ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07900698Updated Oct 28, 2026

Clinical Impact of Ultrasound Diagnosis in Bowel Endometriosis

An observational study in Endometriosis, Endometriosis Rectum and Endometriosis Pelvic, sponsored by Erasme University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by Erasme University Hospital · Observational

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This retrospective single-centre study evaluates how accurately preoperative ultrasound detects bowel involvement in women with deep endometriosis, using surgical findings as the reference. It also assesses whether ultrasound correctly locates and measures bowel lesions, and whether ultrasound lesion size predicts the type of bowel surgery performed (shaving, discoid excision or segmental resection). Data come from the medical records of patients operated at the Endometriosis Clinic of Hôpital Erasme, Brussels.

Read the detailed description

Deep endometriosis involving the bowel requires accurate preoperative mapping to plan surgery and counsel patients. Expert transvaginal ultrasound is recommended as a first-line imaging tool, but its real-world diagnostic performance and its value for predicting the surgical technique need further evaluation.

This is a retrospective, observational, single-centre cohort study. Patients who underwent surgery for suspected or confirmed deep endometriosis at the Endometriosis Clinic of Hôpital Erasme (HUB, Brussels) between 2018 and 2028 will be identified from the clinic database. Preoperative ultrasound reports will be compared with operative reports and histopathology.

Collected variables include ultrasound presence, location and size of bowel lesions; surgical findings and technique (shaving, discoid excision, segmental resection); and histopathological lesion size. No additional examinations or contacts with patients are planned. A waiver of informed consent has been requested from the Ethics Committee given the retrospective design.

A preliminary analysis covering patients operated between 2018 and 2025 will be performed first.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometriosis
  • Endometriosis Rectum
  • Endometriosis Pelvic
  • Endometriosis Colon

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • transvaginal ultrasound
  • deep infiltrating endometriosis
  • bowel endometriosis
  • retrospective study
  • preoperative imaging
  • segmental resection
  • shaving
  • discoid resection
03

In context

Endometriosis

920 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometriosis; 266 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 135 across 349 observational studies indexed under Endometriosis.

Browse Endometriosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasme University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 181 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women operated for deep endometriosis at the Endometriosis Clinic of Hôpital Erasme (Brussels) between 2018 and 2028

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18 years or older
  • Preoperative ultrasound performed at the Endometriosis Clinic of Hôpital Erasme
  • Surgery for deep endometriosis at Hôpital Erasme between 2018 and 2028, with bowel endometriosis confirmed by histopathology
  • Operative report available

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missing or incomplete preoperative ultrasound or operative report or histology
  • Patient opposition to the use of her medical data for research
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients operated for deep endometriosis with suspected bowel involvement

    Women who had a preoperative expert ultrasound and surgery at the Endometriosis Clinic of Hôpital Erasme between 2018 and 2028

    Diagnostic Test: preoperative transvaginal ultrasound

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testpreoperative transvaginal ultrasound

    Routine preoperative ultrasound performed as part of standard care in patients with a suspected deep infiltrating endometriosis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Bowel Endometriosis Compared With Surgical Findings Confirmed by Histopathology

    Percentage of patients with bowel endometriosis found at surgery (operative report) and confirmed by histopathology who were correctly identified as having bowel involvement on preoperative transvaginal ultrasound. Unit: % of patients.

    Time frame: From preoperative transvaginal ultrasound to surgery and histopathology report, up to 24 months (an average of 3 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Bowel Lesions With Concordant Location on Transvaginal Ultrasound and at Surgery

    Percentage of surgically confirmed bowel lesions whose location on preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (rectum, rectosigmoid junction, sigmoid colon) matches the location described in the operative report. Unit: % of lesions.

    Time frame: From preoperative transvaginal ultrasound to surgery, up to 24 months (an average of 3 months)

  2. Correlation Between Bowel Lesion Diameter on Transvaginal Ultrasound and on Histopathology

    Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the largest bowel lesion diameter measured on preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (mm) and the largest lesion diameter measured on the histopathology report (mm). Unit: Spearman's rho.

    Time frame: From preoperative transvaginal ultrasound to histopathology report, up to 24 months (an average of 3 months)

  3. Percentage of Patients Undergoing Segmental Resection According to the Largest Axis of the Bowel Lesion on Transvaginal Ultrasound (< 3 cm vs ≥ 3 cm)

    Percentage of patients treated by segmental bowel resection, the most radical surgical technique, versus conservative techniques (shaving or discoid excision), as recorded in the operative report, in the group with a bowel lesion largest axis \< 3 cm on preoperative transvaginal ultrasound and in the group with a largest axis ≥ 3 cm. This outcome aims to assess whether lesion size on ultrasound can predict the need for the most radical surgery. Unit: % of patients.

    Time frame: From preoperative transvaginal ultrasound to surgery, up to 24 months (an average of 3 months)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual data come from hospital medical records and will not be shared, in line with GDPR and the ethics approval

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07900698
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Oct 8, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion