ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07275021CVIUpdated Dec 10, 2025

Cerebral/ Cortical Visual Impairment: Screening, Identification and Outcome Prediction in Neonates

An observational study in Preterm Less Than 32wks With IVH, WMI/PVL and Late Preterm or Term (37-42wks) With Neonatal Encephalopathy Treated With Hypothermia for HIE, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 31 Weeks to 42 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-10.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
31 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI) is the leading cause of childhood visual impairment in the United States and other industrialized countries. CVI is a brain-based visual disorder in which visual acuity or visual fields are reduced despite a normal eye examination or greater-than-expected visual impairment relative to ocular pathology. CVI is increasingly recognized in children with neurological conditions, yet it often remains undiagnosed until later childhood, delaying opportunities for early intervention.

Population-based studies suggest that CVI is more common than previously understood. Recent estimates indicate that over 180,000 individuals in the United States aged 0-22 years may have diagnosed or likely CVI, with only a minority formally identified. Children with CVI frequently have co-occurring neurological conditions, including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, developmental delays, or genetic disorders. Infants born preterm or with conditions such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), perinatal stroke, or white matter injury are at particularly high risk. Prospective research also shows that a substantial proportion of infants born very preterm exhibit behavioral features of CVI later in childhood.

Despite improvements in neonatal neurocritical care, early detection of CVI remains challenging. Current clinical practice focuses on managing conditions such as HIE, perinatal stroke, periventricular leukomalacia, and other brain injuries, but there is limited research evaluating structured early identification pathways for CVI in infancy. Diagnostic tools such as brain MRI and Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) have shown potential for identifying brain-based visual dysfunction, but their integration into early predictive models for CVI has not been fully explored.

This study addresses a critical gap in pediatric care by prospectively evaluating high-risk neonates using clinical, neuroimaging, neurophysiologic, and standardized developmental assessments through 24 months of age. Early identification of CVI may support timely referral for visual rehabilitation and developmental services, potentially improving long-term functional outcomes. Developing a predictive model for early CVI detection will contribute to improved clinical pathways, enhance early diagnosis, and reduce the long-term educational and social burden associated with undetected CVI. Ultimately, this research aims to improve outcomes and quality of life for infants at risk for brain-based visual impairment.

Read the detailed description

The study is a prospective observational study designed to follow preterm and term infants who are at high risk for Cerebral/ Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI). Preterm Infants born before 32 weeks gestational age with conditions such germinal matrix/intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), white matter injury (WMI including periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), and late term and term infants with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) or prenatal Stroke will be enrolled during the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay and monitored through a structured follow-up schedule. The study focuses on data collection using advanced diagnostic imaging and neurodevelopmental assessments without introducing randomization or experimental interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preterm Less Than 32wks With IVH, WMI/PVL
  • Late Preterm or Term (37-42wks) With Neonatal Encephalopathy Treated With Hypothermia for HIE

Keywords

  • Cerebral/ Cortical Visual Impairment
  • Vision Disorders, Cerebral/Cortical
  • Brain Injuries
  • Visual Disorders
  • Periventricular Leukomalacia
  • Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
  • Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain
  • White Matter Injury
  • Visual Evoked Potentials
  • Infant, Extremely Premature (for <32 weeks GA)
  • Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage
  • Intraventricular Hemorrhage
  • Neonatal Encephalopathy
  • Prenatal Stroke
03

In context

Vision Disorders

360 studies on the registry are indexed under Vision Disorders; 84 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 126 across 97 observational studies indexed under Vision Disorders.

