidelity and context. Fidelity will be assessed using facilitator session checklists, attendance records and independent review of a sample of recorded sessions.

Analysis: Feasibility outcomes will be reported using descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals. Exploratory analyses of secondary outcomes will estimate effect sizes and variance to inform the sample size for a future definitive trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Cancer Survivorship

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Underserved Populations
  • Psychosocial Intervention
  • Cultural Adaptation
  • Migrants
  • Fear of Cancer Recurrence
  • Quality of Life
  • Co-Design
  • Resilience
  • Health Equity
  • Feasibility Study
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University College Dublin is the lead sponsor of 114 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of breast cancer stage 0 to III.
  • Completed primary treatment (surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy)
  • Belong to at least one underserved group: minority ethnic group (including Irish Travellers), migrant or refugee, living in a rural area, or experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.
  • Living in Ireland
  • Able to give , with interpreter support if needed
  • Able to attend group sessions face to face or online

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (stage IV) breast cancer
  • Severe mental health or cognitive difficulties that would prevent taking part in group sessions.
  • Currently taking part in another psychosocial intervention study
  • Took part in the BRIGHT co-design panel or user testing
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BRIGHT Resilience Intervention

    Participants attend the 8-week culturally tailored BRIGHT resilience intervention: weekly 90-minute

    Behavioral: BRIGHT Resilience Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Enhanced Usual Care

    Participants receive standard oncology survivorship care plus the BRIGHT Survivorship Resource Booklet. They are offered the BRIGHT resilience intervention after the 3-month follow-up (waitlist crossover).

    Other: BRIGHT Survivorship Resource Booklet

Interventions

  • BehavioralBRIGHT Resilience Intervention

    A culturally tailored, co-designed group resilience programme for breast cancer survivors from underserved communities. Eight weekly 90-minute facilitated sessions, delivered in a hybrid format (community face to face and secure online). Planned modules: psychoeducation; emotional adjustment; managing fear of recurrence; culturally responsive coping and resilience; self-advocacy; healthcare navigation; peer support; and signposting to community resources. Delivered by trained facilitators using a standardised manual. Materials available in English and 2 to 3 priority languages.

  • OtherBRIGHT Survivorship Resource Booklet

    BRIGHT Survivorship Resource Booklet A printed resource booklet with survivorship information and signposting to support services, given alongside standard oncology survivorship care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment Rate

    Number of participants randomised per site per month. Progression target: at least 4 participants per site per month.

    Time frame: From start to end of recruitment, up to 6 months

  2. Retention

    Percentage of randomised participants who complete the 3-month follow-up questionnaires. Progression target: at least 80%.

    Time frame: 3 months after the end of the intervention

  3. Session Attendance

    Percentage of the 8 intervention sessions attended by participants in the BRIGHT arm, from attendance records. Progression target: at least 75% session completion.

    Time frame: During the 8-week intervention

  4. Intervention Fidelity

    Percentage of planned session components delivered as intended, assessed using facilitator session checklists and independent review of a sample of recorded sessions. Progression target: at least 85%.

    Time frame: During the 8-week intervention

  5. Acceptability

    Participant satisfaction with the intervention, measured using a questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, and explored in interviews with 15 to 20 participants and facilitators.

    Time frame: Week 8 (end of the intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depressive Symptoms

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27; higher scores mean more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and 3 months after the end of the intervention

  2. Anxiety Symptoms

    Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores mean more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and 3 months after the end of the intervention

  3. Fear of Cancer Recurrence

    Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory, Short Form (FCRI-SF). Scores range from 0 to 36; higher scores mean greater fear of recurrence.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and 3 months after the end of the intervention

  4. Cancer-Specific Quality of Life

    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, Breast (FACT-B). Total scores range from 0 to 148; higher scores mean better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and 3 months after the end of the intervention

  5. Psychological Resilience

    Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Higher scores mean greater resilience

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and 3 months after the end of the intervention

  6. Unmet Supportive Care Needs

    Supportive Care Needs Survey, Short Form (SCNS-SF34). Domain scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores mean greater unmet need.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and 3 months after the end of the intervention

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — A decision on sharing anonymised individual participant data will be made before recruitment starts, in line with University College Dublin policy, funder requirements and GDPR.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2029; primary completion for Sep 2030, 11 months later.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2026
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2029
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2030
CompletionEst.
Sep 2030
Last update
Nov 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 12, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 12, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07930715
Collaborators
Breast Cancer Now
Responsible party
Sinem Uzar Ozcetin (Associate Professor in Mental Health Nursing, University College Dublin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
Start date
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2026

Study contacts

Karina Correa Valdez
Contact
karina.correavaldez@ucd.ie
+353 0833887830
Sinem Uzar Ozcetin Associate Professor in Mental Health Nursing
Contact
sinem.uzarozcetin@ucd.ie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion