An observational study in Sepsis and Septic Shock, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational
This observational study compares extended versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in sepsis patients, assessing survival, clinical cure rates, and practical ICU challenges. The findings will guide optimal antibiotic protocols, potentially improving sepsis outcomes through precision dosing strategies.
Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Septic shock should be considered a subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities significantly increase mortality risk compared to sepsis alone.
Beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit broad-spectrum activity against most Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, making them a key component of sepsis treatment. Their bactericidal effects are time-dependent, meaning efficacy depends on maintaining free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the target pathogen for an optimal duration.
In clinical practice, beta-lactams are typically administered via intermittent infusion. However, critically ill patients often experience altered pharmacokinetics due to changes in renal clearance, protein binding, fluid balance, and volume distribution. This variability can lead to unpredictable drug concentrations, increasing the risk of subtherapeutic antibiotic exposure.
Existing studies suggest that continuous infusion may enhance beta-lactam efficacy by maintaining drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for longer periods, optimizing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets. Some meta-analyses and small randomized controlled trials report reduced mortality and improved clinical cure rates with continuous infusion, while others show no significant difference. However, differences in dosing regimens, patient populations, and pharmacokinetic variability in critically ill patients make it difficult to draw firm conclusions.
1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 90 is below the median of 108 across 406 observational studies indexed under Shock, Septic.
Browse Shock, Septic studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Compared within Shock, Septic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Critically ill patient diagnosed with pneumonia at Critical care unit at Assiut University Hospital
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Patients admitted to critical care unit diagnosed with pneumonia with two of the following:
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Immunosuppression
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Extended infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics
Drug: Extended beta-lactam antibiotics
Intermittent infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics
Drug: Intermittent Beta-lactam antibiotics
Group A will be receiving extended infusion of beta-lactam antibiotic over 4 hours.
Group B will be receiving intermittent infusion of beta-lactam antibiotic over 30 minutes.
All-cause mortality at 28 days from the date of randomization.
Time frame: Baseline and 28 days
Clinical cure
defined as completing the full course of beta-lactam therapy within 14 days without requiring additional antibiotics for the same infection within 48 hours after treatment cessation.
Time frame: Baseline and 16 days
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.