Browse Vision Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,267 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 65 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
31 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes preterm and term infants at high risk for cerebral visual impairment due to neurological injury diagnosed in the neonatal period. This includes:

  • Preterm infants born \<32 weeks gestation with intraventricular hemorrhage or white matter injury
  • Late preterm (34-36 weeks) and term (37-42 weeks) infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia or diagnosed with perinatal stroke

Eligible infants are enrolled during their initial hospitalization and followed longitudinally into early childhood to assess visual development, neurodevelopmental outcomes, and early signs of cerebral visual impairment. Parent(s) or legal guardian(s) must be willing and able to provide informed consent.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm infants born \< 32 weeks gestational age with any of the following:
  • Germinal matrix/intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH)
  • White matter injury (WMI), including periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)
  • Late preterm infants (born 34-36 weeks gestation) or term infants (born 37-42 weeks gestation) with:
  • Neonatal encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia for suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)
  • Infants diagnosed with perinatal stroke

Parent(s) or legal guardian(s) willing and able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Neonates whose parent(s) or guardian(s) cannot commit to long-term follow-up

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Preterm/Term High-Risk Infants

    Infants at high risk for Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI), including preterm infants with IVH or white matter injury, term or late preterm infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and infants with perinatal stroke. Participants are followed prospectively and undergo standardized clinical, neuroimaging, neurophysiologic, and developmental assessments through 24 months of age.

    Other: Prospective Clinical and Neurodevelopmental Data Collection

Interventions

  • OtherProspective Clinical and Neurodevelopmental Data Collection

    Participants undergo standardized collection of clinical, neuroimaging, neurophysiologic, visual assessment and neurodevelopmental data as part of this prospective observational study. Data include information obtained from clinical care and scheduled follow-up assessments through 24 months of age. No interventions are assigned.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence of Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) at 24 Months

    Diagnosis of Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI) based on standardized clinical visual assessment performed. Outcome measure: Low, or high risk.

    Time frame: 24 months of age

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Function assessment

    Visual function evaluated using the age-appropriate CVI and parent questionnaire administered at scheduled follow-up intervals (6, 12, and 24 months per protocol), with primary reporting at 24 months. * Teller acuity Cards (testing distance: 38 cms, 55 cms 84 cms) * Patti Pics or grating acuity (testing distance: 25 cms, 50 cms and 100 cms) * Visual behavior scale (grade: 1, 2, or 3) * Resolution Distance Visual acuity Outcome measure: Low, or high risk.

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) Response

    Assessment of cortical visual pathway response using VEP performed at 6 and 24 months per protocol, with primary reporting at 24 months. Outcome measure: low or high risk group.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Neurodevelopmental Composite Score

    Standardized neurodevelopmental testing obtained as part of 12-, 18-, and 24-month clinical follow-up (e.g., Bayley-IV). Primary reporting at 24 months Outcome measure: * Low-Risk: scores within or above age-expected norms * High-Risk: scores ≥1 SD below the mean (Standard Score \<85) indicating developmental delay

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
    Recruiting
    • Mohamed El-Dib, MD, · Contact
    • Gena Heidry, MD · Principal investigator
    • Ellen Grant, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chang MY, Borchert MS. Advances in the evaluation and management of cortical/cerebral visual impairment in children. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov-Dec;65(6):708-724. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 19. PubMed 32199940 ↗
  • Pilling RF, Allen L, Bowman R, Ravenscroft J, Saunders KJ, Williams C. Clinical assessment, investigation, diagnosis and initial management of cerebral visual impairment: a consensus practice guide. Eye (Lond). 2023 Jul;37(10):1958-1965. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02261-6. Epub 2022 Oct 18. PubMed 36258009 ↗
  • Sakki HEA, Dale NJ, Sargent J, Perez-Roche T, Bowman R. Is there consensus in defining childhood cerebral visual impairment? A systematic review of terminology and definitions. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;102(4):424-432. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310694. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed 29146757 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan to share individual participant data

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 29 months after the start.

Of 51 non-industry observational studies under Vision Disorders, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 29 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 58 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 19, 2025
First posted
Dec 10, 2025
StartActual
Jul 7, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Dec 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07275021
Responsible party
Mohamed El-Dib, MD (Director, Neonatal Neurocritical Care Department of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School President, Newborn Brain Society, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2025
Start date
Jul 7, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 10, 2025

Study contacts

Mohamed El-Dib, MD
Contact
mel-dib@bwh.harvard.edu
+15712016409
Mohamed El-Dib
Contact
Mohamed El-Dib, MD
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion