ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07293078POC-AI-ICUUpdated Dec 18, 2025

Point-of-Care AI Assistance and Critical Care Outcomes: A Randomized Trial

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Point-of-care large language model decision support (ChatGPT-5) in Critical Illness, Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF), sponsored by MetroWest Artificial Intelligence Research Workgroup. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-18.

Primary conditionSepsisRegistry: Critical IllnessReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Critical Illness — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Sepsis
Why
  1. Critical Illness is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Sepsis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by MetroWest Artificial Intelligence Research Workgroup · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, unmasked, randomized, multicenter clinical trial evaluating the impact of point-of-care large language model (LLM)-based decision support on diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes in adult medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients.

Consecutive adult ICU admissions at participating community hospitals (initially MetroWest Medical Center and St. Vincent Hospital) will be screened for eligibility. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to standard care or an AI-assisted group. In both arms, initial evaluation and management will follow usual practice. For patients randomized to AI assistance, de-identified admission data (history and physical, labs, imaging reports, and other relevant documentation) will be formatted and submitted to a state-of-the-art LLM (ChatGPT-5) at the time of admission. The AI-generated differential diagnosis and therapeutic recommendations will be provided to the admitting team for consideration. For the standard care arm, LLM output will be generated but not shared with clinicians.

After discharge, a masked chart review will determine the "ground truth" primary diagnosis and extract outcomes including: Primary Outcome - a composite of medical errors (from time of ICU admission through day 7 of ICU stay, or ICU discharge, whichever comes first); Secondary Outcomes - 90-day mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and ventilator-free days.

Read the detailed description

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT has created new opportunities and risks for their use in medicine. Although early studies suggest high diagnostic accuracy in complex clinical scenarios and ICU admissions, the impact of LLMs on real-world clinical outcomes and the optimal mode of physician-AI interaction remain uncertain. Published work from our group showed that ChatGPT-4 achieved diagnostic accuracy comparable to board-certified intensivists for ICU admissions in a retrospective study. However, prospective, randomized data on clinical outcomes are lacking.

This trial will evaluate a pragmatic paradigm for integrating LLMs at the time of ICU admission (point-of-care AI). All eligible adult MICU admissions at participating sites will be prospectively randomized to: (1) standard care, or (2) AI-assisted care in which an LLM receives standardized, de-identified admission data and returns a proposed primary diagnosis, ranked differential diagnosis (up to five conditions), suggested additional information, and prioritized therapeutic interventions. Admitting clinicians in the AI-assisted arm will be asked to review and optionally incorporate the AI recommendations and will complete a brief questionnaire regarding perceived utility and any changes in diagnosis or management.

A masked clinical adjudication panel will perform longitudinal chart review to define the "ground truth" primary diagnosis and assess error rates and outcomes. The primary endpoint is a composite of medical errors. The specific time frame will be from the time of ICU admission through day 7 of ICU stay, or ICU discharge, whichever comes first. Secondary endpoints will include 90-day mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and ventilator-free days. Other exploratory secondary endpoints will be considered. The trial is designed to enroll approximately 1000 patients across multiple MICUs, with interim analysis at 12 months to assess feasibility, integrity, and futility. The study is minimal risk, uses de-identified data for AI queries, and does not alter standard diagnostic testing or therapeutic options.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness
  • Sepsis
  • Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF)
  • Multi-organ Failure
  • Acute Kidney Injury
  • Delirium Confusional State
  • Shock

Keywords

  • Critical Care
  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Large Language Model
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Diagnostic Accuracy
  • Clinical Decision Support
  • Critical Care Outcomes
  • Sepsis
  • Shock
  • Acute Respiratory Failure
  • Multiorgan Failure
03

In context

Sepsis Reclassified

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 102 across 1,165 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with MetroWest Artificial Intelligence Research Workgroup as lead sponsor.

Compared within Sepsis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Critical Illness. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) at participating hospitals.
  2. Direct admissions from the emergency department or transfers from medical wards to the MICU.
  3. Critically ill patients meeting local ICU admission criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Transfers to the MICU from outside hospitals, operating room, or post-anesthesia care unit.
  2. Age \< 18 years.
  3. Incomplete or missing essential clinical information at admission (e.g., key labs or documentation not yet available).
  4. Primary surgical or cardiac (e.g., STEMI) patients.
  5. Pregnant or postpartum women.
  6. Prisoners.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard Care

    Patients receive usual ICU care per local practice. De-identified admission data may be processed and submitted to the LLM for research purposes, but AI output is not shared with treating clinicians and does not influence real-time management.

  • Other
    AI-Assisted Care

    Patients receive standard ICU care plus point-of-care LLM-based decision support at admission. De-identified admission data are formatted and submitted to an LLM (ChatGPT-5). The model returns a primary diagnosis, ranked differential diagnosis list, suggested additional information, and prioritized therapeutic recommendations. This output is provided to the admitting team for consideration in ongoing management.

    Other: Point-of-care large language model decision support (ChatGPT-5)

Interventions

  • OtherPoint-of-care large language model decision support (ChatGPT-5)

    Use of a large language model (ChatGPT-5) to analyze de-identified ICU admission data (history, physical examination, laboratory results, imaging reports, and other documentation) at the time of admission. The model generates diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations that are shared with clinicians in the AI-assisted arm only.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of Medical Errors

    Proportion of patients with at least one clinically important diagnostic or therapeutic error identified by masked chart review (e.g., missed or delayed critical diagnosis, major guideline-discordant therapy with potential for harm).

    Time frame: From the time of ICU admission through day 7 of ICU stay or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 90-day All-Cause Mortality

    All-cause mortality within 90 days of index ICU admission, as determined by chart review and available follow-up records.

    Time frame: 90 days from ICU admission.

  2. ICU Length of Stay

    Total number of days spent in the ICU during the index hospitalization.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge (up to 90 days).

  3. Ventilator-Free Days

    Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 28 days after ICU admission.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after ICU admission.

  4. Hospital Length of Stay

    Total number of days from hospital admission to hospital discharge during the index hospitalization.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge (up to 90 days).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Framingham Union Hospital/MetroWest Medical Center
    Framingham, Massachusetts 01702, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Singh J, Bohra R, Mukhtiar V, Fernandes W, Bhanushali C, Chinnamuthu R, Kanamgode SS, Ellis J, Silverman E. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Large Language Model (ChatGPT-4) for Patients Admitted to a Community Hospital Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Case Study. J Intensive Care Med. 2026 May;41(5):413-420. doi: 10.1177/08850666251368270. Epub 2025 Aug 17. PubMed 40820407 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data will be retained for reanalysis by the study team. There is no current plan for routine public sharing of individual participant-level data, but de-identified datasets may be shared with qualified investigators upon reasonable request and appropriate data use agreements.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2026; primary completion for Dec 2028, 35 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 17, 2025
First posted
Dec 18, 2025
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2029
Last update
Dec 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07293078
Lead sponsor
MetroWest Artificial Intelligence Research Workgroup
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 18, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2025

Study contacts

Eric Silverman, M.D. principal Investigator, M.D.
Contact
esilverman@pamw.org
508-344-5680
Eric Silverman, M.D.
principal investigator · MetroWest Medical Center and St. Vincent Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion