ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07184593NuROPIUpdated Sep 22, 2026

Nucleosome Monitoring Relevance for Outcome Prediction in Critically Ill Patients

An observational study in Sepsis, Septic Shock and Cardiac Arrest (CA), sponsored by Erasme University Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Primary conditionShock, SepticRegistry: SepsisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sepsis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Shock, Septic
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Shock, Septic, a narrower term within Sepsis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Erasme University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

NUROPI is a single-centre, prospective, non-interventional study in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Erasme Hospital (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium).

Some critically ill patients get worse during the first days of their ICU stay. Identifying them early could allow faster escalation of care. Nucleosomes are fragments of DNA wrapped around proteins called histones. They are released into the blood when cells die or when white blood cells form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). High blood levels of nucleosomes may reflect inflammation, clotting activation and organ damage.

This study will measure the H3.1 nucleosome in the blood of 1,000 consecutive adult ICU patients. The measurement uses a CE-marked laboratory test (Nu.Q® NETs, chemiluminescence immunoassay on the IDS-i10 analyser).

No additional blood sample is taken for the study. H3.1 is measured on the leftover plasma of blood samples already drawn for routine care, at ICU admission, 6 hours, day 1, day 3 and day 7. Patient treatment is not changed. Patients, or their relatives or legal representative, receive an information notice and may refuse participation at any time.

The main question is whether H3.1, alone or combined with routine ICU data, can identify patients at high risk of clinical deterioration within 72 hours of ICU admission. Other questions concern the link between H3.1 and mortality, organ dysfunction, and ICU treatments, and how H3.1 levels change during the first week.

Read the detailed description

Background Extracellular histones and nucleosomes act as damage-associated molecular patterns. They activate Toll-like receptors (TLR2, TLR4, TLR9), promote cytokine release, damage the endothelium and contribute to immunothrombosis. Circulating histone levels correlate with organ dysfunction severity in septic shock. Their prognostic value across the full spectrum of critical illness remains to be established.

Objectives Primary objective: to evaluate the clinical performance of plasma H3.1, alone or combined with routine ICU parameters, for the early identification of ICU patients at high risk of clinical deterioration requiring timely escalation of care.

Secondary objectives: to assess H3.1 as an independent prognostic marker of 28-day mortality after adjustment for established severity scores (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment version 2 [SOFA-2], Simplified Acute Physiology Score II [SAPS II]); to describe H3.1 kinetics over the first ICU week; to assess associations between H3.1 and organ dysfunction, vasopressor requirements, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy (RRT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE); to compare H3.1 levels across diagnostic subgroups; to explore interactions between H3.1 and ICU therapies (anticoagulation, dexmedetomidine, corticosteroids, RRT, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]); to assess H3.1 as a potential enrichment biomarker for future trials targeting extracellular histones.

Design Prospective, non-interventional, single-centre diagnostic-prognostic derivation and internal validation study. No procedure is performed for research purposes. H3.1 is measured on residual plasma (at least 100 µL) from routine K2-EDTA samples drawn through an arterial or central venous catheter already in place. Timepoints: ICU admission (H0), 6 hours (H6), day 1 (D1), day 3 (D3) and day 7 (D7). Plasma is analysed in batches by chemiluminescence immunoassay (Nu.Q® NETs, IDS-i10) and is not stored or biobanked beyond the study analyses. Participation is based on a non-opposition procedure. A deferred procedure may be used when neither the patient nor a representative can be informed at inclusion. Routine clinical data (including SOFA-2 and SAPS II) are recorded in REDCap.

Population 1,000 consecutive adults admitted to the ICU within the previous 24 hours, all admission diagnoses combined. Enrolment is capped at 20 neurosurgical and 50 cardiac-surgery patients. Patients with active malignancy are included and analysed as a pre-specified subgroup.

Primary endpoint Clinical deterioration, defined as an increase in SOFA-2 score of at least 2 points from admission within 72 hours, or ICU death within 72 hours.

Secondary endpoints ICU, 28-day and 90-day all-cause mortality; vasopressor duration; mechanical ventilation duration; development of septic shock; ICU length of stay; VTE events; the primary composite endpoint at 48 hours; change in SOFA-2 from admission to day 7 (or ICU discharge if earlier); correlation between the change in SOFA-2 and the change in H3.1 from admission to 72 hours; H3.1 thresholds predicting poor outcomes across subgroups.

Sample size and analysis The expected prevalence of the primary endpoint is 20% to 35%. With a null area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.50, an anticipated AUROC of 0.75 and a two-sided alpha of 0.05, 1,000 patients provide more than 90% power across this range (Hanley and McNeil, 1982). At a central prevalence of 25%, about 250 events are expected, supporting up to 25 candidate predictors (at least 10 events per variable). An interim analysis is planned at 500 patients. Internal validation will use bootstrap resampling (1,000 iterations). A pre-specified sensitivity analysis will exclude patients with an admission SOFA-2 score of 15 or more. Reporting will follow STARD 2015 for H3.1 as a stand-alone test and TRIPOD 2024 for the combined prognostic model.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Septic Shock
  • Cardiac Arrest (CA)
  • Pancreatitis
  • Acute Brain Injury
  • Trauma Blunt
  • Cardiogenic Shock

Keywords

  • nucleosome
  • septic shock
  • Histones
  • Cardiac Arrest
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Trauma
  • Acute brain injury
03

In context

Shock, Septic Reclassified

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 108 across 406 observational studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasme University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 181 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Compared within Shock, Septic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Consecutive adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Erasme Hospital (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium), all admission diagnoses combined. To avoid over-representation of elective post-operative admissions, enrolment is capped at 20 neurosurgical and 50 cardiac-surgery patients.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Admission to the ICU of Erasme Hospital within the previous 24 hours, regardless of admission diagnosis
  • Arterial catheter or central venous catheter already in place for clinical reasons

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Imminent death ( less than 24 hours)
  • Therapeutic limitations at ICU admission (e.g., no indication for intubation, comfort care only)
  • Absence of an arterial catheter or central venous catheter
  • ICU admission more than 24 hours before screening
  • Readmission to the ICU of a previously enrolled patient
  • Opposition to participation expressed by the patient or their legal representative
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Critically ill adults (all-comers)

    Consecutive adults (18 years or older) admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Erasme Hospital within the previous 24 hours, all admission diagnoses combined, with an arterial or central venous catheter already in place for clinical reasons. Enrolment is capped at 20 neurosurgical and 50 cardiac-surgery patients. Plasma H3.1 is measured on residual routine samples at admission, 6 hours, day 1, day 3 and day 7. Pre-specified subgroup analyses include sepsis versus non-sepsis, surgical versus medical admissions, and active malignancy.

    Diagnostic Test: Plasma H3.1 nucleosome measurement

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPlasma H3.1 nucleosome measurement

    Measurement of circulating H3.1 nucleosomes by chemiluminescence immunoassay (Nu.Q® NETs on the IDS-i10 analyser, CE-marked in vitro diagnostic device) on residual plasma from routine K2-EDTA samples. No additional blood sampling is performed and results are not used for clinical management.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Discriminative performance of admission plasma H3.1 for early clinical deterioration

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of plasma H3.1 measured at ICU admission, alone and combined with routine ICU parameters, for predicting clinical deterioration. Clinical deterioration is defined as an increase of at least 2 points in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment version 2 (SOFA-2) score from admission, or ICU death, within 72 hours of ICU admission.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-day all-cause mortality

    Death from any cause within 28 days of ICU admission. Association with admission H3.1 will be assessed after adjustment for SOFA-2 and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II).

    Time frame: 28 days after ICU admission

  2. Change in SOFA-2 score at 72 hours

    Difference between SOFA-2 score at 72 hours (D3) and SOFA-2 score at ICU admission (H0), analysed as a continuous variable and as an increase of at least 2 points. Assessed in patients still in the ICU at 72 hours.

    Time frame: ICU admission (H0) and 72 hours (D3)

  3. Early ICU mortality

    ICU death from any cause within 72 hours of the admission sample (H0).

    Time frame: From ICU admission to 72 hours

  4. ICU mortality

    Death from any cause during the ICU stay

    Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, up to 90 days

  5. 90-day all-cause mortality

    Death from any cause within 90 days of ICU admission.

    Time frame: 90 days after ICU admission

  6. Change in SOFA-2 score at day 7

    Difference between the SOFA-2 score at day 7 (or at ICU discharge if earlier) and at ICU admission (H0).

    Time frame: ICU admission (H0) and day 7

  7. Correlation between change in SOFA-2 and change in plasma H3.1 at 72 hours

    Correlation between the change in SOFA-2 score and the change in plasma H3.1 concentration from ICU admission (H0) to 72 hours (D3).

    Time frame: ICU admission (H0) and 72 hours (D3)

  8. Plasma H3.1 concentration over the first ICU week

    Plasma H3.1 nucleosome concentration (ng/mL) measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay (Nu.Q® NETs, IDS-i10).

    Time frame: ICU admission (H0), 6 hours, day 1, day 3 and day 7

  9. Vasopressor-free days at day 28

    Number of days alive and free of vasopressor therapy (noradrenaline or vasopressin) from ICU admission to day 28. Patients who die before day 28 are assigned 0 days.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to day 28

  10. Ventilator-free days at day 28

    Number of days alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation from ICU admission to day 28. Patients who die before day 28 are assigned 0 days.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to day 28

  11. ICU length of stay

    Number of days from ICU admission to ICU discharge or death.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, up to 90 days

  12. Development of septic shock

    New onset of septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria during the ICU stay, in patients admitted without septic shock.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, up to 7 days

  13. Venous thromboembolism events

    Occurrence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, confirmed by Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography pulmonary angiography, or clinical assessment with D-dimer.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to 7 days

  14. Plasma H3.1 thresholds predicting poor outcomes

    Plasma H3.1 cut-off values associated with 28-day mortality and with the primary composite endpoint, overall and in pre-specified subgroups (sepsis versus non-sepsis, surgical versus medical admissions, active malignancy).

    Time frame: From ICU admission to 28 days

  15. New initiation of renal replacement therapy

    Initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) during the ICU stay, in patients not receiving chronic dialysis before ICU admission.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, up to 7 days

  16. Renal replacement therapy-free days at day 28

    Number of days alive and free of RRT from ICU admission to day 28, in patients not receiving chronic dialysis before ICU admission. Patients who die before day 28 are assigned 0 days.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to day 28

Other outcomes

  1. Progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD)

    Defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73m² persisting for ≥3 months, or requirement for chronic dialysis.

    Time frame: At 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Su F, Moreau A, Savi M, Salvagno M, Annoni F, Zhao L, Xie K, Vincent JL, Taccone FS. Circulating Nucleosomes as a Novel Biomarker for Sepsis: A Scoping Review. Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 21;12(7):1385. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071385. PubMed 39061959 ↗
  • Garcia B, Su F, Dewachter L, Wang Y, Li N, Remmelink M, Eycken MV, Khaldi A, Favory R, Herpain A, Moreau A, Moiroux-Sahraoui A, Manicone F, Annoni F, Shi L, Vincent JL, Creteur J, Taccone FS. Neutralization of extracellular histones by sodium-Beta-O-methyl cellobioside sulfate in septic shock. Crit Care. 2023 Nov 24;27(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04741-x. PubMed 38001494 ↗
  • Allam R, Kumar SV, Darisipudi MN, Anders HJ. Extracellular histones in tissue injury and inflammation. J Mol Med (Berl). 2014 May;92(5):465-72. doi: 10.1007/s00109-014-1148-z. Epub 2014 Apr 6. PubMed 24706102 ↗
  • Cheng Z, Abrams ST, Alhamdi Y, Toh J, Yu W, Wang G, Toh CH. Circulating Histones Are Major Mediators of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Acute Critical Illnesses. Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):e677-e684. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003839. PubMed 31162199 ↗
  • Silk E, Zhao H, Weng H, Ma D. The role of extracellular histone in organ injury. Cell Death Dis. 2017 May 25;8(5):e2812. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.52. PubMed 28542146 ↗
  • Yang T, Peng J, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Liu Z, Jiang L, Jin L, Han M, Su B, Li Y. Emerging therapeutic strategies targeting extracellular histones for critical and inflammatory diseases: an updated narrative review. Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1438984. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1438984. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39206200 ↗
  • Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Hylander Moller M, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337. No abstract available. PubMed 34605781 ↗
  • Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C, Megarbane B, Quenot JP, Siami S, Cariou A, Forceville X, Schwebel C, Martin C, Timsit JF, Misset B, Ali Benali M, Colin G, Souweine B, Asehnoune K, Mercier E, Chimot L, Charpentier C, Francois B, Boulain T, Petitpas F, Constantin JM, Dhonneur G, Baudin F, Combes A, Bohe J, Loriferne JF, Amathieu R, Cook F, Slama M, Leroy O, Capellier G, Dargent A, Hissem T, Maxime V, Bellissant E; CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Network. Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):809-818. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705716. PubMed 29490185 ↗
  • Ranieri VM, Thompson BT, Barie PS, Dhainaut JF, Douglas IS, Finfer S, Gardlund B, Marshall JC, Rhodes A, Artigas A, Payen D, Tenhunen J, Al-Khalidi HR, Thompson V, Janes J, Macias WL, Vangerow B, Williams MD; PROWESS-SHOCK Study Group. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2055-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202290. Epub 2012 May 22. PubMed 22616830 ↗
  • Tindal EW, Armstead BE, Monaghan SF, Heffernan DS, Ayala A. Emerging therapeutic targets for sepsis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2021 Mar;25(3):175-189. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2021.1897107. Epub 2021 Apr 12. PubMed 33641552 ↗
  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PubMed 26903338 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07184593
Responsible party
Charles Dehout (Consultant, PhD student, Erasme University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 22, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Charls Dehout, M.D
Contact
charles.dehout@hubruxelles.be
+32 2 555 6589

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion